About

WARNING, WARNING: PAGES ON THIS BLOG CANNOT GET OUTDATED – THEY ARE ALL RELATED! OTHER BLOGS CHANGE PAGES EVERY DAY; TO CREATE CONFUSION. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED TO SEE THE END OF THE PROPAGANDA, THIS BLOG IS FOR YOU; THE GENUINE PROOFS ARE ALL IN THIS BLOG

IT’s  ABOUT  REAL  PROOFS / FACTS, PROVEN BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT  -  IF IT’s KNOWN WHAT IS ON THIS BLOG – WILL BE THE END OF THE SICK  PROPAGANDA – PLEASE MAKE A COMMENT; RECOMMEND THIS BLOG

CO2  HAS  NOTHING  TO  DO  WITH  THE  PHONY  GLOBAL WARMING – WATER CHANGES THE CLIMATE, NOT CO2 – CLIMATE IS IN CONSTANT CHANGE – CLIMATE CAN CHANGE FOR THE BETTER ALSO – EVERYTHING IS  PROVEN NOW; NO NEED TO WAIT   TO  2100.  

TO ALL AUSTRALIANS: ORGANIZE A PETITION IN YOUR RESPECTIVE AREA WITH A QUESTION: ARE SENATOR BROWN AND TIM FLANNERY PREPARED TO BE ATTACHED TO A LIE DETECTOR, TO ANSWER A SIMPLE QUESTION: ”DO THEY BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING”?! NO, NOT IN CLIMATE CHANGE, CLIMATE IS IN CONSTANT CHANGE / NECESSARY (not that dirty trick).  BUT DO THEY BELIEVE IN THE PHONY GLOBAL WARMING. BEFORE THAT, NOBODY SHOULD SUPPORT THEM,  ESPECIALLY  THEIR  MISLEAD FANATIC APOSTILLES

Rely on what is reliable. Physics, chemistry, arithmetic are the most reliable sciences. On the other hand, Climatology is the biggest shonky science. Used car dealers go by rules and regulations; climatologist don’t, but they will – crime shouldn’t pay! People go to jail for $1000 bucks. If enough people know what is on this website and in my book – will be the end of Kyoto Protocol and all the associated swindle, in few months. No laundering tax $$$ and brainwashing the kids in school and university. So, if you notice that I’m not very, very diplomatic regarding the swindlers; is because: when you learn all the real proofs I have – being diplomatic to them, is same as being diplomatic to bank-robbers, or a pedophile. The damages they do, are much bigger crimes, than any bank-robbers can do.

The biggest precursor of the evil is: 1] connecting the permanent climatic changes with the phony GLOBAL warming.  2] the few sceptical scientist have being indoctrinated in the past with same shonky theories – they are using the misleading data from IPCC as factual – to prove them wrong. 3]when are real proofs available; they opt for the Warmist maybes, can happen, it’s possible, 90% possibility… The laws of physics controls the temperature, not the climatologist!

No, it’s not possible; whatever the laws of physics don’t approve. Same laws of physics were 15000y ago, 5BC, 900 -1300AD, 150y ago, 98, as today. Same laws of physics will be in 2100AD. You will see that: I have proven that is no such a thing as GLOBAL warming, but climate is constantly changing; for different reasons, nothing to do with CO2!!! CO2 is the good guy, the Warmist are naughty! Many active Skeptics are profiteering from the Warmist’ propaganda – they will not discus how to improve the climate. Climate never stops changing, but can change for better and for worse. Water changes the climate. If you go from east to west coast of Australia, USA, Africa; you will encounter 150 different climates. Same CO2 level, same sunspots from the sun; but completely different climates. Tragically, the ignorant Skeptics are creating ‘’backdoor exits’’ for the Warmist with their silly sunspots and previous phony GLOBAL warmings… Q: can lots of previous phony GLOBAL warmings prove that is no GLOBAL warming in 2100?! Here are some real proofs, you compare:

1] for the atmosphere to get warmer by 2⁰C, first must get warmer by 0,5⁰C. Instantly is not possible to get warmer by 0,5⁰C, but lets pretend that it can. 0,5⁰C warming will make oxygen +nitrogen to expand; the  troposphere to expand into the stratosphere by 100m. Up there, the temperature is -90⁰C. Expansion is instant – intercepts appropriate extra coldness to counteract and that extra cold air falls down in a jiffy, not after 100years. Because of fast spinning of the planet and upper winds – that extra coldness falls somewhere else – but overall, it’s same warmth units in the troposphere every day of every year. So, if it cannot get warmer for more than few minutes by 0,5⁰C, how can it get warmer by 2 or 5⁰C?! Some places on the planet always gets warmer – instantly other places gets colder – to equalize. Otherwise the winds would stop permanently. That never happened. The only reason northern hemisphere gets warmer in June, July; is because on the S/H is colder and the air shrunk.

2] the laws of physics don’t work ‘’only sometime’’ Because of the same laws of physics, the WHOLE planet’s atmosphere cannot get colder also (as in Ice Age), or solar eclipse. When the moon gets in-between the sun and earth, or Venus, Mercury; they prevent lots of sunlight not to reach to the earth. Where is the shadow – the air gets colder = shrinks – from other areas air goes there to prevent vacuum = on the other places with less air to expand, gets warmer. It was same, only on a larger scale and for long period during any ice age. Where was colder – air density was greater – on the expense of the opposite end of the planet – on the opposite end, with less air to carry the heat up to the stratosphere for cooling /to intercept extra coldness – had much hotter days, not colder; as the shonky science suggests. When was colder in Europe /USA by 8⁰C during the ice age; Oceania was warmer by 0,8⁰C, because Oceania is 10 times larger. Here is something to scrutinize:::

3] Here is some reality for both camps:: oxygen + nitrogen expand and  shrink instantly, in change of temperature, they are 998999ppm. As in ‘’big city heat’’ growing cities for the last 100years. The air from 500km3 expands by 10%. The extra 50km3 volume goes up and increases the volume of the troposphere. Those extra 50km3 intercepts extra coldness in 3,5 seconds – that extra coldness falls down in minutes; but because of upper winds and fast spinning of the planet, it falls somewhere else – overall, the warmth in the atmosphere doesn’t change. Oxygen and nitrogen don’t wait for 1000 y to get warmer by 2-3⁰C, then to start expanding. Expansion is instant, as soon as small part get warmer by only 0,0001⁰C. Therefore, as long as one believes in the laws of physics – is stupid to believe in any GLOBAL warming! Same laws of physics will be in 100 y as they are today. Shock for the Skeptics: same laws of physics were in 98, same laws were 5BC, 1200AD, same laws of physics were 6 000 y ago, for when you were told lie that was warmer; and was same warmth units 15 000 years ago (during the big ice age)

For the last 150y, the sun has produced tremendous amount of heat on the planet. It’s all gone. Today is exactly the same warmth as it was before 151 years ago. Extra heat in the atmosphere is not accumulative; because of expanding and shrinking of O+N in change of temperature. Not enough extra heat accumulated for the last 150years in the atmosphere, to boil one chicken egg. B] when is solar eclipse – lots of sunlight is reflected by the moon, or Mercury, or Venus, not to come to the earth, but that doesn’t lower the temperature even for one milli-degree, not even for that same day. Because of instant shrinking of the air when gets colder = releases less heat for the duration. Both camps act as if they have abolished the laws of physics!… Skeptics, if you want to win, don’t blame the Warmist for anything, until you scrutinize the following 3 paragraphs:

Q: do you know that: close to the ground is warmer by 105⁰C, than where O+N expand, when warmed extra, UP into the stratosphere? (on the ground +14⁰C, on the edge of the troposphere is   -90⁰C) that is 105⁰C difference! Same as if your body warms up from 37⁰C to 38⁰C, but instantly you spread and dip your arm into ice of minus –67⁰C. The blood from your arm will bring extra coldness to other parts of the body and make them much cooler. When O+N expand extra up into the stratosphere – they cool extra – shrink extra and bring that extra coldness down in a jiffy, not 100y.

 Q 1: when you warm up oxygen + nitrogen by 6⁰C, why do they expand much more, than when you warm them by only 2⁰C, or even less on 0,5⁰C? A: because they need to increase the volume of the atmosphere more, to intercept extra coldness, to equalize. Q 2: when you warm O+N for 20minutes, why they don’t shrink after 10 minutes? A: because they need to keep intercepting extra coldness and redirecting it down, as long as the troposphere is warmer, to keep the temperature overall in the atmosphere to be same. Q3: after 20 minutes if O+N cool to previous temperature; why they don’t stay expanded for another hour? A: if they did, they would have redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers and lakes in a day. Q 4: can extra CO2 prevent oxygen and nitrogen of expanding? A: those two gases expand trough hi-tensile walls of a hand-grenade, when warmed. Q 5: why O+N shrink when cooled, instead? A: to minimize exposure (shrinking the atmosphere) to intercept less coldness, until they get to previous temperature. It takes minutes only. That proves that ice age on both hemispheres simultaneously is impossible! Q 6: do those two gases expand when warmed / shrink when cooled; because they have nothing better to do, or they are regulating the heat in the atmosphere to be always the same?! Q 7: for the last 3 Januaries, when was record coldness in Europe /USA, why on the same dates was record heat in Australia? A:To balance. Same as children’s see-saw plank in the park. The more one side goes up = the more the other side goes down. Both sides don’t go up or down simultaneously. The Laws of physics don’t work ‘’only sometime’’ prof. Plimer! You deserve a medal from Al Gore…!

 Formula: EH=AE=ECI    ( Extra Heat= Atmosphere Expands= Extra Coldness Intercepts) Laws of physics, chemistry, arithmetic are the most reliable sciences. Rely on the reliable, not on the shonky scientists. What the laws of physics don’t approve = it must be wrong!!! Unless the laws of physics are abolished by legislation in the parliament and in the UN. If we don’t need the laws of physics, abolish them by referendum. Enough people have being already brainwashed by ABC & SBS Pty Ltd, and by the British BBC. Confusing the constant / normal climatic changes with the phony GLOBAL warming; created plenty nutters in both  camps. Referendum would be successful. Warmist blame CO2 every time when is an cyclone, earthquake, hurricane. But on that same day on million other places, is beautiful weather – they don’t say thanks to the CO2 for a beautiful weather. Million to one is not bad, isn’t it? The other 350 days have same CO2, but good weather; thanks CO2…!

The same shonky professions, when they find that was warmer /colder in Europe 5BC, or 1250AD, they declared that the whole planet’s atmosphere was same – they have given even names Maxima / minima… what a crap. At that time people were scared to sail more than 50km west of Portugal, Morocco. Who was collecting data at that time for Australia, Oceania. Their proofs are so childish (I have disproved all those; I have never believed for one minute in their shonky GLOBAL warming; read the condensed version of the book; so I don’t have to repeat all now) There are real reason why some parts of the planet get extra warm /cold; but never the WHOLE planet’s atmosphere!

CLIMATE

For the climate to change, it doesn’t need any bloody GLOBAL warming /cooling. To repeat again: most of the genes in every critter, including human; are degenerated /junk genes. But not the genes for adaptation. The good Lord made the climate to be in constant change, to keep the genes for adaptation /diversification alive. I.e. you use it of lose it. That proves that the climate never stopped changing for the last 65 million years. If they don’t stop it with carbon tax, will they return the rip-off money? If it wasn’t for industrial revolution, would the climate stayed the same?! In nature nothing stays the same; either deteriorates or improves, grows or shrinks. Why with lies they are creating fanatic zombies / nutters from the most ignorant?! A: Profits, and power over the Urban Sheep.

Human is powerful to improve / deteriorate the climate. Trees will tell you where is better climate, and why. Around Kyoto city, with much more CO2, the trees are healthier, than inland Australia, why? Nullabor in southern Australia has less CO2 than any place on the planet. Nullabor is Latin for ‘’Zero Trees’’. Amazon rainforest has 200% more CO2, than inland Australia. The winds bring in the jungle CO2, plus the fungi rotting the leafs, dead branches, trunks, roots are releasing same amount of CO2, as much as the trees absorb per calendar year. B] Tributaries to Amazon are on same latitude as the Australian tropical dry rivers – same sunspots affect both. Wake up Skeptics; Warmist go for ‘’carbon smart’’ Skeptics go for ‘’carbon stupid’’. Australia should have much higher rainfall than South America, because is smaller landmass – surrounded by the biggest mass of water.

This is constructive criticism, Skeptics; million proofs how ignorant you are, are in front of your eyes. Creation of extra methane is the most beneficial – Warmist are badmouthing it, Skeptics are helping them. 2]Needs to bring acidity from thousands of planets, to lower to pH7,3  in the sea; which would have being better for fish and corals, anyway. Unless is below pH7, is NOT ACIDIC!!! Rainforest creeks are acidic. Most of the lands on the planet are too alkaline, not acidic. Human increases alkalinity in the sea, not acidity! Get all the proofs from this blog; expose the Warmist and some egotistic Skeptics for the damages they are doing. When you know what is on this blog, they don’t argue with you anymore. If is honest one, he /she drops the jaw; if is a Swindler, from any camp – they just panic and cut-off the debate. Make a list of their names, for when time comes for ‘’truth and reconciliation’’  They know that: if they argue against what is on this blog = they are arguing against the laws of physics, not only against you. Let them abolish those laws first, in parliament and by UN, before they con about the phony global warming

It’s not only a game for rip-off and oppression; when you learn about the damages they are doing to the climate, with their misleading; will knock your socks off. Leading Skeptics are blinded by the aggressive propaganda, cannot realize about the damages I refer; they are even part of the crime. That makes Sceptic’s crime double crime, by false pretence. Same as if policeman makes damages, he is more guilty, than when pick-pocketers make damages. Think about it, boys; forget your ego!

In my book, there is a question: who is the clown to say that 151 years ago was the best amount of CO2 in the air and in the sea?!?!?! Australia has more climatologist, marine biologist, ecologist per capita on the planet than any other country; there is more of them than is cane-toads in Queensland; and swarms more are coming out of universities every season, like from a sausage machine.  Indoctrinated that carbon is bad. The zombie graduated and his conman professor are 25% made of carbon, trees also. For locomotion, carbon uses oxygen, the winds to spread it where is needed.  Those bubbles in the bread they eat are  999999ppm CO2; made by the yeast.  Also the bubbles in beer, champagne are CO2 999999ppm. The flour, sugar, backing powder in the cake he eats are all made from carbon. Compare with the 260-400ppm in the atmosphere, that they are scaring you with.

They can get away with anything. Blaming CO2 for drought…? Water makes it wet. Blaming CO2 for bushfires – CO2 is fire retardant gas. Blaming CO2 for cyclone, earthquake or hurricane… When is bad weather on one place – on million other places on that same day is good weather. Why the Warmist don’t blame CO2 for the good weather on the other million places on the planet; with same CO2 level? Million to one is not bad… thanks CO2!

Everything is proven, now, not to wait 100years; spread the word /the truth. In the past they were big CLIMATIC CHANGES, not GLOBAL warmings  /coolings. Laws of physics, boys!!! The sooner they are exposed = the less permanent damages they will make = the criminal law will be more lenient on them. Most of the damages are irreversible. Money squandered is hard to return. Start from the homepage to the last article. They are all related; cannot be outdated. But don’t skip articles or paragraphs could be the most important conection. Lots of kids are enrolling in universities in the shonky professions, when the truth is known… the best years of their lives wasted; by the Warmist propaganda… If you know some of them, suggest to them,  to read what is on this blog, you will be saving the kid’s future as extra benefit

WHERE ARE THE PEER, TO REVIEW  ALL THE REAL PROOFS ON THIS BLOG?! YOU BE THE ONE. THE TRUTH WILL WIN, IT’S ON THIS BLOG. BE PART OF   ”THE RESISTANCE”