ZERO GLOBAL WARMING, CLIMATE NEVER STOPS CHANGING; CAN CHANGE FOR BETTER ALSO – IS IT PERFECT CLIMATE NOW?


  Stefan Mitich – spokesperson for non-believers in GLOBAL warming lies.
PLEASE NOTE: THE PAGES / POSTS ON THIS BLOG CANNOT GET OUTDATED + THEY ARE ALL RELATED. SATURATING WITH TOO MUCH LITERATURE ON SOME BLOGS IS TO CREATE CONFUSION AND WASTE YOUR TIME. ON THE FEW PAGES / POSTS ON THIS BLOG IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE / PROOFS / FACTS / FORMULAS; TO SEE THE END OF THE PROPAGANDA. PLEASE READ EVERY POST /PAGE   

WE SHOULD DEBATE; HOW TO IMPROVE THE CLIMATE, NOT HOW TO STOP IT FROM CHANGING.    NOTHING STAYS THE SAME IN NATURE; DETERIORATES OR IMPROVES.   WATER H2O CHANGES THE CLIMATE, NOT CO2.   WOULD THE CLIMATE STAYED THE SAME,  IF IT WASN’T ANY INDUSTRIAL  REVOLUTION?!  2-condensed-version-of-the-book.pdf 

1]Climate is in constant change, some places for better, some for worse; H2O changes climate, not CO2! 2] For any reason the atmosphere warms up –expends upwards into space of minus -90⁰C, intercepts extra coldness instantly, redirects it =prevents Global warming. The laws of physics say: if one part of the atmosphere gets warmer – other part instantly gets colder – to equalize. If is known all what is on this website, or in my book; wouldn’t be any flat rate carbon tax, or repossessing farmer’s water, or burning /destroying the coal in the ground (coal seam gas); would be the end of Kyoto Protocol. Everything proven scientifically,  beyond any reasonable doubt, now; not to wait 100 years to see that they are wrong (the Nostardamus trick). Rely on what is reliable, eliminates guessing

2] all the fuss about the phony Global Warming is because; the  scientist from both camps ignore that: oxygen and nitrogen are 998 999 ppm in the air – they expend when get warmer, expansion is instant. Where they expend up,  is minus  -90⁰C. Release heat, intercept appropriate extra coldness in 3,5 seconds – shrink, and in a jiffy drop to the ground, to equalize. Because of fast spinning of the planet eastward +winds – the extra coldness intercepted, falls somewhere far west, in much larger area. Cities get warmer = far west from cities is the sea = above the sea colder. Part of the planet’s atmosphere can get warmer and always does; reason why the winds existThe whole atmosphere cannot get simultaneously warmer, or colderas long as the laws of physics exist. The unlimited coldness in the stratosphere is used, if the troposphere expends, or that coldness is wasted, just zooms trough. The precursor of all evil is: promoting by both camps that: past warmings and ice ages were Global. That makes both camps wrong. Past warmings / ice ages were localized – not GLOBAL. Laws of physics don’t permit / approve warming, or cooling to be GLOBAL.

My formulas solve all the confusions: If troposphere gets colder, for ANY reason. As in solar eclipse for example; when the moon, Venus or Mercury is in-between the sun and the earth – lots of sunlight is reflected, not to come here. Atmosphere shrinks instantly / accordingly, and intercepts less coldness / releases LESS HEAT, if you will; on the edge of the troposphere, into the stratosphere; for the duration of the eclipse – overall temperature doesn’t get colder even for one day: EC->AS->LHR (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > less Heath Releases) Or, when it gets warmer for any reason, my formula: EH->AE->EHR  (Extra Heat ->  Atmosphere Expends ->Extra Heat Release) or extra coldness intercepts, if you will. (in a solar eclipse – where the shadow is -> air gets colder and shrinks -> from outside the shadow lots of air goes to where the shadow is = outside the shadow LESS air -> gets hotter than normal – as soon as the eclipse is over, winds equalize = zero effect.

When is a solar eclipse – on part of the planet is full eclipse for 6 minutes / partial eclipse for 20 minutes – the big part is only partial eclipse – but doesn’t produce enough GLOBAL cooling – not enough to cool one beer.  2] Mercury blocks 5% of the sunlight all day – that means as if the sun didn’t exist for 30 minutes. Presume: if it wasn’t any sun; earth’s temperature would have being close to ultimate zero Kalvin. From ultimate zero – to +15C above zero – if you take 5% of it – that’s how cold the planet would have got, would have gone colder by 12C; when  mercury is in-between – IF IT WASN’T FOR oxygen & nitrogen shrinking instantly, when cooled. But, unless you are into astronomy – you wouldn’t even know that Mercury is blocking part of the sun.  Meteorologist don’t even take in consideration for predicting next day’s temp; if Mercury or Venus is in-between the sun / earth. Each one of them blocks 5% of the sun’s light, not to come here.

In the military book says:  if you see a flashlight from atom bomb explosion in the distance – instantly hit the ground, with your butt towards ground zero and put the gas-mask on – and after the original blast, if you can turn your head towards ground zero. Because after three (3) minutes – the wind with same speed as the explosion, goes BACK towards the ground zero and demolishes just as much, already weakened concrete buildings. But, turning in the opposite direction without getting up – otherwise – the returning wind will take you to ground zero.

What the issue here is:  atom bomb is heating oxygen + nitrogen to millions of degrees – they expand and their SPEED damages concrete buildings; not the 20-30kg  of plutonium – (reason atom bomb is useless out of space, where is no oxygen + nitrogen) effect would be as few shotgun pellets (apart in Hollywood entertainment). Please note: O&N wouldn’t have SHRUNK after three (3) minutes – IF THEY WERE NOT COOLED –that’s the issue!!! But, they shrink almost as fast as they expand from the explosion. They shrink with the speed of the bullet and demolish the already weakened concrete buildings. MILLION DEGREES, O2+N2, COOL IN THREE (3) MINUTES -  the shonky ‘’experts’’  tell you that: in 10 years, the planet will be warmer by 0,156C… Cannot cool fraction of a degree in 10 years ?! They can keep lying, thanks to the fake Skeptics...   

No, when air close to the ground warms up EXTRA, by 1-2-3C, doesn’t expand as fast as by atom bomb; but expands accordingly, by the amount of extra heat / INSTANTLY.  Just that atom bomb is taking dust + WATER VAPOR + CO2 – it gives better chance to be analysed visually; what normal extra warming does to oxygen + nitrogen. I.e. if is localized extra warming – that part of the troposphere expands into the stratosphere as a nuclear mushroom – then intercepts appropriate amount of extra coldness in 3,5 seconds – then INSTANTLY shrinks and brings that extra coldness to the ground, in a jiffy.

Second version: If the WHOLE troposphere warms up – troposphere expands into the stratosphere instantly and equalizes in minutes. Another shocking truth: O&N don’t wait to warm up by 2-3C, then to start expanding – they start expanding when get warmed extra by 0,000000001C! So, in atom bomb mushroom from explosion, is lots of CO2 and ‘’water vapor ’ but don’t stop O&N off expanding. 2] We notice the horizontal winds, but not the vertical. For our convenience god / nature made the ‘’verticals’’ to speed up as they go up; and can keep an 80kg man + his glider in the air for hours. Horizontal winds cool the soil and your french-fries – vertical winds cools the planet. They can be a breeze, or as fast as a bullet, depends on the amount of EXTRA heat. The ‘’ convayer belt’’ taking heat up; speeds / slows, as necessary. Please note: heat is NOT wasted by conduction!!! O&N are very lousy heat conductors. When oxygen or nitrogen atom collects the heat from the ground -> expands instantly and is taking that heat personally to the edge of the troposphere ->releases that heat ->shrinks -> becomes heavier per volume than any other atoms of O&N and falls down to the ground as a shotgun pellets -> and push other hot atoms =convayer-belt speeds up = similar as when water from the block of the engine on your car speeds up going to the radiator; only,your radiator is in space of 20C – O&N take the heat to space of minus -90C – THAT IS 110C COLDER PLACE

In the hot air balloon – the warmed air in the balloon is lifting 5-6 people + the bucket + the gas bottle + the very heavy balloon cloth – over half a ton – because that extra warmed air is fighting to go fast up and release that extra heat. Imagine if the balloon just wasn’t there, to contain that hot air = that warmer air would have shot up as a rocked into the stratosphere – spreads as the top of a mushroom into the lower stratosphere, and releases the heat into the unlimited coldness in the stratosphere – becomes colder than the rest of the air below = on the way to the ground, as shotgun pellets. Therefore, is not something that is not known, proofs exist all over the place, for every Swindler’s con. Swindlers, and the ‘’fake Skeptics’’ constantly are using as a ‘’smokescreen’’ the words: thermodynamics, convection, sensitivity’’ but avoid to implement them. What about the: Oxygen (O2)+ Nitrogen (N2) sensitivity?! I have put that ‘’O2 / N2’’ because the Swindlers instead of saying oxygen & nitrogen; they use O2 / N2; as smokescreen; for the public to think that the Desperadoes are talking something scientific / important. When you see some of con artist’s O2 / N2; tell them: is not ”only” two O and two N; but 998999ppm of the atmosphere are those two elements, cut the Bulshit! People on the street never say: oxygen two / nitrogen two. For same smokescreen they use ‘’Kelvin, (k)’’ temp = your deep freezer is 270 hot… (from ultimate zero) for them ‘’coldness’’ doesn’t exist. Engineers that make stoves / fridges, put hot / cold; because they have useful products to sell – but the ‘’climatologist’’ con artist have only crap to sell = no coldness exist…wow!!! O2 / N2 + Kelvin… Use those symbols, to recognize who is a con artist, in the climate debate. By the way; climate is ALWAYS changing, but NO GLOBAL warming. By the way: after 20-30 minutes hot air baloon in the air – is 20000ppm of CO2 inside; but is still pushing upwards!

 WHY BOTH CAMPS REFER TO CO2 AS: A ‘’GREENHOUSE GAS?!’’

 All normal greenhouses have solid glass roof. Glass is transparent for the sunlight; but ‘’SOLID’’ prevents hot air of getting out. On the other hand; CO2 is NOT transparent for the sunlight – intercepts sunlight high up = less comes to the ground.

 b] CO2 & water vapor are less than 3% of the atmosphere, the rest is oxygen &nitrogen. Which means: ‘’ if one removes 97% of the roof off a normal greenhouse – that wouldn’t be a greenhouse anymore!’’ When there is a small hole on the roof of a normal greenhouse – farmer instantly plugs the hole – heat not to escape out. Warmist are lying for profit and power / why are the ‘’Skeptics’’ misleading for, by referring CO2 &H2O as ‘’Greenhouse Gases?! Because of ignorance, or b: because they are born losers??

ALL IT BOILS DOWN TO IS,  TWO THINGS: 1] when they keep repeating ”convection”  BUT THEY DON’T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT: ‘‘VERTICAL WINDS” CHANGE STRENGTH AND SPEED, AS REQUIRED!  THAT’S THE CONVEYOR BELT; SPEEDS WHEN WARMER THAN NORMAL – SLOWS WHEN COOLER. 2] THEY DON’T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT: WHEN TROPOSPHERE WARMS UP, FOR ANY REASON – TROPOSPHERE INCREASES VOLUME -> GOES FURTHER UP INTO THE STRATOSPHERE. If that was taken into account – destroys any misleading of the WHOLE planet getting warmer. Or the WHOLE planet having Ice Age. Laws of physics don’t permit anything like that / impossible even theoretically. Those laws don’t work ”only sometimes” / they don’t compromise! Unless you can get over that hurdle – going around it; everything you say / do; is a ”sandpit job” Immature DOO-DOO!

Therefore, YOU SHOULD ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWERS, TO ALL THOSE QUESTIONS:

Q: do you know that: oxygen + nitrogen are 998999ppm in the troposphere, CO2 only 260-400ppm? Q: do you know that O+N expand /shrink INSTANTLY in change of temperature? Q: do you know that: where they expand upwards, on the edge of the troposphere is minus-90⁰C? Q: why O&N  expand more, when warmed by 5⁰C, than when warmed by 2⁰C? A: when warmed by 5C, they need to go further up, to release more heat / intercept more, extra coldness, to equalize. Q: if O&N are cooled after 10 minutes to previous temperature, why they don’t stay expanded another 5 minutes extra? A: not to intercept too much extra coldness, to prevent too much cooling. A2: they stay expanded precisely as long as they are warmer – not one second more or less – that’s how they regulate to be same warmth units overall in the troposphere, every hour of every year and millenia!

Q: do you know that: if troposphere warms up by 2⁰C extra – troposphere expands up into the stratosphere by 1km, how much extra coldness is there to intercept? A: intercepts extra appropriate coldness to counteract the extra heat in 3,5 seconds -> that extra coldness falls to the ground in minutes Q: if O+N are warmed extra for 30 minutes, why they don’t shrink after 15 minutes, or after one day? A: if O&N after cooled to previous temperature; stayed expanded for a whole day extra -> they would have redirected enough extra coldness, to freeze all the tropical rivers / lakes.

Q: can CO2 of 260-400ppm prevent oxygen + nitrogen (998999ppm) of expanding, when they warm up? A: O&N when warmed extra – they expand through the walls of a hi-tensile hand-grenade. Q: do you believe in the laws of physics, or in IPCC and the Warmist / Fake Skeptic cults? The laws of physics say: part of the troposphere can get colder than normal – only when other part gets warmer than normal. B] if the WHOLE troposphere gets colder > air shrinks > releases LESS heat /intercepts less coldness on the edge of the troposphere > retains more heat and equalizes in a jiffy. C] both hemispheres cannot get warmer simultaneously for more than few minutes – if they doo -> troposphere expands extra >releases extra heat / intercepts extra coldness and equalizes in a jiffy. Q: do the O+N wait to warm up by 2-3⁰C, before start expanding, or expand instantly extra when they warm up by 0,000001⁰C?  All those things can be experimented / replicated now; no need to wait 100y and see that: all they come up with, are lies

OPEN CHALLENGE TO ALL COMMENTERS; TO FIND MISTAKE, OR BETTER ANSWERS

If any of the active Warmist & Skeptic gets outside the ‘’big city island heat’’: you can see 10km radios +10km up = 700km3 of air. There are horizontal and vertical winds. From those rocks over there, vertical wind goes up – behind there, vertical winds go in direction down towards the swamp – on the other side – vertical winds go fast up from that red exposed soil to the sunlight – further there vertical wind goes in direction down towards the rice paddies - behind you, the wind goes upward from the farmer’s house walls / roof. Those winds slow when the cloud comes above… but depends on the angle the cloud approaches and its density / altitude… then those winds speed up again, but not at the same speed… red soil is warmed faster than the rocky outcrops.  After sundown 2h, from the sandy soil and that house, vertical winds change directions. From the red soil and the rice paddy / swamp, change direction, but after midnight; and at much slower speed.

2]Those vertical winds are attacked by horizontal winds that are on different altitudes / directions every 30m, up. Sometime SOME winds travel at 3knots – others at 27knots – others at 40knots and rearrange the temperature constantly – then some slow down – others speed up. Who is recording the DIFFERENT temperatures on every few cubic meters that is changing EVERY 10 MINUTES in the year; in the space you can see?! The space you can see with your eyes, without moving, is area of 600 000 different temperatures, and those temperatures change every 10 minutes. There are 6 000 thermometers monitoring for IPCC on the WHOLE planet; only for the hottest minute in 24h!

They have only 1% of thermometers for what is needed, to monitor the space you can see with your eyes. How many thermometers you think you will see in those 700km3?! How much larger area on the planet you cannot see without mowing?!? Be honest to yourself. Not 100-200-300-600 years ago… NOW they have 6 000 thermometers for the WHOLE planet that is sending them data, mostly on the ground / most of them concentrated in Europe /USA

Nobody knows correct the temperature in the troposphere for last year, to save his life; but they pretend to know for year 1700, 1200AD, 5BC. They know which year was warmer by 0,12⁰C or colder than the previous year… look at their charts… What was the temp 345km NE of Wellington? People didn’t even know that New Zealand existed at that time… What about 432km SW of Hobart, at 357m altitude on the year after, on 4 of July at 9,35AM; or 456km SW of Easter island on that same time of the day at 69m altitude? Is Easter island not on their globe? Easter island in Pacific represents 20 times larger atmosphere than Europe + USA. Was it cloudy on that day? When gets cloudy – upper atmosphere gets warmer – on the ground cooler; but that rule is only for daytime; at night is opposite; but not if it wasn’t cloudy… depends on the thickness AND altitude of the cloud, also. Com-on ‘’leading scientist with temperature charts’’. Temperature in the troposphere is 3 dimensional. Would you buy a used car from a temperature chart maker?! Because of them, billions of $$$ are getting ripped-off, because of them, tremendous damages are getting done to the economy, environment and to kid’s brains in school and university. People shouldn’t profit from crime; existing laws say.

With that lousy accuracy, when they state that: one year was warmer or colder than the next by 0,015⁰C, that is to one thousandth of a degree precision… it’s only admission that he or she is honesty deficient! For correct data, must be from every cubic meter of air, equally; for every 10 minutes in the year; from the ground to the edge of the troposphere. Not only from the hottest minute in the day – unless the hottest minute is on same time of the day; unless when the hottest minute goes up by a degree from yesterday – every other minute in the 24h get warmer by a degree,  every day on every place on the planet. Otherwise is all bull. When some place is warmer than usual – declaring the WHOLE planet is warmer – is same as saying: the planet is warmer at lunch time by 12⁰C, than before sunrise…?! That’s how reliable their data collection is.  They collect data on 6 000 places on the planet / not evenly distributedIt’s ESSENTIAL to have from 6 000 trillion places data to be collected, for every few minutes, before can start talking about reliability of GLOBAL temperature. They are not interested in correct data; because correct data would prove them wrong. Local temperatures always fluctuate – GLOBAL overall, never!

Do you know why the hottest minute of day is not on same minute, not even in same hour every day?! B] Why different places  / days have different minutes as the hottest minute of the day? Therefore, collecting temperature for the hottest minute in the day is completely meaningless!  If one day has one hour above 20⁰C, but the following day has 3h-4h above 20⁰C is much more important than picking  the hottest minute.  2] average temperature for every minute in 24h and the hottest minute don’t fluctuate the same.   3] if vertical wind with extra coldness was only 55m on the way down; when the temperature for that day was recorded for that place, but not tomorrow, or not on the other side of the hill, is recorded / not recorded…

Extra heat in the atmosphere is not accumulative – because of the expansion and shrinking of oxygen + nitrogen in change of temperature > if you collect all the extra heat accumulated in the atmosphere for the last 150 years – you wouldn’t have enough heat to boil one chicken egg!!! I suggested in my book: ‘’all charts about the ”global temperature” should be printed on soft paper only, to have some positive use.  

Stefan‘s formula: EC > AS > LHR
References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA, the big one; they were ALL localized  For the duration of the Big Ice Age in Europe / USA (N/H); on the southern hemisphere was much, much warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were then, as today!!! If the whole troposphere get colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalizes in a jiffy. Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of extra heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it + all the geothermal heat released into the air, plus all the heat produced by burning wood/ fossil fuel, volcanoes, precisely, all of it gone, instantly.

But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder for some reason –> troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 10 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / save / accumulate in 5 minutes?! Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes!   Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in fetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimize / maximize of 5% of extra surface area; troposphere can shrink / DOUBLE in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!! Q: how fast can oxygen and nitrogen expand when warmed up? A: by expanding, they are pushing the bullet with high velocity from the barrel of the gun.

The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER than normal; by as much, to equalize   Yes, in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now with CO2 / Methane conspiracy, they are robbing nations / countries… They are robbing the poor, the pensioner, the low paid; because carbon tax is a flat-rate tax. On every product in the shop, the pensioner pays same carbon-tax as the millionaire. The loot money disappears in the jet-setters pockets + for unnecessary phony GLOBAL warming ‘’researchers. The ‘’spoils’’ are not evenly divided; the biggest liars get the most. The ‘’Believers’’ of the lower genera and IQ, as usual, get the middle finger on the end; they are the collateral damage. Born losers.

Q: do you think that: during the medieval PHONY GLOBAL warming, the laws of physics were different than today?
Q: do you believe that 15000BC or in a 100 years from today, the SAME laws of physics didn’t and will not exist? They want you to believe them. What’s their motif? You don’t need 6 guesses.

Another one: Greenland and Antarctic are almost as large as USA. On Greenland, and Antarctic are few thermometers clustered on a very small area. B] if the weather bureau was reporting the temperature for few places in Florida – as the temperature for the WHOLE of USA, many people wouldn’t believe that is same. In the evening when they report the weather for the whole of USA; remember what Stefan was saying: compare yourself if: when the temperature in Florida goes up by one, or two degrees for next day, does the temperature in all of the other states goes up by EXACTLY that much. Or, some places goes up, some down. Some place by more some by less. Therefore: not having data collected on every kilometer on Antarctic / Greenland = is blatant misleading (smoking gun). Then see on how many places the temperature is monitored in central Pacific for IPCC? Central Pacific is 15 times larger than USA. That is for temperature on the ground. Unwritten rule is: when close to the ground is cooler than normal > upper atmosphere is warmer than normal. Q: upper atmosphere is 90% of the troposphere… occasionally they send a balloon… to monitor on 1m3…??? Satellite takes occasional TWO DIMENSIONAL infrared photo…?! KING Al IS NAKED!!! The ‘’fake Skeptics’’ are Al’s Gore’s fig leafs / as the Devil’s Advocates.

Q: can the Warmist realize that: heat distribution on the earth is 3 dimensional? A: of course they can, but is against their theology.  Q: can the fake Skeptics realize the truth? A: only if is a secular Skeptic. ‘’Closed parashoot brains’’   don’t function.

Another one: Even though is not; just presume that: data collection is spread ”evenly” around the planet, on every 500km. b] In your backyard you can find 3-5 variations in temperature; disregard that – here is a catch for the Warmist and the fake Skeptics: Q: is it from one thermometer for 150km one temperature – then the other 1250km is temperature same as the next thermometer that is recording? What about when the temperature from one thermometer is same for 6km2 at 21C- but is 23C temperature as the other thermometer is recording for 494km2?! it’s regular occurrence. Only that’s enough to blow out of the water any GLOBAL temp chart / any proof / suggestion that anybody knows what is the temp overall in the troposphere. One cannot compare one unknown with another unknown

Then next day around the first thermometer is  for 390km2 at 21C- but from the other thermometer is 110km2 at 23C. Larger area would have bigger value; for any normal profession; but not for climatology ”statistician” and fanatic Warmist & Skeptics. Which means: the inaccuracy is minimum of 1,8C; they are talking about accuracy of one thousandth of a degree. That’s the temperatures only about the 2m above the ground. Look at ALL the ”GLOBAL TEMPERATURE charts, on Warmist & Skeptic’s charts: it goes ”precisely by 0,003C up; than for next year goes down by 0,002C – then next year up by 0,004C – all of their GLOBAL temp charts look as a seismograph… They are definitely not talking about the GLOBAL temps, but about their integrity and stupidity.  Agree?

CHAPTER  II

ALL THE HEAT IN THE TROPOSPHERE OVERALL; IS ‘’the EARTH’S GLOBAL  TEMPERATURE’’

Forget about USA temp, or Arctic, or Antarctic, or Mediterranean; unless is all the heat combined in the troposphere, it’s = misleading / brainwashing crap. Promoting Frankenstein temperatures is, to deceive, confuse:

1] Forget about the temperature in the sea; submarine volcanoes /hot vents increase the temp. B] winds, ruff sea cools the surface water. C] below if is 10cm of 20C and 55m of 23C; or is the opposite, nobody notices the difference; even though tremendous difference in the amount of stored heat. D] yesterday’s rain brought coldness from high up and cooled the ‘’surface’’ water; below hasn’t changed – but record will show: the Whole ocean to the bottom as colder by 2C. It’s stupid data for immature people. Designed exclusively for fundamentalist and for the Urban Sheep.

2]Forget about Arctic temperature, or surface temperature, or Antarctic temp; they are all for confusing the ‘’already confused’’ The whole temp of the troposphere is the earth’s temperature!!! If one is taken on Arctic in July, was warmer than normal, England was warmer than normal in May, Brazil in December was warmer than normal, Australia was warmer than normal in January… it’s all meaningless crap. Smokescreen / puling wool over ignorant eyes. To get; from 10 light years away from the truth, down to only 9 light years: they should take the temperature simultaneously, on the whole planet. for example, at 12 pm Greenwich time; then to take it at 3am Greenwich time, on the whole planet, and compare those two. Lets call it: ’People’s request, model for monitoring’’

3]Forget about the temperature in the stratosphere. That temp doesn’t fluctuate. B] in the stratosphere are gases as aerosol, helium, ozone. Those gases just seat / spin there and never come to the ground to bring any coldness = they are COMPLETELY  irrelevant for the planet’s temperature regulation. But are used occasionally for confusion  There is no methane in the stratosphere, it’s a lie. Methane sinks in the ground, because is produced together with other compounds. If some goes up in the atmosphere  at night – as soon as reaches altitude where is sunlight, UV, infrared; zaps it instantly and turns every molecule of methane into 2 molecules of water and one CO2.

4] Forget about cherry picking, always is someplace warmer than normal; unless the Swindler finds out and report the other place where is colder than normal also; he is lying to you; or fundamentalist is usually lying to himself also / reassurance – fear of reality.

5]Forget about heat from the smelters converting ores into metals, or heat stored in the atoms, or in the sea. It’s all ”earth’s energy budget” – BUT NOT part of the GLOBAL temperature! M y oven was yesterday 240C, making roast; does that mean that GLOBAL temp is gone up by 225c? Idiots! Energy that came from the sun yesterday and was locked in the trees or crops. Red soil absorbs more heat than rock. It’s not difference than them talking about the energy locked into the fossil fuel, or into the atoms = con, con. Those ‘’energy budgets, positive / negative signals and albedos’’ should all go into Hansen’s & Plimer’s butts. Sand exchanges heat easier than red clay. What’s the difference if the absorbed heat during the day is released instantly; or released during the night, or released after 6 months by the grass, or in 15y from the tree???. Fundamentalists from both camps: Q: what’s the difference if CO2 in the air releases the heat 2minutes before, or after?! It’s the O2+N2, stupid!!! Rocks and clay don’t go up towards the stratosphere, to release / waste heat and exchange it for coldness. It’s the oxygen + nitrogen, they are 998999ppm, stupid! The amount of wool the Warmist pulled over the Skeptic’s eyes; to keep the Fakes warm and cook their brains, is bigger than Mt Ararat.

6]Forget if the sea-level goes up or down, that has noting to do with any phony GLOBAL warming. 

7]Forget about the ice on the polar caps + glaciers. They don’t depend on temperature, average temp there is minus -30C. on the land ice is melted from below, by the geothermal heat / on the sea is melted by the salty water, from below. More ice / less ice; 100% depends on the availability of raw material for renewal of the ice every winter. That raw material / water vapor in the air, is treated as ‘’ bad for the climate’’ by the fanatics from both camps.

As soon as heat is released from wood, coal, plutonium, volcanoes, smelter, from your oven into the air; ‘’then it belongs as GLOBAL temperature’’. No matter if it’s in your room, backyard, Arctic, equator, 2-40-700m  in the air, or 1-5-20km altitude. That is GLOBAL temperature. All other crappy staff is for creating zombies / fanatics / rip-off and destruction of the democratic west. If not with red Kalashnikovs, trying to win with with a green one. Trying to rebuild the Berlin Wall, in every democratic country

When any extra heat is released, or produced in the air / troposphere; on the place / places released -> that O+N expand upwards, accordingly to the extra amount of heat released. Intercept EXTRA coldness, to equalize, and instantly shrink; not to redirect too much extra coldness. That’s what regulates the global temperature. Any other heat than the heat in the troposphere; is a smokescreen. No matter if is Arctic’s, Africa, Antarctic’s heat, or heat in the sea, or heat stored in the atoms, in the fossil fuel, or in your oven; only becomes as ”official GLOBAL temp”, when is released in the air, not before

1] If you exclude part of the planet – that is not GLOBAL temperature. If you exclude 98%, as it is the case with the Conspirator’s GLOBAL temperature – it’s brainwashing business, nothing to do with the reality. If is monitored on 6000 places for IPCC, that says about the temperature on 6000m3, not GLOBAL temperature. On one small hill there are 1000 different temps; AND THEY CONSTANTLY CHANGE for every 10 minutes in 24h. There are even days when between 10-11AM is warmer than at 12, doesn’t that matter? Temperature changes every 10 minutes – unless is data collected for every 10 minutes – is only fodder for the Urban Sheep. If upper troposphere is warmer than normal (because of dimming affect) – lower troposphere / just above the ground is always cooler during the day / if upper atmosphere is colder – on the ground is hotter. Excluding one or the other – is not earth’s temperature; because on the earth, temperature distribution is 3 dimensional. Thermometer is for monitoring the temp in a room; not one thermometer  for a hundred cubic kilometers.  With 6000 thermometers officially monitoring for IPCC; can collect temperature for 6000 rooms; Hilton hotels have 12000 rooms – not enough thermometers to monitor those rooms; what about for the rest of the planet???

Therefore: must be included the warmth in the WHOLE troposphere / for every 10 minutes / on the WHOLE planet. Only if that is done, can be calibrated. But if that is done – no need for calibration, because OVERALL the warmth units in the Whole troposphere are ALWAYS THE SAME. Because the laws of physics and my formulas say so. They use the word ”sensitivity” to confuse the ignorant. If they use ”sensitivity” in oxygen & nitrogen in expanding when warmed / shrinking Instantly when cooled… the conspiracy would have fallen a part in days. When gets warmer than normal close to the ground, VERTICAL WINDS speed up! As soon as it cools – they slow down; why the real laws of physics are discarded? Using the word ”thermodynamics” but not using it, WHY?! Which people don’t want to see the end of the propaganda? The Warmist believe in; 90% possibility in GLOBAL warming in 100y + most of the brainwashed Skeptics believe 101% in GLOBAL warming. They are the Devil’s advocates – doing the Warmist dirty job (remember, the Fake Skeptics that are Warmist’ roles of toilet paper – doing the Warmist dirty job)

Horizontal winds take the heat away from solid objects / vertical winds are taking the heat up and exchange it for extra coldness / as soon as it gets warmer > the vertical winds increase in speed / strength. 2] Warmed troposphere expands accordingly / increases in volume INSTANTLY; that is the second and most important factor; taboo for both camps… Look at it on the bright side: the brainwashing propaganda will make the psychiatrists rich.

ANOTHER CHAPTER

If there are more dams built, to save extra storm-water  TO INTRODUCE MOISTURE IN THE AIR / TOPSOIL – surrounding areas become cooler during the day – but warmer at night. Example: If Brazil’s vegetation is destroyed and turned into desert – day temperature will go up – but night temperature will become colder; by Warmist shonky / con monitoring, would have registered as warming planet, because for them only counts the hottest minute in 24h; the independent fluctuation in the other 1439 minutes is COMPLETELY irrelevant. Those things make ‘’CLIMATIC CHANGES’’ but not Warmer, or colder planet!!! Because; now on the ground in Brazil is cooler during the day than in Sahara; BUT in upper atmosphere above Sahara is COLDER during the day than above Brazil. Overall same temperature; heat in upper atmosphere has same value as on the ground. Unlike on the moon, on the earth the heat distribution is 3 dimensional!!! The Conspirators succeeded to confuse the ‘’ignorant intelligentsia ’ that the phony GLOBAL warming and the constant climatic changes are related, or, one and the same thing. WRONG!!! The SPEED of the vertical winds regulate the temperature to be same overall in the troposphere every day and night of every year and millenia.

When nights are warmer than usual, as in Brazil, there is reason for it. When days are warmer than should be on a particular latitude, as in Sahara, there is reason for it!!! The shonky ‘’climatologist’’ don’t want you to know about those reasons – because they declared water vapor as a bad gas, to support badmouthing CO2 (because CO2 + H2O affect is same, only is more H2O = greater effect, than from  CO2).

That SAME affect means: they make cooler days and warmer nights, on the ground – absence of those gases, especially H2O, as in Sahara = worse climate. Warmist hypocrisy exposed!!! In Sahara the ‘’vertical winds’’ are much STRONGER than in Brazil. As a result, in Sahara cools down from 45C to 5C at night, in 12h. In that same 12h, on same distance from the equator and the polls, in Brazil cools from 33C day time, to 22C at night, in 12h. Which means: in Sahara, the ‘’faster vertical winds’’ cool by 29C more in 12h, than in Brazil; where those winds are much slower. THOSE VERTICAL WINDS CAN INSTANTLY SPEED UP ON THE WHOLE PLANET, IF IT GETS WARMER!!! If those vertical winds can cool by 30C more in 12h, is an INSULT TO HUMAN INTELLIGENCE  the Warmist lie that the planet will get warmer every 10years by 0,5C. It wouldn’t make sense to an earth worm, but it does make sense to prof Ian Plimer’s Smarties…
Q: why those basic factors are not used by the Conspirators and their B/S distributors?
Q: why those basic factors are not noticed / are avoided by the ‘’fake Skeptics’’? Warmist believe of 90% possibility of GLOBAL warming / Skeptics believe 101% in GLOBAL warmings… ? That is not a Skeptic; but Hansen’s Fig Leaf / covering up Hansen’s Gore’s shame
========================
Q: can the Warmist realize that: heat distribution on the earth is 3 dimensional? A: of course they can, but, truth is against their theology.

Q: can the ‘’fake Skeptics / the B/S addicts’’ notice those things? A: NO, because they are busy, busy with their buckets and wheelbarrows actively collecting IPCC’s & Al’s B/S….

2]CO2 is only 260-400 parts per million; not a Greenhouse gas, but a shade-cloth affect, gas. CO2 intercepts 1000% better UV, than ozone can (remember the fuss about ozone depletion?). Because carbon intercepts sunlight, warms the 2 atoms of oxygen in the molecule = they lift and keep him in the upper atmosphere all day; (where cooling is much more efficient)At night, CO2 loses the benefit from the sunlight – as good heat conductor intercepts much more coldness than oxygen and nitrogen can (biggest mistake, to overlook that); falls down to feed the trees /crops. Laws of physics control the infallible self regulation of heat in the air, not CO2, or the shonky climatologist.

3] human can save extra storm-water on the land (dams) and improve the climate, where is now extreme. Subhuman can reposes farmer’s water – to drain it in the estuary; less water inland and humidity = less rain inland in the future = worse climate. Rain-clouds avoid dry land. Topsoil moisture, water storages attract clouds from the sea. Moisture from cotton and rice farms create buffer between the desert and the big city on the coast, in the land of OZ. When their water is removed to the lakes in the estuary; the dry heat from the desert will be to the outer suburbs of Brisbane Sydney and Melbourne. Less rain in their water catchment areas = more sewage filtered water for drinking, bigger bushfires and house-fires, people will be ready to pay $300 per ton of carbon. (CO2 has nothing to do with the climate)

4] O&N in the atmosphere are transparent for the sunlight. The carbon atom in the CO2 molecule is not. (even though CO2 is invisible to the naked eye. Bushfire smog makes big dimming to the sunlight – because is concentrated = less CO2 -> less dimming effect). Carbon intercepts the sunlight and warms up the 2 oxygen atoms in the molecule of CO2. Those 2 oxygen atoms in the CO2 molecule expend more than the surrounding atoms of oxygen and nitrogen = reason CO2 during the day goes high up (far away from your nose). Up there intercepts more UV and infrared = less comes to the ground (dimming affect). In the upper atmosphere cooling is much more efficient = less heat on the ground.

After sundown, CO2 loses the benefit of the sunlight; at night, carbon in the CO2 molecule intercepts much more COLDNESS, than oxygen +nitrogen can. CO2 falls to the ground at night, to feed the trees, grass and crops. Intercepts more heat during the day, intercepts extra coldness during the night. Those two factors cancel each other = zero warming affect. Same as metal intercepts more heat during the day / more coldness during the night, than wood =( CO2 compared with O&N). CO2 is not a Greenhouse affect gas, but ‘’shade-cloth affect’’.   Remember the fuss about ozone depletion?! CO2 is 10 times better for blocking UV in the upper atmosphere ”dimming” than ozone 

5]Past Geologic discovery showing that on some place was warmer, or colder; some year or millenia  then declaring that the whole planet was colder; or was GLOBAL warming, it’s same as saying: planet is warmer by 12C degrees at lunch time, than before sunrise. Abolish the laws of physics first. Atmospheric temperature cannot be taken as human body temperature; when under the armpit is 1C warmer = the whole body is warmer by that much. Because is different temperatures on every cubic kilometer  on every 2m from the ground to the stratosphere + horizontal and vertical winds never stop, and are never carbon copy as last or any other year. Unlike on the moon; on the earth the warmth distribution is 3 dimensional. Talking about warmer or colder year, without monitoring on minimum of 60 trillion places for every few minutes of the year, is ludicrous.

Especially when stating that one year was warmer than the next by 0,125⁰C…?! Nobody knows what was the temperature overall with inaccuracy of + /- 3C, for last year, to save his life; how can anybody compare it with any other year?! To one thousandth of a degree precision…?!?!?!

As Example: instead of heat, replace it with water: if you monitor the amount of water in the 6 creeks in your area – this year is 25% less water in those creeks than last year… that doesn’t mean that the planet has 25% less water – it means that some other place is more water. B] but doesn’t mean that because of lass water in your creeks that Amazon river has 25% more water, because of it. Same as if in USA + Europe gets warmer by 3C – in Oceania needs to be cooler by 0,3C, to equalize, because Oceania is 10 times larger.  2] Bigger ripples in the pond don’t make more water; because the bigger the ripples = the bigger the groves in -between; same with temperature - the warmer than normal gets on some place / places – the colder other places / hemisphere gets; laws of physics don’t work only sometimes!  

They only collect the hottest minute of the day. How about the other 1439 minutes? Do they go up as much as the hottest minute? Between 8 -11AM is more minutes, than the hottest minute – but they never go up or down as the hottest minute. 3] Unwritten rule is: if upper atmosphere gets warmer than normal – on the ground cooler days – because of dimming effect; which is the opposite when is not cloudy – but nights are warmer in dimming. 4] There is 40km thick layer of troposphere – they are monitoring on few places / 2m above the ground; what about the temp, because of different dimming effect for the other 39km and 998m? Don’t that warmth counts; why did they disowned 99,999% of the troposphere?! 5] in Europe + USA can get warmer by 2C, all it needs to get cooler by 0,2C in Oceania – to be equal balance. 6] Satellite takes infrared ‘’TWO DIMENSIONAL’’ photo.. 7] For the satellite is irrelevant if it’s a layer of 500m of 12C and 5cm of 15C, or is 500m of 15C and 5cm of 12C; BUT THE CONTENT OF HEAT IS BIG, BIG DIFFERENCE  All important factors conveniently disregarded. 8] for another con; they release a balloon up; does that balloon monitor the temperature in the WHOLE troposphere; or just a gimmick, to justify their expanses?

6] What was the temperature 123m above East Anglia university on 11 /7 /2010 at 10AM? If they don’t have that simple data; how will they know the temperature at that same time 432km NE of Fiji ?! When Europe gets colder by 8 degrees – Oceania needs to get warmer by 0,8 degrees, to equalize; because is 10 times larger. B] For a start, is it 10 times more monitoring places in Oceania than in Europe + USA?!?! How about 93m, 156m, 278, 890m above the ground, doesn’t that count? Isn’t that in the same atmosphere that you are talking about?! Cloudy – upper atmosphere warmer – on the ground milder; clear sky – on the ground hotter days / colder nights = overall, always same temperature. Like changing fistfuls of dollar coins from one pocket to other – doesn’t make you richer or poorer.

BOTTOM LINE: TEMPERATURE IN THE EARTH’S  TROPOSPHERE IS 3 DIMENSIONAL, NOT TWO DIMENSIONAL, AS ON THE MOON !!!

Do you believe me now, that: Atmosphere is not same as human body. I.e. when gets warmer under the armpit by half a degree= the whole body is warmer by that much. Atmosphere is completely opposite; when one part gets warmer = another part must get equally colder. That’s what the laws of physics do, by expanding oxygen + nitrogen, they are in charge of regulating the temperature. Determining warmth in the atmosphere, by monitoring on 6000 places for IPCC, is only proof that the Swindlers don’t know, or avoid my formulas / for the process of ”self adjusting”. Not knowing the most basic, or not wanting to know the laws of physics, but squandering billions, what does that makes them…? You be the judge.  

The atmosphere starts expanding, as soon as it warms by 0,1 degree. No, not on the northern or southern hemisphere; but when the whole troposphere starts getting warmer – that is GLOBAL, isn’t it? When warms up by 0,1 degree – the troposphere expands by 50m, upwards. Intercepts appropriate extra coldness to equalize, instantly. Please note: air doesn’t wait to get warmer by 2-3-4 degrees, before starts expanding. So, if the whole atmosphere cannot get warmer by 0,05 degree, how can it get warmer by 2C or 5C degrees? The laws of physics sometimes appear weird, but they are consistent and always correct. Here is a weird example that is correct:

Presume as if there was a wall on the equator, high enough into the stratosphere – to be able to prevent air from one hemisphere to be possible to go to the other hemisphere: when the sun goes from the southern hemisphere to the northern – northern hemisphere wouldn’t get summer climate. Because, as soon as the air there warms= expands, if the extra volume cannot go to the southern; where is simultaneously shrinking, because of S/H winter, air would expand and go upwards. Up, the temperature of minus -90 degrees – will redirect that extra coldness down = will stay cold. It’s same as if; when the car engine gets warmer – instantly if the car radiator enlarges. Normally, when goes from winter into summer; the air expands; but that extra volume goes to the other hemisphere; where the air is simultaneously shrinking, by becoming winter. This shouldn’t be something controversial, it’s factual – nobody will build that wall; I inserted this; to show you the power of O+N in expanding; how much extra coldness can intercept. So, when is ice age – look for real reasons, not the sunspots. Same sunspots are affecting Brazil, Burma, Sahara and central Australia, but different climates. CARBON IS THE GOOD GUY, THE CARBON MOLESTERS ‘‘from both camps” ARE NAUGHTY:

Clouds/humid air have lots of static electricity. Carbon /CO2 is perfect electricity conductor, O+N are not. 2] CO2 absorbs much more coldness in the upper atmosphere at night than O+N, reason CO2 is used to make dry ice instead of O&N. That extra coldness  and ability to absorb electricity, CO2 uses for condensation; it’s essential for rainmaking. Without CO2 – humidity increases – but no rain. When is high humidity – decreases evaporation = much less rain. + (evaporation is cooling affect – less evaporation = less cooling of the seawater and on the ground) that’s why, where is a dam + topsoil moisture – is cooler during the day, than where water is absent. Warmer during the night = better climate!!! **

METHANE (CH4)

To cover up for the damages they are doing / damages in progress, by using methane for misleading; Warmist used another dirty trick. You will be shocked about those damages; first here is their trick:

The good Lord made  methane to be produced as a compound with other HEAVIER elements TOGETHER. By itself, methane is odorless; but is very smelly, when produced. The ‘’smelly’’ bit is the organic particles/ sulfur, ammonia; the sinkers; to make it to sink in the ground. After those organic particles disintegrate deep in the soil –or get munched by bacteria. Warmist to discredit me, they point out that; methane is not as heavy as air; so it doesn’t sink. Well, they don’t have to tell; how does it sink? Why is so much of methane in the ground for fracking, how did it get their; you are not suppose to know. Many times they go to Antarctic, Greenland and bring lots of lies. For you is cheaper to believe them, than to go there in person and see that they are lying. But for methane is NOT necessary – because; all of you are producing it! Admit, that it smells, when fresh, is not odorless! 

Same as when the cow is belching, or releasing methane from the other end. ‘’METHANEGATE’’ is to cover up the smell. Well, unless the Green People go behind every cow, elephant, bison and instantly purify the methane = they are lying; to use methane for destroying the grazing animals. P.s. methane produced from coal doesn’t smell; that’s where the ‘’canary in the coal-mine’’ comes from. In the coal-mine, the good Lord didn’t need to invent something, to make methane to sink, because is produced in the ground. Organically produced methane above the ground, is never in a pure form. You don’t need to go and sniff the cow’s exhaust, grass clippings from the lawnmower after a week smell same as the cows methane. Simple proof of Warmist ‘’Methanegate’’. Please read the rest, on pages ‘’ METHANE (CH4) + THE CREATION OF CRUDE OIL, to see complete picture; what they are really covering up; it will knock your socks off::

Experiment: in a transparent bottle, catch some methane from cow, sheep, or your own; let it on the sunlight for few hours (as long as there is oxygen in the bottle also – to imitate atmosphere. In couple of hours that methane will turn into 2 droplets of water=  magic. Methane doesn’t stay in the atmosphere for 10 years!!!

Methane on the sunlight cannot last longer than 1 hour; UV burns / oxidizes it, because is the most flammable gas. A] to create one molecule of methane, takes the carbon atom from CO2, plus the hydrogen atoms from 2 water molecules = methane (CH4). As leftover are 4 free/new oxygen atoms. Compare with their misleading.

Formula: CO2 +2H2O = grass – Grass +cow & sheep = CH4 +O4    Which means: for every molecule of CO2 the grass /trees collect – they need to absorb twice as many molecules of H2O (water) (if available) to create its body / celluloid.

Therefore, for more CO2 to absorb – they need more water; in the topsoil and moisture in the air. 2: it is well known that grass / trees absorb CO2 – keep the carbon for themselves and release in the air the two oxygen atoms, from the CO2 molecule. But you have to know that: the plants need to absorb double the amount of H20, keep the hydrogen from the water for themselves and release the oxygen from that water molecules also = the more storm-water saved on the land in dams. Grass / trees absorb ”WATER VAPOR” from the air, when available. If not available in the air -> it vacuums the moisture from trees / grass -> trees / grass without moisture suffer / sick or bushfires gets them.  For the cult ”water vapor is bad for the climate” mother of all stupidity

Vegetation keeps the hydrogen atoms from that water – releases the oxygen in the air from all that water. Why is that taboo, anti-dam boys? B] no water on the land = vegetation cannot absorb CO2; more stormwater saved in dams = more CO2 absorbed. Bottom line: vegetation releases oxygen from the water molecules also, by keeping the  hydrogen for themselves; not just carbon from the CO2! More oxygen in the air = better cooling process during the day, better insulation at night. Oxygen is the best insulator – less of it = more extreme night temp::

Cow & sheep eat the grass and produce methane. Methane sinks in the ground and stays there for million years. If it wasn’t eaten by the cow &sheep, grass burns and becomes CO2 in the air again. Or, the fungi turn it into CO2 again. They are scaring people from methane – but promote ‘’organic fertilizer’’. How much methane is produced to make one bag of ‘’organic fertilizer?!’’ 

B]natural gas is 95% methane. Burning it, every molecule of it destroys 4 oxygen atoms in the atmosphere. Lots of natural gas is used in transport, cooking, industry and the big flames on thousands of oil rigs = destroys lots of free oxygen. Gas was in the ground for millions of years –oxygen was in the atmosphere. Burning gas, is turning oxygen from the air into water. Only creation of extra methane can counteract the damages. In New Zealand the extremist already imposed to graziers ‘’Permission to fart tax’’. Penalizing them for doing good. In Australia are delaying methane tax, to split the conservative vote; until first they introduce the  ‘’flat rate carbon tax’’

C] CSIRO, for big bucks are modifying the methane producing bacteria in animal’s intestines; to inhibit methane instead. Nature / god created methane in the intestines for 3 reasons: 1: there is never food in all the intestines; where is no food, methane keeps the intestines in round shape, to prevent twisted intestines. 2: methane gas  production pushes the already digested food slowly on the way out. Without  methane; on that warm place food dehydrates = constant constipation. Will the phony Greens go inside cow’s, elephant’s intestines and shovel the thing for 2-3m on the way out? 

D] apart of processed food, every fresh food is covered in bacteria / viruses. Methane is fumigating those 1000 different/harmful bacteria; protects the good bacteria. Without methane, harmful bacteria/viruses will multiply in that warm place with lots of food. Animal / human will resemble a roadkill in few weeks.

Genetically modifying those essential bacteria is ‘’biological warfare’’ Australia is a member of the ‘’Geneva Convention’’.  Because, Maggots / harmful bacteria / shonky scientists /  viruses  don’t like methane Prof. Ian Plimer &Co  bag the methane also.

Tim Flannery, Prof. Ross Garnaut use cars with exhaust, but don’t have cattle; so they stick their nose into the sheep’s  & cow’s exhaust; to mislead the nation / to badmouth unjustifiably,  the most noble grazing animals. To decrease the limited amount of oxygen in the atmosphere; not to be sufficient for the warm-blooded critters = mad science at its best. Burning natural gas is harmful, destroys the oxygen in the atmosphere. Creating new methane is = repairing the damages; is producing new free oxygen. Is that bad?!**

8]Burning the non-renewable coal reserves for coal seam gas, is another stupidity. A] burning one layer of coal in the ground, does produce methane from the next layer of coal, by overheating it. B] But, because methane is much more flammable than coal, most of that newly created methane burns in the ground, by using the oxygen intended for the continues burning of coal. C] where is methane and coal present, methane burns first!!! I.e. less than 10% of that energy will be salvaged – the rest, coal as non-renewable recourse wasted in the ground. Just to badmouth the CO2. On the previous election campaign, ALP promised to protect coalminer’s jobs… by turning the coal into ash, when still in the ground…?!?!?!  Hello coal-miners!!!

9] coral evolved/adopted and was most prolific when was 4000% more CO2 than today. Coral is made from carbon and calcium. If CO2 increases = better coral. The only way to get its carbon is: rain washes CO2 into the sea, mixes with salty water, coral/algae collect the CO2 – keep the carbon for themselves; release the oxygen into the water, for the fish. Climate in Australia will change for dryer, because of the Bob Brown’s Water Embargo on Australia. Apart of Marine Biologist and other extremist; does anybody believe that: where the coral is, it will get dryer? The seawater is alkaline and alkalinity is increasingBecause of all the salts, potassium, magnesium, calcium, ash + products made from bleach, chlorine, get washed into the sea every year. High alkalinity is much more damaging to the coral than lower. Sea-salt is made from Sodium and chloride, they are the two of the most alkaline elements. SO2+N produce acidity, not CO2. The rainforest creeks are all acidic. Some acidity is essential to go into the seawater, to lower the pH. Highly oxygenised storm-water +silt from the hills are bleaching the coral. (They are against dams). Because coral adopted to very low oxygen level in the past; now is taking refuge only in waters depleted of oxygen. Who gets more money /power, if the coral suffers?!

Unless the pH in the seawater gets below 7, water is not acidic. (pH7 is neutral = but notthe best for fish or coral; even though is the mildest for coral! Why; read on the page: {THE SEAWATER IS GETTING MORE ALKALINE}

Seawater is pH8,3 but not even distribution!!! All the carbon from 10 000 planets equal to plane earth; to be brought here and dumped in the sea – the pH will not go below 7,5pH. Algae that protect the coral and give nice colour to the coral, would love pH7,5 in the water. All the chlorine, bleach and products with bleach in it, increase alkalinity in the seawater. All the extra ash, magnesium, lime, potassium, washed into the sea every year from farms / hills; is increasing alkalinity. Extra alkalinity is more harmful for everything. Seawater gets ruff, releases the excess CO2; same as when you shake a beer or champagne bottle. Yes, those bubbles coming out of beer, soda-water and champagne are CO2 bubbles. You wouldn’t like beer or champagne without bubbles = you are paying for the CO2, because CO2 is essential for life, odorless and tastes good. The biggest 3 Swindlers in OZ Marine biology, professors Will Stephen, Charlie Vernon  and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg  + Flannery, shouldn’t be allowed in university, to brainwash the kids. Shouldn’t be financed by taxpayer’s money, to con the nation!… Unfortunately, prof. Will Stephen and Tim Flannery are on the panel for paying ’flat rate carbon tax’’. Surprised? *

Whatever the laws of physics don’t approve of= it’s wrong First, in the 70’s and 80’s, they promised us ‘’Nuclear Winter for the year 2 000’’. Before we even defrosted from their Nuclear Winter; in 90’s, they promised Global Warming of 5-6C, by 2060. Since 97, the CO2 production increased beyond anybody’s prediction – After the flop in Copenhagen, they lowered it to 1,5⁰C, in 100 years? They can be flexible, because the bias media will not point to them that: from 5 / 6C warming, down to 1,5C is much more, than from 1,5C down to zero.

They got assistance from the leading Skeptics  they are for 0,5⁰C in 100years…? Both camps have lots of thin air in their crystal balls, to harvest from. Alarmist have support from the Skeptic’s ignorance, to proceed with imposing carbon tax and the rest = in 100 years to see who was correct; 1,5C, or Skeptic’s 0,5C. People on the street know: if it can happen, better play safe than sorry – nobody can predict precisely even next Monday’s climate, not in 100years. The leading Skeptics are guillotining the truth, same as Al Gore /Flannery. Prof. Plimer and his apostols deserve a medal from Al Gore and from Ross Garnaut. The truth: AS LONG AS OXYGEN + NITROGEN EXPAND WHEN WARMED, SHRINK INSTANTLY WHEN COOLED; THE WHOLE PLANET’s ATMOSPHERE CANNOT GET WARMER / OR COLDER, FOR MORE THAN FEW MINUTES. Try to get around that hurdle = you are not honest to yourself.

8] The bottom line is: I have proven that: CO2 is not a GLOBAL warming gas,   GLOBAL  warming in 100y is ZERO. Prediction ‘’in 100years’’ is Nostradamus’ tactic. I.e. they know that: in 100y from today, there is a big chance that you will forget to take them to court of justice for rip-of / destructions. Both camps are molesting the essential CO2, which is 260-400 parts per million. But are completely ignoring that: the brilliant self adjusting of the atmospheric temperature is controlled by oxygen and nitrogen, the other 998 999 parts per million. When O&N get warmer for any reason – they expend instantly. Into the space they expend, the temperature is minus -90C.  As soon as they intercept appropriate coldness to equalize, they instantly shrink; to prevent too much cooling. If they stayed expanded ALL day – would have redirected enough EXTRA coldness; to freeze all tropical lakes and rivers!!!

Mitich formula says: EH =>AE =>ECI (Extra Heat -> Atmosphere Expends -> Extra Coldness Intercepts). My formula should be on every bumper-sticker, to make Warmist & Skeptics to start thinking. Unless the laws of physics approve of a theory = that theory is a loud of crap. Because of the Warmist’s and Skeptic’s crappie theories, lots of damages are in progress against the climate and humanity. The whole truth is more urgent now than ever before, to stop the Warmist excessive power. If the public knows all what is on this website and in my book; would be involuntary Euthanasia to Kyoto Protocol in less than 4-5 months. Be part of history /truth, inform everybody to download what is on our website. People need/deserve real proofs that can be proven now. No more: maybe, can happen, we don’t know, it’s possible, scientist say… 90% possibilityIt’s proven every subject, here and now, zero possibility of Global Warming; water exclusively changes the climate! Carbon levy is a flat rate tax = extortion money; cash for the Swindlers + bribe for bias media moguls; for misleading ads and silencing the truth. For laundering taxpayer’s $$$

In China, family and factory pays less than 9% for electricity per kilowatt, than what Australians are paying. (Electricity in China produced from Australian coal). Carbon tax is extortion money – you don’t pay the electricity bill –they cut of the electricity = the fridge goes off = Australia becomes salmonella /typhoid capital of the world. Extremist politicians and media blame the opponents for scare tactic; the whole carbon fear-mongering is just a scare tactic, for oppression, for laundering the taxpayer’s cash. Brainwashing the kids in schools and university that ‘’less CO2 = Green, is a grotesque crime.

Message for the believers in warming: if this website doesn’t prove you wrong = you must be correct. Be fair to yourself, read and see that: changing from the  Phony GLOBAL Warming into Climate Change, will not protect your lies anymore! Message to the Skeptics: if you are a Skeptic  you are for the truth. Read everything what is on our website; you will know 100% why you are correct in not believing in global warming – with real proofs = you will not be skeptical 90%, you will know for sureDon’t let them con you anymore that global warming and climate change are same thing; they are not related.

Water changes the climate = human can change the climate for better also, by saving extra storm-water on the land. Enough ‘’carbon footprints’’ time for ‘’Carbon Fingerprinting’’ the beneficiaries of the misleading propaganda!!! They changed from ‘’Global Warming’’ to ‘’Climate Change’’ as a Fig leaf, to cover up their shame, for lying about the phony Global warming. The leading Skeptics are using the Alarmist wrong data as factual – now they persist as the ‘’Alarmist’s Devil’s Advocates’’ and developed ‘’truth phobia’’ same as the Alarmist. The truth should be paramount boys, not your ego and arrogance. Assisting the Alarmist is, being part of their crimes. We are not climate change deniers; climate is in constant change, we have proven beyond any reasonable doubt: that is no  Global warming. Constant climate change has nothing to do with any phony Global warming. Those 2 natural phenomena are confused by both camps. Actually, one is natural phenomena, the other is a phenomenal lie.

Please, inform everybody about our website. Become member of ‘’the Resistance’’! Establish branches overseas, in your respective countries for ‘ the Resistance’’. The truth on the end always wins. The more people know about our website, the sooner we will see the end of Kyoto Protocol’s misleading propaganda / rip-off and destruction of the free world. Have all the real proofs; no more of Al Gore’s & prof Plimer’s ‘’maybes, can happen, 90%  possibility’’ I have proven why it cannot happen, and what will happen. The laws of physics, chemistry and arithmetic are 100% reliable sciences. THEY WILL BE THE SAME IN 100 YEARS AS  they are TODAY. Do you trust the laws of physics, or the shonky Climatologist?

If you read the ”condensed version, in PDF form; YOU WILL SEE THAT THE OVERALL TEMPERATURE IN THE ATMOSPHERE DOESN’T GO UP AND DOW AS YO-YO. If fluctuation in sunspots was dictating the climate = would have being same climate in Brazil and northern Australia. Same sunspots, same latitude, same CO2; BUT COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CLIMATES. GLOBAL warmings / coolings in the past were not GLOBAL!!! Laws of physics don’t permit that. First they must abolish those laws, by legislation and in UN.

Otherwise, those laws say: both camps are wrong – people and economies are suffering, because of silly outdated theories. People in 5BC, 1200AD were scared to sail more than 50km west of Portugal – not to fall of the planet; but the shonky climatologist + Skeptics, with confidence are telling; without knowing the temperature for both Americas, Oceania for that time. Rely on the reliable, laws of physics, chemistry, arithmetic. Maunder maxima / minima, Holocene were localized extreme climatic changes, not GLOBAL warmings. Similar as every January for the last 3 years, only on a larger scale, for prolong periods. Was colder in Europe – but warmer Oceania. Than warmer Europe by 2 degrees = colder Oceania by 0,2 degrees, because is 10 times larger. They pretend to know that 800y ago was SAME temperature in Oceania as in Europe / before thermometer was invented – you should take their own temperature = they must be hallucinating,  or shamelessly lying…???!!!

They made it official that: ‘’during the northern summer; the planet is WARMER BY up to 3,8C than during the southern summer.’’ WOW, what a science!…

I believe that: their data shows even bigger difference; but they are not heroic enough, to admit -> ‘’smoothing follows’’

The truth: not enough EXTRA WARMTH is in the atmosphere during the northern summer than during southern, to boil one chicken egg with it!!! BUT, it shows that ‘’their modelling’’ is complete crap! It shows warmer, for two unscientific reasons::

#1:  because 75% of the monitoring places are on the N/H, 25% only on the southern. Example: if 75 workers get pay increase by 10% for 6 months and 25 workers get pay decrease by 10% = overall together they will be getting more money; than for the next 6 months – when 75 workers get salary decreased by 10% and the other 25 workers get increased their salary by that much. What a con science is used; by not having monitoring places spaced equally!!!… Reason everybody is scared from the truth, and are trying to silence my proofs / science!!!

Reason #2: on the S/H is much more water, than on the northern hemisphere. Where is ‘’more water’’ DAYS ARE COOLER / NIGHTS WARMER!!! It proves that: monitoring only for the ‘’HOTTEST MINUTE’’ in 24h, and ignoring the other 1439 minutes – is the mother of all con and misleading science!!! BY BOTH CAMPS!!! Warmth in every minute in 24h has SAME value; but doesn’t go up / down equally as the hottest minute!!!

That’s admission that they are wrong by 3,8C in 6 months – then look at their ”GLOBAL” temperature charts for the last 150y, 1000y, 6000 years – they ”pretend” to be correct in one hundredth of a degree and occasionally in one thousandth of a degree, for every year. That’s what kind of people FROM BOTH CAMPS are talking about their  ”scientific proofs”… where is their credibility,  what kind of ”computer models” can be wrong by 3,8C for 6 months non-existent difference in temp – but are talking ”with precision” about 1920′s, 1850′s, 5BC…?

150y ago, there were only few unreliable thermometers; data collected by unreliable people. But that data is used as correct – sometime, by some, is stated as: unreliable; but was / IS used as reliable anyway, by those same people. 400-500-700 years ago.. well the correct GLOBAL temperature ”BY THEIR PROXY’‘   was discovered from: if there were 12 bushels of grain per acre in Devon-shire, England; then next year was only 11,5 bushels ->  that means that: in all of Oceania, south America and the other 90% of the planet – the temperature following year was ”COLDER BY 0,04C, on the WHOLE planet…. WOW! What a science – precision in one hundredth of a degree. Look at their GLOBAL temp charts = it looks as seismographs / the planet has a hi-fever…?

Their GLOBAL temp cycles are even more sick. They found in Colorado Canyon erosion that: certain deposits repeat themselves -> instantly they name them as ”factual cycles” in other country, or other continent, alluvial deposits don’t mach the ones in Colorado – instead of admitting that: THOSE CYCLES were not GLOBAL – they just ad more and more different cycles. Blame the sun, solar dust; blame everything that cannot take them to court for defamation. Instead of starting to analyse: how the deterioration of vegetation / climate was gradually affected by human inventing the ARTIFICIALLY CREATION OF FIRE. In Eurasia + North Africa 50000-60000 years ago – north America 15000y ago – in Australia maybe 30000y ago. After 20-30 intensive bushfires, the vegetation gives up -> without vegetation -> rainfall decreases = become hotter days / colder nights / more extreme climate. Unfortunately, admitting the truth – so that the climate can be improved - which would bring money to the engineers and working people; but not to the Organized Crime

Before the invention of artificial fires by human – the only fires the earth did know was from volcanoes and lightening storms. Volcanoes aren’t very often – electric storm is associated with rain = because of wet; fire doesn’t go far.  Artificial fires first started, when was mulch everywhere – after many generation; the mongrels were turning the best lands into desert… now the Fakes are ”SKEPTICAL” if human can change the climate… self destructive idiots… born losers!

BOTTOM LINE:

If there wasn’t one molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere; temperature would have being exactly the same as it is now – because CO2 has NOTHING to do with the temp; which is completely / 100% regulated by oxygen &nitrogen.

Why is difficult of learning the most important factors: ”ABSORPTION OF HEAT IS ALWAYS ”EQUAL” the RELEASE {A=R} because O&N are responsible for regulating same amount of heat to be always in the troposphere.

Mitich formulas:       1]   { EH =>AE =>EHR } Extra Heat => Atmosphere Expands => Extra Heat Release

               Fire            2] CH4+2O2 = 2H2O+CO2  

Cow & sheep    3] 2H2O+CO2=CH4 +4O

 

About stefanthedenier

Climate Change, Global warming or not. Polar ice. Methane
This entry was posted in Recent Possts. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to ZERO GLOBAL WARMING, CLIMATE NEVER STOPS CHANGING; CAN CHANGE FOR BETTER ALSO – IS IT PERFECT CLIMATE NOW?

  1. Truthseeker says:

    Stefan, I have managed to work out how to leave a message on your site.

    Let me point you to something that seems to be quite compatible with what your are proposing on this site. I have not read the book only the preview that you can see here :-

    http://www.venturaphotonics.com/TheDynamicGreenhouseEffect.html

    I would be interested in your opinion.

  2. Truthseeker, thanks a million; I have read what’s on his webpage, but not his book. Therefore, I don’t know /don’t have a right to judge what he knows. His knowledge of the genesis and evolution of the Warmist propaganda is brilliant. He is very articulate / straight shooter – perfect. He is using the word equilibrium few times, but to point to all of you people that: in nature everything is in constant change = stick the word equilibrium, in a warm place. BRILIANT
    .
    Well collecting the temperature data, to know how warm is the atmosphere; is same as counting the flies in the bush – they constantly go up /down, left / right and that way; some are dying / new are born. Cannot line them up in row of 6 and count them. Still would have being much easier to know the CORECT number of flies in Australia, than the temperature in the WHOLE atmosphere. Nobody knows last year’s temperature, to save his life – millions are comparing; one unknown, with million other unknowns = it’s the biggest stupidity / lies, since the homoerectus invented the language.

    Sea-currents control the climate, not CO2 – he is correct. Because I haven’t read his book, I don’t know if he is familiar that H2O controls the climate on many different ways, not only currents. Topsoil moisture / water storages / clouds/ moisture in the air – or lack of those, on the land.

    Unfortunately, he is into Medieval global warmings / coolings + he worships sunspots also. I have proven why ‘’Europe’’ had warmer / colder / warmer climate for different centuries – you will find on the subject a lot in that ‘’condensed version of my book’’ above (in PDF form) He refers to those anomalies as ‘’GLOBAL’’ … he is dead wrong. To repeat again: during medieval ages, people were scared to sail more than 50km west of Portugal, Morocco – not to fall of the planet. Unless somebody was collecting the temperature for him in Oceania, south/ north America = he is putting himself down. B] if somebody was looking at the sun, to record the sunspots, at that time; to get blind in 3 minutes = your friend is using data ‘’from the most stupid person’’ in all medieval ages.

    Therefore, if one knows the power of the self adjusting mechanism the atmosphere has – will not worship, or include sunspots. The Warmist did same as any liar. I.e. when one tells a lie – tomorrow must tell another two, to cover up / support the first lie. On Monday must tell another six lies, to support the first three, and so on. Because has being over 20 years = lots of lies accumulated. Skeptics don’t believe in 30 -40% of those lies; but are fanatical about the rest. That’s why we are having carbon tax – not because the Warmist can have ONE legitimate proof about the phony GLOBAL warming. That person doesn’t believe in 70% of the Warmist’ lies. Nevertheless, he believes in some very rotten lies, as I pointed = will not read his book, there is nothing I can learn from him. Apart of polished English, because of urgency; I have to rely on anybody that can spread the truth on good / bad and any English. 500 million people speak English, I need 150 people to join the resistance – we will win. The names of those 150, will be on a monument, for 1000 years. Anybody wants to join the resistance, park your name here, on this website

    Because that gentleman believes only in 30% in the Warmist crappie theories; for me would be easy to point to him to complete his puzzle. I have difficulty with other Skeptics that believe in 70% of the Warmist crap. When I explain / prove a subject; in his mind goes: he sounds correct on this one… but doesn’t fit that and that… and that – so he puts me behind the door. Because he cannot comprehend that: that and that and that are also wrong; I cannot cover in 3 paragraphs, to correct all the Warmist lies. If somebody understands my formulas, but doesn’t offer help; I consider him / her ‘’ as running with one leg on each side of a barbwire fence. I.e. not committed, irresponsible, self worshiper. I don’t want to be judged by my English, but ”by my proofs beyond any reasonable doubt”. Truthseeker, thanks for the tip, anyway.

  3. when truthseeker suffers from ”truth phobia” he is looking for a victim

  4. Truthseeker says:

    Stefan, now all my comments apart from the first have been removed.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s