Q & A

posted on January 4. 2012



WHO IS THE CLOWN, TO SAY THAT 290ppm of CO2 is the best for crops and trees?! CO2 is food for the trees &crops – isn’t it appropriate to ask the trees&crops for advice: how many parts per million of CO2 is the best?!?! Trees and crops cannot be ”brainwashed” by the aggressive propaganda, they don’t tell lies!

 All normal greenhouses have solid glass roof. Glass is transparent for the sunlight; but ‘’SOLID’’ prevents hot air of getting out. On the other hand; CO2 is NOT transparent for the sunlight – intercepts sunlight high up, where cooling is more efficient => less sunlight comes to the ground.

 b] CO2 & water vapor are less than 3% of the atmosphere, the rest is oxygen &nitrogen. Which means: ‘’ if one removes 97% of the roof off a normal greenhouse – that wouldn’t be a greenhouse anymore!’’ When there is a small hole on the roof of a normal greenhouse – farmer instantly plugs the hole – heat not to escape out. Warmist are lying for profit and power / why are the ‘’Skeptics’’ misleading for, by referring CO2 &H2O as ‘’Greenhouse Gases?! Because of ignorance, or b: because they are born losers??


Q: do you know that: oxygen + nitrogen are 998999ppm in the troposphere, CO2 only 260-400ppm? Q: do you know that O+N expand /shrink INSTANTLY in change of temperature? Q: do you know that; where they expand upwards; on the edge of the troposphere is minus – 90⁰C? Q: why O+N  expand more, when warmed by 5⁰C, than when warmed by 2⁰C? A: when warmed by 5⁰C, they need to go further up, to intercept more extra coldness, to equalize. Q: if O+N are cooled after 10minutes to the previous temperature, why they don’t stay expanded another 5 minutes extra? A: not to intercept too much extra coldness, to prevent too much cooling. A2: they stay expanded precisely as long as they are warmer – not one second more or less – that’s how they regulate to be same warmth units overall in the troposphere, every hour of every year and millennium!

Q: do you know that: if troposphere warms up by 2⁰C extra – troposphere expands up into the stratosphere by 1km, how much extra coldness is there to intercept, and swap it for the extra heat? A: expansion is INSTANT – intercepts extra appropriate coldness to counteract the extra heat in 3,5 seconds > that extra coldness falls to the ground in minutes Q: if O+N are warmed extra for 30minutes, why they don’t shrink after 15minutes, or after one day? A: if O+N after cooled to previous temperature; stayed expanded for a whole day extra > they would have redirected enough extra coldness to freeze all the tropical rivers / lakes.

Q: can CO2 of 260-400ppm prevent oxygen + nitrogen of (998999ppm0 of expanding when they warm up? A: O+N when warmed extra – they expand through the walls of a hi-tensile hand-grenade. Q: do you believe in the laws of physics, or in IPCC and the Warmist cult? The laws of physics say: part of the troposphere can get colder than normal – only when other part gets warmer than normal. B] if the WHOLE troposphere gets colder -> air shrinks -> intercepts less coldness on the edge of the troposphere > retains more heat, and equalizes in a jiffy. C] both hemispheres cannot get warmer simultaneously for more than few minutes – if they doo -> troposphere expands extra -> intercepts extra coldness and equalizes in a jiffy. Q: do the O+N wait to warm up by 2-3⁰C, before start expanding; or expand INSTANTLY extra, when they warm up by 0,000001⁰C?  Mitich formula: EH>AE>EHR  (Extra Heat >Atmosphere Expands >Extra Heat Releases) Tons of extra CORRECT proofs, why I am a GLOBAL warming Infidel. I believe in climatic changes; big and small – I know that human can improve the climate /to a degree; because water controls climate = human can control water.  On the other hand, the phony GLOBAL warmings are, yes, phony. B/S makes fertile imaginations. Money corrupts even honest people, lying is bread and butter to people involved in climatology

Not the people on the net Warmist & Skeptics; but if somebody ask those questions people on the street  – they would have known the answers, without any ”doubt” without any reservation:

Q: do you know that the earth has oxygen& nitrogen, lots of it?

Q: do you know that they expand when warmed and shrink when cooled, ’instantly”?
Q: do you know that: where the troposphere expands up; there is -90C, very, very cold? Yes, on 10km altitude is -90C (-130F)

Today Warmist& Skeptics don’t know that the earth has oxygen &nitrogen – that’s why they are comparing the earth with the moon and Venus…?

Second factor in ”self regulating the temperature” is: because most of the heat produced is on the ground -> the hotter it gets-> the stronger the vertical winds! Q: why the people with hang-gliders don’t like to go up, above ”cold ground”? A: because over ”cold ground” the vertical winds are very slow – he would drop down with his glider as a brick.

Third factor in temperature self regulation: the ”vertical winds” go further UP. Because the air is thinner in higher altitudes -> more of the ”cold vacuum” penetrates into the troposphere and is canceling / neutralizing all the heat! Q: why is permanent ice on top of a mountain in the tropics? A: because the planet orbits around the sun at 108000kmh -> every 9 minutes NEW ”cold vacuum” penetrates trough the upper troposphere and is neutralizing any extra heat; same as when you put a block of ice into pot of hot-water.  Q: why that ”cold vacuum” doesn’t accumulate heat and warms up? A: because the ”cold vacuum” doesn’t have friction or gravity – the earth’s atmosphere cannot take with her any ”warmed cold vacuum” – it stays where it was, the earth moves on. Same as the air penetrating trough your car radiator, when you travel fast -> the warmed air from the radiator stays where it is, the car moves on, into other cold air. So, those three factors are self regulating the ”overall” global temperature to be always the same, always! All the warmings and coolings in the past were localized!

Let me tell you the ”PRECISION” the earth’s  ‘’TEMPERATURE SELF ADJUSTING MECHANISM” has:

Example: when you light a cigarette – it produces heat for the one cubic inch around where is burning – that cubic inch of air expands and becomes two inches by volume – the extra cubic inch doesn’t go in the yard, because is already air there – instead, as warmed, it goes up to the end of the troposphere and discharges that heat – swaps it for enough coldness to cancel the heat produced by the fire – and one cubic inch of air continues going up and down every minute, until you put the cigarette off, then it stops instantly, not to bring more coldness than necessary. That same thing happens for heat produced by CO2, heat from the erupting volcano, heat from smelter for melting iron ore, and for any other heat. Troposphere expands and shrinks constantly, as required, like piano accordion. Can expand by one inch, by 3m, actually, the troposphere can double in volume, instantly  = can discharge double the amount of heat in minutes

Q: how does the troposphere knows how much exactly heat to waste for every individual day?

A: the good Lord has inserted a thermometer in EVERY atom of oxygen &nitrogen – those thermometers are ordering the atoms to expand / shrink ”precisely” according to heat/coldness! The extra heat produced in individual day determines  the ”precise” volume of the troposphere 

Therefore: for the last 150y, the sun produced lots of heat on the earth, lots of heat produced by the geothermal, lots of heat produced by burning fossil fuel – all that heat is gone, all of it – Since the ”middle” of LIA until today hasn’t accumulated enough ”extra” heat ”overall”, what one cigarette burning can produce!!! That’s infallible precision. If you collect ALL the ‘’extra’’ heat accumulated for the last 10 000y, you wouldn’t have enough heat, to boil one chicken egg. Extra heat in the earth’s atmosphere is NOT accumulative

LIA is the Skeptic’s biggest weapon – what it was? A: river Thames was frozen for few days – WOW! What was the Medieval ”Global” Warming? A: genuine proof exist, written record from a farmer in Buckingham-shire was producing an ”extra” bushel of grain per acre – another WOW! Friends, planet is a very big place – the ”globe” is NOT spinning around  England, would you believe that?

yes there was an ice age for 12000 years, but it wasn’t ”global” cannot be global – the ”honest” laws of physics don’t permit that – unless you have abolished those laws of physics by legislation in parliament and in UN – otherwise, those laws don’t compromise!!! Please learn first about the ”self adjusting temperature mechanism the planet earth has”!

I’ll tell you, how YOU can take charge of the informative debate; first, you get the experiment, by correct observation: in the morning, you drink your coffee in the yard and observe: the soil is warming up, and vertical winds start speeding up, by 11AM those vertical winds are so strong, can keep high up a man and the glider together of 100kg for hours (they cannot be noticed on the ground, because is their starting point BUT: from 30-50m up, they are already speeding up, reason men with the gliders jump off the cliff to take off) So: in the morning the vertical winds go up to 2km altitude, by 11AM they go up to 4km altitude – you make a fire in the backyard – the heat from the fire will go up to 6km altitude, to be neutralized by the constantly incoming ‘‘cold vacuum” – heat is produced from that big forest fire on the hills you can see in the distance-> the hot air, including the CO2 produced, will go up to 7km high, for all that heat to be neutralized. Now, start calculating: how much coldness was wasted; from 2km latitude to 20km latitude early morning; then how much is wasted from 4km up to 20km after 11AM, and how much coldness is wasted from 7km upwards, when is no forest fires for the rest of the year (not to mention at night???! ) At night, not that just vertical winds don’t go high up, but they slow down to a breeze, because is not much to cool; but: if it was warmer – they would have being going higher AND would have being faster – instead I don’t think that at night I would have gone up on a hang-glider. YOU calculate all that coldness that zooms trough the troposphere  underutilized from few hundred meters up to 18km altitude, or not utilized  at all?! After you calculate all that, you will know that: there is enough EXTRA coldness in the troposphere, to neutralize 2-3 times(200-300%) times more heat than the earth normally produces. Therefore: imagine that in this moment is imaginary global warming of 3C– all it would need for those ”vertical winds” to go 150m higher than normal, for 9 minutes, and that extra warming to be neutralized permanently! Now you know how much extra heat the troposphere can get read off, in no time at all. Would you still approve of the shonky scientists wasting billions in searching for the non-existent global warming?! Should the traitors of humanity academics keep brainwashing the kids in school and university?! I told you the details; now, you tell me about your honesty and honor, should they, should they be stopped?! So: when any extra heat, for any reason: #1: vertical winds speed up #2: vertical winds go higher #3: the troposphere enlarges!!! Can CO2 prevent all those natural phenomena? NO, CO2 is integral part of those processes!!!


If any of the active Warmist / Skeptic gets outside the ‘’city island heat’’: you can see 10km radios +10km up = 700km3 of air. There are horizontal and vertical winds. From those rocks over there, vertical wind goes up – behind there, vertical winds go in direction down towards the swamp – on the other side – vertical winds go fast up from that red exposed soil to the sunlight – further there vertical wind goes in direction down towards the rice paddies –   behind you, the wind goes upward from the farmer’s house walls / roof. Those winds slow when the cloud comes above… but depends on the angle the cloud approaches and its density / altitude… then those winds speed up again, but not at the same speed… red soil is warmed faster than the rocky outcrops.  After sundown 2h, from the sandy soil and that house, vertical winds change directions. From the red soil and the rice paddy / swamp, change direction after midnight; but at slower speed. Who is monitoring for them all those constant changes in temperature, did they tell you?!

2]Those vertical winds are attacked by horizontal winds that are on different altitudes / directions every 90m. up. Sometime SOME winds travel at 3knots – others at 27knots – others at 40knots and rearrange the temperature constantly – then some slow down – other speed up. Who is recording the DIFFERENT temperatures on every few cubic meters that is changing every 10 minutes in the year, ”in the space you can see”?!?! The space you can see with your eyes, without moving, is area of 600 000 different temperatures, and those temperatures change every 10 minutes. There are 6000 thermometers monitoring for IPCC on the WHOLE planet! Monitoring temp in a room is a bit easier than in open spaces; because there it fluctuates every few minutes

Only 1% of thermometers for what is needed, to monitor the space you can see with your eyes. How many thermometers you think you will see in those 700km3?! How much larger area on the planet you cannot see, without mowing?!? Be honest to yourself. Not 100-200-300-600 years ago… NOW they have 6 000 thermometers for the whole planet that is sending them data, mostly on the ground / most concentrated in Europe /USA…

Nobody knows the temperature in the troposphere for last year, to save his life; but they pretend to know for year 1700, 1200AD, 5BC. They know which year was warmer by 0,012⁰C, or colder than the previous year… look at their charts… What was the temperature 345km NE of Wellington? People didn’t even know that New Zealand existed at that time… What about 432km SW of Hobart, at 357m altitude on the year after, on 4 of July at 9,35AM; or 456km SW of Easter island on that same time of the day at 69m altitude? Is Easter island not on their globe? Easter island in Pacific represents 20 times larger atmosphere than Europe + USA combined. Was it cloudy on that day? When gets cloudy – upper atmosphere gets warmer – on the ground cooler; but that rule is only for daytime; at night is opposite; but not if it wasn’t cloudy… depends on the thickness AND altitude of the cloud, also if it was cloudy all day; or as usual, clouds accumulate by the evening. Com-on ‘’leading scientist with temperature charts’’. Temperature in the troposphere is 3 dimensional. Would you buy a used car from a GLOBAL temperature chart maker?! Because of them, billions of $$$ are getting ripped-off, because of them, tremendous damages are getting done to the economy, environment and to kid’s brains in school and university. People shouldn’t profit from crime; existing law says in Australia. I had comments from them: ”but that’s all the data we have and we have to work with it”  It’s same as me saying: I have $55, and would like to buy a jumbo-jet. It’s nothing wrong by saying: we don’t have sufficient data = we are ”guessing GLOBAL Warmist”   They should know that:  presenting crap as factual, for benefits is a crime!!! I say: there are enough proven evidences – no need for guessing!!!

With that lousy accuracy, when they state that: one year was warmer or colder than the next by 0,025⁰C, it’s only admission that he / she is honesty deficient! For correct data, must be from every cubic meter of air, equally; for every 10 minutes in the year; from the ground to the edge of the troposphere. Not only from the hottest minute in the day – unless the hottest minute is on same time,  every day on every place on the planet and ALL other minutes go up every day as much as the hottest minute. Otherwise is all bull. When some place is warmer than usual – declaring the WHOLE planet is warmer – is same as saying: the planet is warmer at lunch time by 12⁰C, than before sunrise…?! That’s how reliable their data collection is.  They collect data on 6 000 places on the planet / not evenly distributed. It’s ESSENTIAL to have from 6 000 trillion places data to be collected, ”for every few minutes” before can start talking about reliability of GLOBAL temperature. They are not interested in correct data; because correct data is proving them wrong. Local temperatures always fluctuate – GLOBAL, never!

Do you know why the hottest minute of the day is not on same minute, not even in same hour every day?! B] Why different places have different minutes as the hottest minute of the day? Therefore, collecting temperature for the hottest minute in the day is completely meaningless!  If one day has one hour above 20⁰C, but the following day has 3h-4h above 20⁰C, is much more important, than picking  the hottest minute.  2] average temperature for every minute in 24h and the hottest minute don’t fluctuate the same == it’s only useful for the B/S Merchants.   3] if vertical wind with extra coldness was only 55m on the way down; when the temperature for that day was recorded for that place, but not tomorrow, or not on the other side of the hill… think.

Extra heat in the atmosphere is not accumulative – because of the expanding and shrinking of oxygen + nitrogen, in change of temperature > if you collect all the extra heat accumulated in the atmosphere for the last 150years – you wouldn’t have enough heat to boil one chicken egg!!! I suggested in my book: ‘’all charts about global temperatures, should be printed on soft paper only, to have some positive use.  That’s all what the fuss is about?!

Stefan‘s formula: EC > AS > LHR      (Extra Coldness -> Atmosphere Shrinks -> Less Heat Releases)  simple, isn’t it?
References about colder years / mini ice age, LIA, the big one; they were ALL localized. For the duration of the Big Ice Age, in Europe / USA (N/H), on the southern hemisphere was much, much warmer than normal. Don’t forget the laws of physics; same laws of physics were then, as today!!! If the whole troposphere get colder; oxygen + nitrogen shrink, INSTANTLY! Which means, release less heat / intercept less coldness, if you will; and equalizes in a jiffy.

Let me tell you something that everybody overlooks: tomorrow the planet will be exactly as warm as yesterday – today the sun will produce tremendous amount of heat on our planet; but ALL will be wasted, all of it + all the geothermal heat released into the air, precisely, all of it. All the heat from burning fuel + from volcanoes; all gone. Q: how does the troposphere knows how much ”extra” heat is produced today  than yesterday – so to release precisely extra only that much?  A: the good Lord installed a thermometer in EVERY atom of oxygen and nitrogen; to know by how much to expand = how much EXTRA coldness is necessary, to equalize. Q: how can an atom have more brains than the ”BELIEVERS” in the  past and future phony ”GLOBAL” warmings?!

But presume that the whole troposphere got much colder, for any reason – troposphere instantly shrinks and WASTES only half of the heat that the sun produces on earth for 5 minutes – do you know how much extra heat would stay / save / accumulate in 5 minutes?!  Would finish the biggest ice age in 5 minutes! My formula is the best proof:    EC>AS>LHR    (Extra Coldness > Atmosphere Shrinks > Less Heat Releases)   Similar as when you are cold in bad – you go in foetus position – to minimize surface exposure – when you get warm, you spread arms and legs, for bigger cooling exposure. In other words, you are doing a lousy imitation of what the troposphere can do. You minimize / maximize of 5% of extra surface area of your body; troposphere can shrink / double in volume INSTANTLY, if necessary!!! Q: how fast can oxygen and nitrogen expand when warmed up? A: by expanding, they are pushing the bullet with high velocity from the barrel of the gun, no delay for a decade, or for another 88years!

The only way one hemisphere can get colder / ice age, is: if the other hemisphere simultaneously gets WARMER by as much, to equalize! Because in that case, on the hemisphere that gets colder – the air shrinks / volume decreases – but the EXTRA volume of air from the opposite hemisphere because of extra warming, is compensating in volume; for shrinking on the colder half – or in that case, Ice Age was 30- 40% of the planet’s area colder. The shonky scientists in the last 150 years were COMPLETELY disregarding the laws of physics!!!… As a bi-product, we had Nuclear Winter for year 2000 / lots of PHONY GLOBAL warmings predicted in the past (from the ”pretend Skeptics) and in 100 years a PHONY GLOBAL warming, by the Warmist swindlers. Yes, in the past Organised Crime was robbing banks and shops; now by CO2 / Methane conspiracy /con, they are robbing nations / countries… They are robbing the poor, the pensioner, the low paid; because carbon tax is a flat-rate tax. On every product in the shop, the pensioner pays same carbon-tax as the millionaire. The loot money disappears in the jet-setters pockets + for unnecessary phony GLOBAL warmings ‘’researchers / conferences. The ‘’spoils’’ are not evenly divided; the biggest liars get the most. The ‘’Believers’’ of the lower genera and IQ, as usual, get the middle finger on the end; they are the collateral damage / born losers. I have being accused off: not being very ”diplomatic” to the opponents. Well, being diplomatic to hardcore criminals; is only helping them to commit more and bigger crime = to harm more people and to put themselves in bigger troubles, after.

The troposphere is earth’s radiator/ as on your car radiator. You don’t put truck’s radiator into a car, or car’s radiator in truck, because it wouldn’t cool enough. b] when you are in bed and is cold – you shrink in a fetus position – when you get hot, you spread arms and legs, for bigger exposure, you don’t succeed much, but it helps. Earth’s troposphere can double in size, in an instant, if warmed that much. c] imagine if you have a radiator on your car, to instantly / accordingly expand when the engine is hot and to shrink when is cold; as a piano accordion radiator; but only imagine, because if you install that kind of radiator- you will attract too much attention and cause traffic hazard.

WELL, THE TROPOSPHERE IS LIKE PIANO ACCORDION (O2&N2) ARE EXPANDING / SHRINKING ALL THE TIME AS NECESSARY. Reason: sun eclipse, CO2, CH4 or the stupid sunspots cannot change the overall planet’s temperature. Unless the Skeptics realize that – they will stay as born losers, with their sunspots! (the car regulates by thermostat when is cold – and the fen speeds up when you are revving the engine more for speed – that’s mechanical and fails. The EXPANSION / SHRINKING of O2&N2 never failed – therefore: in the past, warmings / coolings were ALWAYS localized, never global all ”proxy data” is a crap!!! that’s why: if the Skeptics didn’t exist, Warmist would have invented them… Next time when you look at somebody’s car radiator, remind yourself and appreciate how more efficient is the earth’s brilliant troposphere – as ”SELF ADJUSTING MECHANISM”  The ”NORMAL” laws of physics were same in the past, as they are today – and they will be same in 2100. Crap as ”Maunder Minima / Maxima” LIA, GLOBAL cycles, and similar, is the Skeptic’s milestone

Q: do you think that: during the medieval PHONY GLOBAL warming; the laws of physics were different than today?
Q: do you believe that 12000 BC or in a 100 years from today, the SAME laws of physics didn’t and will not exist?

fault #1:
All those past ”global” warmings and ”global” coolings and ”cycles” were NEVER global. The normal laws of physics doesn’t permit the ”whole” planet to be warmer, or colder for more than a day, there are logical explanations for what was really happening on individual occasions! Therefore: same laws of physics will be in 100y from now = proofs that is not going to be ”global” warming. b]As long as people on the street think that; the earth’s temp goes up and down as a yo-yo = Warmist won, will rob and oppress the world based on fairy-tales. You people should learn about ”the earth’s self adjusting mechanism” ::: a] earth’s troposphere is like piano accordion – constantly shrinks/expands, as required and wastes all extra heat. b] why did the engineers built bigger radiator in a truck than in small car?.A: truck engine produces 3 times more heat, BUT has same temp as a small car – because truck has bigger radiator – the troposphere (O&N) are the earth’s radiator; can double in an instant, if necessary b] when for ANY reason gets warmer than normal, which is most of the time close to the ground – the ”vertical winds” speed up = same as: when you rev the engine more -> instantly car moves faster, fen next to the radiator speeds up and water pump pumps faster BECAUSE: the engineers that build truck, cars they are smart people and put different size radiators. On the other hand; on the blogosphere, earth’s radiator O2&N2 don’t exist. reason they are ALL comparing earth with the moon and Venus………

fault #2:
the ”correct” monitoring is completely WRONG, not only the manipulated data; therefore: the temp is same every year, BUT, even if there was any fluctuation in temp, nobody would have known!!!

1] monitoring only for the hottest minute in 24h and ignoring the other 1439 minutes, in which the temp doesn’t go up, or down as in the ”hottest” minute…. statistically 1439 against one…
it’s same as: if the car is got 2440 different parts, but you are building that car, ”with one bolt only” you will not get very far…!

2] the ”highest temp minute in 24h, is not at the same time every day!!! sometime is the ”hottest at 11, 50AM, most of the time is after 1pm = that is many more warmer minutes.

3] pointing some place that is warmer than normal – is SAME as saying: ”the planet is warmer by 12C at lunch time, than before sunrise…?

4] a thermometer can monitor the temp in a room; but one thermometer for 10 000km2?

5] even those ”few” (6000) thermometers are not evenly distributed; no honest statistician would have taken to make ”statistic” if he wasn’t told; which individual thermometer, how much area represents.Example: if the workers in 4 countries have their pay packet increased by a dollar, and in 2 countries had ”decreased by a dollar Q: would the ”overall’ all workers in those 6 countries get more money, or less?
(the 4 countries were Luxembourg, Monaco and Belgium and Portugal, increased by a dollar. The other two were India and Chinese workers, decreased by a dollar

6] when is sunny – on the ground is warmer / in upper atmosphere is cooler – BUT, when is cloudy, upper atmosphere is warmer, on the ground cooler – overall same temp; BUT, because ALL thermometers monitoring are on the first 2m from the ground = they are completely misleading!!!

Therefore, the truth: in the 70′s was exactly the SAME temp as today, and will be exactly the same ”overall” GLOBAL temp in 100y = Warmist in jail
unfortunately: in the 70′s they were scaring the people from: CO2 ”dimming effect” that will produce cooling by year 2000 – so they were manipulating the data to reflect ”cooling planet”. After they started scaring the people with global warming and manipulate data ”as warming” — people compare those two ”manipulated” data and confuse the crap out of themselves…

Aristotle said: ”the truth is much more important, than million believers”:
The truth always wins on the end.
Past ”phony global warmings” don’t prove that is not going to be global warming in 100y!!! It only confuses the honest people on the street that the ”global” temp goes up and down as a yo-yo

The truth: in 2100, if you collect ALL the ”extra” warmth accumulated since the Kyoto conference in 97, you wouldn’t have enough extra heat, to boil one chicken egg!!! extra heat in the earth’s atmosphere is not accumulative!!!

so, they are the ”two things” that I’m correct and can prove everything now, no need to wait 100years, when the spend the money and are gone
Q: can you remember in 100y from now to ask them for the money back? The Warmist know the answer on that question

T H E    B O T T O M    L I N E:

ALL THE HEAT IN THE TROPOSPHERE OVERALL; IS ‘’the EARTH’S GLOBAL  TEMPERATURE’Forget about USA temp, or Arctic, or Antarctic, or Mediterranean, or heat in the sea, or heat stored on individual year in the trees, heat in your oven, in the fossil fuel, or heat stored in the atoms. They are places with ”STORED HEAT”. Stored heat is NOT a part of the ”official GLOBAL TEMPERATURE” Stored heat is constantly used for confusing the ignorant, gullible, and people that don’t use their own brains. Unless is ALL the heat combined in the troposphere ‘’ONLY’’, it’s = misleading / smokescreen.

1] Forget about the temperature in the sea; submarine volcanoes /hot vents increase the temp. B] winds, ruff sea cools the surface water. C] below if is 10cm of 20C and 55m of 23C; or is the opposite, nobody notices the difference; even though tremendous difference in the amount of stored heat. D] yesterday’s rain brought coldness from high up and cooled the ‘’surface’’ water; below hasn’t changed – but record will show: the Whole ocean to the bottom as colder by 2C. It’s stupid data for immature people. Designed exclusively for fundamentalist and for the Urban Sheep.

2]Forget about Arctic temperature, or surface temperature, or Antarctic temp; they are all for confusing the ‘’already confused’’ The whole temp of the troposphere is earth’s temperature!!! If one is taken on Arctic in July, was warmer than normal, England was warmer than normal in May, Brazil in December was warmer than normal, Australia was warmer than normal in January… it’s all meaningless crap. Smokescreen / puling wool over ignorant eyes. To get from 10 light years away from the truth, down to only 9 light years: they should take the on every monitoring place temperature simultaneously, on the whole planet. For example, at 12 pm Greenwich time; then to take it at 8am Greenwich time ‘’on the whole planet’’ and compare those two. Lets call it: ’People’s request, model for monitoring’’

3]Forget about the temperature in the stratosphere. That temp doesn’t fluctuate. B] in the stratosphere are gases as aerosol, helium, ozone. Those gases just seat / spin there and never come to the ground to bring any coldness = they are irrelevant for the planet’s temperature regulation. Are used occasionally for confusion  There is no methane in the stratosphere, it’s a lie. Methane sinks in the ground, because is produced together with other compounds. If some goes up in the atmosphere  at night – as soon as reaches altitude where is sunlight, UV, infrared; zaps it instantly and turns every molecule of methane into 2 molecules of water and one CO2.

4] Forget about cherry picking, always is someplace warmer than normal; unless the Swindler finds out and report the other place where is colder than normal; he is lying to you; or fundamentalist is usually lying to himself also / reassurance – fear of reality. Troposphere cannot waste, if there is any ”EXTRA” heat in the oceans from submarine volcanoes, or for any other reason; until that extra heat is released into the air – same goes for heat from any other source. Therefore, before released, is not part of the GLOBAL temperature.

5]Forget about the heat in the smelters, converting ores into metals / my oven was yesterday 240C, making roast; does that means that GLOBAL temp is gone up by 225c? Idiots! Energy that came from the sun yesterday and was locked in the trees or crops – then released in 6months or 25y (the word: ‘’energy budget’’ is crap). Red soil absorbs more heat than rock – irrelevant if released in the air at 12pm or 11am. It’s not difference than them talking about the energy locked into the fossil fuel, or into the atoms = con job. Those ‘’energy budgets, positive / negative signals and albedos’’ should all go into Hansen’s & Plimer’s ass. Sand exchanges heat different than red clay. Fundamentalists from both camps: Q: what’s the difference if CO2 in the air releases the heat 2minutes before, or after?! It’s the O2+N2, stupid!!!

Rocks and clay don’t go up towards the stratosphere, to release / waste heat and exchange it for coldness. It’s the oxygen + nitrogen, they are 998999ppm, stupid! The amount of wool the Warmist pulled over the Fake Sceptic’s eyes; to keep the Fakes warm and cook their brains, is bigger than Mt Ararat. They will start ‘’researching’’ if the stew, goulash, soup, or french-fries have bigger energy budget and which of them is releasing heat faster ‘’and producing GLOBAL warming… As long as the Fakes  are Warmist’ roles of toilet paper. There is money to be made on shonky researches. There is no money into acknowledging that: ‘’overall global temp is always the same; that’s what the laws of physics and my formulas say!!!

6]Forget if the sea-level goes up or down, that has noting to do with any phony GLOBAL warming. There are real reasons for it.

7]Forget about the ice on the polar caps + glaciers. They don’t depend on temperature, average temp there is minus -30C. on the land ice is melted from below, by the geothermal heat / on the sea is melted by the salty water. More ice / less ice; 100% depends on the availability of raw material for renewal of the ice every winter. That raw material / water vapour in the air, is treated as ‘’ bad for the climate’’ by the fanatics from both camps.

As soon as heat is released from wood, coal, volcanoes, smelter, plutonium, from your oven, into the air; ‘’then it becomes /belongs as GLIOBAL temperature’’. No matter if its in your room, backyard, Arctic, equator, 2-40-700m  in the air, or 1-5-20km altitude. That is GLOBAL temperature. All other crappy staff is for creating zombies / fanatics / rip-off and destruction of the democratic west. If not with red Kalashnikovs / oppress them with green. CO2 is increasing, not a hint of GLOBAL warming; fake Skeptics are looking for reasons why. Because isn’t such a thing, idiots, stop helping the Warmist. The fake Skeptics are the biggest Sadomasochists. Borrowing Warmist weapons, to soot themselves in the foot. Warmist cannot come up with one milligram of GLOBAL warming… the Fakes are searching, to find out why is not happening… because the Fakes don’t have enough dignity / honesty – to admit that they have being duped by Plimer – because there was no GLOBAL warming happening in the first place.

When any extra heat is released, or produced in the air / troposphere; on the place / places released -> that O+N expands upwards, accordingly, to the extra amount of heat released. Intercepts EXTRA coldness, to equalize, and instantly shrink; not to redirect too much extra coldness. That’s what regulates the global temperature. Any other heat than the heat in the troposphere; is a smokescreen. No matter if is Arctic’s, Antarctic’s heat, or heat in the sea, or heat stored in the atoms, in the fossil fuel, or in your oven; becomes GLOBAL temp is, when is released in the air, not before. All the solar / galactic influences on the earth’s climate is much less than one single Al Gore’s fart!


To calibrate the variation in Global temperature; needs a solid / RELIABLE starting point. As: water freezes on zero centigrade / boils on 100C.

1] If you exclude part of the planet – that ”is not GLOBAL temperature”. If you exclude 95% of the planet, as it is the case with the Conspirator’s GLOBAL temperature – it’s brainwashing business, nothing to do with the reality. If is monitored on 6000 places for IPCC, that says about the temperature on 6000m3, not GLOBAL temperature. On one small hill there are 1000 different temperature; AND THEY CONSTANTLY CHANGE for every 10 minutes in 24h. There are even days when between 10-11AM is warmer than at 12, doesn’t that matter? Temperature changes every 10 minutes – unless is data collected for every 10 minutes – is only fodder for the Urban Sheep. If upper troposphere is warmer than normal (because of dimming affect) – lower troposphere / just above the ground is always cooler / if upper atmosphere is colder – on the ground is hotter. Excluding one or the other – is not earth’s temperature; because on the earth, temperature distribution is 3 dimensional. Thermometer is for monitoring the temp in a room; not one thermometer  for a million cubic kilometres.  With 6000 thermometers officially monitoring for IPCC; can collect temperature for 6000 rooms; Hilton hotels have 12000 rooms – not enough thermometers to monitor those rooms; what about for the rest of the planet???

Therefore: must be included the warmth from the WHOLE troposphere / for every 10 minutes / on the WHOLE planet. Only if that is done, can be calibrated. But if that is done – no need for calibration, because OVERALL the warmth units in the Whole troposphere are ALWAYS THE SAME. Because the laws of physics and my formulas say so. They use the word ”sensitivity” to confuse the ignorant. If they use ”sensitivity” in oxygen + nitrogen in expanding when warmed / shrinking Instantly when cooled… the conspiracy would have fallen a part in days. When gets warmer than normal close to the ground, VERTICAL WINDS speed up! As soon as it cools – they slow down; why the real laws of physics are discarded? Using the word ”thermodynamics” but not using it, WHY?! Which people don’t want to see the end of the propaganda? The Warmist believe in 90% possibility in GLOBAL warming + most of the brainwashed Skeptics – they believe 101% in GLOBAL warming. They are the Devil’s advocates – doing the Warmist dirty job (the Fake Skeptics that are Warmist’ roles of toilet paper)

Horizontal winds take the heat away from solid objects / vertical winds are taking the heat up and exchange it for extra coldness / as soon as it gets warmer > the vertical winds increase in speed / strength. 2] Warmed troposphere expands accordingly / increases in volume INSTANTLY; that is the second and most important factor; taboo for both camps… Look at it on the bright side: the brainwashing propaganda will make the psychiatrist rich.

Extra heat in the atmosphere is not accumulative – because of INSTANT expansion / shrinking of oxygen + nitrogen in change of temperature!!! For the last 150y, the planet hasn’t accumulated enough extra heat, to boil one chicken egg. Look at their GLOBAL temperature charts… those charts don’t tell about the GLOBAL temperature, but is the ‘’smoking gun’’ admission that they are the biggest shameless liars. Time to get on the front foot and expose the Warmist conspiracy, and the fundamentalist Sceptic’s ignorance / stupidity.  Same laws of physics were 5BC, 1230AD, 1850AD, 1998AD, 2011AD, and it will be the  SAME LAWS OF PHYSICS in 2100 !!! O+N will be expanding / shrinking in change of temp, just the same as today. If you use the laws of physics, is same as travelling in time. Unfortunately, if you take the Fundamentalist Warmist and fake Skeptics in time machine to 2100 – they see that is same temp as today – then bring them back – they will still promote GLOBAL warming for 2100. About 80% of the people on the street are secular Warmist / Skeptics – interested in the truth. Ignore fanatics from both camps in the blogosphere, help me inform  the truth, to the people on the street = you will be doing noble job. The truth always wins on the end.

Solutions: If there are more dams built to save extra stormwater, TO INTRODUCE MOISTURE IN THE AIR / TOPSOIL – surrounding areas become cooler during the day – but warmer at night. Example: If Brazil’s vegetation is destroyed and turned into desert – day temperature will go up – but night temperature will become colder; by Warmist ‘shonky / con’’ monitoring would have registered as warmer planet. Those things make ‘’ CLIMATIC CHANGES’’ but not Warmer, or colder planet!!! Because now on the ground in Brazil is cooler during the day than in Sahara; BUT in upper atmosphere above Sahara is COLDER during the day than above Brazil. Overall same temperature; heat in upper atmosphere has same value as on the ground. Unlike on the moon, on the earth the heat distribution is 3 dimensional!!! The Conspirators succeeded to confuse the ‘’ignorant intelligentsia’’ that the phony GLOBAL warming and the constant climatic changes are related, actually one and the same thing. WRONG!!! The SPEED of the vertical winds regulate the temperature to be same overall in the troposphere every day and night of every year and millennium. My proofs will win!!!

Which brings back to collecting the data from the hottest minute of the day; which is not on same minute / not even on same hour every day!!! What about the other 1439 minutes in 24h, fellas??? When nights are warmer than usual, as in Brazil, there is reason for it. When days are warmer than should be on a particular latitude, as in Sahara, there is reason for it (H2O)!!!  The shonky ‘’climatologist’’ don’t want you to know about those reasons – because they declared water vapor as a bad gas, to support badmouthing CO2 (because their effect is same, only is more H2O than CO2).

That SAME affect means: H2O + CO2 make cooler days and warmer nights, on the ground – absence of those gases, especially H2O, as in Sahara, HOTTER DAYS / COLDER NIGHTS= worse climate. Warmist hypocrisy exposed!!! In Sahara the ‘’vertical winds’’ are much STRONGER than in Brazil. As a result, in Sahara cools down from 45C to 5C at night, in 12h. In that same 12h, on same distance from the equator and the polls, in Brazil cools from 33C day time, to 23C at night, in 12h. Which means: in Sahara, the ‘’faster vertical winds’’ cool by 30C more in 12h, than in Brazil, where those winds are much slower. THOSE VERTICAL WINDS CAN INSTANTLY SPEED UP ON THE WHOLE PLANET, IF IT GETS WARMER!!! If those vertical winds can cool by 30C more in 12h, is an INSULT TO HUMAN INTELLIGENCE, the Warmist lie that the planet will get warmer every 10years by 0,5C. It wouldn’t make sense to an earth worm, but it does make sense to prof Ian Plimer’s Smarties… (the fake Skeptics) The logic and common sense deficient D/H.
Q: why those basic factors are not used by the Conspirators and their B/S distributors?
Q: why those basic factors are not noticed / when I state, are avoided by the ‘’fake Skeptics’’?

In the military book says:  if you see a flashlight from atom bomb explosion in the distance – instantly hit the ground, with your butt towards ground zero and put the gasmask on – and 3 minutes after the original blast, if you can turn your head towards ground zero. Because after three (3) minutes – the wind with same speed as the explosion, goes BACK towards the ground zero and demolishes just as much, already weakened concrete buildings. But, turning in the opposite direction without getting up – otherwise – the returning wind will take you to ground zero.

What the issue here is:  atom bomb is heating oxygen + nitrogen to millions of degrees – they expand and their SPEED damages concrete buildings; not the 20-30kg  of plutonium – (reason atom bomb is useless out of space, where is no oxygen + nitrogen) effect would be as few shotgun pellets (apart in Hollywood entertainment). O+N wouldn’t have SHRUNK after three (3) minutes – IF THEY WERE NOT COOLED –that’s the issue!!! But, they shrink almost as fast as they expand from the explosion. They shrink with the speed of the bullet and demolish the already weakened concrete buildings. MILLION DEGREES, O+N COOL IN THREE (3) MINUTES –  the shonky ‘’experts’’  tell you that: in 10 years, the planet will be warmer by 0,156C… Cannot cool fraction of a degree, in 10 years ?! Thanks to the fake Skeptics   

No, when air close to the ground warms up EXTRA, by 1-2-3C, doesn’t expand as fast as by atom bomb; but expands accordingly, by the amount of extra heat / INSTANTLY.  Just that atom bomb is taking dust + WATER VAPOUR + CO2 – it gives better chance to be analysed visually; what normal extra warming does to oxygen + nitrogen. I.e. if is localized extra warming – that part of the troposphere expands into the stratosphere as a nuclear mushroom – then intercepts appropriate amount of extra coldness in 3,5 seconds – then INSTANTLY shrinks and brings that extra coldness to the ground in a jiffy.

Another one: Greenland and Antarctic are almost as large as USA. On Greenland, and Antarctic are few thermometers clustered on a very small area. B] if the weather bureau was reporting the temperature for few places in Florida – as the temperature for the WHOLE of USA, many people wouldn’t believe that is same. In the evening when they report the weather for the whole of USA; remember what Stefan was saying: compare yourself if: when the temperature in Florida goes up by one, or two degrees for next day, does the temperature in all of the states goes up by EXACTLY that much. Or, some places goes up, some down. Some place by more some by less. Therefore: not having data collected on every kilometer on Antarctic / Greenland = is blatant misleading.

Then see on how many places the temperature is monitored in central Pacific for IPCC? Central Pacific is 15 times larger than USA. That is for temperature on the ground. Unwritten rule is: when close to the ground is cooler than normal > upper atmosphere is warmer than normal. Q: upper atmosphere is 90% of the troposphere… occasionally they send a balloon… to monitor on 1m3…??? Satellite takes occasionally TWO DIMENSIONAL infrared photo…?! KING Al IS NAKED!!! The ‘’fake Skeptics’’ are Al’s fig leafs.

Another one: Even though is not; just presume that data collection is spread ”evenly” around the planet, on every 500km. In your backyard you can find 3-5 variation in temperature; disregard that – here is a catch for the Warmist and the fake Skeptics: Q: is it from one thermometer for 250km one temperature – then the other 250km is temperature same as the next thermometer is recording? What about if the temperature from one thermometer is same for 6km at 21C- but is 23C temperature as the other thermometer is recording for 494km2?!

Than next day around the first thermometer is  for 390km2 at 21C- but from the other thermometer is 110km2 at 23C. Larger area would have bigger value; for any normal profession; but not for climatology and fanatic Warmist and fake Skeptics. Which means: the inaccuracy is minimum of 1,8C; they are talking about accuracy of one thousandth of a degree. That’s the temperatures only about the 2m above the ground. Look at ALL the ”GLOBAL TEMPERATURE charts, on Warmist and fake Skeptic’s charts: it goes ”precisely by 0,003C up; than for next year goes down by 0,002C – then next year up by 0,004C. They are definitely not talking about the GLOBAL temps, but about their integrity and stupidity.  Agree?

Q: can the Warmist realize that heat distribution on the earth is 3 dimensional? A: of course they can, but is against their theology.
Q: can the ‘’fake Skeptics / the B/S addicts’’ notice those things? A: NO, because they are busy, busy with their buckets and wheelbarrows actively collecting IPCC’s & Al’s B/S….

They made it official that: ‘’during the northern summer; the planet is WARMER BY up to 3,8C than during the southern summer.’’ WOW, what a science!…

I believe that: their data shows even bigger difference; but they are not heroic enough, to admit -> ‘’smoothing follows’’

The truth: not enough EXTRA WARMTH is in the atmosphere during the northern summer than during southern, to boil one chicken egg with it!!! BUT, it shows that ‘’their modelling’’ is complete crap! It shows warmer, for two unscientific reasons::

#1:  because 75% of the monitoring places are on the N/H, 25% only on the southern. Example: if 75 workers get pay increase by 10% for 6 months and 25 workers get pay decrease by 10% = overall together they will be getting more money; than for the next 6 months – when 75 workers get salary decreased by 10% and the other 25 workers get increased their salary by that much. What a con science is used; by not having monitoring places spaced equally!!!… Reason everybody is scared from the truth, and are trying to silence my proofs / science!!!

Reason #2: on the S/H is much more water, than on the northern hemisphere. Where is ‘’more water’’ DAYS ARE COOLER / NIGHTS WARMER!!! It proves that: monitoring only for the ‘’HOTTEST MINUTE’’ in 24h, and ignoring the other 1439 minutes – is the mother of all con and misleading science!!! BY BOTH CAMPS!!! Warmth in every minute in 24h has SAME value; but doesn’t go up / down equally as the hottest minute!!!

That’s admission that they are wrong by 3,8C in 6 months – then look at their ”GLOBAL” temperature charts for the last 150y, 1000y, 6000 years – they ”pretend” to be correct in one hundredth of a degree and occasionally in one thousandth of a degree, for every year. That’s what kind of people FROM BOTH CAMPS are talking about their  ”scientific proofs”… where is their credibility,  what kind of ”computer models” can be wrong by 3,8C for 6 months non-existent difference in temp – but are talking ”with precision” about 1920’s, 1850’s, 5BC…?

150y ago, there were only few unreliable thermometers; data collected by unreliable people. But that data is used as correct – sometime, by some, is stated as: unreliable; but was / IS used as reliable anyway, by those same people. 400-500-700 years ago.. well the correct GLOBAL temperature ”BY THEIR PROXY’‘   was discovered from: if there were 12 bushels of grain per acre in Devon-shire, England; then next year was only 11,5 bushels ->  that means that: in all of Oceania, south America and the other 90% of the planet – the temperature following year was ”COLDER BY 0,04C, on the WHOLE planet…. WOW! What a science – precision in one hundredth of a degree. Look at their GLOBAL temp charts = it looks as seismographs / the planet has a hi-fever…?

Their GLOBAL temp cycles are even more sick. They found in Colorado Canyon erosion that: certain deposits repeat themselves -> instantly they name them as ”factual cycles” in other country, or other continent, alluvial deposits don’t mach the ones in Colorado – instead of admitting that: THOSE CYCLES were not GLOBAL – they just ad more and more different cycles. Blame the sun, solar dust; blame everything that cannot take them to court for defamation. Instead of starting to analyse: how the deterioration of vegetation / climate was gradually affected by human inventing the ARTIFICIALLY CREATION OF FIRE. In Eurasia + North Africa 50000-60000 years ago – north America 15000y ago – in Australia maybe 30000y ago. After 20-30 intensive bushfires, the vegetation gives up -> without vegetation -> rainfall decreases = become hotter days / colder nights / more extreme climate. Unfortunately, admitting the truth – so that the climate can be improved – which would bring money to the engineers and working people; but not to the Organized Crime

Before the invention of artificial fires by human – the only fires the earth did know was from volcanoes and lightening storms. Volcanoes aren’t very often – electric storm is associated with rain = because of wet; fire doesn’t go far.  Artificial fires first started, when was mulch everywhere – after many generation; the mongrels were turning the best lands into desert… now the Fakes are ”SKEPTICAL” if human can change the climate… self destructive idiots… born losers!


The leading ‘’Skeptics’’ realized that: it’s easier with a telescope to see distant objects in details -> concocted that: Galileo, and after him, people were observing the sunspots. Then they added that: since 6000years ago, Chinese were absorbing and documenting sunspots. So, they falsified for every year in the last few thousand years – sunspots to fit their original lies and misleading GLOBAL temp charts… PERFECT FIT! Marvelous… crap!

In reality, for the first time a filter was made, to see that the surface of the sun is not just red; but has sunspots; in 2004-6. Before that, for 100y they were blocking the sun with a cardboard and observing the sun-flare; NOT sunspots!!! Because the sun-flares from the corona were going in 8 minutes, where the earth will be in 6 months; the flares that affected the earth directly were blocked… wasn’t any benefit. B] looking directly at the sun, in 7-8 minutes; you will not see any sunspots, BUT, will see sunspots after for a day, even in a completely dark room; and you will never see anything else in your life.

C] if you look at the sun with a telescope, will burn your eyes COMPLETELY  in half the time, than looking direct at the sun. Depends the power of the telescope; in 2-3 seconds complete blindness – in 10 seconds, your head will be steaming – in 2-3 minutes: the light through your eye socket would be going out from the back of your head. Galileo wasn’t so stupid, to look at the sun; he was looking at Jupiter. But the ‘’Fake Skeptics’’ to make the skeptical people to appear as bigger liars than the Warmist -> made for every year their ‘’forgery sunspots’’ to clip exactly to match their misleading global temp charts… what a criminal scam… to degrade the genuine skeptical people!..

D]Their phony GLOBAL temp charts for the past, were created from their phony ‘’proxy’’::: if records say: 12 bushels of grain per acre, in Yorkshire / England = was warm year, on the whole planet. Next year only 11,2 bushels; they made official: colder year on the WHOLE planet by 0,4C. Next year locust, or neighbor’s goats damaged the grain; only 9,3 bushels -> mini ice age declared officially on their ‘’GLOBAL’’ temp charts. Therefore: if the neighbor got drunk in the tavern, instead of looking after his goats; the extra bottle of vino; changed the number of the sunspots…?! miracle, or a grotesque CON, by the ‘’leading’’ Fake Skeptics…

E] if Colorado canyon alluvial deposits say that: for certain period in the past was more rain, or less – for the Original Swindlers, that was telling the temp on the WHOLE planet…? Instead of admitting that: those deposits cannot even tell about the rainfall for the whole state of Colorado. Because they have being declaring: Paleocene,  Eocene, Crapocene – phony GLOBAL temp cycles = what a scam, declared as official records, by the original scum. Therefore, to cover up the mountains of the original Pagan lies – GLOBAL temp charts, which look as seismographs, with precision to one hundredth of a degree – they made the ‘’Sunspots Forgery’’ to support the biggest continuous con, since Darwin published his book. Before that; the climate entirely depended on St. Peter’s mood.

Would falsifying sun’s activity chart, make the politicians, media; and especially Mann, Hansen: to admit that they are lying about the phony GLOBAL warming? NOP, they and the bias media know the date in 2004, when the first time powerful filter was used, to see details on the surface of the sun; and the company that made that filter. They keep under their sleeve that proof, to be used, when is most important time; to rub ”Skeptic’s” nose in public…

Next Q&A on similar topics / subjects, in following days. If you have a question or two, challenge me, and the world. Declare if you believe in the laws of physics, or in the contemporary propaganda…?

5 Responses to Q & A

  1. message from Stefan: I find on other blogs comments, and questions to me; to explain for some subject that is on this website. 1] if I don’t get informed, I cannot answer. 2] other blog get closed for comments, before I’m informed.(pages on this website cannot get outdated – will be always open) 3] host of other blog might not like debate that are not related to their subject. Please, leave any question here, I will reply

  2. Today they have satellites which circle the Earth twice in a day gather temps all through the atmosphere, so I assume that they then are seeing warming at the surface, but according to your physics, they should also be seeing a cooling in the upper atmosphere to balance the warming right? And so they are just keeping that information from us I would assume.

    Also I’d like to comment on your comment about people being afraid to sail of Portugal. In 600 BC in Egypt people were able to calculate the radius of the Earth, thus knowing that the Earth was round. So it’s a common misconception today that people in the 1500s didn’t know the Earth was round. I mean if you think about it, they saw the same sun and moon we do, do you think they’d be so naive to see it being round and not assume the Earth was as well?

  3. Richard Fenske commented. May 13, 2012 at 3:21 pm

    Richard, sorry for delay in reply on your comment; busy getting details for my new book.
    Rich, satellites are the most unreliable for details. a] temperature doesn’t change twice a day; but every 15-20 minutes. b] satellite temperature / infrared photo is same as: ”if the satellite makes a normal photo of USA, on A4 format; than you try to count the number of people were in america yesterday; when you can’t even see the towns. It’s only to con the ignorant, If satellite can give data with any accuracy – they wouldn’t be going to any trouble to monitor land temp. c] usually is monitored on city airports… how many different temperatures are between one city airport, to another city? Plus, 2/3 of the planet is covered by sea, where nobody monitors.

    Richard, I’ll put a comment specially for you, below this one; to explain about the Vikings on Greenland. Cheers!

  4. for Richard: VIKINGS ON GREENLAND

    Vikings were going to Greenland; but they were calling ‘’Green-land’’ the southern patch of ground, on the biggest white island on the planet; NOT the whole island. The ‘’bull’’ fertile imagination of the Fakes; declared as ‘’most, or BIG part’’ of the island was green, because of its name, and the WHOLE planet warmer… ? WOW! It was a bit LESS ice then, because was ‘’colder’’ not warmer area (definitely nothing to do with the WHOLE planet!). Arctic ocean had less ice at that time – currents were taking ‘’colder water into Atlantic – > it was LESS evaporation = therefore was ‘’less raw material’’ to replenish the ice deficit on Greenland. (ice on Greenland (Tera Firma) is melting constantly; summer and winter; from below, by the geothermal heat) Therefore, the amount of ice depends of the availability of raw material for replenishing the ice. That ‘’raw material’’ ‘’water vapour’’ is declared as BAD FOR THE CLIMATE, by both camps. None of them can notice that: where is now 1km thick ice on Greenland – on SAME latitude in Norway, Finland is forest – further east on SAME latitude, in Siberia is Permafrost (permafrost is desert in a cold country) Because Greenland is wedged between Atlantic and Arctic oceans – ‘’water vapour from Atlantic going north is intercepted by Greenland. Norway is far away from Atlantic – Siberia even further away.

    So, on places where lots of ice is accumulating in winter, that ice keeps more coldness than air can – protects itself in summer. Reason you put in your cool box ‘’cold ice’’, instead of ‘’cold air’’ Is it starting to make sense? In your cool box 2-3kg of ice, keeps cold for 2 days. On Greenland is much more than 4kg of ice / on Antarctic is much more than 8kg of ice; to keep it frozen; if for few days in a year, the temp gets over zero C (melting point). The amount of ice on the polar caps entirely depends on the amount of availability of raw material for replenishing the melted ice by the geothermal heat!

    B] the ‘’researchers’’ found that: Viking’s artifacts are getting exposed by the melting ice on Greenland = that’s their proof that: at that time, the WHOLE PLANET was WARMER, Crap!!!

    C] let me tell you something: during the WW2, number of US aircrafts, on the way to Europe, have fallen on Greenland. Those planes are now 178m below the surface of the ice. In another few hundred years, they will be on the bottom on a 1km thick ice above them. Magic for the ignorant, that believe the Fakes. Time to start believing in Stefan’s theory, that: the ice on Greenland, Antarctic, is melted from below; by the geothermal heat / day and night, summer and winter. The deficit must be replaced by freeze-drying the moisture from the air. When no deficit replaced, because of no sufficient ‘water vapour’’ in the air = Warmist go in overdrive: look, look, GLOBAL warming, because is less ice. B] when more moisture comes to there = more fresh ice created = the Fake zombies, as the dumbest of the dumb; go into overdrive; look, look, more ice, must be GLOBAL cooling! (the truth: up to 2m of ice is melted every year, from below; by the geothermal heat / similar amount is created by freeze-drying the moisture from the air. Same way as the old freezers were creating ice with ZERO snow / rain in the kitchen – from humid air, when often the fridge door is opened -> ‘’water vapour’’ gets on a cold place = ice. Greenland, Antarctic don’t have doors!!! For the Swindlers from both camps; water vapour is bad…? Vikings were not dumb, as the contemporary ‘’researchers’’

    Instead, the con Artists, made it into ‘’GLOBAL warming’’ because of the adventures Vikings. That was long before the thermometer was invented. B]Vikings were going from Scandinavia south to Sicily at that SAME time; that should be equal proof of GLOBAL cooling?!?! Even today long enough thermometer doesn’t exist, to monitor the temperature in Oceania, Antarctic ocean, from Greenland; did the Vikings really monitored the temperature in Australia, Patagonia, from Greenland; for the contemporary Evil Cults?! People believing that: because of more / less ice on Greenland; is a proof of GLOBAL warmings / coolings – should take the leading con Artists from both camps, in a class action; for ‘’Brains Degradation’’ That makes con artists like Tony Brown, Plimer, Vukcevic and similar; bigger liars than Hansen, Mann, Gore. They use Greenland’s ice / Viking’s settlements; as a phony ‘’GLOBAL warming’’ against IPCC…?! Shameless idiots! Truth: availability of raw material for replenishing the ice; dictates the amount of ice on the polar caps! Lack of normal science in the Fakes, makes them to shoot themselves in the foot by a machine-gun, instead of pistol; on the honest people’s expense. Instead of proving that: warmings / Ice Ages are NEVER GLOBAL. The Fakes are prepared to die in the trenches, to support the Warmist lies that: even though are never GLOBAL, will keep presenting them as global. Because; if the truth is known that: ‘’OVERALL’’ temp on the WHOLE planet is always the same = Warmist lies will collapse instantly. Who’s more guilty?

  5. Thank you for your response, I look forward to learning more in your book.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s