THE REAL SKEPTIC’s PROBLEMS
Skeptic is NOT a Skeptic, if he / she believes 101% in the phony GLOBAL warmings – he is a FAKE! Section of his brains for logic and common sense is in induced coma.
1] not knowing that climatic changes has nothing to do with the phony GLOBAL warming. 2] falling for the trick that; past big climatic changes were GLOBAL warmings. Wrong! 3] by the laws of physics, Ice Age / warming of the WHOLE planet is impossible. 4] most of the active Skeptics being big city slickers; cannot comprehend that water improves; or lack of it on the land and in the atmosphere deteriorates the climate, nothing, nothing to do with CO2. 5] Refusing to acknowledge that oxygen + nitrogen; that are 998999 ppm are regulating the temperature in the atmosphere, to be same every hour of every month, year and every millennia. Warmist are exploiting Skeptic’s ignorance and winning, so-far. Nothing to be proud of, Skeptics. Warmist are winning, with your ignorant support; by putting the real climatic changes, with the phony GLOBAL warming, in the same basket = same as the Warmist.
Stefan‘s formula: EC > AS > LHR
References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA (the big one) they were ALL localised. For the duration of the Big Ice Age in Europe / USA (N/H), on the southern hemisphere was much, warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were then, as today!!! If the whole troposphere was colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalises in a jiffy. Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it + all the geothermal heat released into the air, precisely, all of it. But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder for some reason – troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 5 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / save / accumulate in 5 minutes?! Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes! My formula is the best proof: EC > AS > LHR (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > Less Heat Releases) Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in foetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimise / maximise of 5% of extra surface area; troposphere can shrink / double in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!! Q: how fast can oxygen and nitrogen expand when warmed up? A: by expanding, they are pushing the bullet velocity from the barrel of the gun.
The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER by as much, to equalise! Because in that case, on the hemisphere that gets colder – the air shrinks / volume decreases – but the EXTRA volume of air from the opposite hemisphere because of extra warming, is compensating in volume; for shrinking on the colder half – or in that case was 30- 40% of the planet’s area colder. The shonky scientists in the last 150 years were COMPLETELY disregarding the laws of physics!!!… As a bi-product, we had Nuclear Winter for year 2000 / lots of PHONY GLOBAL warmings in the past (from the ”pretend Skeptics) and in 100 years a PHONY GLOBAL warming, by the Organised Crime. Yes in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now with CO2 / Methane conspiracy /con, they are robbing nations / countries… They are robbing the poor, the pensioner, the low paid; because carbon tax is a flat-rate tax. On every product in the shop, the pensioner pays same carbon-tax as the millionaire. The loot money disappears in the jet-setters pockets + for unnecessary phony GLOBAL warmings ‘’researchers. The ‘’spoils’’ are not evenly divided; the biggest liars get the most. The ‘’Believers’’ of the lower genera and IQ, as usual, get the middle finger; same as the D/H from the sceptical genera
2] Here is some reality for the both camps::: oxygen + nitrogen expand and shrink instantly, in change of temperature. As in ‘’big city heat’’ growing cities for the last 100years. The air from 500km3 expands by 10%. The extra 50km3 volume goes up and increases the volume of the troposphere. Those extra 50km3 intercepts extra coldness in 3,5 seconds – that extra coldness falls down in minutes; but because of upper winds and fast spinning of the planet, it falls somewhere else – overall, the warmth in the atmosphere doesn’t change. Oxygen and nitrogen don’t wait for 100 y to get warmer by 2-3⁰C, then to start expanding. Expansion is INSTANT, as soon as small part get warmer by only 0,0001⁰C. Therefore, as long as one believes in the laws of physics – is stupid to believe in any GLOBAL warming! Same laws of physics will be in 100 years, as they are today. Shock for the Skeptics: same laws of physics were in 98, same laws were 5BC, 1200AD, same laws of physics were 6 000 y ago, when you were told lie that was warmer; and 15 000 y ago (during the big ice age)and 1230AD!
For the last 150y, the sun has produced tremendous amount of heat on the planet. It’s all gone. Today is exactly the same warmth as it was before 151 years ago. Extra heat in the atmosphere is not accumulative; because of expanding and shrinking of O+N in change of temperature. Not enough extra heat accumulated for the last 150years in the atmosphere, to boil one chicken egg. B] when is solar eclipse – lots of sunlight is reflected by the moon, or Mercury, or Venus, not to come to the earth, but that doesn’t lower the temperature even for one milli-degree, not even for that same day. Because of instant shrinking of the air when gets colder = releases less heat for the duration. Both camps act as if they have abolished the laws of physics!… Skeptics, if you want to win, don’t blame the Warmist for anything, until you scrutinize the following 3 paragraphs:
Q: do you know that: close to the ground, is warmer by 105⁰C, than where O+N expand when warmed extra, UP into the stratosphere? (on the ground +14⁰C, on the edge of the troposphere is -90⁰C) that is 105⁰C difference! Same as if your body warms up from 37⁰C to 38⁰C, but instantly you spread and dip your arm into ice of minus -67⁰C. The blood from your arm will bring extra coldness to the other parts of the body and make them much cooler. When O+N expand extra up into the stratosphere – they cool extra – shrink extra and bring that extra coldness down in a jiffy, not in 100years.
Q 1: when you warm up oxygen + nitrogen by 6⁰C, why do they expand much more, than when you warm them by only 2⁰C, or even less on 0,5⁰C? A: because they need to increase the volume of the atmosphere more, to intercept extra coldness, to equalize. Q 2: when you warm O+N for 20minutes, why they don’t shrink after 10 minutes? A: because they need to keep intercepting extra coldness and redirecting it down, as long as the troposphere is warmer, to keep the temperature overall in the atmosphere to be same. Q3: after 20 minutes if O+N cool to previous temperature; why they don’t stay expanded for another hour? A: if they did, they would have redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers and lakes in a day. Q 4: can extra CO2 prevent oxygen and nitrogen of expanding? A: those two gases expand trough hi-tensile walls of a hand-grenade, when warmed. Q 5: why O+N shrink when cooled, instead? A: to minimize exposure (shrinking the atmosphere) to intercept less coldness, until they get to previous temperature. It takes minutes only. That proves that ice age on both hemispheres simultaneously is impossible! Q 6: do those two gases expand when warmed / shrink when cooled, because they have nothing better to do, or they are regulating the heat in the atmosphere to be always the same?! Q 7: for the last 3 Januaries, when was record coldness in Europe /USA, why on the same dates was record heat in Australia? A:To balance. Same as children’s see-saw plank in the park. The more one side goes up = the more the other side goes down. Both sides don’t go up or down simultaneously. The Laws of physics don’t work ‘’only sometime’’!
Formula: EH >AE >ECI ( Extra Heat > Atmosphere Expands > Extra Coldness Intercepts) Laws of physics, chemistry, arithmetic are the most reliable sciences. Rely on the reliable, not on the shonky scientists. What the laws of physics don’t approve = it must be wrong!!! Unless the laws of physics are abolished by legislation in the parliament and in the UN. If we don’t need the laws of physics, abolish them by referendum. Enough people have being already brainwashed by ABC & SBS Pty Ltd, and by the British BBC. Confusing the constant / normal climatic changes with the phony GLOBAL warming created plenty nutters in both camps. Referendum would be successful. Warmist blame CO2 every time when is an cyclone, earthquake, hurricane. But on that same day on million other places, is beautiful weather – they don’t say thanks to the CO2 for a beautiful weather. Million to one is not bad, isn’t it? The other 350 days have same CO2, but good weather; thanks CO2…! hippocricy!
Help me to present the truth to the world. Repeating prof. Gerard Diamond’s crap, adopted as factual by prof. Plimer, is self destructive. Those phony proofs that prof. Plimer collected from around the planet are outdated deceiving jokes. Remains me of a starving man trying to shit, I.e. lots of hot air but nothing solid. His proofs are not proofs. All his references came from shonky science. Atmospheric temperature doesn’t go up and down as a yo-yo. Only heat and coldness CHANGE locations. That’s not GLOBAL warming, or GLOBAL cooling. Climatologist’s profession is based on lies. It’s one thing to brainwash their students = cloning more deviates of themselves; it’s another matter when they con the ignorant people / politicians = that’s a crime against humanity. The semi honest leading Skeptics are assisting them. Because by false pretence, it’s their double crime.
Another Stefanthedenier ‘s formula:
References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA (the big one) were ALL localised. For the duration of the Big Ice Age in Europe / USA (N/H) on the southern hemisphere was much, warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were than as today!!! If the whole troposphere was colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalises in a jiffy. Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it. But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder for some reason – troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 5 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / accumulate in 5 minutes?! Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes! my formula is the best proof: EC > AS > LHR (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > Less Heat Releases) Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in foetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimise / maximise 5% of extra surface area; troposphere can double in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!!
The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER by as much, to equalise! Because in that case, on the hemisphere that gets colder – the air shrinks / volume decreases – but the EXTRA volume of air from the opposite hemisphere because of extra warming, is compensating for shrinking on the colder half – or in that case was 30- 40% of the planet colder. The shonky scientists in the last 150 years were COMPLETELY disregarding the laws of physics!!!… As a bi-product, we had Nuclear Winter for year 2000 / lots of PHONY GLOBAL warmings in the past (from the ”pretend Skeptics) and in 100years a PHONY GLOBAL warming, by the Organised Crime. Yes in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now with CO2 / Methane conspiracy /con, they are robbing nations / countries…
3] when Warmist comes up with some stupid proof; the active Skeptics get in overdrive ridiculing, being sarcastic. Q: if the Warmist are so stupid, how come they rip-off billions of $$$ from the Urban Sheep, calling themselves Skeptics. (reason they are referred in Australia as: ‘’prof. Plimer’s Galahs’’) They are the people that are prepared to stand up for the truth - unfortunately, Ian is got monopoly on their brains. I call them; prof; Plimer’s D/H.
Warmist cannot have one single legitimate proof, because there is no such a thing as GLOBAL warming. They know that, reason they changed the term from GLOBAL warming, to ‘’Climate Change’’. (as a fig leaf, to cover up their shame for lying about GLOBAL warming). Unless the Skeptics realize that, they will never win. If they do open their eyes / closed parashoot brains, they will win instantly = Warmist ‘’fig leaf’’ removed. A] People should debate; how to improve the climate, not how to stop it from changing. B] climate never stopped changing for one day in the last 65 million years. Climate can change for better, not just for worse. Q: do you like climate in which properties, animals, trees and people get burned in bushfires? CO2 is not creating bushfires, CO2 is fire retardant molecule. Dry heat created inland, is vacuuming the moisture from the topsoil and vegetation close to the coast for 11months in the year, is preparing it for bushfires. Extra dams, stormwater saved on the land minimizes that dry heat. Who is against saving extra stormwater on the land?! Unfortunately, the Skeptic Smarties cannot even see through the Warmist agenda.
It’s much less CO2 in the desert than in Sydney, Detroit, Kyoto. Where is better climate? Same sunspots influence Sahara and Brazil, why is different climate? Trees can tell you which climate is good or bad. Ask the children, they will tell you the truth; before they get brainwashed in school / on TV– by the biggest Organized Crime on the planet. Would the climate stopped changing 150y ago, if it wasn’t industrial revolution? It’s not the ‘’carbon smart’’ or ‘’carbon stupid’’ but get all the proofs and facts on this website. We will see the end of the misleading propaganda, and start improving the climate. Say it loud and clear: What do we want?! Climate change!! When do we want it?! Now!! What do we want? Climate change for better!! They will stop calling you a ‘’climate change Denier’’ Be a phony GLOBAL warming Denier. If you deny that human can change the climate; my tiers will not help you much, you need a shrink! More H2O on land = better climate. Drain farmer’s water in the estuary = worse climate
Verdict: Skeptics shouldn’t whinge, but to present the real proofs to the people; not to the top Warmist. The top Warmist know that is all lies; they are creating those lies. But to present the truth to their followers – because their followers will be the biggest losers. I have all those proofs; no need to wait 100years, to prove that will not be any GLOBAL warming. I have the solid proofs, now!
When the Skeptics say: ‘’if Australia introduces carbon tax, will be miniscule /insignificant help to the climate’’ = is a gross stupidity!! Because science of ‘’very small affect’’ is same as Warmist ‘’big affect’’ = lie. Plus is dignifying the Warmist’ lies. It’s same as saying: man can get pregnant, but only little-bit. Warmist go for ‘’Climate Smart’’ Skeptics go for ‘’Climate Stupid’’ Q: If Australia and the rest of the world go instantly to zero carbon emission; will that stop the climate from changing? NO! Because CO2 has nothing to do with the climate! 300-500y ago was less cars on the road, even less electricity was used; but climate was changing. Why don’t you ask the Warmist: if we go to cave age; will the climate stop changing? Q: will the tornadoes, earthquakes and cyclones disappear? Q: is this a perfect climate now; in which trees, animals and birds get mummified without water and incinerated in big bushfires???! Or, you Sceptics will prove that is no GLOBAL warming in 2100, by telling crap about sunspots? Or with the phony GLOBAL warmings in the past? Get the prof. Plimer’s wool off your eyes first, so you will be able to see the reality first. Warmist, was it better climate 151 years ago than now?!
Yes, human can improve and deteriorate the climate. If you go from east coast to west coast of USA , or Australia, you will encounter 50 different climates. Same CO2 level, same sunspots, but different climates. BECAUSE CLIMATE IS CONTROLED BY WATER (H2O) , altitude and latitude, not CO2. We cannot do anything about altitude / latitudes, but can do a lot about H2O on the land. Topsoil moisture, water storage and H2O in the atmosphere is the biggest factor; human can save extra stormwater and improve the climate; subhuman can reposes farmer’s water to drain it in the estuary. Big difference. Farmer’s water evaporates – helps the surrounding vegetation / attracts extra clouds from the sea (clouds avoid dry lan /air). Draining storm-water in the estuary on the driest continent is as if never rained. Dams attract extra clouds from the sea. Dams improve the climate. Green senator Brown made himself a name by preventing hydro-electric dam of being built. That dam would have produced more electricity, than all the solar panels on the planet.
Tragically, the Skeptics became bigger ‘’carbon molesters’’ than the Warmist. That distanced them from the reality. Few academics that are referred as ‘’Climate Change Deniers’’ should get a medal from Al Gore and Tim Flannery. Those ‘’Deniers’’ that human can change the climate are doing Al Gore’s dirty job. The truth: human cannot produce GLOBAL warming; but human can deteriorate / improve the climate. Unfortunately, those few ‘’Skeptic academics’’ have being learning from the same books as the Warmist about the ‘’previous phony GLOBAL warmings / GLOBAL coolings” they have being brainwashing their students and followers = now they cannot turn around and say: oops, they were localized warmings and ice ages, not GLOBAL; because THE LAWS OF PHYSICS will not permit GLOBAL. In other words, their egotism is more important than the health of the planet. F#*& the truth…
That’s why I am begging any person, sceptical or not; present all the proofs /facts and formulas that are on this website to every leading Skeptic. If he /she tries to wiggle out = is real proof that they are as scared from the truth as the leading Warmist. Some of those leading Skeptics are profiteering from the Warmist propaganda (as Anthony Watts), others are protecting their ego and false reputation = that makes them bigger part of the crime (false pretence)
Warmist say: 90% possibility of GLOBAL warming. I have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that is and will be zero GLOBAL warming. B] The word ‘’sceptic’’ means 90% is not going to be GLOBAL warming, only 10% yes. In other words, Skeptic’s nickname is dignifying the Warmist. Because it suggests that: 10% there is possibility of GLOBAL warming. Most probably the name ‘’Skeptic’’ was concocted by the Warmist. You read what is on this website, you will not be believer or Skeptic. You will know 100% that is no such a thing as a GLOBAL warming, but human can improve and deteriorate the climate. Only when the truth is known, appropriate solutions can be applied to improve the climate. We should start to debate how to improve the climate, not to stop the climate from changing, stupid. To improve the climate, must be done everything opposite than what the Warmist demand. Save extra stormwater on dry lands as Australia, Sahara, Pakistan.
All contemporary Skeptic’s proofs have being concocted by the Warmist. Even the Warmist are ashamed of telling them, but the Skeptics are using those stupid / unsubstantiated proofs as factual and weapons (water pistols) against the Warmist… Those same phony proofs were used in the beginning of the Warmist march, by prof. Gerard Diamond. He had a problem to con the people that the whole planet’s atmosphere can get warmer and colder. His phony proofs after were used by the few Skeptic academics to brainwash the sceptical people… To do Al Gore’s dirty job. Plus to let know the Warmist; how ignorant the Skeptics are. That Warmist can and will use the Skeptic’s proofs as a ‘’backdoor exit’’ when people realize that the planet is not getting warmer – Warmist have under their sleeve: didn’t get warmer because of sunspots. Shame, shame prof. Plimer and Lord Monkton!!! Their proofs are as if: they are proving that in 100years will be only a small Fire Dragon with 1/2 head, because they have proofs of existence of big and small 6-7 heads dragons in the past…?! It’s not funny, they pretend to represent the truth. I have being physically attacked in the supermarket car park, no, not by Warmist, but by prof. Plimer’s apostil; for saying that: 98 wasn’t warmer or colder year than any other year, 5BC was same temperature as today.
Most of the genes in every living critter are junk genes. I.e. use it or lose it. But the genes for adaptation and diversification are still fully functioning in every critter. That is the best proof that the climate never stopped changing. In the critters that don’t exist anymore, as dinosaurs; those genes were degenerated = when the bacteria that produces methane evolved – created lots of extra free oxygen = from 6-7% oxygen in the atmosphere went to 20% – much less CO2 = DINO went belly up. (in my book I have extensive work / proofs on the subject) Genetically modifying that bacteria to inhibit methane instead, by Australian CSIRO, will reverse the climate /environment, not to be suitable for warm-blooded critters, but to be suitable for the dinosaurs, unfortunately, he is gone… To make it even more sick, the leading Skeptics are molesting the methane also…!!! Truth: creating more methane = more free oxygen in the atmosphere. Burning natural das, destroys the free oxygen
6] blaming the solar and galactic influence on the earth’s atmospheric temperature is another sick proof (self-destructive smoking gun) Having in mind that the atmosphere can double in volume is split second – how much is extra coldness there to intercept?!? Leading Skeptics with that proof are only creating ‘’ backdoor’’ exit for the Warmist… We know that NASA is on the Warmist bandwagon – they can say that was more, or less sunspots = will have phony reason why GLOBAL warming is not happening. Because of the Skeptic’s ignorance and immaturity, the Warmist can persist with any crap, knowing that the leading Skeptics are common sense deficient, but mountains of egotism.
Instead of substituting the phony GLOBAL warming with the name ‘’Climate Change’’ if they substituted it with ‘’Dog Turd’’ that would have made the Skeptics ‘’Dog Turd Deniers’’. It’s same thing. Will carbon tax prevent doggy poo of being different shapes and sizes? No! same with the climate. Human is powerful enough to deteriorate the climate = therefore, is powerful enough to improve the climate. Saving more stormwater on the land = will be produced less dry heat = will destroy less moisture in the atmosphere, created by the oceans. That will produce more raw material for ice on the polar caps. More ice on those waters, to insulate the seawater from the tremendous coldness = milder temperature on the whole planet. People as Senator Brown, Tim Flannery and many other Warmist are demanding the opposite. The active Skeptic are big city Slickers… still think that climate is controlled, by turning the button on the Fujitsu air-conditioner, or by CO2. Controlling it to be below 2C warming…?
Skeptics, if you want to win:
1] forget about; anthropogenic, crapogenic; CO2 is the good guy. Starving trees for CO2 don’t discriminate if is carbon 12 or carbon 14. By debating about it = you give impression that carbon is bad. Your body is 25% made of carbon. So are the trees, more H2O+CO2 = green. Using CO2 for your vocal cords when exhaling, to badmouth CO2, is ignorance. All those burbles in beer any fizy drink and champagne are pure CO2. You put yeast to produce CO2, bread to be spongy. 2] forget about past GLOBAL warmings; they were localized, not GLOBAL In Europe /USA can get colder by 10⁰C – in Oceania needs to get warmer by ONE degree, to equalize. Because Oceania is 10 times larger. Before Columbus, people were scared to sail more than 50km west of Portugal; not to fall of the planet; how did you collect the temperature at that time in Oceania, America? Thermometer was invented in 17 century – not accurate anyway. All the GLOBAL Warmings for the past were concocted by the same shonky profession that you are trying to prove them wrong. Was real reasons for river in London freezing, not any bloody GLOBAL cooling. Read why was colder / warmer in Europe in the past; real reasons, not the crap that you use for proving the Warmist wrong. Past phony GLOBAL warmings will not prove that is no GLOBAL warming in 100years from now. Start using the laws of physics, you will recognize what is the truth or wrong. It’s all here, for you. Help me spread the correct proofs / evidences, please! Instead of just being sarcastic about the Warmist phony proofs; get the real proofs from this website; you will see the end of the Warmist propaganda. Sunspots / medieval GLOBAL warmings are indicators to the Warmist, that Skeptics are not using their own brains / immature. It’s same as little Jonny proving to his father that the stork makes / bring babies. Wake up Skeptics; most of the phony past GLOBAL warmings are invented by people that are in the Warmist camp; or would be, if they are still alive.
People go to jail for $1000 bucks. Warmist are squandering billions of tax $$$. They will not give up; unless are exposed by real proofs. So-far, the Warmist keep the silly Skeptic’s proofs, as handy Warmist ”back-door” exit. As their plan B. They should be told by the Skeptics loud and clear: ”crime shouldn’t pay! When exposed, will be ”truth and reconciliation” !!! IN civilised society justice should be done / punishments to fit the crimes!” Half of the protagonist will withdrew instantly. With my proofs, no need to wait 100 years, to see that Warmist are lying. Use my proofs, see the effect on them, for yourself.
Remember: unlike on the moon, on the earth warmth is 3 dimensional. No matter if that warmth is 6feet above the ground, or 6km. 2] Troposphere is not like human body; if under the armpit is warmer by 1C = the whole body is warmer by that-much. In the atmosphere, unless one part gets colder – other part cannot get warmer; that’s what the laws of physics say! Because; if one part gets warmer without other part getting colder > air in the warm part expands up. Collects / redirects extra coldness and equalizes in a jiffy. But if some other place gets colder – the extra volume of air expanded by becoming warmer goes to area where is gone colder – because there the air has shrunk! As the children’s see-saw plank; both sides don’t go up, or down simultaneously. Start to believe in the laws of physics and my formulas:
Mitich formulas: 1] { EH >AE >ECI } (Extra Heat> Atmosphere Expands > Extra Coldness Intercepts)
Fire 2] CH4+O4 = 2H2O+CO2
Cow & sheep 3] 2H2O+CO2=CH4 +O4
