Share this:

From the Resistance / Stefan

THE BIG ICE AGE CONFUSED EVEN HONEST CLIMATOLOGIST AS PROF.  PLIMER

© For the last 2-3 N/H winters was experienced extreme coldness. For everything that happens, there is always real reason. Reasons this time are created by human and can be prevented. Unfortunately, the climatologist are back to front on everything – needs extensive explanations; I will insert what was exactly the last big Ice Age.

A nuclear ice crusher Russian ship is taking tourist to North Poll every second week. Because the whole mass of ice moves clockwise = after 2 weeks, they can’t use same corridor. Therefore they slice another… and another… Those slices float south and melt = much less ice left. Plus, when sliced, ruff water brakes much, much more. But that is good for the Warmist. They know that: ice is white – reflects the sunlight – minus white ice, hopefully a small GLOBAL warming; to get them out of trouble…?!

What they don’t know is: water has mirror affect reflection also. 2] for 6 months in a year, there is no sunlight to reflect. 3] white ice is full of air, makes the ice perfect insulator. 4] minus ice; during winter, the water absorbs much more coldness. 5] with that extra absorbed coldness + the normal winter coldness in the air; with double strength radiates south and intercepts the moisture = drops double amount of snow in Europe / USA = no moisture left for replenishing the ice on Arctic Ocean. 6] that ice seats on salty seawater with strong currents and constantly melts from below – needs replenishing every winter.

That was giving the big surprises to the shonky experts for the last 3 northern winters. The morons were expecting warmer, because of less ice – instead everything is opposite than their theology /predictions. It means: the chain reaction was already triggered by those ice crusher ships; to take the shonky climatologist / bias media and other spectators further north. Less ice means colder northern winter. Because is colder there – the air shrink extra – to avoid vacuum – from the southern hemisphere lots of air goes north = on the southern hemisphere simultaneously record hot days. The laws of physics were same 15000y ago as last year

In my book I have extensive work how and why the Big Ice Age started, how and why it finished. Because is not many books; plus distribution is lousy; I have to insert some explanations here; so you people can get the clear picture: real reasons for everything that happens in nature, always controlled by the laws of physics. Planet’s atmosphere had same warmth units as today – distribution was different; wasn’t colder planet.

Before the Big Ice Age, Gibraltar Straight didn’t exist. Mediterranean sea didn’t have physical contact with Atlantic. When I say Mediterranean, Aegean, Adriatic, Black sea. The water in those ‘’inland Lakes’’ was fresh enough to drink. Sahara Savannahs had high rainfall to keep Mediterranean full. Then the precursor of all evil was invented, artificial fire for cooking / warming in cold nights. Before that, human was mostly vegetarian + eating crustacean… Fire, roasting /adopting meat to vegetarian stomach made population explosion. As vegetarians, in winter month human was culled by nature. Meat on animals become as food in the fridge – available regularly. The mongrels around the Mediterranean system had brains to make fires, but not to control it. On rainy days was not easy to start fire by rubbing two sticks, but if you make bushfire, logs are smouldering for a week = ready fire for in the morning + all night for warming up. 1] They didn’t strip the vegetation in Sahara with axes, but by burning. Sahara without vegetation stopped getting the rain = Mediterranean, Ionian, Aegean, Adriatic dry. Simultaneously Caspian, Aral sea, Black and Dead sea become dry – because they are all same weather system. (We are talking about the last big Ice Age 24000-12000 )

2] those waters were supplying before moisture for the river Rheine + for the Russian river’s catchments areas that are draining into the Arctic. Freshwater was spreading on the top of the heavier salty water and was protecting the ice from the salty water. Less that freshwater = ice increased melting on Arctic Ocean. (please note: river Rheine was draining in same place as today, but because the English Chanel didn’t exist – the freshwater from Rheine was spreading in Arctic via North Sea) = was for better protection for the ice.

3] because of the planet spinning eastward, the newly developed dry heat in Sahara was going over the north Atlantic and was destroying the humidity that was suppose to be for renewal of Arctic’s ice, every winter. Less raw material for ice = less ice = was helping the salty water to melt the ice completely in the Arctic ocean. Without ice, Arctic’s water was exposed without insulation/shield in winter. Arctic Ocean started absorbing much more coldness. That coldness was radiating south – intercepting whatever moisture was created in Atlantic and was depositing it as ice in northern Europe and USA. = was no moist air left to go to Arctic Ocean (similar affect as the last 3 winters). 4] From Mexican gulf was no Gulf Stream to the Mediterranean and Baltic sea, that was making high evaporation into the gulf waters = very moist air was going north – was getting intercepted by extra coldness from Arctic = 1km thick ice in northern USA. B] Whatever water was left into Mediterranean, Black sea,  Caspian, Aegean, Adriatic – was freeze-dried and packed north, to create 100m tick ice in northern Europe; on the expense of Arctic, no ice.

WATER IN ARCTIC OCEAN WITHOUT ICE AS SHIELD / INSULATION,   WAS  EXPOSED TO MINUS -70⁰C to – 80⁰C  OF WINTER COLDNESS That extra cold-water was going south as on a conveyor belt. What I mean by that is: if the water didn’t have to go south to the Mexican gulf; would have being as stationary conveyor belt. The Arctic water would have absorbed as much as possible coldness, because of no ice as insulator, and stops absorbing. As on stationary conveyor belt you can put 5 tons of dirt, max. But when conveyor belt is moving – you can shift 10000 times more dirt = coldness /by the currents. Currents now are much stronger from Arctic to Mexican gulf; because of the Gulf Stream. At that time wasn’t a gulf stream; because Gibraltar and English Chanel didn’t exist = now is worse scenario getting prepared by the shonky climatologist and bias media.

About 15 000y ago, in the pick of the Ice Age; Mediterranean, Ionian, sea of Marmara, Aegean, Adriatic, Black sea, Caspian, Aral sea were all puddles of water, as is now Dead Sea. All their water was into the oceans. (when the climatologists state that: during the Ice Age, the sealevel was much lower – they don’t take in calculation how much that water was rising the oceans’ level; so they lie how much Antarctic’s ice ‘’if’’ melt will rise the sealevel. Even though those inland seas were empty and they today contain much more water than Antarctic’s ice) 2] because extra coldwater from the Arctic Ocean as on conveyer belt was going south into North Atlantic and North Pacific for millennias (from 26 000BC to 16 000BC – the water in the oceans expended. Seawater expands when gets colder, not warmer. All the water in every sea and ocean combined; about 20% is above 5⁰C, about 80% is at 4⁰C and below. If you fill up a bottle of seawater at 4⁰C, then put it in the freezer. After cooling by couple of degrees, the bottle will explode. Because when seawater gets colder = expands; when gets warmer = water level goes down. Yes, some was locked into the ice, but because of combination of seawater expending when get colder + plus 90% of the water from abovementioned inland seas was in the ocean = water from Atlantic started overflowing into the Mediterranean lake, between Spain and Morocco. Not one of the shonky theoretician has taken the most important factors in consideration. Prof. Plimer got his references from 1000 of them.

From about 15 000years ago, as creek, then river of saltwater started from Atlantic into the Mediterranean swamp. A] because of high evaporation in the Mediterranean. B] because as Atlantic was losing water to Mediterranean = ocean level was getting gradually lower = it took few millennias to level the water in Atlantic and Mediterranean, and created Gibraltar Straight. 2] as Mediterranean /Adriatic was getting filled up = they started producing snow for the Alps = Rheine River started draining lots of water and flooding / turning Holland into a lake, for a short time. Was building lots of freshwater there, because Baltic / North Sea are shallow = the ice was to the bottom. That made the water to build up in Holland and with the help of water from river Seine – all that water went west and dug the English Chanel. (Before the ice age, all that freshwater was going north into the Arctic – spreading on the top of the salty seawater and was protecting the ice from melting. (Now that benefit is gone forever = now is much more sensitive for the ice in Arctic)

5] For dozen millennias during the Ice Age, the air above Parallel of Cancer to North Poll was much colder = shrunk – it was laws of physics. To avoid creation of vacuum on the northern hemisphere – lots of air from the southern hemisphere was gone north = was less air on the southern hemisphere. Similar as during the last 3 years in December /January, only then was on much larger scale. Wasn’t only 6 weeks in the year, but 50 weeks in the year. With less air as insulator – southern hemisphere had colder nights and much, much, much  hotter days = that destroyed vegetation in Australia and Brazil. In Brazil vegetation recuperated after the ice age, in Australia has being going from bad to worse = gradually dryer and dryer…

Southern hemisphere was hotter; wasn’t a carbon copy temperature as in the northern hemisphere, during the Big Ice Age. The laws of physics don’t permit that!  2] Human can change the climate – human made the Big Ice Age by uncontrollable fires in Sahara; produced the big ice age by rubbing two sticks. Now we have the nuclear ice crusher ships and the organized Crime /Antarctic Division of CSIRO Swindlers+bias media. 3] We calling ourselves Europeans destroyed the Australian vegetation 12 000 – 24 000y ago, indirectly. By making Sahara, Arabian peninsula desert. 4] the water level in the oceans was higher during the Ice Age, not lower. 5]  Water reflection of sunlight is same as from white snow. 6] that is /was 6 months of darkness, very, very cold darkness on the Polar Caps. When is no sunlight to reflect, but lots of coldness to absorb without ice as shield / insulation 7] seawater expends when gets colder, not warmer. 8] the adding of extra water in the oceans; for not having water in the Mediterranean, not considered. Why?!

Because those 6 different inland seas from Gibraltar to Caspian didn’t have water; where was all that water gone? If they did take into account the real factors = they wouldn’t be demolishing the Arctic ice now, by Ice Crusher sips; in hope to produce global warming, without white ice for reflecting the sunlight; wrong! Same vandalizing of the ice around Antarctic! Sea-currents constantly bring warmwater to the polar caps; ice as perfect insulator is protecting it from the tremendous coldness in the air. No ice=water gets extra coldness!

Nevertheless, now carbon copy of the last big Ice Age is not possible, because Gibraltar Straight, Bosforous, English Chanel are open for business. But because are open for business, different /midi Ice Age is starting now. Which means: because of the Gulf Stream; Arctic Ocean will absorb much more coldness, and will distribute it south much quicker . During the last one, it wasn’t much currents going from Arctic, the water there had limited capacity to collect extra coldness without ice for shield. Now extra currents as on conveyer belt are taking that extra coldness and is more efficiently distributing it south = to make space for more coldness Arctic’s water to collect. Plus at that time was no idiots in CSIRO /ABC and other Swindlers demolishing the ice in Antarctic ocean. Now, the New Ice Age will be colder from Lion in France to the North Poll. Colder from Melbourne to Antarctic. But between Lion and Melbourne will be much hotter and more extreme = the worse scenario. Between the parallels of Capricorn and Cancer will get hotter days than ever, to counteract with minimum air left as shield. Sealevel will gradually rise, because water will be colder – colder seawater expends, not warmer + colder water = less rain = less water on the land and in the air…

Different ice ages happened in the past, for different reasons /on different places; but same laws of physics. ‘’Milankovich’ wobbling of the planet’’ = north poll moves to land / southern poll moves into ocean – water can absorb and distribute more coldness than land. 2] movement of tectonic plates, which poll is on land or on water; or both polls end up on water. Those factors change climate / create different ice ages. But the whole planet’s atmosphere, always has same warmth units! That’s what the ‘’laws of physics’’ say. In the last 2-3 northern winters – north of Cancer was colder – from southern hemisphere lots of air was gone north, to avoid vacuum = Victoria, Adelaide, WA simultaneously was much hotter. Please note: Europe / USA can get colder by 8⁰C = Oceania will get warmer by 0,8⁰C, because Oceania is much larger area.

This contemporary disturbance of tectonic plates on the bottom of the oceans /La Nina will not last; to counteract the cooling of the ocean’s waters on the polar caps with less ice. Demolishing the ice in the polar waters will have chain reaction affect. Plus more dry heat produced inland Australia – to destroy the humidity made in the Indian ocean during summer, for replenishing the ice in winter around Antarctic, will come back with revenge. Whatever I am saying, all can be proven now, easy  in honest computer model.

If you follow and trust /respect the laws of physics – it’s as traveling in time; as if you were there then. Unless you believe that different laws of physics controlled then; as our shonky climatologists think. Wrong! Theoretically northern and southern hemisphere can get warmer or colder simultaneously, but only for few minutes. You see, they are damaging the ice in the Arctic and around Antarctic. Less or no ice, water absorbs extra coldness and currents are taking that water to lower latitudes. Colder water – cools the air. Are you fallowing me? Colder water from around Antarctic comes towards Australia = Great Australian Byte gets colder water = colder air. (Hopefully will not reach to the Barrier Reefs) Unfortunately, hope doesn’t stop the tides. Another tide takes colder water towards southern part of Africa /Argentina. Same situation with extra colder water from the Arctic goes south. Obviously all that cools the air = colder atmosphere…? No!

In split second as soon as the air get colder – air shrink = volume of the atmosphere smaller. That’s what the laws of physics say. I will never argue against those laws, would you? As I said in my book: those laws of physics are my Lord’s 10 Commandments. You can brake the 10 Commandments in your bible, but not the laws of physics. They have being issued to do a job. The air shrink; same as when you are camping in a cold night – gets cold = you get in fetus position – to minimize body surface. Planet’s atmosphere when gets colder does the same, only is much more efficient than you. You can minimize body surface by 2-5% max. Planet’s atmosphere if it get much colder, can shrink by half. Or if it gets hotter – can double in size. Atmosphere is surrounded with empty space with temperature of minus -90⁰C. (That’s much colder than where you are camping). Because the more the air gets colder = the more it shrinks = the less coldness intercepts… if you believe that the air was shrinking during the ice ages, because of extra coldness = was releasing less heat = ice age is not possible to be colder on the WHOLE  planet’s atmosphere; or warmer.

Or, when part of the atmosphere gets warmer = expends = intercepts extra coldness and is dropping it somewhere else, to make colder,  as balance. I.e. one place gets warmer = another simultaneously must get colder. Or, if the whole atmosphere get warmer, instantly expands – intercepts extra appropriate coldness to equalize in about 3,5 seconds – falls down and equalizes in a jiffy – atmosphere back to normal volume. Hypothetical: after collecting appropriate coldness to equalize, if the atmosphere didn’t shrink to previous volume for one whole day; would have intercepted and redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers. Fortunately, the shonky climatologist and extreme lefty politicians didn’t succeed to abolish the laws of physics. It proves that: in the past, ice ages were on part of the planet – the other part was always warmer. It proves that: GLOBAL warming is not possible. Or ice age on the whole planet, is impossible!

Step 2: the same warmth units the planet’s atmosphere had yesterday – will have tomorrow also. Today, for 24 hours the sunlight will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but all will be wasted. They talk that from one day’s energy from the sun, we can have electricity for 1000years and more, all that heat will be lost today, same day. You will not have enough left from that heat, to boil one chicken egg. Same goes with all the heat the sun drops for the whole year – all gone. Extra heat in the planet’s atmosphere is not accumulative. The Big Ice Age didn’t lasted for one day, but 12000 years = proof that the southern hemisphere was hotter, not colder, to prevent vacuum in the atmosphere! Therefore: human cannot produce GLOBAL warming or GLOBAL cooling. Because the capacity and power of oxygen and nitrogen expending and shrinking into that empty /cold space; is beyond the imagination of the shonky climatologist.

Human can change the climate, for better and for worse. Maybe the good Lord wanted human to produce the Big Ice Age – water in the Atlantic to expand and cut into the Mediterranean sea. Now Aral sea is getting dry, needs something to be done again. Aral sea can take as much water as is trapped in Antarctic ice. It’s not going to be done by the Warmist, they are for money for nothing. Human can improve the climate; definitely not by carbon rip-of. Prof Ian Plimer is not a Climate Change Denier. He proofs himself that climate has changed many times on every place on the planet. But because of his education, he cannot, or doesn’t want to comprehend that: 1] H20 changes climate = human can change the climate, but cannot produce global warming. 2] Their global warmings in the past were localized warmings /coolings, not the whole planet’s atmosphere. 3] warming of the whole planet’s atmosphere is not on, Ian. As soon as you realize that, they should apologize for calling you a climate change Denier. Because you never denied that climate doesn’t change. Only when you understand that human can change the climate – can produce localized warming, but not global warming – that can pull the carpet from under the Swindler’s feet. Alarmist are playing with words, because they have nothing better to show. They cannot have one solid proof; because is no global warming – that’s why the Warmist turned into practical Climate Changers; by denying water to the land and sufficient water to the atmosphere!!! Extra water in the atmosphere can only happen with extra water on the land, to evaporate. Opposite than Brown’s & Tim Flannery’s  demand.

Demolishing the ice on waters on the polar caps with ice crusher ships; ice is brittle – ruff water demolishes the rest; just to bring shonky researchers, bias media. That will make northern Europe much colder winters – southern much hotter summer. Similar affect in the 2 Americas. Biggest crime of the new millennia.

      BY RUBBING TWO STICKS, HUMAN CREATED THE BIG ICE AGE

Now human has Nuclear Powered Ice Crusher Ships, thousands of Warmist Swindlers, the politically bias  media and billions of taxpayer’s dollars. Human can change the climate for better also. If is done everything opposite than what the Snake Oil Merchants  demand for preventing their Phony Global Warming.

Fact 1: white ice is full of static air = perfect insulator for the water, during the polar winters

Fact 2: ice must be replenished on the water every winter on the polar caps, less raw material = less ice

Fact 3: surface of the water has mirror affect for sunlight reflection, similar as white ice.

Fact 4: for 6 months every year, there is no sunlight to reflect, but need insulator to protect the water from the unlimited coldness in Arctic Ocean, and in the waters around Antarctic ocean.

Fact 5: waters in the Arctic absorbs much more coldness in winter, without ice as insulator.

Fact 6: salty ocean water melts the ice from below, if no enough raw material to get regularly replenished…

Fact 7: coldness from the air + the extra coldness accumulated in the water without ice as shield / insulator, radiates south – intercepts the moisture in Europe and USA = no moisture / raw material left for replenishing the ice on Arctic Ocean = chain reaction = accumulative negative affect has already started.

Fact 8: tremendous amount of warmwater in the Mediterranean system comes from Mexican Gulf by the currents; because of very high evaporation, but not many tributaries to replenish the water deficit.

Fact 9: when Gibraltar Straight didn’t exist to let water in, from the Atlantic = all those inland seas lost their water in less than a 1000 years. Because, smarty pants human in Sahara /Arabian peninsula was making fires

Fact 10: not having water in the inland system, dry swamps as they became, were producing dry heat instead of extra humidity to help north Atlantic; by not producing extra row material for renewing the Arctic’s ice.

Fact 11: because the oceans have more water that is below 4⁰C, than above, when the seawater gets colder – the water level goes up. Climatologist are not just wrong on everything, but back to front also.

Fact 12: because was no water in the Mediterranean system from Aral to Gibraltar = that water was in the ice and in the oceans. Combination of those two factors made the oceans to rise a lot and overflow into the Mediterranean, where Gibraltar is now.

Fact 13: when air get colder for any reason, it shrinks. Power of preventing vacuum, pulls air from other places; those other places with less air = the sun penetrates more + less air to expend higher and intercept extra coldness  = much hotter days, even though is official Big Ice Age somewhere else.

Fact 14: not taking all those factors and much more; made the shonky experts to believe that whole planet’s temperature goes up and down as a yo-yo. Unless they take on board what is in my book, from now will be regarded as premeditated catastrophic  damages.

Yes, the earth is on the brink of ecologic collapse, but not because of carbon and methane. If the shonky climatologist can understand why is 1km thick ice on Greenland, but on the same latitude in Norway / Finland is grass, trees and potatoes growing; on same latitude in Russia is permafrost – will be able to understand how and why the big Ice Age was created, why it has finished.  Greenland + Norway + permafrost in Russia are same angle to the sun, same distance / influence from north poll and other stars’, same CO2 level, but completely different climate.  Under your shonky science – should be same climate. Permafrost is desert in a cold country. Why is not same climate in Uluru, Simpson desert as in Amazon jungle, Burma? Same latitude, same angle to the sun, same CO2 level, but completely different climate. H2O, boys, not CO2! There is more CO2 in Amazon jungle than in the desert. In Amazon jungle, the winds bring same amount of CO2 as in Simpson desert + the fungi rotting the vegetation release lots of CO2 in the jungle; is it better climate in the desert with less CO2 / H20?  If they were interested in climate; forget about CO2! Start saving extra stormwater in new dams = more humidity / less dry heat = more ice on the polar caps. Unnecessary demolishing of the ice on Arctic and around Antarctic is the second biggest crime in progress.     

Share this:

Interesting when they threaten with; less rainfall in Amazon, sinking Bangladesh, BOO! But not one say: climate change will increase the rainfall in Sahara…? Fear warmongering has always being big currency, but never as big as since the Kyoto conference. Floods and droughts, BOO!!! But nobody mentions of building few new dams… why? Because dams are built by honest people.

Instead of molesting the essential CO2, to deteriorate the climate from bad to worse; climate on many places on the planet can be improved. On places that is gone to extreme, as in Australia, Pakistan, parts of Africa. In drought, we prepare for floods, in floods we save water for droughts. No, we don’t save water when the dam capacity is down to 20%. Same as when you have $200, you can save every cent of it – but will not make you very comfortable.

Queensland’s floods last season were good example. After prolong droughts; the soil was not water receptive / doesn’t retain moisture. Because of prolong droughts, the beneficial bacteria in the soil are dead. 2] because of the tremendous dry heat in the centre – clouds stayed 200km of the beach for few weeks, on the dividing ranges = terrible floods. If they went straight inland – wouldn’t have being any big floods  b] west of the divide, water drains into the Lake Eyer basin. If that basin has regular water – would fight against LESS dry heat – evaporation on farming land would decrease, and much more benefits.

Instead, the nation must obey the two biggest Warmist Bigots, Tim Flannery and Bob Brown. Because of the shonky Climatology scientist, they can get away with ‘’premeditated murder’’

In the Victorian bushfires 170 people died. Not because is too much CO2 around Kyoto city, Detroit and Stuttgart, but because; for the previous 11 months, the dry heat from inland was vacuuming the moisture from the vegetation close to the coast.  B] because at that time; the N/H was experiencing extreme cold winter. What is that got to do with Victoria?

When is extra cold in the N/H, the air shrink – to avoid vacuum, big percentage of air from the southern hemisphere is puled north = less air on the southern hemisphere – cannot go high enough, to intercept extra coldness = we experienced extra heat = big bushfires. When the people were still sizzling in the inferno; David Karoly and Will Stephen were on extremist ABC, telling the nation that: those big fires are, because of the phony GLOBAL warming…? Suddenly for them the N/H wasn’t on the same globe. Shame, shame, shame!!!

On the commission of enquiry for those bushfires was decided: to chop the trees of the road – so that people can escape future fires. Nuclear shelters were not used during the Cold War, but people are building them now; to survive big bushfires… this is worse than a war.

The dry heat from inland did the Victorian fires. That dry heat goes in every direction during the year. When over Victoria – is usually on high altitude – destroys clouds. Chopping the trees of the road, the black bitumen will not have any shade all day – will create extra dry heat – that dry heat is much more effective locally, on the ground; will be much easier to start fires from exhaust spark, or cigarette butt. Or by Warmist lunatics – to blame the phony global warming.

Instead of, off the road planting bushy trees, with palatable leafs for the bacteria in the soil; the extremist unwritten rule is: eucalyptus or nothing. Toxins from the eucalyptus leafs kills the good bacteria – they cannot even get the dry grass into the soil – to prevent fuel for the fire. Australia is the smallest continent, surrounded by the biggest mass of waters on the planet – is the driest continent – thanks to the eucalyptus leafs. Bacteria doesn’t touch them = they accumulate for few years and wait for fire. Burn and produce lots of heat. Minus good bacteria, the dead grass is for continuation / spreading the fires. Less moisture in the air – high evaporation – less moisture in the air / less topsoil moisture and water storages – clouds are avoiding Australia as cars around a traffic island. Thanks to the leaders into the international extremist cult. Thanks to the ‘’pretend Skeptics’’

Wivenhoe dam was used as an example: Brisbane / Ipswich flooded in 74, after Sir Joh build a big dam = Brisbane was protected. The extremist had to discredit that theory. When another big storm finally arrived, it was their best chance – to prove that dams are useless for preventing floods. Dams prevent flooding on 1000 places around the planet; but that will not be mentioned by the politically bias media – don’t you worry about that.  It was in the beginning of wet season, of La Niña / wetter than average year.

Dam is full, 100%, to the floodgates. Above the floodgates can contain another 110% because becomes larger area. Floods were progressing from north Queensland for couple of weeks, before arriving to the Toowoomba ranges = it wasn’t a surprise storm. When the stormwater arrived from the headwater of Brisbane river to the dam; the dam was 197% full. Any moron would have known: is the beginning of a very, very wet season – water should have being emptied to the bottom of the floodgate, before the big stormwater arrived. Even a moron knows why those gates are called ‘’Floodgates’’ , but not the Commissioner and minister for water.

Appropriate solution: dam should have being emptied to the bottom of the floodgate; before the flood-water reached the dam. Even then, to leave open two out of five gates. During the floods, there was no rain below the dam; river can handle extra water, without flooding. To coincide with high tide, at appropriate time should be only one floodgate open. By the time floods were over – the dam would have being full, but no flooding. Instead, when the flood-water reached the dam, was 197% capacity full. When the flood-water decreased, the dam had only 185% capacity; before the flood-water arrived, was more water in the dam, than when finished = all back to front; beat that crime Bin Laden. Bin Laden can only dream off, what Bob Brown is doing to Australia. Instead of water being TO THE BOTTOM of the ”floodgates” when the storm-water arrived… the dam had less water when the flood finished… that is not premeditated…? Dams are preventing floods all around the world, they don’t have green senator Brown and ”climate change expert” Tim Flannery…

Stephen Robertson, minister for water admitted: he was asked to release 5% of the water before the flood-water arrived – he told them not to, because will not help much. He is correct; releasing 5% wouldn’t have prevented flooding. If they released 2%, would have being even less help. But, why they didn’t release all the water above the floodgate – is a taboo question. The commissioner for water on a conference was talking about dams; long before, she said: we don’t want dam on Fitzroy river (Kimberleys), not to happen same as to Murray river, drying. The lefty Crony doesn’t even understand that: dam saves water in floods, to have water in dry time. B] Fitzroy river would have being happy to have half of the water as Murray, in dry season. Only few pools of water survive in that rive during dry season. Another few bushfires – those pools will not have permanent water. On those pools of water depends all wildlife in radios bigger than western Europe. That crony has being given fat salary, to be in charge of the Brisbane’s floodwaters, and to con the ignorant…

Instead of recommending few more smaller dams to be built upstream, was floated suggestion: to build expensive levy in Brisbane and prevent future floods. That levy would be a good ad for the Warmist – levy to protect from the phony GLOBAL warming…?! B] this time during the days that Brisbane was flooded – wasn’t any rain below the dam. That is unusual, next floods, most probably will be raining simultaneously in Brisbane. C] the areas of Brisbane that were flooded; they are floodplains for the city of Brisbane’s creeks. 

Levy is useless, unless is closed, where those creeks are draining into the river. If they are closed, water from the river not to go upstream in those creek’s floodplains – simultaneously raining; the rainwater would flood the same areas that was flooded last time by water overflowing from the river = lots of money can be spent on levy – same parts of Brisbane would flood again = the phony GLOBAL warming did it…?! Or is it the stupidity + green senator’s wishes: no dam to be built on the driest continent / Australia.  If I forget Tim Flannery, you should remember him. He made TV show, why no dam to be built in tropical parts of Australia. Because that would improve the climate on the whole continent.

All river’s catchment areas are one weather zone in Australia. Winds blow in all directions. If is any moisture = moist air blows – if no moisture, dry / hot  winds blow to places that is still some moisture = that deteriorates climate from bad to worse. Instead of money squandered to prevent the phony GLOBAL warming; ¼  of those money to be spent on improving the climate, by building lots of small dams in the tropics – climate on the whole continent would improve. Clouds will not avoid Australia as cars around a traffic island. Instead from every direction would be going inland and continued / spread to the red centre.

Australia has beautiful .rich soil. Trees would be growing sky high if the moisture content inland improves. We are constantly blaming Brazilians for chopping trees; but never blame our Green vermin for denying water to Australia, trees to grow. Australia is surrounded by more water than Brazil – should have more regular rain than brazil. Between Townsville and Broome, grass and new trees would have absorbed much more carbon than carbon trapped in all the fossil fuel on the planet. Needs water, to improve the climate, for grass and trees to grow. needs ”Bob Brown’s Water Embargo on Australia” removed / abolished.

No need to block the rivers for dams, even though they are not perennial. Small dams on creeks that are tributaries in those rivers – all those rivers will become permanent. Native birds / animals would become prolific, with permanent water available – if nothing on extinction list, the green vermin would be the only losers. Clouds avoid dry areas – why not one climatologist knows that? They even blame moisture in the air, same as CO2, for the phony GLOBAL warming…?! Many phony Skeptics are supporting the same stupidity. If you don’t know what is good climate – ask the trees; not the criminals calling themselves ‘’Climatologist’’ and the ”pretend Skeptics”, that are doing the Warmist’ dirty job.

On ‘’Skeptic’s’’ websites is regularly / proudly debated; how much extra water vapour in the air is harmful for ‘’their climate change’’ …  If you go inland Australia, Sahara; anybody with half a brains would have realized that more HO2 in the air = better climate. Yes, H2O + CO2 clouds intercept the sun’s radiation – but the sunlight comes from the OTHER SIDE of the water / dirty clouds. B]When is intercepted high up in the clouds – that heat never comes to the ground. C] up in the latitude of the clouds, cooling is much more efficient, than on the ground. Instead, Warmist cooked the brains of many skeptics, they are singing the Warmist’ lyrics: wavelengths, algorithm, albedo, anthropogenic, crapogenic, equilibrium!!! People on the street think: if there are proofs, leading skeptics will prove the Warmist wrong… WRONG! Abuse of trust makes the phony Skeptics bigger criminals than the active Warmist. From the Warmist is expected to tell lies, same as crocodiles are not blamed for eating people – it’s their job. Many leading Skeptics used Warmist lyrics, to sound trendy – now they have to persist with the ‘’borrowed crap from the Warmist + to silence the truth – the hell with the interest of the nation.

Because of them, no dam is built any-more, on the driest continent. Bob Brown an Flannery cannot stop millions of people wanting to build dams and improve the climate. Unfortunately, the ‘’pretend Skeptics’’ blame H2O /CO2 in the atmosphere ‘’will produce less GLOBAL warming’’… only little bit…  For the people on the street sounds as: only little bit dead, or as saying; only little bit pregnant… Where they got that evidence? From same thin air that the Warmist got their evidences. Why should the Warmist be ashamed of telling lies, ashamed from whom?!

Stormwater must be drained into the sea. After nixing with the salty water – for billions of dollars is desalinated. When the hottest days arrive – sprinkler inspector. During the hottest days, sprinklers keep humidity in the air up. Dry air = more dust in the air for your children’s lungs. If you inhale CO2, it’s harmless gas, goes out again; when you inhale dust – in the lungs is moisture – dust turns into sticky mud. If sprinklers are used during the hottest days – grass / trees are greener – less work for the air-conditioners. No moisture in the air – dry heat is preparing for bigger bushfires and house fires… Congratulation senator Brown…

If farmers have sufficient water for irrigation – when that water evaporates, fights against the dry heat coming from the centre. Less farmers irrigate – remaining farmers must increase irrigation – because with less moisture in the air – evaporation increases. Instead, with ‘’pretend Skeptic’s blessings’’ Warmist are repossessing farmer’s water, to drain it into the estuary… Warmist are even draining water into the sea from the dam built when there was sanity in politics. Less moisture in the air – the dry heat from inland will dry the water catchment areas that are water supply for Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and for vegetable farms for those cities. More filtered sewage water for drinking… people will be ready to pay $300 per ton of carbon. Blame the non-existent GLOBAL warming. Congratulation Warmist…

Fact 1: clouds from the sea prefer to go on the land; because on the land is no secondary sun reflection as from water surface.

Fact 2: clouds are avoiding Australia as cars around traffic island; because of too much dry heat inland is repelling the clouds. Not because is too much CO2 around Kyoto city.

Fact 3: when cloud from Atlantic goes into Brazil – doesn’t rain for few weeks only on the first 150km – instead it spreads inland, because is no dry heat inland in Brazil, to keep preventing the clouds of going deep inland. Can the climatologist see the difference?!

Fact 4: when for prolong period doesn’t rain / soil depleted completely of moisture; good bacteria dead; no bacteria to take nutrients in the soil – soil doesn’t absorb / retain moisture = bigger floods – washes the topsoil away. In the water that flooded Brisbane 10% was soil + organic matter that should be in the soil; if it was good bacteria, as in other countries, where the Greens are secular.

Fact 5: toxins from eucalyptus leafs are poisoning the beneficial bacteria; that bacteria controls the climate. Eucalyptus toxins turned the wettest continent of Australia – into driest. If more beneficial bacteria in the soil = better climate. The Warmist extremist are exporting eucalyptus seedlings to other countries = exporting environmental terrorism. (don’t take me wrong, I always have eucalyptus oil, is perfect for killing bacteria and prevent infection, when have scratches / cuts) unfortunately, soil without bacteria is DEAD soil. Equal of hundreds of Exxon Valdez ships of toxic eucalyptus oil is distributed on Australian soil / waterways, every year. Extremist demand farms to be planted with eucalyptus trees, to stop climate of changing = mother of all lunacy…

Fact 6: more water storages, more irrigation (especially more rice paddies) more H2O in the air, essential bacteria multiplies in the forest = more frequent /regular showers – soil absorbs retains much more rainwater = no floods.

Fact 7:  ‘’climatologist’’ pretend not to see that: farmer’s water is barrier / buffer between the desert and the big cities on the beach; where most of the Urban Sheep congregates?! Obviously they can see – reason they are against dams, reason they are for repossessing farmer’s water. Can the Skeptic’s Smarties see that? No, they are into Warmist lyrics: wavelengths, algorithm, equilibrium, albedo, anthropogenic, crapogenic, sunspots in medieval ages! They are even proud of it…

Fact 8: when the floods were in Pakistan, Warmist were using their misfortunes, to lie that the phony GLOBAL warming is doing it. Instead of saying: dams prevent floods. Dams can produce electricity. Dams improve the climate. Pakistan has salinity problems, same as Australia. If lots of small dams are built: increase rainfall, decreases evaporation, minimizes floods, extra humidity created in the area – can benefit from the Horn of Africa to Afghanistan + will improve the ”Himalayas glaciers”. Extra dams will prevent scorching the crops in dry season. When rainfall increases / evaporation decreases = salinity problem disappears. Less H2O in the air, surrounding trees are suffering, or bigger bushfires. Every country where are big bushfires, are getting dry winds from some desert. Bushfires kill animals and people = premeditated mass murderers are the people against extra dams.

Fact 9: if Asian rice paddies are drained and planted with eucalyptus, Asia would have instantly become dryer than Australia, Himalayan glaciers would have disappeared in 3 years. Because Asia /India are much bigger landmass than Australia, especially to the west, there is no large mass of water up to west-coast of Africa. Australia is surrounded with warmwater on all 4 sides. Is the driest, thanks to senator Brown, Flannery and the big city sceptic’s Smarties; that are doing fanatically the Warmist’ dirty job: wavelengths, algorithm, equilibrium, anthropogenic, albedo,  crapogenic,  they know, was sunspots in medieval ages, the whole planet was warmer… bullshit !!!

Fact 10: Brisbane, Ipswich floods were in the BEGINNING of La Niña (wetter than average year) That was known to the authority. If the dam was emptied to the bottom of the ‘’floodgates’’ before the floodwater arrived – devastation would have being avoided. Why are they called: ”floodgates”?!

Fact 11: lots of toxins have being washed into the sea by flooding Brisbane / Ipswich, proof that those same extremist in the authority that orchestrate the city floods are not worried about the health of Moreton Bay / the Barrier Reef.

Fact 12: billions of dollars damages, innocent lives lost, nobody is in jail for it, they are still in charge. Minister Roberson on one occasion said: dams shouldn’t be built; because water is wasted by evaporation. Turnbull uses same sentence…!!!!

Fact 13: dam improves the climate, evaporated water from dam attracts more regular showers, keeps the essential bacteria in the soil alive, surrounding soil is water receptive, surrounding vegetation absorbs that moisture from the air – if no moisture in the air – vegetation sucks the last drop of water from the soil = makes dry creeks. More dams help each other, to fight the dry heat created in the center; like one hand washes / helps the other = best result.

Fact 14: by using Brisbane / Ipswich as sacrificial lamb – they proved that dams are useless for floods and droughts. On thousands of places in other countries proves the opposite!!!! Thanks local extremist media…

Fact 14: sprinkling the backyard during the hottest days is multiple benefits: keeps the grass alive, only green grass can absorb CO2 + CO. Green grass keeps cooler. Dry = dust in the air – in your and your children’s lungs – so that the Urban Sheep can please ABC & Brown, Flannery, minister Robertson…

Fact 15: lots of small dams on the tributaries of tropical rivers will make the rivers with permanent water. Permanent moisture / water makes healthy prolific trees; native critters prolific, instead on extinction list. Who would be the loser?

Fact 16: Egypt is next to the biggest desert on the planet; they have stored water for if is not raining for 7 years. In Australia tremendous amount of stormwater is wasted – weeks after the floods, sprinkler inspectors. Farmers are denied water, so we can import food from China. In china the rice paddies attract regular rain, keep better climate – in Australia rice paddies are treated as the biggest evil – by the Kyoto Cult Organized Crime.

Fact 17: farmers are collecting sunshine and CO2 from the atmosphere and are turning it into food, fiber and export dollar – the extremist prefer to borrow money and import. When you sell minerals / coal, next year cannot sell the same ton of it; unlike farmers produce.

Share this:

TO PREVENT MODIFICATION  OF THE BACTERIA THAT PRODUCES METHANE; INTO BACTERIA THAT INHIBITS METHANE, NEED TO KNOW HOW CRUDE OIL WAS CREATED

In my book I extensively explained on the subject. But on the strongest possible way; to emphasize the crime in progress: by genetically modifying  the methane producing bacteria, into bacteria to inhibits methane instead; we will have a page on crude oil here:

©Many theories, but nothing convincing exist; how crude oil was created in the ground. 1] from the animal’s fat sinking deep down – fat is adhesive – wouldn’t sink more than a foot. 2] animals buried (same as trees for coal) is less than convincing. A] there was never so many animals together to be buried, to have enough fat for the amount of oil on most of the places in existence. B] oil is very strong preservative – would have being 100 times more bones from those animals, than oil, but is not.

That’s where the methane producing bacteria comes on the scene; the one that is modified into Frankenstein superior bacteria, to inhibit methane instead; by the loonies in CSIRO.

First the algae evolved and released some free oxygen, by eating CO2. But that was insignificant. Then coral / crustacean evolved. Coral eats CO2 – keeps the carbon for itself – releases the oxygen – when coral dead – turns into limestone, still keeps the carbon. That was significant benefit for producing free oxygen. Then trees evolved – they absorb CO2, when dead – fungi release the carbon from dead trees back as CO2 = ZERO benefit. (at that time was no lightening fires, even though was lots of dead trees, because of big percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere as fire retardant; and wasn’t enough oxygen to sustain fire.

Coral / shells in the sea were most prolific then; because was lots of CO2 in the water; rain was washing lots of it into the sea. But sea wasn’t alkaline, CO2 doesn’t make the water alkaline. Thanks to corals / shells, the oxygen level into the atmosphere was steadily increasing from 1% up to 7-8%. That has given enough oxygen for many coldblooded critter, including the dinosaurs. Tectonic plates were moving more than today; tsunamis were burying lots of trees; but the fungi were rotting them and turning all the carbon from the logs into CO2 again. Belief that there is 100million old coal is wrong. On the surface was lots of debris waiting to be decomposed by the fungi – inside those debris was nitrogen and the tree roots– since than trees developed habit to need lots of nitrogen in their root system. Most of their roots were into the debris.

Then about 65 million years ago, another kid arrived on the block, the methane producing bacteria. It was meters of thick rotting vegetation, debris on the surface everywhere. Fire was unknown. Newly evolved methane producing bacteria had the food, to multiply very fast, lots of them. The raw methane with its heavy organic ‘’additives’’ (smelly gunk) was sinking deep in the ground. Unlike fungi that convert the celluloid back into CO2; trees were absorbing CO2; when dead, methane bacterium was turning the carbon into methane + even more important; was splitting the water molecules and taking the hydrogen from them to create methane = the oxygen from those water molecules was becoming as free in the atmosphere.

2] by the creation of lots of fresh yummy methane sinking in the ground; new customer evolved; the fresh organic methane eating bacteria. That bacteria was gorging on abundant amounts of fresh methane. Methane having more energy than any other food, those bacteria that were eating it deep down; were fattening themselves as shameless piggies.  From their bodies, when dead, was produced all the crude oil; that’s why is no bones or any imprint of any other animals into the crude oil. Thanks to the methane producing bacteria, we now have crude oil. (the bacteria that like to munch methane, must still exist in the ground. In my book I proposed; to look for them somewhere on Borneo. On other places as in and around Arabian peninsula, they must be gone; without continuation of regular supply of fresh methane from the surface…

3] As I said; before 65 million years were big tsunamis to bury trees, but the fungi were rotting them completely; they didn’t turn into coal. When the methane producing bacteria arrived on the scene; when a big tsunami bulldozes and buries some big forest; the leafs / twigs and bark  was eaten instantly by that bacteria and produced lots of heat; without oxygen present in the soil> the heat turned the tree trunks into coal + the methane producing bacteria fumigated the rest and killed any fungi present. Now natural gas / methane exist together with oil in the ground; but coal and crude oil together don’t exist – because the bacteria that eats methane, doesn’t eat methane when if it’s in pure form. Methane eating bacteria only eats methane produced above the ground and sunk together with other (smelly additives) compounds. ( talking that bacteria eats today methane in the atmosphere, is not to admit that UV destroys any methane wandering in the atmosphere in a jiffy, not in 10 years)

Experiment: in a transparent bottle, catch some methane from cow, sheep, or your own; let it on the sunlight for few hours (as long as there is oxygen in the bottle also – to imitate atmosphere, in couple of hours that methane will turn into 2 droplets of water;  magic.

1]2]3]4] Logs kept the carbon as in coal, thanks to the methane producing bacteria fumigating the fungi. Therefore, the trees that collected CO2, kept the carbon for themselves; fungi were collecting oxygen, to turn that carbon back into CO2; but the methane bacteria was preserving the carbon and hydrogen into the coal / oxygen was staying in the air. B] lots of methane produced that sunk in the ground = oxygen stayed in the air as free. 2] thanks to the methane producing bacteria, lots of crude oil was made = the oxygen stayed in the air as free. In no time, oxygen from 7%, increased to 16-18%. That killed the dinosaurs. They were cold blooded, slow moving; adjusted for 70-80 million years to low oxygen level. Getting to 16-18% oxygen was too much for them in a very short period = belly up. For the first time the planet has seen big bushfires.

Most of the bacteria and viruses that Dino was used to, died of too much oxygen – new ones involved that tolerate plenty oxygen. B] Dino used fungi to digest his food for millions of years, those fungi produced enzymes that suits the dinosaurs. Enzymes in digestive system produced by methane producing bacteria is good for warm-blooded critters / including human, but not for Dino. The fungi since then had constant wars with the bacteria (reason we use fungi’s penicillin, to kill bacteria) CO2 in the atmosphere decreased rapidly. Before 65 million years ago, days were colder, but nights were warmer. Because CO2 by dimming was preventing lots of sunlight not to come to the ground, but the percentage that did come to the ground, CO2 cloud was keeping that warmth. In a way was as having smaller fire under the roof; comparing with now, bigger fire in a house without a roof. Smaller fire with roof, the heat goes to every room, including towards the polar caps / including at night. Now bigger heat is created on the ground during the day, without that dimming; but at night that heat is quickly wasted = we have hotter days / colder nights.

Dino felt same as if to human increasing from 21% oxygen to 45%. 2] because corals increased oxygen very, very slowly, maybe for the previous 60-70 million years coral decreased for some reason – important fact is: Dino had SAME amount of oxygen for many million years, adopted to that amount / his genes for adaptation degenerated. Now when the idiots are fighting to stop the climate of changing is so pathetic. In all living critters, most of the genes are junk genes; BUT NOT THE GENES FOR ADAPTATION. Proof that the climate never stopped changing for millions of years, now they will stop it with carbon tax…?! The good Lord created day and night / summer and winter / dryer and wetter years / higher and lower altitudes / latitudes; to keep the genes for adaptation alert and working. Because as with everything; you use it or lose it. Reptilians somehow survived that big change 65 million years ago, but with higher concentration of free oxygen and used not to need for much of oxygen; now turtles / crocs can survive for up to 1h under water… good on them.

Therefore, comet didn’t kill the dinosaurs. If it was so big comet to kill the Dino from Alaska to Tasmania – would have pushed the planet of its orbit – we would have being now part of the sun; or flown somewhere on the other side of Jupiter. Evolvement of the methane producing bacteria changed the atmosphere for warm-blooded critter that need lots of oxygen. Australian CSIRO by modifying the methane bacteria is reversing to atmosphere to be good for Dino, but they better resuscitate him fast – before it becomes oxygen depleted for the Green psychopaths in CSIRO…

Now we are burning that coal, burning the crude oil and gas, dissolving the limestone for cement = decreasing the free oxygen in the atmosphere rapidly = will become good atmosphere for the Dino, but will become impossible for the warm-blooded critters to survive… On many places the oxygen level is already below 19% of the air – when gets below 17%, modern critters will start imitating dinosaurs’ last days. Only creation of EXTRA fresh methane – which sinks into the ground = minimizes the damages. My formula: 2H2O + CO2 = CH2 + O4  (CO2 + 2H2O = grass + cow’s methane producing bacteria = CH4 + O4) Under the circumstances, they cannot think of anything WORSE, than to modify the methane producing bacteria; to interfere with animal’s digestive system; just to badmouth methane cow &sheep (cow &sheep are the Australian Twin Towers!!! What does that makes the Warmist scientist in CSIRO???!!! The same ‘’mass premeditated murderers’’ are experimenting CO2 geosequestration. When is more CO2 in the air / in the sea > more trees, plus MORE algae corals in the sea grow > they keep the carbon for themselves – release the oxygen atoms from the CO2, for the fish in the water – after some time, that oxygen is in the atmosphere. When CO2 is sequestrated deep in the ground – the two oxygen atoms from every CO2 molecule are decommissioned forever. Isn’t that lunacy / premeditated crimes?!

So, fresh methane with its ‘’natural additives’’ is heavier than air > sinks in the ground. If you haven’t read the page I have the ‘’METHANEGATE’’ you should read it, to see the real premeditated crimes in progress, by the same psychopaths; just to promote the phony GLOBAL warming. I need your help people, to inform the society of the reality. Popular blogs are saturating with lots and lots of texts, to confuse the people – it’s not in their interest the truth to be known, for 3 big reasons

My formula: 2H2O + CO2 = GRASS / GRASS + COW = CH4+O4

Share this:

SEAWATER IS GETTING MORE AND MORE ALKALINE. LESS ALKALINE DOESN’T MEAN ACIDIC AND CORAL BLEACHING unless pH is below 7, is not acidic – the sea will never be acidic; salt is alkaline.

The truth is almost always opposite than what comes out of the propaganda machine: getting less alkaline would have very bad affect; but because the Warmist are constantly into damage control / to cover up for previous lies; they cannot realize what the REAL bad affect would be. I will tell you, but first read the real facts; before we get into their hypothetical.

THE BIGGEST THREAT TO BARRIER REEF ARE, THE MARINE BIOLOGISTS   ©  Constant scaremongering that: carbon is bleaching the coral, global warming will destroy the reef by 2030. The only reason marine biologists cannot be called: the biggest scum of the earth is: because they are on the water. Unless the real problems are known to the society, no real solutions can be applied. Deceiving the people with phony problems = the real problems are growing bigger. Who is to blame? Let people be the judge   1. Global warming – doesn’t exist! 2. Acidification – the sea is alkaline, not acidic!    3. Climate change – yes climate is changing, more than marine biologists would prefer for their ideology! Climate in Australia is changing for ‘’dryer Climate’’ apart of the marine biologists + ABS &SBS, who else believes that: where the corals are – will get dryer?! *

Climate in Australia will get much dryer. Apart of the marine biologists + politically bias media, does anybody believe that: where the corals are, it will get dryer? (coral actually prefers drier climate)  Wetter climate means more sediments washed on the reef = bad for coral. Wetter means reef water gets too much oxygenized by freshwater from the hills = bad for coral, more silt; coral is cactus of the sea). By the way, Barrier Reef is safe,  because the Dividing Ranges are close to it = no big water catchment areas to wash on the reef. The trick is; to move the clouds on the western side of the Divide. The only way that can happen is; if the creation of dry heat is decreased inland = to improve the climate. Carbon levy has the opposite affect, because deceives the people that: if they produce less CO2 – climate somehow will stop changing. But if continues to change (climate constantly changes) it’s your fault, people! You should have started paying immediately ETS, when they suggested! In other words: they have everything planed.  Wrong!!!

Clouds prefer to be over land. But, when you fly from Cairns to Sydney, can see that all the clouds are on the beach. Why? Clouds are created in the sea by evaporation, but in most places in the world, the clouds instantly go overland. Reason is: the good Lord made the ‘’mirror affect’’ sun-reflection from the surface of the water. That makes the secondary reflection for the clouds from below = lifts the clouds higher up. That mirror affect reflection of sunlight from the most of vegetation doesn’t exist. (accept from some eucalyptus forests. They have silvery colour leafs – to imitate semidesert and repel clouds away from land.) Otherwise, if you implement geometry; the angle the sunlight hits the water = reflects as billiard ball up = is affective up to 20km over the land – to push the clouds further inland = west of the Divide. But is not happening, because no vegetation with dark green leafs + the tremendous dry heat from inland is the most important factors for making the clouds to go as cars around traffic island around Australia.

The land of the Long White Cloud is because: they don’t have the dry heat created inland. For the clouds, big or small – coming towards New Zealand from the sea is same as car going downhill. Stays overland because the winds cannot push it away over the sea again, on the other side of the island. Because, for the cloud to go over the sea again, would be as car going 40 degrees up steep hill, because of the glare from the seawater. On the other hand, going from the sea over Australian land, to penetrate trough the dry heat is as car against brick wall. That brick wall sometimes repels even cyclones not to go overland. Imagine the millions of smaller clouds that are kept away from the land. Imagine the humidity from the reef that is avoiding the land By clouds/humidity staying above the reef > decreases evaporation – evaporation is cooling process for the sea.

Those factors are controlling the climate, not CO2! If any climatologist intends to become honest – please contact me, you will learn a lot of beneficial truth /facts, for the good of the reef / country.    

1.Coral is made from Calcium-Carbonate. The only way to get its carbon is; by CO2 getting washed from the atmosphere, by the rain. The only way to absorb it, is: by mixed CO2 with salty seawater. Calcium as soluble element, washes from the land for the coral and shellfish. When some calcium washes from the farmer’s superphosphate into the sea= it’s extra bonus. I hope that the honest people can connect bleach = bleaching. Acidity comes from nitrogen + sulphur compounds, not from CO2. That acidity from nitrogen, SO2 is essential for the algae that are giving the beautiful colours and protection to the coral. Otherwise coral by itself is white as a porcelain. Nitrogen is also essential for all the algae and the seagrass. (Remember the Swindler’s resent crocodile tiers about the dugong?)

Coral evolved and was most prolific, before was any trees, before was any coal deposits or crude oil or natural gas. All the carbon trapped in all trees + grass + coal deposits + crude oil +natural gas, was 10% in the atmosphere, about 90% in the sea and lakes. Because rain existed – rain washes CO2 = most of it was in the sea, not in the air. The pH in the seawater was lower than today, because of extra sulfur in the water! Every continent was a desert = was not much rain on the land to wash sediments. Because was tremendous abundance of CO2  available in the seawater at that time = made the coral to be a lousy carbon collector = the more CO2 = better, healthier and more prolific coral. It was more nitrogen, sulphur at that time, because was no trees and grass to compete with the primitive critters as coral and algae. Was no fossil fuel with sulphur stored in the ground. Nitrogen +sulphur was more abundant – the algae that protect the coral need it for their survival as much as they can get.

CO2 was most abundant, when coral was most prolific, 1500% more CO2 in the seawater than today. 2. H2O to start condensation in the atmosphere, it needs CO2. Together they fall down as rain; rain is pH7, pH.7 is pH. neutral, not acidic or alkaline, but neutral! Anything above pH7 is alkaline. Higher alkalinity harms the coral more, than lower. With 7,3pH, water would have being much more gentle to coral /fish (but other evil would have evolved). To bring the seawater down below pH7, would need the acidity from thousands of planets equal to the earth. Tragic part is that: the warm coral seawater doesn’t absorb much CO2. That makes coral between rock and a hard place. I.e. cannot survive anymore in cold waters, because is too much oxygen in it – on the other hand; warm seawater can keep much less CO2. You can experiment with shaking warm beer, with salt in it. Salty seawater shakes constantly; when warm = beer gets flat much easier = loses CO2 (the bubbles in beer are CO2 molecules). You have seen bubbles on the seawater when splashing. The more CO2 in the water = more bubbles. Those bubbles don’t heart anybody.  Coral is desperate for extra CO2!!!! Much more desperate than the trees. Easy to prove. The bubbles in bread /beer / champagne are 899999ppm CO2

Blaming CO2 for making the seawater acidic is pretty sick. CO2 is essential building block for the coral, same as for the trees. The sea is already very alkaline. Lots of extra magnesium, calcium, salt and potassium as soluble elements are coming by the floods from the land into the sea and are increasing the alkalinity. They are blabbing about the ppm of CO2, but never say: what are the parts per million of calcium, magnesium, potassium, ash and salt from the hills as highly alkaline arriving every year in the seawater!!! Let me tell you another fact: acidic water comes to the reef from the rainforest creeks / rotting leafs. Amazon + Congo rivers bring more acidity into the sea.. nitric / sulfuric acid, how about chopping their rainforests?  To blame CO2, is not just sick, but destructive! Carbonic acid is almost not acidic. coral absorbs the carbonic acid to become 25-30% of his body. Carbonic acid is essential, your body is full of it; when your body burns the carbohydrates – releases CO2 – as carbonic acid, to travel to the lungs; and CO2 out. When you get from Yorkshire to London – you are not getting in France, but still in England =when the pH in the water goes from 8,3pH, to 8,1pH, is not getting acidic, but less alkaline = that is improvement for the coral and fish. (experiment on your eyes: seawater and rainwater effect, fish have eyes also) – less alkaline water = less burning.

Unfortunately acidity doesn’t survive, because is made from organic compounds. Magnesium, calcium and potassium as basic elements +salt compounds just keep accumulating in the water. High alkalinity bleaches the coral + lots of extra oxygen in the water bleaches the coral,  not CO2.

1] bleach as hydrochloride, kills the algae that give the colour and protect the coral = bleaching. Chlorine in the city water supply and in the swimming-pools ends up on the reef to help the bleaching. Most of the household cleaning sold in the shops contains bleach. The amount of bleach and bleach products used between Brisbane and Cairns are unknown to me, but is possible to find out. If you don’t know – is: because the marine biologists are not interested in the truth = it’s in their interest the coral to get bleached. Bleach is pH 13= very alkaline. Extra acidity in the seawater is essential, to counteract the constant increase of alkalinity!!!!

2]  long time ago, the environmentalists were justifiably complaining that; people should use only bio-degradable soap and detergents. People were reluctant to use bio-degradable for 3 reasons. 1. The cost was double.  2. Needed to be washed twice – to get some result. 3. If the washing stayed in the cupboard for more than 3 days – the washing starts to be offensive to the nose. B] To make normal commercial soap and detergent, it needs to boil caustic soda and oils or fats together. Caustic soda is very, very alkaline. When the lunacy quadruplet, the electronic media went into overdrive; that we must use the water from the laundry and shower on the yard as gray water (to justify why the stormwater in the environment must be drained into the sea = to save it for the next generation + because Pacific doesn’t have enough water + for digging the lowland islands).

Brainwashed’’ city’s farmers’’ on the beach for using that gray water, to be progressive. Rain washes those thousands of tons of caustic soda/bleach, household  cleaning products from the towns onto the reef =handy to blame the normal farmers and fishermen. Caustic soda/bleach melt the algae that protect the coral. Industrial oils, olive oil, fat from the bar-be-que, kitchen gray water washes on the reef. From the backyard, from the sewage treatment plant, everything ends up on the reef. Oils smother the coral above low tide level. That coral is dead, or on the dead bed.  (Ironically, those oils and fats are doing positive for the coral below low water mark, by depraving the water of oxygen). Coral cannot tolerate highly  oxygenated water. When coral was most prolific and adopted to low-level, oxygen as free agent was less than 0,1% in the water. Big difference, isn’t it? That’s why coral is sheltering around the planet in waters depleted of oxygen, as refuges.  (in the beginning of coral, water had much, much less oxygen – therefore coral was prolific everywhere. Shonky scientist discover coral deposits in temperate regions from 100million years > instantly declare that the planet was much, much warmer. In reality, it wasn’t much oxygen in those waters then, as now)

3] by overpopulation on the planet – more and more of those fats and oils end up in the sea. Oils and fats are not compatible with the seawater = spread on the top, as invisible foil. Water in the sea can only replenish its oxygen from the air. By splashing in the air – collects oxygen (not when on the top of the water are those oils and fats). 2. Those oils prevent evaporation. A] evaporation is cooling process for the water = less cooling. 3. Less evaporation = less rain. Rain is cooling process – brings coldness from high up. 4. When water evaporates, as humidity, is in direct contact with the oxygen in the atmosphere = replenishes itself with oxygen. As clouds in the air collects extra oxygen – falling down as rain, collects even more oxygen. Storm-water cascading from the hills replenish extra oxygen. Because of the decrease of rainfall – big part of the year, big part of the seawater around the planet doesn’t contain enough oxygen to sustain fish. They blame the fishermen. Is not overfishing, but  lack of oxygen in the water, because of extra industrial oils, olive oil and chicken fat +++.

The only positive affect of overpopulation is; producing extra CO2. Rain washes the extra CO2 in the water, coral, seagrass algae collect the CO2, keep the carbon for themselves – replenish the water with oxygen. If it wasn’t for that positive contribution – most of the seawater would have being unfit to sustain most variety of fish; especially fish as tuna that need more oxygen than others… thanks again CO2. (the propellers of outboard motors increase oxygen level in the water = good for the fish, not for the coral) If people know what is in my book – when they park their bout above coral-turn the outboard motor of, instantly. If no coral below – the outboard motor is replenishing oxygen for the fish – good on you fishermen, 95% are modern fish, they all need more oxygen than is in the water now. Big areas, for big part of the year are oxygen depleted; cannot sustain fish; thanks to the misleading propaganda. Why do you think that many variety of fish avoid the reef?

Yes, by less evaporation, because of oils and fat – the reef water cannot cool itself. That doesn’t bother the coral. Coral in the past was able to tolerate cold and hot water. That is not any problem to the coral. Coral today prefers warmwater for different reasons. The only things that predate in evolution the coral, are the algae. First, the algae were collecting CO2, releasing oxygen from it in the atmosphere. When the coral evolved, the atmosphere had 1% of oxygen as free agent. The rest of oxygen was all in the H2O+ CO2 + FeO, SO2 molecules. Coral helped in releasing extra oxygen from the CO2. Algae + coral, shellfish supplied the atmosphere to up to 4-5% of oxygen (now is 21% in the atmosphere, 2% in the water). When the coral was most prolific for millions of years, in the sea the oxygen was less than 0,5%. That’s how the coral likes it. Today, coral is sheltering in waters depleted of oxygen. That’s why it prefers warm water. Water that is on the bottom  above +4⁰C – is oxygen depleted. Why?

Only one litter  of water at +4⁰C is one kilogram heavy. (that’s how the learned people invented the kilogram as a universal unit for measurement). Water below +4⁰C, or above, expands and changes the specific gravity per volume. Therefore, if the water temperature on the bottom is any degree above +4⁰C= is heavier than the water on the surface = there is no water circulation = no replenishment with oxygen = only shelter /sanctuary for the corals, coral predates  even the dinosaurs. If the water on the bottom gets below 4⁰C, that water starts to expand – the water-pressure squeezes it to the top – cools some water molecules that are smothered with oxygen on the surface – those molecules become colder = heavier = circulation starts = water increases oxygen level – those algae that protect the coral dead = coral bleached. There is big, big possibility in the near future some freak currents from Southern Ocean  to bring water at much below +4⁰C to Barrier Reef. Extensive explanations in the book. Another way the reef water gets occasionally over-oxygenated for the coral, is by monsoonal rainwater from the hills…

No, not from the rain falling on the reef. The reef can tolerate that much oxygen with no damage. Plus that freshwater stays on the surface. It’s the rainwater that comes by the rivers from the hills. We discussed how rainwater get saturated with oxygen. During storms, the rivers bring lots of that muddy water onto the reef. Muddy river water is as heavy as the salty seawater. That heavily oxygenized muddy water pushes the salty seawater away and, as a big iceberg is saturating the coral with too much oxygen and mud. If dams are made on those rivers – in the dam the mud settles – oxygen gets slowly depleted. So if the next storm pushes the stagnant  water out of the dam onto the reef = not much oxygen and mud in that water. Do you know if the marine biologists are for making dams; or belong in the other mob that is against saving water on the driest continent on the planet???

I will tell you why: If extra water is saved on the land, that makes milder climate, more trees and no more species on endangered list. With extra water on the land, CLIMATE IMPROVES, everything becomes abundant. Who will be the loser if the climate improves? Who will be the loser if birds, animals, trees become prolific? Who will be the loser if the coral become more prolific??? The more things on extinction list = more cash / power for the Green People. Conflict of interest exposed! Warmer water doesn’t harm the coral. In Red Sea of Negev Desert is beautiful coral – much warmer water than on Barrier reef. Up there is no rivers to bring lots of extra oxygen and mud. Not far from there, similar temperature, similar conditions, but lots of human introduced industrial pollutants =  coral dead. Marine biologists are screwing our Barrier Reef, ABC and most newspaper’s reporters are the reef’s Pimps, by promoting lies / silencing the truth.

4. When boats go on the reef for a whole day or more; for the poo not to stink, they put Formaldehyde on it. Formaldehyde is just another name for Formalin. It kills everything living for many years, after released in the water.  Instantly kills the algae that cover and protect the coral = bleaching. Then continues to kill fish and anything that eats the fish. Instead, carbon is blamed by the shonky Experts. Everything living depends on carbon for existence.  Recently some coral was bleached in Torres Straights by some boat dropping the unwanted  about 200m2 (half a football field area) of coral was completely bleached next to the jetty. Daniel Bateman reports in Cairns Post: coral bleached between Horn and Thursday island, because of Global Warming. Believe me that: between those two islands is much more than half a football field area. But if he pointed the truth = future crimes could have being prevented. Plus, for them is the most important to con the people that: the Phony Warming is bleaching the coral.

In the Torres Straights, localized warming of the water of 200m2 is impossible! The constant currents water going from Indian into Pacific – then back in opposite direction every 6 hours; stronger currents than in the fast flowing river. Unfortunately, the Marine Park Authority is telling him crap, knowing that: Daniel and Cairns Post are doing their dirty job for them, to con the nation (their own free role of toilet paper).  Coral loves extra CO2 and warmer water! Now you know why in the past coral lowed coldwater also, but not now.  Because when coral was most prolific – too much oxygen wasn’t an issue – but for the coral,  is now. Fish unfortunately (as more modern in evolution)

There is more Marine Biologists diplomas in Australia than fishing licenses. Yes, tourist spend money to come to the reef, but the reef belongs to all Australians. Why from that profit we don’t pay-off the foreign deficit. Why the marine biologists are multiplying faster than the Queensland’s cane toads?  Brainwashing the kids in the university that CO2 is destroying the coral – coral is made from carbon, you idiots! The phony global warming is destroying the economy, not the coral. Climate changing to dryer is suitable for the coral – detrimental for fish everything else. Climate can change for better also. Because ETS didn’t eventuate, instantly astronomical extra levies on tobacco, electricity, mining. Must collect extra revenue to reward the promoters of the phony warming; otherwise many of them will spit the dummy, admit that CO2 is not warming gas; water changes the climate. The spoils will not go for building extra dams – to improve the climate / protect the reef from mud and too much oxygenated stormwater. Will be intercepted to reward increasing  number of the green leeches.

Farmer’s calcium is good for the coral. Farmer’s nitrogen is essential for the algae that protect the coral + extra seagrass/algae for the herbivore critters in the sea. If no herbivore – will not be any carnivore fish. Bleach, chlorine, caustic soda, ash, destroy the coral and everything in the waterways. It comes from the city, not from the farm. Another thing that harm the living things in all the waterways is something they put in the laundry detergent /liquid, to keep the washing fresh in the cupboards for long time. Small part of it gets attached to the washing – over 99% of it with the water goes out of the washing machine.

Sugar farmers are marine biologist’s best punching bag. Fertilizer that is good for the farm – is good for the seagrass, for the algae – including for the algae that protect and give beautiful colours to the coral. 1] the run-off from the sugar cane in those creeks, abundant fauna and flora. 2] sugar cane is the biggest vacuum cleaner for CO2 of any plant or tree on the planet. 3] sugarcane collects 500% more CO2 than rainforest. Sugar is export dollar – rainforest produces lots of acidity that ends up on the reef- they say acidity is bad for the reef b] rainforest produces lots of CO2 + Methane. They demonize those. 4] sugarcane collects 2000% more CO2 than eucalyptus forest. Sugar and molasses is converted CO2 into food – eucalyptus forest goes in smog. Hello Marine Biologists!!!

Reporting both sides of the story – those marine biologists / ecologists wouldn’t be able to use the media as their roll of toilet paper = the media to do their dirty job. Therefore one day soon, when the truth is exposed; the shonky experts can justifiably blame the media i.e. if the truth was not silenced by the media – they wouldn’t be going that far with destruction and misleading. Only real, honest, not bias science, can prevent the destruction of the reef, climate and the environment. The ingredients at the moment are opposite… bias media + shonky science in sick ideology = catastrophes guarantied. Environmentalist’s  predictions of catastrophes is same as arsonist predicting when your house will be on fire.. no need much brains/skill for that. (now temporarily, because of sudden movement of tectonic activity, lots of hot vents  on the rim of fire has opened and the seawater is warmer/extra rain – will not last.  New dams must be built, the benefits of extra dams are tremendous

1] Blaming the innocent farmers for coral bleaching is a crime. Marine biologists saying in Cairns Post that: extra monsoonal rain protects the coral by cooling it… even their own records say opposite. Remember the bleaching in 98+99 cyclones? Only important for them is to sneak into the text: Global Warming + Climate Change. It only shows that they don’t have any respect for the people in the media. Why? If people in the media had any respect for themselves – they would have printed both sides of the story = will get instant respect from the shonky experts – will get respect from the honest Australians. After couple of months would get respect from their fanatic followers also. Those fanatic followers are fanatic for being constantly brainwashed. Imagine when they find out that: even after the media was presented with the truth, they increased the brainwashing, instead of presenting the truth. Most of those fanatics believe that is the truth what comes from the media; otherwise they wouldn’t be fanatics. When those Green fanatics find out from other sources that they have being duped, denied the truth by the media + they have being used for destruction  by the Organized Crime; they will get very, unhappy. Higher temperature doesn’t bother the coral. That is only trick by them to promote the phony global warming, by exploiting the ignorant + the bias media + to avoid fixing the real problems and the real threats to the reef.

It’s in Marine Park Authority’s  interest the reef to suffer = bigger funds, more cash and power for them = conflict of interests. Those Green fanatics have being brainwashed to think that they are doing positive. Therefore, the Desperadoes in the media, which persist to con the people that: producing less CO2 will stop the climate from changing, that are silencing the truth are: the biggest threat to the reef and the climate. No both sides of the story = no democracy. Josef Göebbels lasted from 1933- 45 = 12 years. From Kyoto Conference is 13 years. You are on the losing side boys, think now. It’s the best advice you will ever get. Repeating constantly same lies, doesn’t change the truth, only the damages grow.

Bleach + products with bleach in it + chlorine + soap and detergents made with caustic soda + formaldehyde + most important  too much oxygenated stormwater from the hills are bleaching the coral.  Carbon, calcium are essential for the coral, they are made of it. Nitrogen is essential for the algae that are covering the coral + for the seagrass /algae that feed the herbivore in the sea. No herbivore = no carnivore fish, no whales. Hello Organized Crime…   ‘’the marine experts Charlie Vernon, Will Stephen, see in their crystal balls that by 2050, most coral will be dead. Similar Marine Buccaneers  told us in 97 that: in 2030 all coral on Barrier Reef will be dead because of extra CO2. By now  at least 33% should be already dead. At that time, the increase of CO2 was grossly underestimated = by now 50% of the coral should be dead. Com-on Swindlers!..

Now because you know that the sea is not getting acidic; I will tell you the ‘’hypothetical’’   If the seawater gets lower to pH7,3  lots of plankton, algae, viruses and bacteria will multiply, they can be detrimental for many sea fish. Alkalinity is sterilizing / fumigating those harmful bacteria / viruses. Patches of the sea that receive lots of acidity from the rainforest, become not very hospitable for many varieties of fish. You will say: well, river water is acidic – prolific with fish! You will be correct. Acidity / alkalinity kills the unwanted. Neutral pH is  not a good news. Observe stagnant rainwater, as pH neutral. I didn’t put before this on the website, because the Warmist will plagiarize what suits them – to keep fear-mongering – they always are cherry-picking. Now you can point to them: if they start to scare with the seawater getting neutral = bacteria / viruses; you point to everybody that: the seawater is getting too alkaline! Google doesn’t like people to plagiarise; if they use it; must point where it came from, so if anything missing – people can get it here. Because most of the time half truth is more harmful than a lie.

So, acidic in the river, alkaline water in the sea are doing something as: using hot curry in your food in the sub-tropics. It’s burny, burny; but without it > green slime gets on your food if no fridge and makes you sick. (this time ”green slime” I wasn’t referring  as  ”the Environmentalist) But,  too acidic or too alkaline is for preserving; therefore: to avoid the seawater of getting too alkaline and melt the coral and blind the fish – needs regular aiding acidic things To soften the pH!!! People lying that the seawater is getting acidic – they don’t know what they are talking about; but are talking, because they target the Urban Sheep / ignorant 

Fact: all the alkaline elements are water soluble. As calcium, magnesium, potassium, ash get washes from the land into the sea = increasing alkalinity.

Fact: derbies from vegetation, especially from rainforest releases acidity, that is washed into the sea by the floods

Fact: with increasing in population / better living standards – lots of industrial oils, olive oil, chicken, beef pork, lamb fats ends up into the sea – spreads on the surface of the water as invisable film > depraves the water of replanishing with oxygen, by splashing.

Fact: those oils and fats decrease evaporation – less evaporation = less rain > Swindlers blame CO2 for droughts. By blaming CO2 – they are committing double crime – because bad affects can be minimized; if the truth was known. I have being silenced by the Warmist and some ”pretend Skeptics” as ”TALLBKLOKE’ Only people that are scared from the truth, are using any trick, to silence the truth. Silencing the truth is a premeditated crime!!!

I had few extensive comments on Tall-bloke’s blog; he was seating on it / constipating for 10 days. Then when he and Vukcevic realised that I have the real proofs – they have being portraying the planet as having hi-fever, with GLOBAL temperature up and down as electrocuted; they wiped of my comments; TO HIDE THE DIFFERENCE between my proofs and their misleading crap. They are not after the truth, they are covering up the truth, same as the characters in East Anglia – with them, populism has the first and last priority; the hell with the truth. He admitted: that I’m correct that all those phony GLOBAL warmings in the past were localized. 2] We know that: if the sceptical people know that they have being put by prof. Plimer on thin ice; for them to stop  beating themselves in the chest with former phony GLOBAL warmings can’t prove that is no global warming in 100years…. would have a chance to get on the front foot and start being respected by IPCC; instead of doing the dirty job for IPCC…

THE TRUTH WILL WIN. UNTIL THEN, LOTS OF EXTRA DAMAGES WILL BE DONE UNNECESSARY, because of self-centred egotist, the ”Pretend Skeptics”  Stilling lies from East Anglia university will not bring the truth. Anybody silencing me is silencing the truth.

Share this:

From the Resistance / Stefan

THE BIG ICE AGE CONFUSED EVEN HONEST CLIMATOLOGIST AS PROF.  PLIMER

© For the last 2-3 N/H winters was experienced extreme coldness. For everything that happens, there is always real reason. Reasons this time are created by human and can be prevented. Unfortunately, the climatologist are back to front on everything – needs extensive explanations; I will insert what was exactly the last big Ice Age.

A nuclear ice crusher Russian ship is taking tourist to North Poll every second week. Because the whole mass of ice moves clockwise = after 2 weeks, they can’t use same corridor. Therefore they slice another… and another… Those slices float south and melt = much less ice left. Plus, when sliced, ruff water brakes much, much more. But that is good for the Warmist. They know that: ice is white – reflects the sunlight – minus white ice, hopefully a small GLOBAL warming; to get them out of trouble…?!

What they don’t know is: water has mirror affect reflection also. 2] for 6 months in a year, there is no sunlight to reflect. 3] white ice is full of air, makes the ice perfect insulator. 4] minus ice; during winter, the water absorbs much more coldness. 5] with that extra absorbed coldness + the normal winter coldness in the air; with double strength radiates south and intercepts the moisture = drops double amount of snow in Europe / USA = no moisture left for replenishing the ice on Arctic Ocean. 6] that ice seats on salty seawater with strong currents and constantly melts from below – needs replenishing every winter.

That was giving the big surprises to the shonky experts for the last 3 northern winters. The morons were expecting warmer, because of less ice – instead everything is opposite than their theology /predictions. It means: the chain reaction was already triggered by those ice crusher ships; to take the shonky climatologist / bias media and other spectators further north. Less ice means colder northern winter. Because is colder there – the air shrink extra – to avoid vacuum – from the southern hemisphere lots of air goes north = on the southern hemisphere simultaneously record hot days. The laws of physics were same 15000y ago as last year

In my book I have extensive work how and why the Big Ice Age started, how and why it finished. Because is not many books; plus distribution is lousy; I have to insert some explanations here; so you people can get the clear picture: real reasons for everything that happens in nature, always controlled by the laws of physics. Planet’s atmosphere had same warmth units as today – distribution was different; wasn’t colder planet.

Before the Big Ice Age, Gibraltar Straight didn’t exist. Mediterranean sea didn’t have physical contact with Atlantic. When I say Mediterranean, Aegean, Adriatic, Black sea. The water in those ‘’inland Lakes’’ was fresh enough to drink. Sahara Savannahs had high rainfall to keep Mediterranean full. Then the precursor of all evil was invented, artificial fire for cooking / warming in cold nights. Before that, human was mostly vegetarian + eating crustacean… Fire, roasting /adopting meat to vegetarian stomach made population explosion. As vegetarians, in winter month human was culled by nature. Meat on animals become as food in the fridge – available regularly. The mongrels around the Mediterranean system had brains to make fires, but not to control it. On rainy days was not easy to start fire by rubbing two sticks, but if you make bushfire, logs are smouldering for a week = ready fire for in the morning + all night for warming up. 1] They didn’t strip the vegetation in Sahara with axes, but by burning. Sahara without vegetation stopped getting the rain = Mediterranean, Ionian, Aegean, Adriatic dry. Simultaneously Caspian, Aral sea, Black and Dead sea become dry – because they are all same weather system. (We are talking about the last big Ice Age 24000-12000 )

2] those waters were supplying before moisture for the river Rheine + for the Russian river’s catchments areas that are draining into the Arctic. Freshwater was spreading on the top of the heavier salty water and was protecting the ice from the salty water. Less that freshwater = ice increased melting on Arctic Ocean. (please note: river Rheine was draining in same place as today, but because the English Chanel didn’t exist – the freshwater from Rheine was spreading in Arctic via North Sea) = was for better protection for the ice.

3] because of the planet spinning eastward, the newly developed dry heat in Sahara was going over the north Atlantic and was destroying the humidity that was suppose to be for renewal of Arctic’s ice, every winter. Less raw material for ice = less ice = was helping the salty water to melt the ice completely in the Arctic ocean. Without ice, Arctic’s water was exposed without insulation/shield in winter. Arctic Ocean started absorbing much more coldness. That coldness was radiating south – intercepting whatever moisture was created in Atlantic and was depositing it as ice in northern Europe and USA. = was no moist air left to go to Arctic Ocean (similar affect as the last 3 winters). 4] From Mexican gulf was no Gulf Stream to the Mediterranean and Baltic sea, that was making high evaporation into the gulf waters = very moist air was going north – was getting intercepted by extra coldness from Arctic = 1km thick ice in northern USA. B] Whatever water was left into Mediterranean, Black sea,  Caspian, Aegean, Adriatic – was freeze-dried and packed north, to create 100m tick ice in northern Europe; on the expense of Arctic, no ice.

WATER IN ARCTIC OCEAN WITHOUT ICE AS SHIELD / INSULATION,   WAS  EXPOSED TO MINUS -70⁰C to – 80⁰C  OF WINTER COLDNESS That extra cold-water was going south as on a conveyor belt. What I mean by that is: if the water didn’t have to go south to the Mexican gulf; would have being as stationary conveyor belt. The Arctic water would have absorbed as much as possible coldness, because of no ice as insulator, and stops absorbing. As on stationary conveyor belt you can put 5 tons of dirt, max. But when conveyor belt is moving – you can shift 10000 times more dirt = coldness /by the currents. Currents now are much stronger from Arctic to Mexican gulf; because of the Gulf Stream. At that time wasn’t a gulf stream; because Gibraltar and English Chanel didn’t exist = now is worse scenario getting prepared by the shonky climatologist and bias media.

About 15 000y ago, in the pick of the Ice Age; Mediterranean, Ionian, sea of Marmara, Aegean, Adriatic, Black sea, Caspian, Aral sea were all puddles of water, as is now Dead Sea. All their water was into the oceans. (when the climatologists state that: during the Ice Age, the sealevel was much lower – they don’t take in calculation how much that water was rising the oceans’ level; so they lie how much Antarctic’s ice ‘’if’’ melt will rise the sealevel. Even though those inland seas were empty and they today contain much more water than Antarctic’s ice) 2] because extra coldwater from the Arctic Ocean as on conveyer belt was going south into North Atlantic and North Pacific for millennias (from 26 000BC to 16 000BC – the water in the oceans expended. Seawater expands when gets colder, not warmer. All the water in every sea and ocean combined; about 20% is above 5⁰C, about 80% is at 4⁰C and below. If you fill up a bottle of seawater at 4⁰C, then put it in the freezer. After cooling by couple of degrees, the bottle will explode. Because when seawater gets colder = expands; when gets warmer = water level goes down. Yes, some was locked into the ice, but because of combination of seawater expending when get colder + plus 90% of the water from abovementioned inland seas was in the ocean = water from Atlantic started overflowing into the Mediterranean lake, between Spain and Morocco. Not one of the shonky theoretician has taken the most important factors in consideration. Prof. Plimer got his references from 1000 of them.

From about 15 000years ago, as creek, then river of saltwater started from Atlantic into the Mediterranean swamp. A] because of high evaporation in the Mediterranean. B] because as Atlantic was losing water to Mediterranean = ocean level was getting gradually lower = it took few millennias to level the water in Atlantic and Mediterranean, and created Gibraltar Straight. 2] as Mediterranean /Adriatic was getting filled up = they started producing snow for the Alps = Rheine River started draining lots of water and flooding / turning Holland into a lake, for a short time. Was building lots of freshwater there, because Baltic / North Sea are shallow = the ice was to the bottom. That made the water to build up in Holland and with the help of water from river Seine – all that water went west and dug the English Chanel. (Before the ice age, all that freshwater was going north into the Arctic – spreading on the top of the salty seawater and was protecting the ice from melting. (Now that benefit is gone forever = now is much more sensitive for the ice in Arctic)

5] For dozen millennias during the Ice Age, the air above Parallel of Cancer to North Poll was much colder = shrunk – it was laws of physics. To avoid creation of vacuum on the northern hemisphere – lots of air from the southern hemisphere was gone north = was less air on the southern hemisphere. Similar as during the last 3 years in December /January, only then was on much larger scale. Wasn’t only 6 weeks in the year, but 50 weeks in the year. With less air as insulator – southern hemisphere had colder nights and much, much, much  hotter days = that destroyed vegetation in Australia and Brazil. In Brazil vegetation recuperated after the ice age, in Australia has being going from bad to worse = gradually dryer and dryer…

Southern hemisphere was hotter; wasn’t a carbon copy temperature as in the northern hemisphere, during the Big Ice Age. The laws of physics don’t permit that!  2] Human can change the climate – human made the Big Ice Age by uncontrollable fires in Sahara; produced the big ice age by rubbing two sticks. Now we have the nuclear ice crusher ships and the organized Crime /Antarctic Division of CSIRO Swindlers+bias media. 3] We calling ourselves Europeans destroyed the Australian vegetation 12 000 – 24 000y ago, indirectly. By making Sahara, Arabian peninsula desert. 4] the water level in the oceans was higher during the Ice Age, not lower. 5]  Water reflection of sunlight is same as from white snow. 6] that is /was 6 months of darkness, very, very cold darkness on the Polar Caps. When is no sunlight to reflect, but lots of coldness to absorb without ice as shield / insulation 7] seawater expends when gets colder, not warmer. 8] the adding of extra water in the oceans; for not having water in the Mediterranean, not considered. Why?!

Because those 6 different inland seas from Gibraltar to Caspian didn’t have water; where was all that water gone? If they did take into account the real factors = they wouldn’t be demolishing the Arctic ice now, by Ice Crusher sips; in hope to produce global warming, without white ice for reflecting the sunlight; wrong! Same vandalizing of the ice around Antarctic! Sea-currents constantly bring warmwater to the polar caps; ice as perfect insulator is protecting it from the tremendous coldness in the air. No ice=water gets extra coldness!

Nevertheless, now carbon copy of the last big Ice Age is not possible, because Gibraltar Straight, Bosforous, English Chanel are open for business. But because are open for business, different /midi Ice Age is starting now. Which means: because of the Gulf Stream; Arctic Ocean will absorb much more coldness, and will distribute it south much quicker . During the last one, it wasn’t much currents going from Arctic, the water there had limited capacity to collect extra coldness without ice for shield. Now extra currents as on conveyer belt are taking that extra coldness and is more efficiently distributing it south = to make space for more coldness Arctic’s water to collect. Plus at that time was no idiots in CSIRO /ABC and other Swindlers demolishing the ice in Antarctic ocean. Now, the New Ice Age will be colder from Lion in France to the North Poll. Colder from Melbourne to Antarctic. But between Lion and Melbourne will be much hotter and more extreme = the worse scenario. Between the parallels of Capricorn and Cancer will get hotter days than ever, to counteract with minimum air left as shield. Sealevel will gradually rise, because water will be colder – colder seawater expends, not warmer + colder water = less rain = less water on the land and in the air…

Different ice ages happened in the past, for different reasons /on different places; but same laws of physics. ‘’Milankovich’ wobbling of the planet’’ = north poll moves to land / southern poll moves into ocean – water can absorb and distribute more coldness than land. 2] movement of tectonic plates, which poll is on land or on water; or both polls end up on water. Those factors change climate / create different ice ages. But the whole planet’s atmosphere, always has same warmth units! That’s what the ‘’laws of physics’’ say. In the last 2-3 northern winters – north of Cancer was colder – from southern hemisphere lots of air was gone north, to avoid vacuum = Victoria, Adelaide, WA simultaneously was much hotter. Please note: Europe / USA can get colder by 8⁰C = Oceania will get warmer by 0,8⁰C, because Oceania is much larger area.

This contemporary disturbance of tectonic plates on the bottom of the oceans /La Nina will not last; to counteract the cooling of the ocean’s waters on the polar caps with less ice. Demolishing the ice in the polar waters will have chain reaction affect. Plus more dry heat produced inland Australia – to destroy the humidity made in the Indian ocean during summer, for replenishing the ice in winter around Antarctic, will come back with revenge. Whatever I am saying, all can be proven now, easy  in honest computer model.

If you follow and trust /respect the laws of physics – it’s as traveling in time; as if you were there then. Unless you believe that different laws of physics controlled then; as our shonky climatologists think. Wrong! Theoretically northern and southern hemisphere can get warmer or colder simultaneously, but only for few minutes. You see, they are damaging the ice in the Arctic and around Antarctic. Less or no ice, water absorbs extra coldness and currents are taking that water to lower latitudes. Colder water – cools the air. Are you fallowing me? Colder water from around Antarctic comes towards Australia = Great Australian Byte gets colder water = colder air. (Hopefully will not reach to the Barrier Reefs) Unfortunately, hope doesn’t stop the tides. Another tide takes colder water towards southern part of Africa /Argentina. Same situation with extra colder water from the Arctic goes south. Obviously all that cools the air = colder atmosphere…? No!

In split second as soon as the air get colder – air shrink = volume of the atmosphere smaller. That’s what the laws of physics say. I will never argue against those laws, would you? As I said in my book: those laws of physics are my Lord’s 10 Commandments. You can brake the 10 Commandments in your bible, but not the laws of physics. They have being issued to do a job. The air shrink; same as when you are camping in a cold night – gets cold = you get in fetus position – to minimize body surface. Planet’s atmosphere when gets colder does the same, only is much more efficient than you. You can minimize body surface by 2-5% max. Planet’s atmosphere if it get much colder, can shrink by half. Or if it gets hotter – can double in size. Atmosphere is surrounded with empty space with temperature of minus -90⁰C. (That’s much colder than where you are camping). Because the more the air gets colder = the more it shrinks = the less coldness intercepts… if you believe that the air was shrinking during the ice ages, because of extra coldness = was releasing less heat = ice age is not possible to be colder on the WHOLE  planet’s atmosphere; or warmer.

Or, when part of the atmosphere gets warmer = expends = intercepts extra coldness and is dropping it somewhere else, to make colder,  as balance. I.e. one place gets warmer = another simultaneously must get colder. Or, if the whole atmosphere get warmer, instantly expands – intercepts extra appropriate coldness to equalize in about 3,5 seconds – falls down and equalizes in a jiffy – atmosphere back to normal volume. Hypothetical: after collecting appropriate coldness to equalize, if the atmosphere didn’t shrink to previous volume for one whole day; would have intercepted and redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers. Fortunately, the shonky climatologist and extreme lefty politicians didn’t succeed to abolish the laws of physics. It proves that: in the past, ice ages were on part of the planet – the other part was always warmer. It proves that: GLOBAL warming is not possible. Or ice age on the whole planet, is impossible!

Step 2: the same warmth units the planet’s atmosphere had yesterday – will have tomorrow also. Today, for 24 hours the sunlight will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but all will be wasted. They talk that from one day’s energy from the sun, we can have electricity for 1000years and more, all that heat will be lost today, same day. You will not have enough left from that heat, to boil one chicken egg. Same goes with all the heat the sun drops for the whole year – all gone. Extra heat in the planet’s atmosphere is not accumulative. The Big Ice Age didn’t lasted for one day, but 12000 years = proof that the southern hemisphere was hotter, not colder, to prevent vacuum in the atmosphere! Therefore: human cannot produce GLOBAL warming or GLOBAL cooling. Because the capacity and power of oxygen and nitrogen expending and shrinking into that empty /cold space; is beyond the imagination of the shonky climatologist.

Human can change the climate, for better and for worse. Maybe the good Lord wanted human to produce the Big Ice Age – water in the Atlantic to expand and cut into the Mediterranean sea. Now Aral sea is getting dry, needs something to be done again. Aral sea can take as much water as is trapped in Antarctic ice. It’s not going to be done by the Warmist, they are for money for nothing. Human can improve the climate; definitely not by carbon rip-of. Prof Ian Plimer is not a Climate Change Denier. He proofs himself that climate has changed many times on every place on the planet. But because of his education, he cannot, or doesn’t want to comprehend that: 1] H20 changes climate = human can change the climate, but cannot produce global warming. 2] Their global warmings in the past were localized warmings /coolings, not the whole planet’s atmosphere. 3] warming of the whole planet’s atmosphere is not on, Ian. As soon as you realize that, they should apologize for calling you a climate change Denier. Because you never denied that climate doesn’t change. Only when you understand that human can change the climate – can produce localized warming, but not global warming – that can pull the carpet from under the Swindler’s feet. Alarmist are playing with words, because they have nothing better to show. They cannot have one solid proof; because is no global warming – that’s why the Warmist turned into practical Climate Changers; by denying water to the land and sufficient water to the atmosphere!!! Extra water in the atmosphere can only happen with extra water on the land, to evaporate. Opposite than Brown’s & Tim Flannery’s  demand.

Demolishing the ice on waters on the polar caps with ice crusher ships; ice is brittle – ruff water demolishes the rest; just to bring shonky researchers, bias media. That will make northern Europe much colder winters – southern much hotter summer. Similar affect in the 2 Americas. Biggest crime of the new millennia.

      BY RUBBING TWO STICKS, HUMAN CREATED THE BIG ICE AGE

Now human has Nuclear Powered Ice Crusher Ships, thousands of Warmist Swindlers, the politically bias  media and billions of taxpayer’s dollars. Human can change the climate for better also. If is done everything opposite than what the Snake Oil Merchants  demand for preventing their Phony Global Warming.

Fact 1: white ice is full of static air = perfect insulator for the water, during the polar winters

Fact 2: ice must be replenished on the water every winter on the polar caps, less raw material = less ice

Fact 3: surface of the water has mirror affect for sunlight reflection, similar as white ice.

Fact 4: for 6 months every year, there is no sunlight to reflect, but need insulator to protect the water from the unlimited coldness in Arctic Ocean, and in the waters around Antarctic ocean.

Fact 5: waters in the Arctic absorbs much more coldness in winter, without ice as insulator.

Fact 6: salty ocean water melts the ice from below, if no enough raw material to get regularly replenished…

Fact 7: coldness from the air + the extra coldness accumulated in the water without ice as shield / insulator, radiates south – intercepts the moisture in Europe and USA = no moisture / raw material left for replenishing the ice on Arctic Ocean = chain reaction = accumulative negative affect has already started.

Fact 8: tremendous amount of warmwater in the Mediterranean system comes from Mexican Gulf by the currents; because of very high evaporation, but not many tributaries to replenish the water deficit.

Fact 9: when Gibraltar Straight didn’t exist to let water in, from the Atlantic = all those inland seas lost their water in less than a 1000 years. Because, smarty pants human in Sahara /Arabian peninsula was making fires

Fact 10: not having water in the inland system, dry swamps as they became, were producing dry heat instead of extra humidity to help north Atlantic; by not producing extra row material for renewing the Arctic’s ice.

Fact 11: because the oceans have more water that is below 4⁰C, than above, when the seawater gets colder – the water level goes up. Climatologist are not just wrong on everything, but back to front also.

Fact 12: because was no water in the Mediterranean system from Aral to Gibraltar = that water was in the ice and in the oceans. Combination of those two factors made the oceans to rise a lot and overflow into the Mediterranean, where Gibraltar is now.

Fact 13: when air get colder for any reason, it shrinks. Power of preventing vacuum, pulls air from other places; those other places with less air = the sun penetrates more + less air to expend higher and intercept extra coldness  = much hotter days, even though is official Big Ice Age somewhere else.

Fact 14: not taking all those factors and much more; made the shonky experts to believe that whole planet’s temperature goes up and down as a yo-yo. Unless they take on board what is in my book, from now will be regarded as premeditated catastrophic  damages.

Yes, the earth is on the brink of ecologic collapse, but not because of carbon and methane. If the shonky climatologist can understand why is 1km thick ice on Greenland, but on the same latitude in Norway / Finland is grass, trees and potatoes growing; on same latitude in Russia is permafrost – will be able to understand how and why the big Ice Age was created, why it has finished.  Greenland + Norway + permafrost in Russia are same angle to the sun, same distance / influence from north poll and other stars’, same CO2 level, but completely different climate.  Under your shonky science – should be same climate. Permafrost is desert in a cold country. Why is not same climate in Uluru, Simpson desert as in Amazon jungle, Burma? Same latitude, same angle to the sun, same CO2 level, but completely different climate. H2O, boys, not CO2! There is more CO2 in Amazon jungle than in the desert. In Amazon jungle, the winds bring same amount of CO2 as in Simpson desert + the fungi rotting the vegetation release lots of CO2 in the jungle; is it better climate in the desert with less CO2 / H20?  If they were interested in climate; forget about CO2! Start saving extra stormwater in new dams = more humidity / less dry heat = more ice on the polar caps. Unnecessary demolishing of the ice on Arctic and around Antarctic is the second biggest crime in progress.     

Share this:

    THE REAL SKEPTIC’s PROBLEMS

Skeptic is NOT a Skeptic, if he / she believes 101% in the phony GLOBAL warmings – he is a FAKE! Section of his brains for logic and common sense is in induced coma.

1] not knowing that climatic changes has nothing to do with the phony GLOBAL warming. 2] falling for the trick that; past big climatic changes were GLOBAL warmings. Wrong! 3] by the laws of physics, Ice Age / warming of the WHOLE planet is impossible. 4] most of the active Skeptics being big city slickers; cannot comprehend that water improves; or lack of it on the land and in the atmosphere deteriorates the climate, nothing, nothing to do with CO2. 5] Refusing to acknowledge that oxygen + nitrogen; that are 998999 ppm are regulating the temperature in the atmosphere, to be same every hour of every month, year and every millennia. Warmist are exploiting Skeptic’s ignorance and wining, so-far. Nothing to be proud of, Skeptics. Warmist are wining, with your ignorant support; by putting the real climatic changes with the phony GLOBAL warming in the same basket = same as the Warmist.

Stefan‘s formula: EC > AS > LHR
References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA (the big one) they were ALL localised. For the duration of the Big Ice Age in Europe / USA (N/H), on the southern hemisphere was much, warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were then, as today!!! If the whole troposphere was colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalises in a jiffy. Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it + all the geothermal heat released into the air, precisely, all of it. But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder for some reason – troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 5 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / save / accumulate in 5 minutes?! Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes! My formula is the best proof: EC > AS > LHR (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > Less Heat Releases) Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in foetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimise / maximise of 5% of extra surface area; troposphere can shrink / double in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!! Q: how fast can oxygen and nitrogen expand when warmed up? A: by expanding, they are pushing the bullet velocity from the barrel of the gun.

The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER by as much, to equalise! Because in that case, on the hemisphere that gets colder – the air shrinks / volume decreases – but the EXTRA volume of air from the opposite hemisphere because of extra warming, is compensating in volume; for shrinking on the colder half – or in that case was 30- 40% of the planet’s area colder. The shonky scientists in the last 150 years were COMPLETELY disregarding the laws of physics!!!… As a bi-product, we had Nuclear Winter for year 2000 / lots of PHONY GLOBAL warmings in the past (from the ”pretend Skeptics) and in 100 years a PHONY GLOBAL warming, by the Organised Crime. Yes in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now with CO2 / Methane conspiracy /con, they are robbing nations / countries… They are robbing the poor, the pensioner, the low paid; because carbon tax is a flat-rate tax. On every product in the shop, the pensioner pays same carbon-tax as the millionaire. The loot money disappears in the jet-setters pockets + for unnecessary phony GLOBAL warmings ‘’researchers. The ‘’spoils’’ are not evenly divided; the biggest liars get the most. The ‘’Believers’’ of the lower genera and IQ, as usual, get the middle finger; same as the D/H from the sceptical genera

2] Here is some reality for the both camps::: oxygen + nitrogen expand and shrink instantly, in change of temperature. As in ‘’big city heat’’ growing cities for the last 100years. The air from 500km3 expands by 10%. The extra 50km3 volume goes up and increases the volume of the troposphere. Those extra 50km3 intercepts extra coldness in 3,5 seconds – that extra coldness falls down in minutes; but because of upper winds and fast spinning of the planet, it falls somewhere else – overall, the warmth in the atmosphere doesn’t change. Oxygen and nitrogen don’t wait for 100 y to get warmer by 2-3⁰C, then to start expanding. Expansion is INSTANT, as soon as small part get warmer by only 0,0001⁰C. Therefore, as long as one believes in the laws of physics – is stupid to believe in any GLOBAL warming! Same laws of physics will be in 100 years, as they are today. Shock for the Skeptics: same laws of physics were in 98, same laws were 5BC, 1200AD, same laws of physics were 6 000 y ago, when you were told lie that was warmer; and 15 000 y ago (during the big ice age)and 1230AD!

For the last 150y, the sun has produced tremendous amount of heat on the planet. It’s all gone. Today is exactly the same warmth as it was before 151 years ago. Extra heat in the atmosphere is not accumulative; because of expanding and shrinking of O+N in change of temperature. Not enough extra heat accumulated for the last 150years in the atmosphere, to boil one chicken egg. B] when is solar eclipse – lots of sunlight is reflected by the moon, or Mercury, or Venus, not to come to the earth, but that doesn’t lower the temperature even for one milli-degree, not even for that same day. Because of instant shrinking of the air when gets colder = releases less heat for the duration. Both camps act as if they have abolished the laws of physics!… Skeptics, if you want to win, don’t blame the Warmist for anything, until you scrutinize the following 3 paragraphs:

Q: do you know that: close to the ground, is warmer by 105⁰C, than where O+N expand when warmed extra, UP into the stratosphere? (on the ground +14⁰C, on the edge of the troposphere is   -90⁰C) that is 105⁰C difference! Same as if your body warms up from 37⁰C to 38⁰C, but instantly you spread and dip your arm into ice of minus -67⁰C. The blood from your arm will bring extra coldness to the other parts of the body and make them much cooler. When O+N expand extra up into the stratosphere – they cool extra – shrink extra and bring that extra coldness down in a jiffy, not in 100years.

Q 1: when you warm up oxygen + nitrogen by 6⁰C, why do they expand much more, than when you warm them by only 2⁰C, or even less on 0,5⁰C? A: because they need to increase the volume of the atmosphere more, to intercept extra coldness, to equalize. Q 2: when you warm O+N for 20minutes, why they don’t shrink after 10 minutes? A: because they need to keep intercepting extra coldness and redirecting it down, as long as the troposphere is warmer, to keep the temperature overall in the atmosphere to be same. Q3: after 20 minutes if O+N cool to previous temperature; why they don’t stay expanded for another hour? A: if they did, they would have redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers and lakes in a day. Q 4: can extra CO2 prevent oxygen and nitrogen of expanding? A: those two gases expand trough hi-tensile walls of a hand-grenade, when warmed. Q 5: why O+N shrink when cooled, instead? A: to minimize exposure (shrinking the atmosphere) to intercept less coldness, until they get to previous temperature. It takes minutes only. That proves that ice age on both hemispheres simultaneously is impossible! Q 6: do those two gases expand when warmed / shrink when cooled, because they have nothing better to do, or they are regulating the heat in the atmosphere to be always the same?! Q 7: for the last 3 Januaries, when was record coldness in Europe /USA, why on the same dates was record heat in Australia? A:To balance. Same as children’s see-saw plank in the park. The more one side goes up = the more the other side goes down. Both sides don’t go up or down simultaneously. The Laws of physics don’t work ‘’only sometime’’!

 Formula: EH >AE >ECI    ( Extra Heat > Atmosphere Expands > Extra Coldness Intercepts) Laws of physics, chemistry, arithmetic are the most reliable sciences. Rely on the reliable, not on the shonky scientists. What the laws of physics don’t approve = it must be wrong!!! Unless the laws of physics are abolished by legislation in the parliament and in the UN. If we don’t need the laws of physics, abolish them by referendum. Enough people have being already brainwashed by ABC & SBS Pty Ltd, and by the British BBC. Confusing the constant / normal climatic changes with the phony GLOBAL warming created plenty nutters in both  camps. Referendum would be successful. Warmist blame CO2 every time when is an cyclone, earthquake, hurricane. But on that same day on million other places, is beautiful weather – they don’t say thanks to the CO2 for a beautiful weather. Million to one is not bad, isn’t it? The other 350 days have same CO2, but good weather; thanks CO2…! hippocricy!

Help me to present the truth to the world. Repeating prof. Gerard Diamond’s crap, adopted as factual by prof. Plimer, is self destructive. Those phony proofs that prof. Plimer collected from around the planet are outdated deceiving jokes. Remains me of a starving man trying to shit, I.e. lots of hot air but nothing solid. His proofs are not proofs. All his references came from shonky science. Atmospheric temperature doesn’t go up and down as a yo-yo. Only heat and coldness CHANGE locations. That’s not GLOBAL warming, or GLOBAL cooling. Climatologist’s profession is based on lies. It’s one thing to brainwash their students = cloning more deviates of themselves; it’s another matter when they con the ignorant people / politicians = that’s a crime against humanity. The semi honest leading Skeptics are assisting them. Because by false pretence, it’s their double crime.

Another Stefanthedenier ‘s formula:
References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA (the big one) were ALL localised. For the duration of the Big Ice Age in Europe / USA (N/H) on the southern hemisphere was much, warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were than as today!!! If the whole troposphere was colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalises in a jiffy. Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it. But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder for some reason – troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 5 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / accumulate in 5 minutes?! Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes! my formula is the best proof: EC > AS > LHR (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > Less Heat Releases) Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in foetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimise / maximise 5% of extra surface area; troposphere can double in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!!

The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER by as much, to equalise! Because in that case, on the hemisphere that gets colder – the air shrinks / volume decreases – but the EXTRA volume of air from the opposite hemisphere because of extra warming, is compensating for shrinking on the colder half – or in that case was 30- 40% of the planet colder. The shonky scientists in the last 150 years were COMPLETELY disregarding the laws of physics!!!… As a bi-product, we had Nuclear Winter for year 2000 / lots of PHONY GLOBAL warmings in the past (from the ”pretend Skeptics) and in 100years a PHONY GLOBAL warming, by the Organised Crime. Yes in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now with CO2 / Methane conspiracy /con, they are robbing nations / countries…

3] when Warmist comes up with some stupid proof; the active Skeptics get in overdrive ridiculing, being sarcastic. Q: if the Warmist are so stupid, how come they rip-off billions of $$$ from the Urban Sheep, calling themselves Skeptics. (reason they are referred in Australia as: ‘’prof. Plimer’s Galahs’’) They are the people that are prepared to stand up for the truth - unfortunately, Ian is got monopoly on their brains. I call them; prof; Plimer’s D/H.

Warmist cannot have one single legitimate proof, because there is no such a thing as GLOBAL warming. They know that, reason they changed the term from GLOBAL warming, to ‘’Climate Change’’. (as a fig leaf, to cover up their shame for lying about GLOBAL warming). Unless the Skeptics realize that, they will never win. If they do open their eyes / closed parashoot brains, they will win instantly = Warmist ‘’fig leaf’’ removed. A] People should debate; how to improve the climate, not how to stop it from changing. B] climate never stopped changing for one day in the last 65 million years. Climate can change for better, not just for worse. Q: do you like climate in which properties, animals, trees and people get burned in bushfires? CO2 is not creating bushfires, CO2 is fire retardant molecule. Dry heat created inland, is vacuuming the moisture from the topsoil and vegetation close to the coast for 11months in the year, is preparing it for bushfires. Extra dams, stormwater saved on the land minimizes that dry heat. Who is against saving extra stormwater on the land?! Unfortunately, the Skeptic Smarties  cannot even see through the Warmist agenda.

It’s much less CO2 in the desert than in Sydney, Detroit, Kyoto. Where is better climate? Same sunspots influence Sahara and Brazil, why is different climate? Trees can tell you which climate is good or bad. Ask the children, they will tell you the truth; before they get brainwashed in school / on TV– by the biggest Organized Crime on the planet. Would the climate stopped changing 150y ago, if it wasn’t industrial revolution? It’s not the ‘’carbon smart’’ or  ‘’carbon  stupid’’ but  get all the proofs and facts on this website. We will see the end of the misleading propaganda, and start improving the climate. Say it loud and clear: What do we want?! Climate change!! When do we want it?! Now!! What do we want? Climate change for better!! They will stop calling you a ‘’climate change Denier’’  Be a phony GLOBAL warming Denier. If you deny that human can change the climate; my tiers will not help you much, you need a shrink! More H2O on land = better climate. Drain farmer’s water in the estuary = worse climate

Verdict: Skeptics shouldn’t  whinge, but to present the real proofs to the people; not to the top Warmist. The top Warmist know that is all lies; they are creating those lies. But to present the truth to their followers – because their followers will be the biggest losers. I have all those proofs; no need to wait 100years, to prove that will not be any GLOBAL warming. I have  the solid proofs, now!

When the Skeptics say: ‘’if Australia introduces carbon tax, will be miniscule /insignificant help to the climate’’ = is a gross stupidity!! Because science of ‘’very small affect’’  is same as Warmist ‘’big affect’’ = lie. Plus is dignifying the Warmist’ lies. It’s same as saying: man can get pregnant, but only little-bit. Warmist go for ‘’Climate Smart’’ Skeptics go for ‘’Climate Stupid’’  Q: If  Australia and the rest of the world go instantly to zero carbon emission; will that stop the climate from changing? NO! Because CO2 has nothing to do with the climate! 300-500y ago was less cars on the road, even less electricity was used; but climate was changing. Why don’t you ask the Warmist: if we go to cave age; will the climate stop changing? Q: will the tornadoes, earthquakes and cyclones disappear? Q: is this a perfect climate now; in which trees, animals and birds get mummified  without water and incinerated in big bushfires???! Or, you Sceptics will prove that is no GLOBAL warming in 2100, by telling crap about sunspots? Or with the phony GLOBAL warmings in the past? Get the prof. Plimer’s wool off your eyes first, so you will be able to see the reality first. Warmist, was it better climate 151 years ago than now?!

Yes, human can improve and deteriorate the climate. If you go from east coast to west coast of USA , or Australia, you will encounter 50 different climates. Same CO2 level, same sunspots, but different climates. BECAUSE CLIMATE IS CONTROLED BY WATER (H2O) , altitude and latitude, not CO2.  We cannot do anything about altitude / latitudes, but can do a lot about H2O on the land. Topsoil moisture, water storage and H2O in the atmosphere is the biggest factor; human can save extra stormwater and improve the climate; subhuman can reposes farmer’s water to drain it in the estuary. Big difference. Farmer’s water evaporates – helps the surrounding vegetation / attracts extra clouds from the sea (clouds avoid dry lan /air). Draining storm-water in the estuary on the driest continent is as if never rained. Dams attract extra clouds from the sea. Dams improve the climate. Green senator Brown made himself a name by preventing hydro-electric dam of being built. That dam would have produced more electricity, than all the solar panels on the planet.

Tragically, the Skeptics became bigger ‘’carbon molesters’’ than the Warmist. That distanced them from the reality. Few academics that are referred as ‘’Climate Change Deniers’’ should get a medal from Al Gore and Tim Flannery. Those ‘’Deniers’’ that human can change the climate are doing Al Gore’s dirty job. The truth: human cannot produce GLOBAL warming; but human can deteriorate / improve the climate. Unfortunately, those few ‘’Skeptic academics’’ have being learning from the same books as the Warmist about the ‘’previous phony GLOBAL warmings / GLOBAL coolings” they have being brainwashing their students and followers = now they cannot turn around and say: oops, they were localized warmings and ice ages, not GLOBAL; because THE LAWS OF PHYSICS will not permit GLOBAL. In other words, their egotism is more important than the health of the planet. F#*& the truth…

That’s why I am begging any person, sceptical or not; present all the proofs /facts and formulas that  are on this website to every leading Skeptic. If he /she tries to wiggle out = is real proof that they are as scared from the truth as the leading Warmist. Some of those leading Skeptics are profiteering from the Warmist propaganda (as Anthony Watts), others are protecting their ego and false reputation = that makes them bigger part of the crime (false pretence)

Warmist say: 90% possibility of GLOBAL warming. I have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that is and will be zero GLOBAL warming. B] The word ‘’sceptic’’ means 90% is not going to be GLOBAL warming, only 10% yes. In other words, Skeptic’s nickname is dignifying the Warmist. Because it suggests that: 10%  there is possibility of GLOBAL warming. Most probably the name ‘’Skeptic’’ was concocted by the Warmist. You read what is on this website, you will not be believer or Skeptic. You will know 100% that is no such a thing as a GLOBAL warming, but human can improve and deteriorate the climate. Only when the truth is known, appropriate solutions can be applied to improve the climate. We should start to debate how to improve the climate, not to stop the climate from changing, stupid. To improve the climate, must be done everything opposite than what the Warmist demand. Save extra stormwater on dry lands as Australia, Sahara, Pakistan.

All contemporary Skeptic’s proofs have being concocted by the Warmist. Even the Warmist are ashamed of telling them, but the Skeptics are using those stupid / unsubstantiated proofs as factual and weapons (water pistols) against the Warmist…  Those same phony proofs were used in the beginning of the Warmist march, by prof. Gerard Diamond. He had a problem to con the people that the whole planet’s atmosphere can get warmer and colder. His phony proofs after were used by the few Skeptic academics to brainwash the sceptical people… To do Al Gore’s dirty job. Plus to let know the Warmist; how ignorant the Skeptics are. That Warmist can and will use the Skeptic’s proofs as a ‘’backdoor exit’’  when people realize that the planet is not getting warmer – Warmist have under their sleeve: didn’t get warmer because of sunspots. Shame, shame prof. Plimer and Lord Monkton!!! Their proofs are as if: they are proving that in 100years will be only a small Fire Dragon with 1/2 head, because they have proofs of existence  of big and small 6-7 heads dragons in the past…?! It’s not funny, they pretend to represent the truth. I have being physically attacked in the supermarket car park, no, not by Warmist, but by prof. Plimer’s apostil; for saying that: 98 wasn’t warmer or colder year than any other year, 5BC  was same temperature as today.

Most of the genes in every living critter are junk genes. I.e. use it or lose it. But the genes for adaptation and diversification are still fully functioning in every critter. That is the best proof that the climate never stopped changing. In the critters that don’t exist anymore, as dinosaurs; those genes were degenerated = when the bacteria that produces methane evolved – created lots of extra free oxygen = from 6-7% oxygen in the atmosphere went to 20% – much less CO2 = DINO went belly up. (in my book I have extensive work / proofs on the subject) Genetically modifying that bacteria to inhibit methane instead, by Australian CSIRO, will reverse the climate /environment, not to be suitable for warm-blooded critters, but to be suitable for the dinosaurs, unfortunately, he is gone… To make it even more sick, the leading Skeptics are molesting the methane also…!!! Truth: creating more methane = more free oxygen in the atmosphere. Burning natural das, destroys the free oxygen

6] blaming the solar and galactic influence on the earth’s atmospheric temperature is another sick proof (self-destructive smoking gun) Having in mind that the atmosphere can double in volume is split second – how much is extra coldness there to intercept?!? Leading Skeptics with that proof are only creating ‘’ backdoor’’ exit for the Warmist… We know that NASA is on the Warmist bandwagon – they can say that was more, or less sunspots = will have phony reason why GLOBAL warming is not happening. Because of the Skeptic’s ignorance and immaturity, the Warmist can persist with any crap, knowing that the leading Skeptics are common sense deficient, but mountains of egotism.

Instead of substituting the phony GLOBAL warming with the name ‘’Climate Change’’ if they substituted it with ‘’Dog Turd’’ that would have made the Skeptics ‘’Dog Turd Deniers’’. It’s same thing. Will carbon tax prevent doggy poo of being different shapes and sizes? No! same with the climate. Human is powerful enough to deteriorate the climate = therefore, is powerful enough to improve the climate. Saving more stormwater on the land = will be produced less dry heat = will destroy less moisture in the atmosphere, created by the oceans. That will produce more raw material for ice on the polar caps. More ice on those waters, to insulate the seawater from the tremendous coldness = milder temperature on the whole planet. People as Senator Brown, Tim Flannery and many other Warmist are demanding the opposite. The active Skeptic are big city Slickers… still think that climate is controlled, by turning the button on the Fujitsu air-conditioner, or by CO2. Controlling it to be below 2C warming…?

Skeptics, if you want to win:

1] forget about; anthropogenic, crapogenic; CO2 is the good guy. Starving trees for CO2 don’t discriminate if is carbon 12 or carbon 14. By debating about it = you give impression that carbon is bad. Your body is 25% made of carbon. So are the trees, more H2O+CO2 = green. Using CO2 for your vocal cords when exhaling, to badmouth CO2, is ignorance. All those burbles in beer any fizy drink and champagne are pure CO2. You put yeast to produce CO2, bread to be spongy. 2] forget about past GLOBAL warmings; they were localized, not GLOBAL In Europe /USA can get colder by 10⁰C – in Oceania needs to get warmer by ONE degree, to equalize. Because Oceania is 10 times larger. Before Columbus, people were scared to sail more than 50km west of Portugal; not to fall of the planet; how did you collect the temperature at that time in Oceania, America? Thermometer was invented in 17 century – not accurate anyway. All the GLOBAL Warmings for the past were concocted by the same shonky profession that you are trying to prove them wrong. Was real reasons for river in London freezing, not any bloody GLOBAL cooling. Read why was colder / warmer in Europe in the past; real reasons, not the crap that you use for proving the Warmist wrong. Past phony GLOBAL warmings will not prove that is no GLOBAL warming in 100years from now. Start using the laws of physics, you will recognize what is the truth or wrong.  It’s all here, for you. Help me spread the correct proofs / evidences, please! Instead of just being sarcastic about the Warmist phony proofs; get the real proofs from this website; you will see the end of the Warmist propaganda. Sunspots / medieval GLOBAL warmings are indicators to the Warmist, that Skeptics are not using their own brains / immature.  It’s same as little Jonny proving to his father that the stork makes / bring babies. Wake up Skeptics; most of the phony past GLOBAL warmings are invented by people that are in the Warmist camp; or would be, if they are still alive.

People go to jail for $1000 bucks. Warmist are squandering billions of tax  $$$. They will not give up; unless are exposed by real proofs. So-far, the Warmist keep the silly Skeptic’s proofs, as handy Warmist ”back-door”  exit. As their plan B. They should be told by the Skeptics loud and clear: ”crime shouldn’t pay! When exposed, will be ”truth and reconciliation” !!! IN civilised society justice should be done / punishments to fit the crimes!” Half of the protagonist will withdrew instantly. With my proofs, no need to wait 100 years, to see that Warmist are lying. Use my proofs, see the effect on them, for yourself.

Remember: unlike on the moon, on the earth warmth is 3 dimensional. No matter if that warmth is 6feet above the ground, or 6km. 2] Troposphere is not like human body; if under the armpit is warmer by 1C = the whole body is warmer by that-much.  In the atmosphere, unless one part gets colder – other part cannot get warmer; that’s what the laws of physics say! Because; if one part gets warmer without other part getting colder > air in the warm part expands up. Collects / redirects extra coldness and equalizes in a jiffy. But if some other place gets colder – the extra volume of air expanded by becoming warmer goes to area where is gone colder – because there the air has shrunk! As the children’s see-saw plank; both sides don’t go up, or down simultaneously. Start to believe in the laws of physics and my formulas:

Mitich formulas:       1]   { EH >AE >ECI }      (Extra Heat> Atmosphere Expands > Extra Coldness Intercepts)

               Fire            2] CH4+O4 = 2H2O+CO2  

Cow & sheep    3] 2H2O+CO2=CH4 +O4

Share this:

WARMIST’ PROBLEM IS NOT ANY MORE:  TO PREVENT GLOBAL WARMING, BUT  TO PRODUCE  ONE

Just before Kyoto Conference, they predicted GLOBAL warming of 5-6⁰C by 2060. At that time nobody would have predicted the tremendous increase of CO2 by China, India. When they changed from ‘’Nuclear Winter for year 2000’’ – to GLOBAL warming; China was producing same amount of CO2 as Australia. Now China produces = to 15 Australias. If Australia went to zero CO2 emission, would have being tremendous 1500% extra increase of CO2 by China + extra on the planet.

After the spectacular flop in Copenhagen, they should have declared: because of extra increase of CO2 + they don’t want to sign on the doted line; by 2060, the temperature in the atmosphere will increase by 10-12⁰C, instead of 506 degrees. Instead they lowered it; in 100y down to 1,5 – 2⁰C. They are controlling the temperature as on their Fujitsu air-conditioners…?  Nobody from the politically bias /corrupt media pointed that: from 5-6⁰C, going down to 1,5⁰C is much more than from 1,5 down to zero…?!?!?! Yes, nobody noticed that they shifted the post from 2060 to 2100… why?! Com-on Snake Oil Salesmen, double or nothing! CO2 emission doubled since 1990, most polluters don’t want to sign on the doted line – you produce GLOBAL warming of 10-12 degrees – keep all the money. Otherwise, money collected as carbon rip-off; should be used for big new jails, to accommodate all the top Warmist Swindlers and other profiteers of the GLOBAL warming scam.

Year following the Kyoto conference, being so ambitious / inpatient; 98 was declared as the hottest year! Lots of people were not brainwashed enough and didn’t react on it. Reality started to sink into the heads of IPCC, East Anglia… They realized that is going to be a long road in brainwashing; if they keep increasing the temperature by that much – by the time they brainwash 51% of the people in the western democracies – the temperature would have to go up by 20⁰C, so the prudent ones lowered the temp for following years.  As a byproduct, with 98 as the hottest, they created lots of water-pistols for the ‘’Smarty Skeptics’’ (in Australia referred as ‘’prof. Plimer’s Galahs’’) They were all happy to clog the mail and letters to the editors, pointing that 98 was the hottest year!!! Leading Warmist were rolling on the carpet of laughter, because they created the lie that 98 was the hottest; they can increase the temperature any time when suits them – the Skeptic’s Smarties are a joke… not mature opponents. Using IPCC’s wrong data as factual, to prove IPCC wrong…? If that is not stupid; the word ‘’stupid’’ shouldn’t be in the dictionary anymore. Anyway laughter prolongs Warmist’ lives.

By 2002 / 2003, the leading Warmist realized that is not going to be international agreement soon. As they have being planning: if everybody signs, no matter how much they increase CO2; Warmist will claim that warming didn’t happen, because they made everybody to agree and follow them = must pay billions, and worship them for ever; for preventing the phony GLOBAL warming. Wasn’t happening. You think that you have problems… have a heart for the international criminal Warmist Mafia… They had to create some smokescreen… they changed from ‘’GLOBAL Warming’’  to ‘’Climate Change’’. As a ‘’Fig Leaf’’ to cover their shame for not delivering ‘’GLOBAL Warming’’That was so easy for them, the active Skeptics was easy to con that the phony GLOBAL Warming and the constant climatic changes is one and the same thing. Some were winging about it, but in the second sentences were excepting it as a fact… Nevertheless, the leading Warmist were not able to inform publicly their followers for the dirty switch; the Warmist of lower IQ and genera are still mentioning GLOBAL Warming; because some of those Natters genuinely believe – would spit the dummy. But the clever instigators got stuck completely into ‘’Climate Change’’ only. Climate to change doesn’t need global warming. The Snake oil Salesmen would have given up long time with their propaganda, if it wasn’t for the leading Sceptic’s ignorance /egotism. Some of them profiteer from the Warmist propaganda also. Climate can change for better and for worse. Water changes the climate, not CO2.

In 2001 they officially stated: ”if we don’t start DECREASING CO2 this year – will be too late. In 2003 the statement was: if we don’t ratify Kyoto before Christmas and start reducing CO2 emission immediately – will be too late. That was few years back. If you take them on their word – it’s already too late. Person / persons need to admit publicly that they have being lying; before can be believed anything.

All the damages done so-far, all the billions squandered because of their lies; the Green People never admit any guilt. Well, in my book says: ”if the greens don’t admit that is all their fault – it’s all their father’s fault, FOR NOT USING CONDOM!!!”

Therefore, the circus become even more colorful. Apart of some lower IQ Warmist, the only people that believe in GLOBAL Warming, are the Skeptics. Their GLOBAL Warming is suppose to be only 0,5⁰C in 100years. How do they know?! That was the best Christmas Present to the Warmist. They are not arguing; it suits them to wait 100years and see if is going to be 1,5⁰C, or  0,5⁰C, to see who is correct…? It’s same as: one camp saying: man can get pregnant, but only little bit, only 0,5kg. The other camp saying: we think that man can get pregnant from 1,5kg – 5kg!…So, the Warmist rightfully declared ‘’the science is settled’’. Because they coned most of the Skeptics and their Galahs that CO2+CH4 are a GLOBAL warming gases. Wrong! Not all, I know and I have proven that is no GLOBAL warming; but I believe 100% that climate is changing. Human can change the climate  for better and for worse. More stormwater saved on the land; to attract extra clouds from the sea = better climate. More dry heat created on the land, to destroy the moisture in the sea = worse climate = less raw material for renewal of the ice on the polar caps = hotter summers / colder winters in Europe / USA – more extreme temperatures on the southern hemisphere.

To repeat again, just for the record: CO2 is not a GLOBAL Warming gas!!! 1] CO2 does intercept sunlight; absorbs more heat than oxygen and nitrogen. But that makes it to expand and go during the day in the upper atmosphere, where cooling is much more efficient. 2] for 12hours is no sunlight to intercept. B] at night CO2 intercepts much more coldness than O+N can. (Reason CO2 is used for making dry ice instead of O+N). THOSE TWO FACTORS CANCEL EACH OTHER = ZERO AFFECT! Therefore, anybody believing that CO2 is a GLOBAL warming gas is classifying himself as a ‘’flat earth Believer’’. I.e. believing that is sunlight 24 hours on every spot. To make it even simpler: your metal gate gets much hotter during the day, than your neighbor’s wooden gate. That’s how CO2 absorbs much more heat than O+N. But, your metal gate absorbs much more coldness at night than your neighbor’s wooden gate. Same comparison with   CO2  V  O+N = zero warming.

2] to repeat for a thousandth  time: extra heat in the planet’s atmosphere is not accumulative!!! Therefore, the science is not settled!!! B] CO2 is only 280-400ppm. Oxygen + nitrogen are the other 998999ppm. By expanding when get warmer than normal, shrinking when get colder; they regulate the warmth in the atmosphere to be same every hour of every day, month and every year of every millennia. The laws of physics don’t work ‘’only sometime’’. Warmth  and coldness change places constantly, otherwise the winds would stop. When is bigger difference in temperature = the winds increase. Same goes with the vertical winds. When is more H2O, CO2 in the upper atmosphere = upper atmosphere gets warmer – on the ground days cooler / nights milder. Because of proportion of difference = the vertical winds slow. Clear sky = hotter on the ground during the day / colder nights; because vertical winds speed up. Both camps act as if they have abolished the laws of physics!…

Q: when you warm up oxygen + nitrogen by 6⁰C, why do they expand much more, than when you warm them by only 2⁰C? A: because they need to increase the volume of the atmosphere more, to intercept extra coldness, to equalize. Q: when you warm O+N for 20minutes, why they don’t shrink after 10 minutes? A: because they need to keep intercepting extra coldness as long as they are warmer, to keep the temperature overall in the troposphere to be same. Q: after 20 minutes if O+N cool to previous temperature; why they don’t stay expanded for another hour? A: if they did, they would have redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers and lakes in a day. Q:can extra CO2 prevent oxygen and nitrogen of expanding? A: those two gases expand trough hi-tensile walls of a hand-grenade when warmed. Q: why O+N shrink when cooled, instead? A: to minimize exposure and intercept less coldness, until they get to previous temperature. It takes minutes only. That proves that ice age on both hemispheres simultaneously is impossible!!! Q: do those two gases expand when warmed / shrink when cooled, because they have nothing better to do, or they are regulating the heat in the atmosphere to be always the same. Q: for the last 3 Januaries, when was record coldness in Europe /USA, why on the same dates was record heat in Australia? A:To balance. Same as children’s see-saw plank in the park. The more one side goes up = the more the other side goes down. Both sides don’t go up or down simultaneously. Laws of physics don’t work ‘’only sometime’’! EH=AE=ECI    ( Extra Heat= Atmosphere Expands= Extra Coldness Intercepts) Q: was it same laws of physics during the Big Ice Age? Laws of physics, chemistry, arithmetic are the most reliable sciences. Rely on the reliable, not on the shonky scientists. What the laws of physics don’t approve = must be wrong!!!

If anybody can find something wrong in Q&A above = I must be wrong. If not, both camps are wrong, I am correct. The truth will win. Use your knowledge in the laws of physics on the following:

References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA (the big one) were ALL localised. For the duration of the Big Ice Age in Europe / USA (N/H) on the southern hemisphere was much, warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were than as today!!! If the whole troposphere was colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalises in a jiffy. Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it. But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder for some reason – troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 5 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / accumulate in 5 minutes?! Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes! my formula is the best proof: EC > AS > LHR (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > Less Heat Releases) Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in foetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimise / maximise 5% of extra surface area; troposphere can double in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!!

The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER by as much, to equalise! Because in that case, on the hemisphere that gets colder – the air shrinks / volume decreases – but the EXTRA volume of air from the opposite hemisphere because of extra warming, is compensating for shrinking on the colder half – or in that case was 30- 40% of the planet colder. The shonky scientists in the last 150 years were COMPLETELY disregarding the laws of physics!!!… As a bi-product, we had Nuclear Winter for year 2000 / lots of PHONY GLOBAL warmings in the past (from the ”pretend Skeptics) and in 100years a PHONY GLOBAL warming, by the Organised Crime. Yes in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now with CO2 / Methane conspiracy /con, they are robbing nations / countries…

MONITORING ONLY ON 6000 PLACES FOR IPCC (mostly on the ground); IT’S ADMISSION THAT THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE TRUTH!!! ATMOSPHERE IS NOT AS HUMAN BODY – IF UNDER THE ARMPIT GETS WARMER BY 0,5⁰C  = THE WHOLE BODY IS WARMER BY 0,5⁰C. BY THE LAWS OF PHYSICS – WHEN PART OF THE ATMOSPHERE GETS WARMER – ANOTHER PART INSTANTLY MUST GET COLDER.

Warmist shifted it from 2060 to 2100, because: they know that the Smarties will forget in 100y from today to take the Swindlers to justice. No need to wait 100y, to proof the Warmist wrong. Will be same laws of physics in 100y, as they are today. Unless the Warmist convince the ideologist politicians; to abolish the laws of physics by legislation in parliament /UN first. Unfortunately, the leading ‘’honest’’ Skeptics believe that in the past the laws of physics didn’t exist. That’s why they use the most stupid weapon, to prove the Warmist wrong about warming in 100y, by their dozens of phony past GLOBAL Warmings…? That makes them just as big part of the crimes. When times for ‘’truth and reconciliation comes – Warmist will turn around and say: the D/H Skeptics were molesting the CO2 also. In reality, for the Climatologist Sceptics the problem is different. They know that: if is taken away from them the lots and lots of GLOBAL warmings in the past = they will have nothing much left. Therefore, their ego is paramount, f*%#  the interest of the humanity. The temperature in the whole atmosphere doesn’t go up and down as a yo-yo, boys. Warmist spend millions of man-hours making those charts; warmer and colder years. It’s same as saying that ‘’the planet is warmer by 9⁰C at lunch time, than before sunrise’’…  I have already suggested to the Warmist: to print those charts on soft paper; to have some positive use. Same advice applies for the leading Skeptics.

Telling to the public that 6000y ago was 2⁰C warmer than today, because people cannot travel in time back 6000y, to check; is not very, very honest. But people reading my book and other work will know that: for the planet’s atmosphere to warm up by 2degrees, first must warm by 0,5degree. If it does; atmosphere in split second expands by 100m up. Intercepts enough extra coldness to equalize in 3,5seconds – falls somewhere down in a jiffy = cannot be overall warmer by 0,5 degrees. With what kind of thermometers they were monitoring 6000y ago… should return those thermometers and get their money back. Or, they should shove up those thermometers somewhere where is already warm.

Inspiration that: when is cloudy = warmer – therefore more CO2, must become warmer; is stupid and destructive presumption. When is cloudy for 3 days – on the third day is much colder on the ground, than last year on that same day, when wasn’t cloudy. That hypothesis is misleading /crime at best. Blaming sunspots and galactic influence for increasing of temperature in the planet’s atmosphere is another stupidity. If one consider that the atmosphere can double in volume in instant if warmed enough; that would have redirected enough extra coldness in 10 minutes to freeze all the water on the planet… solar and galactic influence should be definitely left to the horoscope people. Instead of climatologist fleecing billions of tax $$$ from the Urban Sheep. Plus, the Warmist Swindlers to have solar /galactic influence as backdoor exit. To avoid justice for not producing their Global Warming. That makes the leading Skeptics bigger criminals than Al Gore and Tim Flannery. Delay = crime.

The damages are not only the rip-off. I] damaging the ice by ice crusher ships on the polar waters is triggering a Midi Ice Age. I.e. between the parallel of Cancer and Capricorn warmer – the rest of the planet colder. That is the second biggest crime ever on the planet committed by human. Number one crime is: converting the methane producing bacteria; to inhibit methane instead. The truth: burning gas is destroying the oxygen in the air – is turning it into CO2+ into water. Only creation of much more extra methane can prevent at least some of the depletion of free oxygen. When you read the truth, will knock your socks of. Creating extra methane is essential, instead, by using fossil fuel; but preventing production of extra methane, will reduce the oxygen level in the atmosphere not to be sustainable for warm-blooded critters. Other damages done to fit the propaganda are tremendous. One of those is burning the coal reserves when still in the ground, to produce gas for burning. 90% of the energy is lost in the ground – in the name that CO2  suppose to be bad. Another one is repossessing farmer’s water + objecting to building extra dams to save extra stormwater, and many more damages!! They are all smoking guns. Enough ‘’carbon footprints’ time for ‘’carbon fingerprinting’’ the Swindlers.

YOU SHOULD START TO FEEL SORRY FOR THE SHONKY CLIMATOLOGIST

No, this is not a joke. Climatologist theology is built on a quick sand. Is not that they are shameless liars only; but their predecessors / their educators have wrong starting point on just about everything. Now climatologist from both camps are jealously guarding those starting points; because, if you take away their wrong theories / lies from them = they have nothing left. The most morally deficient profession. In the past, when one of them finds fossilized palm tree on Antarctic – he goes in the university – cons the students that: the planet must have being warm enough, to sustain palm trees on Antarctic. It is more interesting, than to say that: Antarctic wasn’t on the south poll. If it was, and palms were growing = in Indonesia the temperature would have being above water boiling point. Unfortunately, ones it goes in education books = becomes official. WRONG!!!

Another one finds that coldblooded dinosaurs was living in Alaska… no feathers or hair for protection from the cold =the planet must have being hot enough to support coldblooded critters in Alaska! Wrong!!! North poll was somewhere else. Milankovich was the only one with common sense. But his theory is boring +  doesn’t bring cash, power and prestige to the conmen’s profession.  My favored is: between 900AD – 1300 was warmer planet. Because was sunspots! Wrong, it wasn’t warmer or colder than this year. They have given even a name for that phony GLOBAL warming…?! For the first time ever, precision engineers created a good enough filter – to look at the sun in 2009AD. Even better one is: the Norwegian kayaker went furthest north in 1883, was less ice = it was much warmer. WRONG!!! When is less ice = colder. But that is too complicate for their twisted brains. (I have all the correct proofs, please read the ‘’condensed version of my book’’ it’s in PDF form) It is very important, to make resemblance with what is happening today. Catastrophe ‘’midi ice age’’ can be avoided.

When they blame CO2/CH4  for a hurricane, earthquake, or any other natural disaster; on million other places on that same day was beautiful weather, with same CO2 level – how come they don’t blame CO2 for all that beautiful weather on the other million places?!

Verdict: hoping that in 100y from now, the Urban Sheep will not remember to take you to court of justice for lying –my formulas eliminates that hope / dirty trick, completely. Leading Warmist, if you don’t produce GLOBAL warming; is not that Suckers must be compensated only; but real damages done… they are all listed in my book. China increased CO2 production much more than expected. Indian population grows by 23 million every year, and their economy also = much more CO2 is produced than expected. Other countries as Brazil, Indonesia are increasing CO2 production much more than was expected. Some professional Green Swindlers are trying to create backdoor exit by stating that methane is decreasing… reason is no Global Warming. Wrong!!! Methane (CH4) is not a global warming gas. You will have to learn that: less methane created = oxygen in the atmosphere decreases. Physics, chemistry, arithmetic are reliable sciences. No need to wait 100y, to prove the truth. Start producing GLOBAL Warming; or Swindler’s  passports to be confiscated and their assets frozen. Billions of dollars of tax money squandered / laundered on a shameless lie. People go to jail for $1000 bucks. In the process lots of other damages done to the environment, climate and humanity. Crime shouldn’t pay !!! the more the truth is silenced = more irreversible crimes are committed. Think about it, now! The Earth promised to Heaven; there is no such a thing as a permanent secret /  lie on the Earth. Time is against you!!!

Mitich formulas:       1]   { EH=AE=ECI }

               Fire            2] CH4+O4 = 2H2O+CO2  

Cow & sheep    3] 2H2O+CO2=CH4 +O4