The conspiracy story is simple; energy in – little bit less energy out, and most opponents know that ‘’Warmist can monitor with precision of one hundredth of a degree in temp variation’’. B] to support that story – they have the theory: energy from the sun warms up the ground and ‘’reflection’’ of that energy is intercepted by the naughty CO2, preventing it to ‘’radiate out into space’’. C] back radiation of ultra-shortwave in honest language ‘’reflection, GLARE’’ / in Warmist lingo ALBEDO is part of the scare tactic.

Mmmmm, yes sunlight reflects, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to see things – reflection of photons from objects, eyes tell us the color / colors of the object, cool. But, there is always but in life… *the colors that produce heat ultrashotwave UV&IR that human eye cannot see, are easily absorbed and not reflected; unless is a mirror reflection** – if UV&IR are reflected as other colors of the spectrum; we would have been blinded as bats, after 10 minutes on sunlight. Look at the sun for few minutes, or ask somebody to reflect the sunlight by mirror onto your eyes for 10 minutes, and then you’ll not see after, even other colors. Therefore, them talking about blackbody, secondary reflection / ALBEDO CRAP is voo-doo science on the run. So, the colors of the sunlight tells / shows to cosmonauts where the moon or the earth is, when coming back; BUT no reflection of the UV& IR- otherwise the reflection of the sunlight on a full moon, would made it possible FOR YOU to get suntan, or better call it MOONTAN at night. (Sir Newton must be turning upside down in his grave, the 30,000 swindlers scientist CONVENIENTLY not to know about DIFFERENT BEHAVIOURS of different colors of the sunlight)

Have to insert something: after Douglas Cotton read this first paragraph of the post -> he run to Facebook to tell me ‘’how wrong I am; because in his wisdom mirror concentrates the sunlight on the retina of the eye’’.  Well, mirror doesn’t concentrate sunlight on the retina – only magnifying glass does that – and I used it for starting fire or just to light a cigarette, on many occasions in the bush traveling, just for the fun of it. B] only from half a square inch reflection from the mirror lands on the eye, the rest is over the face; same as when looking at the sun directly. So, directly or reflection from the mirror, only a half square inch lands onto the eye and get blind for life, in 50 seconds’ exposure; = which means: ’ON EVERY SQUARE INCH you see on those 100,000 hectares in that valley in front of you, the sun deposits enough UV &IR, to burn your eye in one minute; but is not enough reflection to damage your Eyesite if you watch at the valley, or the side of that mountain all afternoon, when the sunlight ricochets off the side of that mountain like billiard ball bounces towards your; but not enough UV&IR bounces to damage your Eyesite, and you enjoy the scenery’’. So, mirror is not magnifying glass to concentrate sunlight, and geometry is part of the knowledge of physics; and Douglas Cotton is constantly lying that he knows physics; nobody understanding physics would confuse mirror with magnifying glass. #2: actually, he corrected me by saying that: ‘’UV doesn’t create heat or reflects’’, and gave me link, to go see what his brain-trusts from NASA are explaining on the graph / picture, that there is no mentioning of UV, so he doesn’t believe that UV creates any heat. (what the swindlers using NASA’s name don’t approve -> Doug rejects) even though the SAME UV burns his skin and makes blotches and he peals the skin every year like a snake (would anybody having understanding in physics would blindly believe the swindlers approved to use NASA’s name to give credibility to their lies; because their job is to create confusion for the ignorant, and Doug is a good example that they are doing a good job of him and similar).

FIRST CONFUSION: Talk about 10% of the ultra-shortwave UV&IR getting reflected from the ground to warm up the WV &CO2 in the atmosphere and secondary reflection is dead in the water. If 10% of ultra-shortwave UV&IR is reflected off the ground => it means that: if one minute looking at the sun would make you totally blind forever – from the reflection and secondary reflection would make you totally blind during the day in 10 minutes, simple arithmetic. B] even though we can’t see the ultra-shortwave UV &IR, but we have a built-in defence mechanism, we involuntarily sneeze. Yes, red and violet skirts warm up most men’s hearts, but they don’t produce any heat. Protagonist and most opponents, as for example Mr. Doug Cotton believe that is the case, but all the people that walk outside during the day and didn’t get blind, are proof that Warmist are LYING and good old Doug is a collateral damage from the aggressive, misleading propaganda (I’m mentioning Doug; because he kept abusing me, by saying that ”he knows physics” by repeating what Warmist are promoting – he thing is physics, actually if he knew any honest physics, would have known that they are lying) . C] UV&IR get reflected by a mirror a lot, but less than 2% from surface of the water, from glossy white surface by less than 1%, which is not worth writing home about it*. That reflection from the sea surface is necessary to keep the clouds higher – and when they get closer to land, where is no reflection, for clouds is like going downhill towards the land (except where is dry heat from the desert that makes clouds to go even higher, or go back over water) (they don’t care about that reflection of sunlight in hot desert without green vegetation, but pretend to worry about Arctic’s exposed water, where even the sun needs electric blanket.

B] what they are talking about; water vapor and CO2 clouds supposed to reflect that IMAGINARRY 10% that has reflected from the ground up, to bounce from the clouds and comes back to the ground, to overheat the planet… 2] because swindlers can have gadgets for measuring ultra-shortwave UV &IR they can dish anything and you have to believe them… WRONG! You have the gadget inbuilt in you, as we mentioned, even though you cannot see those colors of the spectrum: on a sunny day look about 7-8 degrees away from the sun; you’ll still sneeze, BUT if is cloudy, you’ll not = which means: if lots of those ultra-shortwaves were reflected 10% from the ground and then as ‘’secondary reflection, PLUS the sunlight that penetrates the cloud, under their theory should be actually MORE POWERFUL, but is not = that part of the propaganda defeated by ‘’your own inbuilt gadget for sneezing’’. ‘’Secondary reflection’’ is more powerful, when you are on the boat, the direct hit from sunlight, plus the ‘’secondary reflection’’ GLARE what they call as albedo from the water combined, reason they invented tinted glasses; it’s part of the culture to have sunglasses on the beach, but not many people have sunglasses when the surface is covered by snow or ice; unfortunately, they are stuck with back to front phony proof that without ice cover over the water on arctic will boil the planet. BUT: when water reflects some UV&IR back into the sky, WV&CO2 clouds don’t reflect it back down; instead absorb it, to keep warmer and stay up, or goes through the cloud up. Same as your skin doesn’t have albedo, but absorbs it 100% and burns more, although goes most of it through the cloud, same as most of it came originally trough the cloud down, when was 100% sunlight, not just 1% reflection from the surface going up, which is so insignificant. Reason on cloudy day is LESS glare / ALBEDO.  D] why I’m saying cloud: is because CO2 and WV clouds give same effect, only WV is 100 times more, so the effect is same only 100 times bigger; and I’m giving water vapor as example, because you don’t need a gadget to see it, as cloud (if CO2 was 80 times more, as in forest fires, can see it also) and because the sunlight lifts the CO2 up during the day, where water cloud is; and only after sundown drops down, when the trees and crops are fattening on carbon, After sundown, or when it rains, rain washes CO2 down and washes nitrogen and anything plants need. B] not 10% is reflected from what originally comes to the ground, as protagonist say, but about 1,5%, as we said ‘’if is reflected 10%, everybody would have been blinded in 10 minutes” can’t avoid looking into the glare / reflection, as avoiding to look direct at the sun.  (from land less than one percent reflected– from water surface 2% on a sunny day, but is always clouds somewhere, so reflection back to the clouds we will say is 1,5%, only during the day, don’t forget that is 24h day / night. Conservative estimate is: 10% from the original 100% is intercepted and half reflected back up by the water cloud, half absorbed; secondary reflection would be 10% reflected from the miniscule 1,5% or 1% as secondary reflection; you play with it, if CO2 clouds doubles, will intercept twice as much from the original 100% – and then would be ‘’less’’ to reflect from the ground up; so, 2% reflecting frim 100% is much more than from secondary 0,5% to reflect 2% is = o,o1% again, with double amount of CO2. – I don’t like to put precise numbers, because water clouds or CO2 clouds are never the same amount and NEVER evenly distributed; so, I’ll put it about the co2 cloud, because that’s all the fuss about: 1% overall GLARE / REFLECTION goes up – from that 1% some goes through the cloud up; some is absorbed and 1% from that 1% as secondary reflection going down. that’s what the fuss is about, the 1% from 1%, do you know how much that is?

My formula is: {1% from 100% coming from the sun is much more, than 1% from 1% that comes reflected from the ground in the secondary reflection} can you dig it: 1% from the bulk of the UV&IR of 100% that comes to the clouds direct from the sun is much more reflected / than 1% reflecting back from the only 1% by the secondary reflection, which is 0,01%, and from that 0,01% mostly is absorbed by the water and CO2 cloud. And that is all the fuss about. In the 60’s and 70’s they were using it a bit more realistically for their ‘’dimming effect’’ will cool the planet, and where ignoring the opposite effect at night that at night slows cooling -/- now they use the other half of the truth, ‘’slowing cooling’’ but ignore that overall WV&CO2 clouds prevent more sunlight from coming to the ground; they used two ‘half-truths and inserted two half lies, and made one lie for the 70’s and the opposite lie for now. What WE are doing now is: discarding the two half lies, and using the both half-truths, to make one COMPLETE TRUTH. IF a Warmist foot solder doesn’t believe me; many of you have solar panels, see if those panels produce more electricity when is cloudy, if it does, swindler’s theory would be correct, because of the secondary reflection, but if you get LESS electricity from the solar panels when is cloudy = your brains-trusts are lying, be fair and inform the truth; if you don’t have solar panels, your peers have them, dig the truth, and don’t let them to keep lying. Every solar panel is your honest gadget. Interrogate the solar panel: do you produce more electricity on full sunlight or when is a heavy cloud??! They invest billions to discover black color that doesn’t have any reflection/glare/albedo, to absorb as much of the ultrashortwave UV&IR, which is not coming back from the clouds. Beloved Warmist’ solar panels will tell you that ‘’the Warmist are LYING’’ (make them to start hating their beloved, expensive panels that are exposing Warmist misleading theories). WARMIST SCAM BUSTED!

C] bottom line is: in the 60’s and 70’s the swindlers were using that phenomena that CO2 will produce ‘’dimming effect and = ice age by year 2000’’ =-= unfortunately then they didn’t take into account that is only 12h sunlight and the other 12h is dark – during the day YES, CO2 intercepts some of the UV&IR and creates insignificant ‘’dimming effect’’, they were right on the money; on the ground would be cooler. Same as when is cloudy for couple of days, on the ground get cooler than last year on those same two days, when WAS sunny. BUT: when is sufficient amount of water or CO2 cloud up- by intercepting some UV&IR from the direct hit from the other side/ coming from the sun -> the air 4-7km up gets warmer during the day; so, at night cooling slows / the *vertical winds* are slower. In other words: WV + CO2 up make cooler days but warmer nights = by overall taking the temp closer to the ground AND temperature higher all together as one system, the overall temp is same. In deserts days are hotter on the ground, but because of no clouds, upper atmosphere during the day is ALWAYS cooler, and because of that, when the sun goes down, COOLING IS QUIKER, AND COOLS MUCH MORE AT NIGHT. Reason deserts have hotter days but colder nights than other places on same latitude. So: extra CO2 would have made cooler days by 0,1C on the ground during the day, but warmer by just as much at night; overall those two phenomena cancel each other => therefore CO2 or WV don’t make warmer or colder planet, only more MILD TEMPERATURE / LESS EXTREME between day and night / WV is much more efficient, just because is more of it in the air. Is that worth to panic?! ‘’Radiative forcing of CO2 &WV / positive / negative feedback / starveback’’ is crap and a half. NO UNCERTAINTY at all. Just compare deserts and rainforests on same latitudes.

D] let’s make it a bit clearer: people using helium / weather balloons can tell you that: ‘’from the ground up, on every 120m-150m is 1C colder’’ – why is it so, not fixed, but 120m-150m? I would go as far as to say that: in desert is colder actually by a degree on every 110m altitude, but in Amazon basin on every 180m is only 1C colder; reason where is WV present, days are cooler on the ground, but cooling at night is much LESS EFFICIENT / the vertical winds are much slower at night = milder climate; one oak-tree knows much more about better or worse climates, than the 30,000-shonky scientist. On the other hand, deserts have hotter days on the ground, but cooler higher up, and colder at night = overall is same. Example: Amazon basin has the proverbial ‘’river in the sky’’ = on the ground is between 24C-33C approximate / in Namibian deserts and Australian great Sandy Desert are ALL on same latitude, same sunspots, but in those deserts, gets between 5C to 50C on same days; that’s what WV&CO2 do to the ”overall”global temperature is NOTHING, ZERO OVERALL, but WV&CO2 make milder climate. The 30,000-shonky scientist don’t know that ‘’milder climate is better climate’’ = all of them combined have less knowledge about the real climate than one Oaktree, I’ll keep saying; and that is official. So, the ‘’secondary reflection’’ con; only look a bit away from the sun on cloudy day and same distance on sunny day -> that will tell you that contemporary propaganda is dead WRONG! Or ask the Green People as solar panels owners; ‘’do they produce more electricity on cloudy or on sunny day’’? Ask them my question and give them insomnia, AND that will make them to hate solar panels and to avoid mentioning them, because those panels don’t tell lies as NASA, NOAA, IPCC commissars. Have some fun with them, by using those Stefan’s / my questions; don’t worry, you can’t be wrong; when millions of THEIR solar panels are approving / confirming our theory!!

B] because the ultrashortwave UV &IR that come from the other side of the water cloud or CO2 cloud are 100%; from the ground is reflected only about 1% -> from that 1% some is absorbed in the cloud, some goes through, and only 0,01% ricochets back to the ground as secondary reflection; therefore: without one or the other cloud much more UV&IR reaches the ground = it is much more to reflect from 100% of the UV&IR when is coming from the sun to the cloud, than to reflect down to the ground from the 1% that has been reflected from the ground, simple logic that 30,000 shonky scientist don’t want you to know, but for you easy to see: CO2 cools minuscule amount the ground during the day, and keeps just as much warmer at night, almost zero effect by CO2, but water cloud is much more efficient, because is much more of it.

#2: in the 70’s they were telling half-truth and half lie, to make a LIE; now they are telling the other half-truth as correct that CO2 intercepts sunlight and warms up the upper troposphere a bit; BUT as typical Flat -Earthers are not taking in consideration that is only 12h sunlight on every spot, not 24h; and WV&CO2 have opposite effect at night = those two opposite effects cancel each other for the ”overall global temperature”. That is: taking their the two half-truths, to make one complete truth:  Sorry to insert something else first: because still many smarties think that the heat to here comes from the sun; the truth is that; heat from the sun doesn’t even go to the orbit of Mercury –  heat is produced by the ‘’ultra-shortwaves UV &IR that come from the sun”. They are cold – they vibrate the elements HERE, and that friction produces the heat = same as: electricity cables have snow and ice on them, but in the microwave that electricity vibrates the water molecules and that boils the water in your coffee cup; similar as when you are cold and rub your hands fast, to warm up; only microwave produces faster vibration to the water molecules; BUT the ultra-shortwaves UV &IR the vibration is so short, but fast, and is more effective on solid objects as steel. Microwave vibrates water, but not the porcelain cup. I hope that was of some help; now the second crap pushed by the Protagonist (usually I call them swindlers) O.K:


Conspiracy says that ‘’61% is absorbed in the surface (how did they get to that number, don’t ask me). And then that 61% produces heat; and conspiracy states that longwave radiation / heat cannot radiate out in space, because is absorbed by CO2 and back radiated to the ground = mother of all voo-doo science. We’ll get into individual details, one at the time, because reality has NOTHING to do with the propaganda. * First of all, I avoid precise numbers; because what is absorbed plus reflected by the clouds when UV &IR were coming down from the sun to here, is different every day on every place. A] sometime is cloudy but not on most places b] clouds are different thickness and because of that, absorb and reflect different amount. C] example; where I’m, in November 1 the sun is just above and you don’t make shade at midday -> then the sun goes south to Rockhampton (Capricorn) and has same radiation here as further south in Brisbane -> then the sun from Christmas starts going north from Capricorn again, and first of February, again is no shade at midday here; but comparing with Sydney or London at those same times is different angle everywhere, because of the curvature of the planet; so when Warmist or my feather-brain friend Doug Cotton say: ‘’by Stefan Boltzmann’s law; 168 watts per square meter according to NASA)’’….. is only for the Flat-Earthers, because the earth’s curvature; light is distributed differently everywhere and different every day as the earth tilts during the year.  So, because of the seasons, even on same place is not same for many days in the year. (if somebody doesn’t know Doug Cotton – he is a Warmist parrot, but HE believes that he is a ‘’skeptic / even though he believes 100% in the phony global warming, and parrots every Warmist misleading theory’’ – (I always say: ‘’if one uses Warmist words, he promotes Warmist cause, without knowing. Warmist are clever with word; in legal therms is referred as: the solicitor is leading the witness to say things that otherwise wouldn’t).

Nevertheless, when ultra-shortwave UV &IR hit the ground, they vibrate the atoms in the soil, trees, water, and create different amounts of heat on different things and different latitudes; now we are going to be working on THAT HEAT: of course that heat is energy, but kinetic energy / heat; is not anymore as **ultra-shortwave UV&IR** = same as the heat in your cup from the microwave, cannot send that energy from the cup via the wire back to somewhere else, BUT many people are confused by the swindlers about the minuscule ‘’secondary radiation of ultra-shortwave UV&IR’’ with the ‘’heat made on the surface’’: that heat only radiates from one micron to couple of feet, when is over 300C, and that’s longwave IR radiation. But they intentionally confuse those, as if is a same thuing; **THAT heat cannot / does not ‘’radiate to out in space’’ therefore CO2 cannot prevent any radiation t out in space**. A] No conduction of that heat either. B] distance by long-wave radiation is close to zero – it’s all done by CONVECTION, forget radiation to out in space; CO2 cannot interfere with the radiation of that heat to imaginary going to out in space, BECAUSE IT DOESN’T RADIATE to out in space. Step one: heat created on the ground ‘’radiates’’ 2-3 inches -> that heat expands that air by another 4-5 inches and heat in that space is collected by the horizontal winds -> horizontal wind when accumulate some heat -that air as warmed / EXPEND, and creates the vertical winds -> ***depends on how warmed that air is, how fast and how high those vertical winds go*** that IS the magic sentence. The warmer the air gets -> the more it EXPENDS – the faster that conveyor-belt is; the hotter it is close to the ground – the cooling INCREASES also – when it cools down -> instantly the conveyor slows or stops accordingly, not to waste any extra heat. Sometimes clouds intercept more of the UV&IR – and it gets cooler day or two on the ground ->instantly vertical winds slow down or stop / or as in the desert the vertical winds are always the strongest; because on the ground gets hotter, but 7-8km altitude is ALWAYS colder than above forest on same latitude, which makes the vertical winds stronger and go higher. That’s how heat is taken up and dispersed by the oxygen & nitrogen that are THE vertical wind / as a conveyor belt – collecting the heat -> instantly expending ->zooming up, but how fast and how high they go to disperse the heat; depends how much hotter is close to the ground = SELF REGULATION by the honest laws of physics. So, radiation of heat from the ground is only few inches; reason here in the tropics dogs suffer more from that radiation than human; because dog’s head is closer to the ground. Q: how can CO2 interfere with the heat ”radiating to out in space” – when ”radiation is only few inches??!

Example: your fridge has cold space, and freezer above – if you put a pot of boiling hot water at 100C in the freezer compartment, and another pot at 50C below, in the fridge => both pots would have cooled down to 4C (39F) simultaneously. Imagine the air above your head, as shelfs ON EVERY 120-150m ALTITUDE IS ONE DEGREE COLDER – if is cloudy cooling continues also, but not as fast, because your *conveyor* is much slower and is slower because ‘’proportion of difference in temperature between the ground and upper troposphere is less (hang-glider people hate slow and useless vertical winds; and are scared of it – but most of times take 80kg man and 40kg glider = 120kg up for two kilometers and keeps him there for hours) As soon as the clouds go away -> starts warming up the surface and instantly vertical winds increase; ‘’self-adjusting mechanism’’ all regulated by the HONEST laws of physics. Because the good lord inserted a thermometer in every atom of oxygen &nitrogen => molecules to know when to shrink, when to expand, and BY HOW MUCH TO EXPAND!! In the desert from midnight to midday warms from 5C-55C, and in next 12h cools by 50C, but on same latitude in rainforest warms up from 25C at midnight to 33C by midday, but for next 12h until midnight cools by only 8C. All ‘’self-regulated’’ by the honest laws of physics. Imagine if in the rainforest was cooling in 12h by 50C, or imagine if it was warming by 50C but was cooling for next 12h only by 8C, then would have been trouble; but as long as the honest laws of physics are regulating the temperature, nothing to worry about; unless the shifty politicians and bias media can abolish those honest laws of physics by legislation in the parliament, and in UN. Challenge them to try.

A: those thermometers inside every atom of oxygen & nitrogen never fail. The 30.000 shonky scientist need to make the shallow politicians to abolish the honest laws of physics by legislation, and in UN; before they should start lying about the phony global warming. Vertical winds disperse the heat on 2-3-4-6km up, for the ”cold vacuum” to neutralize it -> shrink and drop down for more heat. Well, why they don’t go up to 10-15km? A: they do, if is a very hot volcano, or nuclear bomb explosion – has been reported that super-heated gasses go up to 12km-17km and spreads like a mushroom for the incoming ‘’cold vacuum’’ to neutralize the heat. Q: can CO2 prevent it of going up? A: no, even warmed CO2 goes up to 17km, after all CO2 is 2/3 made of oxygen. But 17km is only super-heated gases – otherwise normally no need to go for more than 2-3-4km, to spread the heat and waste it / to be canceled. Waste it, HOW?

A: as increasing altitude from sea-level, the air is thinner and thinner – over 8km altitude, people going there need assistance with extra oxygen; because the air is too thin. 2] as the planet orbits around the sun as a Frisbee at 108000kmh, every 9 minutes changes space, AND that ‘’cold vacuum’’ that we are going through, goes through the thinner air same as air goes through in-between the water cells in the car radiator – B] if the troposphere gets warmer than normal, for ANY REASON -> instantly the troposphere expands, and imitates as bigger radiator, plus makes more space for more cold vacuum’’ to get in; same as if the car engine gets warmer than normal and radiator instantly expends, plus the holes between the water columns to increase and let more cold air through. Well the air is colder than the radiator, but is not as cold as the NEW ‘’cold vacuum’’ that is allowed to zoom trough every 9 minutes. Better to correct it: the ”cold vacuum” actually doesn’t zoom through / instead the earth zooms through the ”cold vacuum’, that’s better. That neutralizes / cancels any extra heat instantly. If is warmer, troposphere expends accordingly, if is colder, troposphere shrinks instantly; everything is regulated by the honest laws of physics. Do you know ‘’what is in-between the molecules in the thinner air on 3-4km altitude? A: more ”NEW cold vacuum” zooms trough it every 9 minutes. So, no heat ‘’radiates out in space’’ but is neutralized same as when you put a block of ice in a bucket of hot water – that heat doesn’t ‘’radiate’’ anywhere, it just gets neutralized. Saying that upper troposphere can get warmer, is same as saying that ‘’on the bottom of the sea will get dryer.  To repeat my favoured remark ‘ Mohamed doesn’t go to the mountain, but the mountain comes to Mohamed’’ = which means: what the swindlers presenting themselves as NASA saying that “a bit more heat goes in, than goes out’’ and they are monitoring, they are LYING 100%, including Christi and Roy Spencer.

B] if heat was actually going out, hypothetically – even if same amount of energy was going out, the planet still would have boiled in one year; because of all the geothermal heat released, plus all the heat produced by any friction or fire, but no heat radiates out at all, and they all know; only Christi & Spencer are playing the trick as ‘’good cops / bad cops’’ against the other swindlers as Hanson & Mann. They are all promoting same lie, by using different tricks, and they all know that they are ALL laying, but are tricking the sceptical people; to approve of Christi and Roy Spencer’s lies. I do believe that; many people have been conned to believe lots of crap, but not them. NASA, NOAA, IPCC, Met Office, they are all of the same politburo, they are all creating and coordinating lies. So, from the moon no albedo crap / reflection on full moon comes to help warming the earth AND the earth doesn’t reflect to warm up the moon. B] most of the heat is neutralized in the first 3-5-9km altitude, but super-heated gases from volcano or atom bomb go higher and spread as a mushroom, as necessary, to be NEUTRALIZED. PLUS troposphere expands a bit more than normal – intercepts more ‘’cold vacuum’’ and fixes in a jiffy, no worries.

OR the opposite: when is a solar eclipse – tremendous amount of sunlight is reflected / blocked by the moon, tremendous amount of less sunlight comes to the earth, on areas gets dark at midday and cools, but by next day overall heat in the earth’s atmosphere is same amount as if it wasn’t a solar eclipse – meteorologist don’t take even in the account the eclipse, for predicting the temperatures for next day. Many times, Mercury or Venus gets between the sun/earth and block lots of sunlight, but unless you are into horoscope or astronomer, wouldn’t even know it’s happening; because doesn’t affect the overall earth’s temperature, even meteorologist don’t need to know for predicting tomorrow’s temperature. Because the troposphere shrinks for few minutes accordingly -> intercepts less ‘’cold vacuum’’ and fixes instantly. Do you follow me; if there wasn’t for the sun, would have been 300c COLDER – well if Venus blocks 5% of the sun- for that day when Venus is in-between, the temperature should have dropped by 15C, same amount of sunlight is blocked by mercury, only more often; the Earth’s Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism (ETSAM) fixes it instantly – doesn’t let to get cooler even for 0,1C, not even for a day. I rest my case!

On many occasions, I gave examples the Mt. Kilimanjaro and Mt Kenya. In Tanzania and on the other side in Kenya gets regularly over 40C – but by the time that heat goes to 6km altitude, is all neutralized, otherwise wouldn’t be any permanent ice on those two mountains in the tropics, on less than 6km altitude. 2] mountain climbers only go in summer to Mt. Everest, in subtropics in summer, some climber’s fingers, ears need to be amputated, if are frozen for more than 2,5h, no blood circulation, on less than 9km in subtropics, in summer / in winter would be certain death from cold. Do you want more proofs that heat doesn’t radiate up into the void, but is neutralized here on the first 3-5km. and all the swindlers are lying?!? Compare with: your room, is always warmer close to the sealing than close to the floor – because warmth goes up, also in environment goes up, but by 6km altitude is neutralized / canceled.   Yes, CO2 during the day goes up, same as warmed oxygen & nitrogen, and releases the heat; after all, CO2 is 2/3 oxygen. B] hot air balloon after 2h in the air is FULL of CO2, but still pushes the balloon up, including 6-7 people and the basket and the gas bottle. CO2 not guilty!!

Swindlers cherry picked some old / outdated experiments by Boltzmann, that are not appropriate for the cooling of the planet;  but most are into the ‘’second law of thermodynamics’’ a] warming CO2 in a tube is not same as in the backyard – because in the backyard as soon as warms a bit -instantly goes up, where cooling is much more efficient, not like overheating it in a tube, where it builds up pressure. B] cooling is done by convection, taking heat constantly up. C] including conduction is exclusively for confusion. Just to point ”how wrong they are about conduction in the outdated thermodynamics, even though doesn’t apply in cooling of the atmosphere: under their laws of thermodynamics /Plank ‘’heat ALWAYS goes from warmer to colder’’ – WRONG!! -/- Experiment: at night, you put a metal bar of 19C in the yard of 20C temperature, in 1h the metal will release another 6-7C to the much warmer air. 2] put a rock at 24C in a fast running creek of 25C – in 1h the rock will release another 4-5C to the warmer water’’ just giving you those couple of examples that the 19 century experiments are outdated; reason they are useful for the swindlers to con the ignorant; same thing is experimenting with warming CO2 in a tube by Boltzmann and wrongly now comparing it with warmed CO2 in the yard. #2: difficult to experiment with carbon in the yard; but you can substitute carbon steel, carbon and steel are comparable, and are in alloy -> if you put a carbon steel and a lump of wood in the yard at daytime -> the wood will be cooler after an hour, because carbon steel absorbs more heat on the sunlight; and that’s what the swindlers are exploiting; if wood represented O2&N2 and carbon steel was representing CO2, BUT: the Flat-earthers forget that is 12h of night… you check yourself and see that ‘’at night the metal / CO2 will be much colder than the wood and the surrounding air. Can you dig it? Those two factors cancel each other!! daytime absorbs more heat, but at night release more hat. Therefore: CO2 &WV give ‘’shade-cloth effect, not greenhouse effect.

Fact #1: because of the curvature of the planet, and constant seasonal tilting; ‘’ The Stefan-Boltzmann Law in physics confirms that the solar radiation impinging on Earth’s surface 168 watts per square meter according to NASA’’ is a grotesque LIE, created for confusing the ignorant. B] if they were interested in the truth, would have never said something like that.

Fact #2: confusing the energy from ultrashortwave UV &IR that goes for great distances, with the kinetic energy / heat that radiates only few inches = is the mother of all tricks that the swindlers puled on the ignorants as Doug Cotton and similar; so, they can keep spreading Warmist lies fanatically. B] same as electricity and heat in the cup are different kind of energy. One of them travels from the sun to hear, great distanced, but the heat in the cup takes time by conduction to warm up even the porcelain cup. C] can the physicist overlook that? A: no, but they can con easy people like our Doug; who thinks: if he keeps repeating shonky’s lies – people will think that he knows physics / and he is constantly letting us know; and to promote Warmist lies, Doug told me ‘’that I don’t know physics and he does’’ = Doug it sounded same as; ‘’little Johnny with confidence was teaching his father how children are made, by explaining about the stork and everything’’… because other grown up people told him so… c] Warmist don’t have a single proof of global warming, but are using the featherbrains opponents as Doug Cotton, to legitimize the existence of the phony global warming, only ‘’something else is doing it’’ he keeps saying= same as proving that ‘’Santa exist, but he doesn’t come via the chimney, but through the window…?

Fact #3: because the heat created on the earth’s surface doesn’t radiate to out in space -> CO2 cannot prevent that non-existent radiation => CO2 not guilty, Warmist and their parrots (as Doug and similar) guilty as hell.

Fact #4: from weather balloons / helium balloons records, the evidences existed for a long, long time, that: -‘’every 130m above your head is colder by 1C => a mile above your head is colder by 10C /15F; is not something that needs to wait 100 years and prove that the swindlers are wrong. Everything I say can be proven NOW, easy.

Fact #5: the warmer the ground gets -> the faster the vertical winds become = the best Earth’s Temperature Self-Regulation Mechanism (ETSM); if warmer, O2&N2 expend -> vertical winds increase speed, and go higher, where cooling is much more efficient

Fact #6: O2&N2 expend instantly when warmed, and increase the vertical wind, and vertical winds go higher up -/ when colder than normal; O2&N2 shrink and vertical winds slow down or even stop, to prevent more cooling than necessary. B] shrinking / expansion of those two gases in change of temperature is INSTANT = cannot make a PAUSE, delay in shrinking / expending = ‘’hiatus crap’’ was a good Warmist trick, to make ignorant opponents to legitimize Warmist lies about the existence of the phony global warming. Give them credit for that… they are very dishonest, but clever. Also, the volume of the troposphere increases and intercepts more ‘’cold vacuum’’ to go through. Same as if you had a rubber radiator on your car; to enlarge when warmer engine or shrink when colder. C] the good Lord made the troposphere to regulate the OVERALL heat brilliantly, just by inserting a thermometer in every atom of oxygen & nitrogen.

Fact #7: reason the shonky ‘’researchers’’ for the last 160y ‘’discovered’’ too many global warmings / ice ages, is because of the tilting of the planet and official North Pol was on many different places in the past; that made warmer imprints on places where is colder now, and colder imprints where is warmer now. B] because was hard to get funds and to get on the front pages then – they had the INCENTIVE to confuse, fabricate more facts. Example: when was in New York 3km of ice, the overall planet wasn’t colder than now; because in western Siberia was temperate climate, in eastern Siberia at that same time was subtropics (but they gave it the name ‘’ the Big Ice Age’’). The planet is not flat anymore, fellas!! Milankovich was misinterpreted; tilting the planet instantly because of the influences of other heavenly bodies was misrepresented, the rest was same crap as the Warmist are manipulating now; for them was much easier, because they were lying about ‘’the past’’ and was not much scrutiny then. Bottom line: global temp OVERALL is same; no need to keep spooking the public that every day is global warming / every night is global cooling = look at those phony ‘global’ temp charts; they look as seismographs; as if the planet has dengue fever and needs Panadol – no wander the public prefers the Warmist to save them.

Fact #8: why weather balloons say on every 120-140m altitude is by 1C colder; why not precise? A: because in cloudy weather, or rainforest; on the ground is much cooler during the day, than in sunny desert; I’ll go as far as saying: in desert is colder by 1C every 100m, and above thick rainforest 1C cooler is on up to 180m and more; BUT OVERALL HEAT is always the same. There is no uncertainty; in Brazil rainforest goes from 24C-33C in 24h – on same latitude in Namibian desert and Australian Great Sandy Desert gets on same days gets between 10C-50C = deserts have the clearest sky V.s Amazon basin has that proverbial river in the sky = those places are the biggest and best example for anybody interested in the truth, what CO2 &WV clouds do to temperature, mild CLIMATE, against extreme in deserts = bad climate, because WV &CO2 clouds are as shock absorbers, prevent extreme, which in honest language is called good climate. B] unless is taken into account all the heat ‘’from the ground to up to 10km altitude, global temp is not monitored!!  Example: if you had 100 pockets and 500 dollar coins, you can redistribute them different in every pocket, then take from some and change to more in the otherpockets, but that will not make you richer. Same as in desert is hotter during day on the ground, but colder higher up, reason at night cooling is faster and more efficient, because vertical winds / the conveyor is much faster Vs, rainforest or where is rice paddies, the vertical winds are slow, don’t go very high, AND the hang glider people hate rice paddies; they prefer exposed rocks to the sunlight and dry.  All that can be proven now, easy – no need to wait 100y and then see that the Warmist are 100% wrong and intentionally lying. At least the temp on the first 7km altitude must be taken into account, as same system, because when is cooler on the ground, higher up is a bit warmer – because ‘’higher up’’ is more space than only on 5feet above the ground; where they locate the thermometers, is very deceiving; AND naïve to ignore the constant imbalance; must be the whole system or nothing. The new president of USA  will be inaugurated soon; can finance a helium balloon and a thermometer; honest people to remap those shelves with cooler temperature as it gets in higher and thinner air, where more ‘’cold vacuum’ penetrates in IS URGENTLY NEEDED!! Otherwise the swindlers FOR CASH attacking coal and oil, to help expensive solar and wind is ‘’PROTECTION MONEY’’ as it was in the 1930 in Chicago, by the mafia.

THIRD CONFUSION: ‘’GREENHOUSE GASES EFFECT: if the start is in the WRONG direction; you’ll be wandering lost in darkness, for the rest of your days. Let’s bring the truth and reality to the daylight: ‘’greenhouse effect’’ interpretation has been given for CO2 giving that effect for the earth, as reason is warmer than the moon – because the moon doesn’t have co2, and you all know that; so, if you don’t know that the earth also has H2O +O2 &N2; they will ride on your backs from victory to victory, by using the grandmother of all con. In reality the ultra-shortwaves create more heat on the moon than on the earth, a] because no atmosphere on the moon to reflect and absorb some of it, before it hits the surface 100% strength b] day / sunlight on the moon is two weeks long, but even though more heat is created, heat doesn’t accumulate; because the ‘’cold vacuum’’ that we are traveling through, is TOUCHING THE GROUND on the moon; on the earth big part of that ‘’cold vacuum’’ is kept 50km away, by the blanket of O2&N2, as perfect insulators. Let’s see the whole reality:

Normal / honest greenhouse has a TRANSPERANT plastic or glass roof, that covers 100%. That plastic or glass roof lets the ultrashortwave UV&IR from the sunlight trough to the ground, to warm up the ground; and then prevents that heat including the geothermal heat, to go up into the atmosphere THAT keeps inside warmer. B] in contrast, CO2 during the day goes up, same as WV cloud and INTERCEPT part of the UV&IR, not to get to the ground = complete contrast, roof on the honest greenhouse is attached and doesn’t go up. C] the roof on an honest greenhouse is 100% cover B] CO2 is only 260-500ppm = that is same as if the normal greenhouse has a fishnet or a postage stamp for a roof… if you make a normal greenhouse with fishnet as a roof, neighbours would put you in a straightjacket; because that wouldn’t prevent any heat of escaping. On the planet earth oxygen & nitrogen are the greenhouse gases: they are transparent, SAME as glass roof on an honest greenhouse; and they let the ultrashortwave UV&IR trough to the ground, to warm up the ground; then the ground warms up the air just above the ground, but oxygen & nitrogen as PERFECT INSULATORS are slowing cooling, same as roof on an honest greenhouse. Imagine even if on the moon was similar amount of CO2 but no oxygen & nitrogen; would have been just as cold.

Bottom line: swindlers can notice the 260-600ppm of CO2 in earth’s atmosphere, which is not on the moon; but cannot notice the 998999ppm of oxygen &nitrogen, AND the amount of water on the earth that is slowing cooling at night, that is not on the moon; in other words, nobody, nobody can accuse the Warmist for comparing apples with oranges, because they are comparing an apple with a watermelon. Fact: O2&N2 are transparent, same as the roof on the honest greenhouse. #2 fact: they are the best insulators, reason they are in the double walls of the refrigerator, or double-glazing, or more O&N gets trapped in your woollen jumper than in a skinny cotton shirt; the wool doesn’t keep you warmer, but the O&N trapped in the woollen cloths. #3: when the troposphere warms up more than normal, for any reason, troposphere INSTANTLY expends and intercepts more cold vacuum; same as enlarging the radiator on the car; on the other hand: if air temperature in a normal greenhouse increases -> some air out the door = less air, same volume; not the case with the troposphere when warmed, because volume of troposphere enlarges when warmed.

#4: when CO2 warms up -> instantly goes up, together with warmed oxygen and nitrogen to higher altitude, WHERE COOLING IS MORE EFFICIENT; not the roof on the honest greenhouse, stays where it was as when was colder inside. The differences between a roof on a greenhouse and CO2 effect are completely the opposite. WV + CO2 give a ‘’shade-cloth effect’’ not a greenhouse effect= daytime intercept some UV &IR high up => less comes to the ground; oxygen &nitrogen + water slow down cooling at night and make MILDER CLIMATE, less extreme between day / night; how can that be bad??! How can they overlook that? Q: why they don’t put CO2 in-between the double walls on the fridges?! Q: how can 30,000 shonky scientists not notice that ‘’the earth is got lots and lots of oxygen & nitrogen as best insulators, but can notice the miniscule amount of the essential CO2 that is on the earth but not on the moon??! Are you still saying ‘’that is not a conspiracy’’? I understand parrots as Doug, but 30,000 scientists not to know that? B] not to know that heat doesn’t ‘’radiate’’ to out in space?? People with helium balloons and small aircraft pilots always knew that is less heat on every 100m altitude, where the air is thinner. C] why the swindlers avoid my proofs and are always trying to silence me instead?!?! = CONSPIRACY!!!

On the moon the ‘’cold vacuum’’ that we are traveling through orbiting around the sun; touches the ground, on the earth is a 15km of thick blanket of insulating O2&N2 – B] the moon travels almost twice as fast than the earth through that ‘’cold vacuum’’, because travels together with the earth, PLUS simultaneously orbits around the earth 13 times in a year. You know that: when you are on the open pick-up truck, traveling through a cold place, the faster the truck travels -> the colder you get (moon travels faster; hello NASA swindlers!!). B] swindler’s common practice is; to go to the polar caps, or on the bottom of the sea, where honest people don’t go; to tell lies to the ignorant; they even used Venus, because she is got more CO2 and are lying that is a ‘’runaway greenhouse’’ on Venus; and lying that the temp is 465C, WRONG! Example: on the earth cools by 30C in 12h from midday to midday in the desert = Venus is traveling through the same ‘’cold vacuum’’ and night is 4 months long – Q: how many 12h are in 4 months? To use Boltzmann’s crappy experiment, building pressure in the tube warming CO2 -> they concocted that Venus has pressure of 92 atmospheres, to justify the phony extra heat accumulation; but no explanation ‘’how can Venus have that much pressure, when is already known that Venus has a bit smaller gravity than earth; what kind of anvils are on the top of Venus atmosphere, to press down and build high pressure, because is definitely not the SMALLER gravity on Venus that is constantly fighting with the empty vacuum around the planet, as in a thug of war, for the gases in Venus atmosphere? Therefore: on Venus, even on the equator gets colder at night than is here on Antarctic in winter. PLUS, because are no water currents there to bring warmth to the night side, and CO2 releases heat much better than water or O2&N2, reason CO2 is used to make dry ice. SCAM BUSTED!

(since I wrote the post about Venus and informed the NASA’s commissars, most swindlers stopped using Venus as example for their CO2 badmouthing) (plus, after I wrote the post ‘’ Global warming lots its compass’’ they stopped using every day *ice falling off the cliff into the water, at least on Australian TV; I would like to know ‘if is similar in N/H for the last 12 months’’) B] did you notice that here is no ‘’may happen, if happens, could happen, it’s possible’’ and similar tarot cards science; everything I say, can be proven now – no need to wait 100y, and then see that they are lying. Can you number all the proofs on this post, that can be proven now? If this is correct = swindler’s propaganda is 100% wrong. Biggest Q: why do you think oxygen & nitrogen shrink when cooled / expend when warmed INSTANTLY, is it because they have nothing better to do, because of boredom, OR they are regulating the ‘’OVERAL’’ global temperature to be the SAME every day of the year and millennia?? Q: can CO2 prevent O2&N2 / troposphere of expending, or warmed O2&N2 of going up, where is cooler and thinner air?? A: no, CO2 is 2/3 made of oxygen, those atoms expand and take the CO2 higher, where cooling is much more efficient, together with O&N.  CO2 also cools and releases heat much faster and better than the other lot; reason CO2 is used to make DRY ICE; The thinner the air is -> the more ‘’cold vacuum’’ penetrates in, and cooling is more efficient. All Warmist foot solder has to learn is that ”the earth is not flat anymore and is not sunlight 24h on every spot on the planet”; when you learn that -> you’ll get warmer to the truth. b] the more CO2 in the air -> the more it gets washed by the rain into the soil to enrich it; rain washes CO2, SO2, CO, NITROGEN and any yummy goodies in the troposphere; WATER WASHES THINGS, FROM YOUR DIRTY ASS, to the gases from the atmosphere; but water and soap will never wash Warmist’ Psychopathic DIRTY minds.

Bottom line:  Human has changed the ‘’micro-climates’’ on many places; since human invented how to produce fire artificially. By rubbing two sticks, changed the ‘’micro-climates’’ AND human can also improve many bad micro-climates now, on many different places, because H2O regulates the climate, not CO2; example: instead of wasting the freshwater into the sea, turn river Congo north, would make Sahara the best savannahs on the planet and will be lots of trees, lakes and other vegetation; on the other hand; chop most of the trees in Amazon basin, drain most swamps and overflows -> Brazil will start resembling Sahara.  – other places have good climate, it’s nothing wrong; BUT HUMAN CANNOT PRODUCE GLOBAL WARMING; because ‘’overall’’ global temperature is regulated by the laws of physics, and HUMAN CANNOT CHANGE THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. Unless lefty politicians can abolish the ‘’honest laws of physics’’ by legislation, and in UN…?

Well fellas, ”this is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth” everything can be proven now, and replicated in controlled environment- stop accusing me that I’m IN BIG OIL- because I only use little bit of olive oil, in my stir-fry, and nothing more. 

#1: dimming by CO2 makes on the ground cooler, but not enough, even to be debated; because during the day sunlight lifts CO2 higher, and just as much 2-3-4km up is a bit warmer during the day. Dimming effect by CO2 &WV – cooling a bit on the ground is proven on many ways, but the best are Warmist solar panels, they produce less electricity; because electricity they produce by using directly the ultrashortwave UV &IR, not already created heat. SCAM BUSTED!

#2: if the people using helium balloons don’t want to give you the data ‘’ on how many meters altitude temperature is diminished by 1C; I strongly suggest the sceptical people to get a helium balloon and a thermometer that will calibrate the temperature from the ground to 10km altitude; of course to document, and invite the bias media as witnesses. Warmist castle would collapse in no time. now will be a new president in USA, the first politician that would prefer the truth; he should finance the experiment, and save billions for USA, and many more billions for other western countries; and fully expose the ACAM from the western Marxist SCUM. Get involved and don’t let the conspiracy to win. This is Skeptic’s **plan B** -use it, or be a born loser. Time will show that is no global warming, or cooling; why waiting for time to prove to you, when YOU can prove to the world, that is all conspiracy 100% crap?! On which side of history do you prefer to be?

Posted in Archives, Recent Possts, Uncategorized | 9 Comments


WHO IS THE CLOWN, TO SAY THAT 290 ppm of CO2 is the best for crops and trees?! CO2 is food for the trees &crops – isn’t it most appropriate to ask the trees&crops for advice: how many parts per million of CO2 is the best?!?! Trees and crops cannot be ”brainwashed” by the aggressive propaganda, they don’t tell lies! Trees are not susceptible to brainwashing, as most of the people are

I have proven ‘’beyond any reasonable doubt: ‘’that is no such a thing as ‘’global’’ warming; warmings / coolings are never global. B] heat from the ground and troposphere is not ‘’radiated’’ out in space – all the heat is neutralized in the troposphere, by the ‘’cold vacuum’’ penetrating into the atmosphere; as the planet orbits as a Frisbee around the sun. No heat can be detected escaping / ”radiating” out of the stratosphere. ‘’Self Adjusting Temperature Mechanism’’ (SATM) is brilliant, infallible. Therefore: if there wasn’t one molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere – heat wouldn’t have being ”radiating” out into the void! Cold vacuum constantly penetrating into the troposphere is neutralizing all the heat in the first 1-9km altitude. Same as: when you put a block of ice into a pot of hot water; the coldness from the ice is neutralizing the heat -therefore: CO2 is unjustifiably blamed! 2] H2O regulates the climate, not CO2! Confusing climatic changes with the phony ‘’global’’ warmings, is the mother of all lies and a gross crime! Here is some of the truth:

THE TRUTH: heat created on the ground AND in the water is neutralized by the ”new cold vacuum” that penetrates into the troposphere every 9 minute. From 2-10km altitude all the heat is neutralized. The thinner the air up -> the more of that ”cold vacuum” penetrates in and out and neutralizes any extra heat. If no extra heat, that ”cold vacuum” just zooms away underutilized, or not utilized at all. Only occasionally super-heated gases from volcanoes and nuclear bombs explosions go above 10km up to 12km-18km, spread like mushroom, to be exposed to more cold vacuum; and gases of million degrees heat is neutralized, BUT: for the rest of the year, all that cold vacuum that zooms trough every 9 minutes, is unused. Because the planet orbits around the sun into that ”cold vacuum” at 108 000kmh -it means that: that ”cold vacuum” cannot get overheated one bit!!! Bottom line is: even if there was not one molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere – heat wouldn’t have ”radiated” out in void; all the cooling is done in the troposphere!!! Heat from the ground ”radiates” only few inches AND: horizontal winds collect  that heat / then ”vertical winds”  disperse it few km up into the thinner  troposphere, where is ”neutralized” by the constantly  coming in new ”cold vacuum” Heat from CO2 doesn’t radiate for more than a micron, and is directly cooled by the ”cold vacuum” No ”BACK-RADIATION”  at all!!! CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas!

BUT, the truth will take long time to reach the public, because of entrenched pagan beliefs in the active Warmist & Skeptic activist… Galileo had similar problems, even Darwin…

Reality / facts: before Darwin published his book; the climate / weather was controlled by witches, dragons, and by St Peter. The bishop was threatening: if is too many teenage pregnancies, or people are not paying the 10% tax correctly to the bishop, that they deserve – St. Peter will sent hailstorms, droughts and floods. When floods finally arrived -> people were blaming the bishop and St. Peter. The bishop to get himself out of trouble – he was blaming the witches, and was burning them, to silence them. After the floods, hailstorms, and burning the witches – always good weather was coming = best proof that the bishop was always correct – and all people were very grateful to the bishop, for the good weather. 2]Many times, the strongest man in town was collecting ‘’contributions’’ so he can go far in the forest; where nobody can see him fighting the dragon (similar as now Warmist White Collar Criminals (WWCC) are going to the polar caps, AND to the bottom of the sea, to fight the elusive phony ‘’global’’ warming; because AGW lost it’s compass) – If they didn’t contribute, then – the bully was taking by force, the best chunks of meat, to be strong, to defeat the dragon, same result.  At least, then everything was clear cut, and everybody knew the truth and ALL the facts..,

Then Darwin published his book… some unemployed geologist and paleontologist went into overdrive.   When they find extra alluvial silt on few m2 somewhere -> that was ‘’proof’’ of warmer the WHOLE planet. Then; some places imprint of dryer= was warmer the ‘’whole’’ planet. Other times wetter was ‘’proof’’ of much warmer the ‘’whole’’ planet… they knew even ”by how many degrees”…?! Or a 10m3 of peat bog somewhere was ‘’proving’’ that ‘’the WHOLE planet’’ was much colder than normal. Extinction of many species was always attributed on warmer OR colder planet. They were going from ‘’Snowball earth’’ to ‘’Ice Free Polar Caps’’ and everything in between. WOW! Honesty was not needed… When they accumulated far too many phony ‘’global’’ warmings and ‘’global’’ coolings – instead of getting embarrassed – they invented truckloads of ‘’global’’ cycles… The earth’s temp was going up and down as if she had a hi-fewer…?! Their ‘’global’’ temp charts started to resemble a seismograph, everything with precision;  1234AD temp goes up by 0,024C –next year another 0,05C, next year goes down by 0,018C, ‘’precision’’ to a hundredth of a degree. 2]Because some report said: how much peasants in Buckingham Shire at that time were paying to the bishop’s 10% = how much per acre grain was produced, was more than during Renaissance = which they declared it ‘’LIA’’. As second ‘’proof’’ they have picture of people scatting on Thames = Buckingham Shire, a small dot on the map is their ‘’globe’’. Most lies were coming from England, for the last 150 years.

All the confusion about the phony global warming, was created long, long time ago. Failed geologist, that were not able to get themselves job in the mining industry did it, it wasn’t the butler who did it…!
Example #1: all extinctions were pinned on global warmings / coolings and comets hitting the earth. The truth: most viruses are smart and leave 10-60% of the host alive, so that the virus can survive, BUT: some viruses were stupid – easy to spread, were killing every host – wasn’t any immunisation invented => host left only fossilized bones to be found, virus extinct; or other animals invented immunity for it and the virus survived – probably now that virus is harmless nuisance as flue virus or similar. But for shionks that; every summer is global warming / every winter global cooling; is handy to blame the ”global” temperature for every extinction…?!

Example #2: alluvial deposits in Colorado canyon are as pages in a book; can tell the past very accurately: bigger gravel deposit = it was more rain – only fine dirt deposits are proof of not much rain, BUT: that doesn’t say even for Colorado state – it only tells about the rainfall of upstream the river catchment, full stop – definitely not about the whole planet!!! b] maybe was a wet year, OR: on 29 of February was lots of rain, rain melted the snow and the water from both created very big flood, then for the rest of the year was dry / no rain… for the shonks that’s irrelevant…?! c] then another shonky geologist finds same imprint in Mongolia, just a coincident – if it wasn’t exactly – he forced it to fit (same as you forcing your sock on a horse’s foot, for money and publicity, you can do it) That double proof cements the knowledge, goes in education books, it’s final proof… The question is: –”if there isn’t SAME imprints on all the other lands between Colorado and Mongolia, were all those lands on another planet at that time?”! That question was never asked, why not? a] more rain doesn’t mean ”warmer year” b] simultaneously floods and droughts happens on many places, all the time, the planet is a big place! When north pole was in Canada – Colorado was covered in ICE, but: at that same time in Germany and Poland was subtropics, equator was going over Siberia; yes it was different CLIMATES on most of the places on the planet; but was SAME overall global temp as today!. b] when north pole was in Vladivostok, equator was close to Colorado; yes different climates everywhere, but ”OVERALL” global temp was same as today! That confused the crap out of the opportunist ”researchers for funds and grants”

Example #3: most important: the official North Poll was on different places in the past – when North Poll was for example on Iceland, or west Canada-> some temperate lands now, was tropics / some today’s tropics were in cold climate. Milutin Milankovich was the only correct in his theory, nobody else! But: for the last 150y they found tropical imprint in cold climate; they declared it as ”the planet was much warmer” OR: when they found imprint of cold climate somewhere in the tropics; was declared as ” snowball earth” top stupidity! Now the western democracies are paying for that stupidity, and even democracy will be lost… because of ”established Pagan beliefs”…

Example #4: in a cave the shonk vandalizes the best stalagmite; cuts it and analyses the rings of calcium: thicker ring for him represents wetter year, WOW! It’s thicker ring because a herbivore animal drops something above, in the poo from the grass is ”extra calcium’‘ – another time a snail died above – from snail’s shell the calcium leached down and made bigger ring on that stalagmite; but that was declared instead as:7200 years ago was warmer by 2C, the WHOLE planet! One dead snail increased the temp on the whole planet, from Africa to Antarctic… reason: because somebody didn’t get into that cave and braked the shonk’s arm, for vandalizing the beautiful stalagmite, BECAUSE: if that stalagmite was able to tell the temp above on the surface -wouldn’t be 30 ALL different shapes and sizes stalagmites in 10m radius in the cave! Was it 30 different climates simultaneously in the 10m radius above the cave, so every stalagmite is different; YOU tell me! 

#5:                      TREE RINGS ‘’PROXY DATA’’ CON

Any lumberjack, or orchard farmer can tell you that: ‘’prosperity of a tree depends on many, many different factors’’ BUT: somebody had to intercept emails, and write a book about ‘’Climategate’’ – so: the ‘’experts’’ on the net can beat themselves in the chest, and ridicule the conspirators… it’s like; somebody just discovered the wheel for them, few years ago…  (they are the best proof; why the Warmist are marching from victory to victory)

Many years before the ‘’Climategate’’ – when the first time I heard on the TV box that:  -‘’experts by tree rings are discovering the variations in past global temperatures’’ I couldn’t have believed my ears…and instantly said to myself: -‘’the trees are not lying, but: dishonest people are using trees, to tell lies’’!!!

Here are only couple of examples why, (you can ad up plenty more examples):

Lets use two trees, 20 feet apart – three #1 and tree #2. O.K:

#1: farmers know that: some soils are better for ‘’wetter years’’ other soils prefer dryer years (sandy/ clay soils) -> tree #1 has more clay, than tree #2 a bit more sandy soil => tree#1 would have thicker rings in dryer year / #2 in wetter years. which means: those trees will show different thickness rings, for same years. b] tree#1 was next to indented surface, which was gradually losing in floods the topsoil, but not the #2 = different thickness rings, for same years! BUT: a branch has fallen after in that indent, and started in floods to stop mulch coming from upstream-> improved thickness of his rings for next few years, but not the other one. After 10years branch rotted, and the floodwater started digging big drainage on the spot-> tree#1 was depraved from nutrients-> next rings were almost invisible.

Then couple of birds made a nest on #1 tree. Birds collected insects and seeds on a large radius area, and shitted all over the lucky tree – shower washes the bird poo onto the roots, as the most beautiful organic fertilizer -> that tree improved, and developed bushy leafs – because of that, other birds made nests on it also-> started to develop the best thick rings for next 5 years, BUT, not the other tree, 20 yards away. Then on tree #2 the eagle made nest-> that made the other birds to disappear -> #1 tree decreased rings thickness, but #2 increased the rings thickness, because the carnivore eagle poops ‘’blood and bone fertilizer’’ the best. AND: I didn’t say anything about the tree#3, 24feet away. Because under that tree was flatter land and no fallen branches, two cows were coming under it, every day for siesta; were crapping under it, all that fertilizer was enjoyed by the lucky tree #3 –Yes in climatology everything is bullshit, except the cowshit – cowshit is definitely not bullshit, but the best organic fertilizer! Therefore: for that tree, few bucketfuls of crap increased the temperature on the whole planet by 1,4C. Until one day the cow running away, slipped and braked her leg under the tree #1. After the cow died, tree #1 had the best blood and bone from it, for next 30 years. If that tree was cut for studying, would have shown as: ‘’the best rainfall, the hottest 30 years of global warming on the WHOLE , by 2,3C,  just because one cow run out of luck.

We forgot about the tree #4, 25 yards away – it had a big tree next to it, which was blocking the sunlight for big part of the day b] was taking most of the nutrients and moisture from the ground, because had bigger roots, so for the tree #4 was big ”global cooling” because was making very small rings for many years… then the big tree fell down, from old age -> stopped collecting nutrients, stopped blocking the sunlight – for the tree #4 suddenly became ”global warming” started making thick rings, AND; the old tree was rotting for many years and was supplying great nutrients -> it had the best ”global warming” but not for the other trees in the neighbourhood. Which one of those four trees would you believe?

So: the trees are not lying, but: people using trees as ‘’proxy’’ are the real grand criminals, because: IF Michael Mann wants you to think that: -‘’a tree that cannot tell about the temperature on the hill in California, where was growing; how the hell can tell about Africa, Siberia, China, Australia, south America, Antarctic AND all the waters in-between?!?! That conman is still benefiting ‘’under false pretence’’ – billions squandered for ‘’preventing the non-existent global warming’’ – because of criminals like him… BUT: when you observe Warmist V Skeptics debate about ‘’Dr. Mann’’ –as if the hardcore criminal is a prophet…!!! When the conman Mann deserve longer jail sentence than Bernard Madoff – because Mann is responsible for squandering more other people’s billions, than Madoff! If Mann was a medical doctor… well, for him and similar protagonist; must be established some kind of Nurnberg model international court of justice! For everyone who deserves more than 8 lifetimes jail sentences. TREES NOT GUILTY!!! One attempting  to get ”GLOBAL temperature data” from tree rings => is admission that: the character is a shameless con! Palm reading or tarot cards, or stalagmire, or tree ring reading is not science!Verdict: the conman Michael Man should shove the ”tree rings temperature data” up his own ring! Anybody ”believing” in any  ”proxy data” is either a con, or a collateral damage  to the aggressive /  skilful  propaganda… a zombie..

YOU know that: simultaneously is floods somewhere, drought other places, but conveniently they didn’t want to know. Can ”global warming” and ”global” cooling be at the same time?! What YOU don’t know is: SIMULTANEOUSLY is warmer than normal somewhere / colder than normal other places, always. Because: they emphasize where is warmer, and avoid to mention that is ”colder” than normal other places! you should know why, unless the propaganda has done a good job on you…

Their peers were not scrutinizing them – because they were creating a new profession AND those lies were bringing prestige and some cash. Those LIES were going in university and education books – when is in the books, it’s official… nobody can argue with books. (in reality, books are made from paper – paper can take everything, from genius work to crap, without objecting – reason they use paper even in the toilets…) B] in the 90’s an American historian, Pulitzer Price Winner (forgot his name) as one of the biggest original Warmist orator, was going around the planet and was saying anything, to prove to the public that: ‘’global’’ temp goes up and down as a yo-yo. Great orator, sometimes was assisted by Dr. Suzuki – he was telling about ‘’vineyards in England, Vikings on Greenland, people scatting on Thames.’’ THEN, prof. Ian Plimer adopted ALL that same crap, plus the crap accumulated for previous 150y, and published his book. His book became the Skeptic’s Bible = that was the biggest Christmas present to the Warmist. Somebody said to me: -‘’if the Skeptics didn’t exist, Warmist would have invented them’’ I’m proving that: ‘’the Warmist did invent the Skeptics’’ to ‘’pretend in public that they have an opponent = if is something wrong, opponents would correct?! As a ‘’Thug of war’’ – but, instead of the ‘’Skeptics’’ pulling the rope, they are pushing it, and are ahead of the Warmist by truckloads of phony ‘’global’’ warmings. (Warmist say: ”90% possibility of global warming in 100y” -most Skeptics expect another seven global warmings from now to 2100 – nothing skeptical about them). Phony global warmings are pouring out of the ‘’Skeptic’s’’ ears and out of their asses. They are stewing in Plimer’s dysentery… The only harm they can do to the Warmist is, Warmist can get hernia, from too much laughter, they can also get hernia from carrying all those billions of $$ looted from the Urban Sheep. All ”proxy data”  collected from the past and used as ”global” temp record; IS THE GRANDMOTHER OF ALL LIES!!!

In the 70’s, they started threatening that: because of too much CO2 emission -> CO2 will create ‘’Dimming Effect’’ and less sunlight will come to the ground -> will create ‘’Ice Age by year 2000’’ they gave it a name ‘’Nuclear Winter Effect’’ apparently because;  similar as if the dust and smog from nuclear war would do. They were emphasizing colder days or places, and avoided to talk about warmer than normal days simultaneously happening other places. Same as today they scream about ‘’warmer’’ days in the media; no matter where on the planet happened, but, where is colder than normal OR on the 90% on the planet where is normal temp, they avoid to mention – only was in reverse, in the 70’s. The biggest conman was an English prof. Hubert Lamb- he knew: if he ‘’predicts’’ Ice Age in 100y, not many people will get scared; so Hubert as the original Carbon Molester ‘’predicted’’ ”ice age in 25 years, by year 2000 – he wrote a book and was translated on other languages – Ice Age for year 2000 can only be avoided, only if we stop burning fossil fuel, especially coal (that helped Thatcher to close the English coalmines, easy). Hubert Lamb managed to con the politicians to give him lots of tax cash – those money attracted similar White Collar Criminals as Hubert. (The western Marxist replaced the bishop, AND the essential CO2 became the Wicked Witch).

In the early 80’s, they realized that: year 2000 is getting closer – no sign of the nuclear winter – his peers decided to go for: ‘’Global Warming instead; by 5-6C, by 2060”. Hubert’s book was sanitized beyond recognition and ‘’reprinted’’ Hubert only jumped from ice age to global warming, because year 2000 was getting closer. If he ‘’predicted it’’ in 100y instead – we would have being today still listening from the same Warmist Organized Crime, how is getting COLDER on the polar caps and on the bottom of the sea, and everywhere where are no honest people going. But they had to go in opposite direction, with bigger noise, people to forget the original Hubert’s ‘’prediction”  (Hubert Lamb was the original CO2 for cash, Prophet / carbon molester) Hubert concocted the ‘’Snowball planet’’ and ‘’both polar caps ice free’’. Then, in the 80’s became: ‘’Greenhouse Global Warming and Sea rising’’ Then was no use of the con term  ‘’Climate Change’’! At that time, still many people knew that water changes climate. Now, where the biggest Warmist White Collar Criminals are in East Anglia university building, is called ‘’Hubert Lamb Building’’ – because the ‘’Skeptics’’ are prepared to die in the trenches, defending the original / biggest CO2 Molester, the hardcore conman Hubert Lamb, because, he was for lots and lots of PHONY ‘’global’’ warmings, ”global” cycles and truckloads of global coolings about the past. Public was not taking much attention, but they were brainwashing the students => the new Pagan religion was established…

Momentum started in 1990, because of the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Before that, there were few millions of communist in the democratic west (now there are none) They were well organized, well connected -they all put green topcoat on and became the noisiest members in the Warmist Organized Crime (WOC) Nothing green about them, only the camouflage; reason I gave them the name: ”The Chameleons”. You go to any Warmist blog – you will see same doctrine: destroy the industry, destroy the economy, destroy freedom of speech, confuse the public. Their blind followers cannot comprehend that: if the economy goes belly up -> they will be the first to fall off the truck (because even in bad economy producers are needed – the parasites like the Warmist followers would instantly turn into organic mulch) Not many Warmist in Ethiopia, Somalia

Many of them were vegetarians, so they started demonizing the methane also, not only CO2; because cow and sheep being feeding the people for 10000y – if people get hungry – easier to start anarchy. Lenin, Trotsky by strikes bankrupted Russian economy AND thanks to the anarchy from WW1 -they created Soviet Union. Using WW2 anarchy, Stalin doubled the size of the empire. They destroy any opposition – if Pol Pot had opposition, he wouldn’t have being able to implement complete Marxist doctrine . They don’t demonize  methane from bison, wildebeest and elephants, only the one from cattle and sheep. Scare tactics were increasing, and by 97 Kyoto Conference; they were sure that they will succeed to con the public: to stop using fuel and kill the cattle and sheep – then when the phony ‘’global’’ warming doesn’t show up – they will get the credit for preventing it; and will demand the taxpayer to feed the Marxist jet-setters forever. 98 was ”predicted” and declared as ‘’the hottest year ever’’ On the Kyoto conference they were confident, they will con the democratic west in no time. (please, go to apparatchiks blogs and see the attack on businesses, atack on anything that keeps the western economy prosperous

After the Kyoto Conference, they were for a big shock – instead of decreasing CO2 emission, most countries were increasing it. Especially happened what they didn’t predict – China, India, Brazil doubled their CO2 emission. Because of that, they ‘’LOWERED’’ their ”prediction”from 5-6C warming, down to 2C warming, and shifted it from 2060 to year 2100 instead. (no skeptic notices that: from 5-6C down to 2C is more, than from 2C down to zero) Anyway, prof Plimer and Monckton were ‘’crapping’’ that: ‘’it will get only warmer by 0,5C – 1,5C, so the Warmist were happy with that and they lowered it down to 2C, Warmist are not fussy. It suits the Warmist to wait 100y and see which lie is correct, Monkton’s OR Warmist ’So they declared that: Science is Settled’’ Warmist are not fussy – Plimer’s & Monkton’s 0,5C – 1,5C  or the Warmist 2C, they are SAME LIES harvested from the same thin air, SO: the Warmist won. Skeptics are using the phony ‘’global’’ warmings / coolings crap concocted by the Warmist, OR by shonky ‘’researchers’’ that would have being in the Warmist cult, if they were alive – Warmist are happy to rob and oppress people until 2099; or until people on the street realize that is NO global warming – (then probably they will start ‘’global’’ cooling again). They are introducing Marxism by default; thanks to the phony ‘’Skeptics’’  Vegetarians say that: methane is 10 times bigger warming gas, Vegans say it’s 20 times, one said that: methane is 30 times bigger greenhouse gas… The truth needs resuscitating! (destroy the noble cow&sheep; because: if is not renewable wool and leather -> will be used synthetic, from non-renewable crude oil AND you will eat direct the grass, instead of knowing that: cow needs the grass, as much as grass needs the cow)

UNLESS WE PRESENT THE TRUTH TO THE PUBLIC that: the whole phony ‘’global’’ warmings crap is just that, 100%, 24 carat crap!!!  Please don’t rely on the phony Skeptics! Even when people that are collecting temp data said that is no global warming; the Skeptics say: ‘’no, no, it’s only a ‘’PAUSE’’ the bigots are praying for ‘’global’’ warming, otherwise they would have to admit to themselves that: they have being duped by Plimer and by Anthony Watts.  Warmist are thieves, but they are cunning, clever thieves, they are making billions, by using a simple lie – they will not admit the truth; without solid evidences, that: ‘’can be proven now, no need to wait 100y’’ I have all those evidences necessary!!!  If you are a Secular Skeptic, please join me; I need all the help possible. If you do believe in the phony global warming; but you are not benefiting from the loot, please join me. The leading Warmist are the most dishonest people – skeptics are pretty honest people, their hearts are on correct place, unfortunately: their brains are 3feet lower than where it should be – they are the  ‘’Plimer’s Closed Parachutes brains’’. They are into the Pagan Religion; lost capacity even to recognize when the truth drops on their lap…The truth always wins on the end! The truth: the ‘’Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism’’ (TSAM) is controlled by the honest laws of physics – those laws were same in the past as they are today, and will be same in 100y from now = no ‘’global’’ warming possible!  Warmings / coolings were /are always localized. Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment; heating CO2 in a tube is not same as warmed CO2 in the atmosphere- which goes instantly up, when warmed, to cool down! Even the cavemen knew that, reason they invented the chimney!!!

Warmist intentionally confuse regular Climatic Changes, with the phony ”global” warming; to confuse the public. Most Skeptics confuse the same, because is trendy – because in the Pagan Religion thinking and different opinions are not appreciated… No Glasnost allowed in both camps…

I think was about year 2000, when the leading Warmist realized that is definitely no ”global” warming – so, they swapped the term ”Global Warming” for Climate Change” because the climate is in constant change – but they never admitted that: H2O CHANGES CLIMATE, NOT CO2; if CO2 was regulating the climate, would have being same climate in the desert and in rainforest (for most of the big city slickers IS same climate in desert and jungle) it’s same as: first saying that: the sun is orbiting around the earth – then swapping it for ” the moon is orbiting around the earth” = so: for the fundamentalist who call the phony ”global warming ”Climate Change” for them is as: the moon and the sun are orbiting the earth?!?! Skeptics  did not notice the trick the Warmist used on them – so… the gullible ”Skeptics” go around like Harry Krishna repeating: Climate Change, climate, climate, climate change! That made the Warmist to flourish, beyond their expectations… Warmist say: ”90% possibility of global warming” (in other words: the other 10% are their ”backdoor exit”  ”Skeptics on the other hand, believe 101% in any phony global warming anybody can think off… Now some ”Skeptics” are even hallucinating that: it will be global cooling for next 30 years – Warmist cannot believe their luck, how ignorant their opponents are… believing all the misleading data…

 Most probably the Warmist have their own people in-bedded in the Skeptic’s camp, to fabricate as much as possible bullshit, to get them deeper and deeper in it… AND: because the Warmist are more intelligent – they know by now that is NO global warming – because they robed billions of dollars already – they know that in few years the people on the street will start asking them to justify why is no global warming, or to give the money back. Now they have justification: their global warming was cancelled by the Skeptic’s global cooling, so, the ”overall” temp is same as always (Warmist already started defending the ”Skeptics” – both camps to go against the ”deniers” and silence them (it’s good for the public to see that) Warmist defending their geldings


Santa has a same ”PAUSE” between january and december… as the phony global warming!

Warmist invented the ”pause” because there are still lots of people on the street that can think for themselves, and are noticing that IS SAME TEMP AS ALWAYS WAS… AND: to prove to the politicians and the media that: –” skeptics are capable of thinking and reasoning as three old kids, OR as a 25y old fencepost”…

Dear visitor, if you tell a Skeptic the truth, with undeniable profs that is no global warming – he will not believe you, BUT: just for an experiment; why don’t you concoct that, say, for example: ” from 600AD to 730AD, for 130y and 4 months was another LIA. Ad some other crap, to make it more convincing and colorful; as: because of that – Mohamed invented the Muslim religion. b] in Europe was getting very cold and because of the cold; Byzantine empire started collapsing c]has being ”discovered” evidences in a peat-bog close to Mecca; in which states: ”the WHOLE planet was in ice ageexactly as  the same as the one in Renaissance (you wouldn’t be telling a lie, because there was no such a thing as LIA during Renaissance) .  In few days will be in most of the ”Skeptic’s blogs.

Warmist say: ”this year is warmer” – ” instead of Skeptics saying: no, it’s a lie! Instead, the ”Skeptics” go in overdrive, searching what is making that extra ”phony” heat – is it sunspots, is it galactic dust, is it natural variation?!?! ”SKEPTICS” ARE CONSTANTLY LEGITIMIZING THE WARMIST’ LIES!!! = Mother of all stupidity… Dear Skeptics: –”what doesn’t exist – cannot have a ”pause” – non-existent global warming doesn’t have a ”pause” that ”pause” will last for a billion years ahead!!!!

Satellite monitoring is for bullshine adicts, nothing more. They are not even monitoring – the ”pretend monitoring” is for justifying expenses and abuse of NASA’s name. There are variations in temp on every 10m altitude, but not on NASA’s infrared picture. If you are a big city slicker – go to hi rise building and check trough the window – as you go higher, temp drops. On NASA’s picture is same temp on the top of 5km mountain as on foot of that same mountain on sea level = proof that they are lying. #2: IF satellites did monitor, their infrared photos would have being showing the difference in temp between sea, lake and dry land, Because, water is colder on the surface, BUT warmer 3-7km altitude in the troposphere = on dry land is hot on the ground, but higher troposphere always colder! No contrast on NASA IR pictures, are they saying that: they cannot pick up difference in temp of UP TO 50C? Using the word *AVERAGING THE DATA* –is the biggest con that doesn’t hold water. When honest person averages the temp for the top of the mountain and foot of the 3-5-6km high mountains, and is SAME temperature top and bottom = NASA’s commissars became very destructive for humanity and NASA’s integrity accumulated in 60’s ans 70’s. I wish I can put those commissars on a witness stand, under oath..!!!    



50BC         1234AD          LIA        1975      1997      2014                    2100

See, straight line, not like a seismograph! People on the street; global temperature ‘’overall’’ is always the same –  stop believing the Warmist thieves and the Skeptics fools; the phony ‘’pause’’ will last for a billion years! MONEY BACK GUARANTIED!

When on the subject on ”natural variation in temperature”: the truth: localized variations in temp are constant / otherwise the horizontal winds would have stopped, BUT: there is no such a thing as ” overall global temp variation!!!” Skeptic people are so addicted in ”global” warmings / coolings crap, the more of that crap = they feel better, happier – they don’t read the label on the crap, analyse / instant consumption – as long as is proof of global warmings and global coolings, the more = the happier, for both camps… They will believe in anything, except the truth!… Lucky Warmist Thieves!


DENIERS UNITE, to see the end of the Warmist cult – do not rely on the phony ”Skeptics” Skeptics are much bigger Warmist and more prolific liars, than the Warmist themselves! The truth: climate keeps changing – ”global” warming is impossible; it’s a concocted myth. Temperature Self Adjusting  Mechanism  (TSAM) is brilliant / infallible. Global warming ”overall” is always ZERO! The only reason the Warmist exist and prosper, is because of the ”Skeptic’s” ignorance and belief in the Pagan Mythology!…

The situation is like this: Warmist are marching from victory to victory, riding on the Skeptic’s back (turned the Skeptics into their own geldings). Skeptics cannot ask themselves: Q:how the hell they can prove to the public that is not going to be any global warming in 100y, by their 100’s of past phony global warming, and global cycles and phony global goolings? Majority of the people on the street don’t give a rat’s ass, which camp is telling more lies, or in more details -all they know is: if it CAN happen, better be safe than sorry… Politicians count the numbers. 

Fundamentalism / religious beliefs is not about proving… It would be as: ”if Rabbi and priest trying to prove to a Muslim cleric; that there is no god”  Theoretically  impossible. Because Mohamed was smart, he built his religion, using Judeo-Christianity as foundation. Only Darwinist can say to a Mullah: ”the God you people believe in, has being invented by people, to control and profit from people – the reality is completely  different. People are genetically hardwired, to believe in good stories (Poe). Which means:  both camps are like two cheeks on a same ass, must be some difference, but impossible to notice the difference. Yes, between the rider and the gelding there isn’t any thug of war/ any difference – So, the Warmist Organized Cult (WOC) declared: ”the science is settled”… They will even agree to 1,5C warming, to match the ”Skeptics” crap. As long as they can keep collecting the loot money, and oppress the society… thanks to whom?!…

Do you understand what I’m trying to say? Skeptic cannot say to the Warmist: -‘‘ hay, you cannot tell the temp for the whole planet, by 6000 thermometers. Because they themselves believe that temperature can be obtained from a peat bog, for hundredths of years, for the whole planet… Earthworms come to the surface and take new derbies in, every night, they shovel the whole mess constantly; it’s not like pages in a book – unfortunately, Skeptics would believe any crap, if promotes phony global warmings – reason they are born losers… b] for example: when Mann was analyzing the temp on the whole planet, from tree-rings… any lumberjack or orchid farmer would have told them that: 30 different things effect the thickens of a tree-rings – tree rings cannot tell the temp for that hill, where was growing – definitely not for the whole planet, BUT: for the skeptics, somebody needed to intercept emails and write a book, so they can beat themselves in the chest and keep repeating: Climategate, Climategate. Their Pagan beliefs are restricting them from using ”reason and logic”  The Warmist Organized Crime are exploiting that, for oppressing and ripping-off the western democracies… They don’t have one legitimate proof of ”global” warming and will never have one; simply: cannot have any genuine proof, for something that doesn’t exist! But the Marxist manipulators are clever thieves…

Hold your horses Warmist, the truth exist: ”that is going to be, ZERO global warming!!! Global temp ”overall” is always the same! Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism (TSAM) is brilliant; START LEARNING ABOUT IT!!!

The precursor of the evil was established in the 1800’s, by Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment: heating CO2 in a tube… The Warmist only weapon: Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment; heating CO2 in a tube is not same as warmed CO2 in the atmosphere- which goes instantly up, when warmed, to cool down! Even the cavemen knew that, reason they invented the chimney!!! In the tube/  sealed chamber, warmed CO2 cannot expend, but keeps warming up when heated, UNDER ITS OWN CREATED PRESSURE – on the other hand: in the air, as soon as CO2 warms up-> INSTANTLY goes UP, where is thinner air and much colder, to release the heat!!! Comparing CO2 warming in the sealed tube AND: free CO2 in the air, is same as comparing a bird on the top of the tree, with a bird in the oven. That’s what the 30000  criminally oriented  ‘’questionable scientist in what fields’’ are trying to con the public, for fleecing the Urban Sheep! And for Marxist /Bolsheviks model oppression!

Instead of the shonks realizing that: warmed CO2 in the tube doesn’t move – in the air; as soon as CO2 warms up a bit-> instantly goes UP, where is colder, to release the heat. Therefore: everybody on the street knows that: smog from cigarette, from chimney, from forest fire, instantly goes up, BUT: the brainwashed graduates know less than children… So: they swapped the ”CO2 in a tube” for a ”greenhouse gas” … how convenient… BUT: they conveniently overlooked that: normal greenhouse has ”solid” glass, or transparent plastic roof / covers 100% of the roof -on the other hand, CO2 is only between 300-400ppm, and oxygen & nitrogen are 998,999ppm; which means: CO2 would represent as a postage stamp as only ”part” of the roof, OR: as fishnet for roof!! which means: warmed gases can get out and UP, via the 99% of the roof! IF any of the Warmist shonks built a greenhouse, with fishnet as a roof – the neighbouring farmers would have put a Straight Jacket on him. Those same Warmist Commissars are preparing to take full control of the democratic world.

ONLY THE TRUTH IS WARMIST’s ACHILLES’S HILL   (Skeptics hate me when I point to them that: ‘LIA, MGW, airport heat are not proofs – with those lies, cannot defeat the professional Liars!!! ” Question is: if it wasn’t airport heat; can 6000 thermometers tell the correct temp for the WHOLE planet?! Unfortunately, by complaining about ”airport heat” they are legitimizing / endorsing the EPA, IPCC and Met Office misleading ”PRETEND” global temperature collecting

Skeptics, if you want to get on the front foot  #1: stop using the words ”climate change” – because climate is in constant change – now is getting summer climate in the N/H – winter climate in the S/H   b] there is ”wet climate” and ”dry climate’‘ sometime wet climate gets dry – dry climate gets wet. So: when you refer to the Phony Global Warming (PGW) as ”climate change” -> you are officially admitting that you are just a Warmist roll of toilet paper, doing the Warmist dirty job, that’s all they need from you… instead, start calling it ”Phony Global Warming (PGW)” If CO2 was regulating the climate – would have being same climate in the deserts and forests; because in both places is same amount of CO2! #2: when they point to a bad weather somewhere, as proof that CO2 is doing it – don’t search for record of last century bad weather; any moron knows that was cyclones in the past. Instead: inform that is beautiful weather on 97% of the planet, even though is same amount of CO2 everywhere. For them is very depressing, to see good weather everywhere and people are enjoying themselves. #3: instead of complaining about ”airport heat” find some news reports from the 90’s – when the Warmist Cult where ”predicting” 5C-6C global warming by 2060 – demand apology, before anything else they can ”predict”. Records from newspapers from the 90’s, will expose all Warmist ”predictions” are expensive lies.

#2: stop hoping that the phony ”pause” will finish -instead: point to the public that is NO global warming – the public to start dealing with the Warmist Organised Cult (WOC) – that will put the Warmist in the corner -> and their funds will dry, media will get against them. Otherwise, what you are doing… even Marcel Marceau can win against you; Warmist Cult doesn’t need to say a single word, they will win; because you keep spooking the public about phony global warmings / coolings; and constantly shooting yourself in the foot, with a machine-gun…

TO PUT THE LEADING WARMIST IN JAIL, here is the TRUTH AND ALL THE PROOFS NECESSARY: the infallible Self Adjusting Temperature Mechanism (SATM) the earth has; the real proofs that can give Involuntary Euthanasia to the Warmist Cult:::   https://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/cooling-earth/

From the ORIGINAL CO2 MOLESTER, Prof. Hubert Lamb; who was promoting ”Big Ice Age for year 2000, because of CO2 DIMMING EFFECT”

MOST of the ”ICE AGE for year 200 Predictors” are now in the Warmist Cult:

Here’s a list of articles from the 70’s predicting the next ice age along with a link to the website that listed them.
1970 – Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age – Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970)
1970 – Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself? (L.A. Times, January 15, 1970)
1970 – New Ice Age May Descend On Man (Sumter Daily Item, January 26, 1970)
1970 – Pollution Prospect A Chilling One (The Argus-Press, January 26, 1970)
1970 – Pollution’s 2-way ‘Freeze’ On Society (Middlesboro Daily News, January 28, 1970)
1970 – Cold Facts About Pollution (The Southeast Missourian, January 29, 1970)
1970 – Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports (St. Petersburg Times, March 4, 1970)
1970 – Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (The Boston Globe, April 16, 1970)
1970 – Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970)
1970 – U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic (The New York Times, July 18, 1970)
1970 – Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age (The Sydney Morning Herald, October 19, 1970)
1971 – Ice Age Refugee Dies Underground (Montreal Gazette, Febuary 17, 1971)
1971 – Pollution Might Lead To Another Ice Age (The Schenectady Gazette, March 22, 1971)
1971 – Pollution May Bring Ice Age – Scientist Rites Risk (The Windsor Star, March 23, 1971)
1971 – U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming (The Washington Post, July 9, 1971)
1971 – Ice Age Around the Corner (Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1971)
1971 – New Ice Age Coming – It’s Already Getting Colder (L.A. Times, October 24, 1971)
1971 – Another Ice Age? Pollution Blocking Sunlight (The Day, November 1, 1971)
1971 – Air Pollution Could Bring An Ice Age (Harlan Daily Enterprise, November 4, 1971)
1972 – Air pollution may cause ice age (Free-Lance Star, February 3, 1972)
1972 – Scientist Says New ice Age Coming (The Ledger, February 13, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Cometh For Dicey Times (The Sun, May 29, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Coming (Deseret News, September 8, 1972)
1972 – There’s a new Ice Age coming! (The Windsor Star, September 9, 1972)
1972 – Scientist predicts new ice age (Free-Lance Star, September 11, 1972)
1972 – British Expert on Climate Change Says New Ice Age Creeping Over Northern Hemisphere (Lewiston Evening Journal, September 11, 1972)
1972 – Climate Seen Cooling For Return Of Ice Age (The Portsmouth Times, ‎September 11, 1972‎)
1972 – New Ice Age Slipping Over North (The Press-Courier, September 11, 1972)
1972 – Beginning of new ice age (The Canberra Times, September 12, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Begins A New Assault In North (The Age, September 12, 1972)
1972 – Weather To Get Colder (Montreal Gazette, ‎September 12, 1972‎)
1972 – British climate expert predicts new Ice Age (The Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1972)
1972 – Scientist Sees Chilling Signs of New Ice Age (L.A. Times, September 24, 1972)
1972 – Science: Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, November 13, 1972)
1972 – Geologist at Case Traces Long Winters – Sees Ice Age in 20 Years (Youngstown Vindicator, December 13, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age On Its Way, Scientist Says (Toledo Blade, December 13, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Predicted In About 200 Years (The Portsmouth Times, December 14, 1972)
1973 – New Ice Age coming? (Popular Science, January 1973)
1973 – The Ice Age Cometh (The Saturday Review, March 24, 1973)
1973 – Believe new ice age is coming (The Bryan Times, March 31, 1973)
1973 – ‘Man-made Ice Age’ Worries Scientists (The Free Lance-Star, June 22, 1973)
1973 – Fear Of Man-made Ice Age (The Spartanburg Herald, June 28, 1973)
1973 – Possibility Of Ice Age Worries The Scientists (The Argus-Press, November 12, 1973)
1973 – Weather-watchers think another ice age may be on the way (The Christian Science Monitor, December 11, 1973)
1974 – Ominous Changes in the World’s Weather (PDF) (Fortune Magazine, February 1974)
1974 – Atmospheric Dirt: Ice Age Coming?‎ (Pittsburgh Press, February 28, 1974)
1974 – Support for theory of a cooling world (The Canberra Times, May 16, 1974)
1974 – New evidence indicates ice age here (Eugene Register-Guard, May 29, 1974)
1974 – Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, June 24, 1974)
1974 – 2 Scientists Think ‘Little’ Ice Age Near (Hartford Courant, August 11, 1974)
1974 – Ice Age, worse food crisis seen (Chicago Tribune, October 30, 1974)
1974 – Imminent Arrival of the Ice (Radio Times, November 14, 1974)
1974 – Making a BBC Science Special [The Weather Machine] (New Scientist, November 14, 1974)
1974 – The Weather Machine (BBC, November 20, 1974)
1974 – New ice age ‘could be in our lifetime’ (The Canberra Times, November 22, 1974)
1974 – Believes Pollution Could Bring On Ice Age (Ludington Daily News, December 4, 1974)
1974 – Pollution Could Spur Ice Age, Nasa Says (Beaver Country Times, ‎December 4, 1974‎)
1974 – Air Pollution May Trigger Ice Age, Scientists Feel (The Telegraph, ‎December 5, 1974‎)
1974 – More Air Pollution Could Trigger Ice Age Disaster (Daily Sentinel, ‎December 5, 1974‎)
1974 – Scientists Fear Smog Could Cause Ice Age (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 5, 1974)
1975 – Climate Changes Called Ominous (The New York Times, January 19, 1975)
1975 – Climate Change: Chilling Possibilities (Science News, March 1, 1975)
1975 – B-r-r-r-r: New Ice Age on way soon? (Chicago Tribune, March 2, 1975)
1975 – Cooling Trends Arouse Fear That New Ice Age Coming (Eugene Register-Guard, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 – Is Another Ice Age Due? Arctic Ice Expands In Last Decade (Youngstown Vindicator, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 – Is Earth Headed For Another Ice Age? (Reading Eagle, March 2, 1975)
1975 – New Ice Age Dawning? Significant Shift In Climate Seen (Times Daily, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 – There’s Troublesome Weather Ahead (Tri City Herald, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 – Is Earth Doomed To Live Through Another Ice Age? (The Robesonian, ‎March 3, 1975‎)
1975 – The Ice Age cometh: the system that controls our climate (Chicago Tribune, April 13, 1975)
1975 – The Cooling World (Newsweek, April 28, 1975)
1975 – Cooling trend may signal coming of another Ice Age (The Sun, May 16, 1975)
1975 – Scientists Ask Why World Climate Is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead (PDF) (The New York Times, May 21, 1975)
1975 – Summer of A New Ice Age (The Age, June 5, 1975)
1975 – In the Grip of a New Ice Age? (International Wildlife, July-August, 1975)
1975 – Experts ponder another ice age (The Spokesman-Review, September 8, 1975)
1975 – Oil Spill Could Cause New Ice Age (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 11, 1975)
1976 – Deadly Harvest [Film] (Starring: Kim Cattrall, Clint Walker, 1976)
1976 – The Cooling: Has the Next Ice Age Already Begun? [Book] (Lowell Ponte, 1976)
1976 – Ice Age Predicted (Reading Eagle, January 22, 1976)
1976 – Ice Age Predicted In Century (Bangor Daily News, January 22, 1976)
1976 – It’s Going To Get Chilly About 125 Years From Now (Sarasota Herald-Tribune, January 23, 1976)
1976 – Worrisome CIA Report; Even U.S. Farms May be Hit by Cooling Trend (U.S. News & World Report, May 31, 1976)
1977 – Blizzard – What Happens if it Doesn’t Stop? [Book] (George Stone, 1977)
1977 – The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age [Book] (The Impact Team, 1977)
1977 – The Ice Age Cometh… (New York Magazine, January 31, 1977)
1977 – The Big Freeze (Time Magazine, January 31, 1977)
1977 – Has The Ice Age Cometh Again? (Calgary Herald, February 1, 1977)
1977 – Space Mirrors Proposed To Prevent Crop Freezes (Bangor Daily News, February 7, 1977)
1977 – We Will Freeze in the Dark (Capital Cities Communications Documentary, Host: Nancy Dickerson, April 12, 1977)
1978 – Ice! [Book] (Arnold Federbush, 1978)
1978 – The New Ice Age [Book] (Henry Gilfond, 1978)
1978 – Winter May Be Colder Than In Last Ice Age (Deseret News, January 2, 1978)
1978 – Current Winters Seen Colder Than In Ice Age‎ (The Telegraph, January 3, 1978)
1978 – Winter Temperatures Colder Than Last Ice Age (Eugene Register-Guard, Eugene Register-Guard, January 3, 1978)
1978 – International Team of Specialists Finds No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend in Northern Hemisphere (The New York Times, January 5, 1978)
1978 – Little Ice Age: Severe winters and cool summers ahead (Calgary Herald, January 10, 1978)
1978 – Winters Will Get Colder, ‘we’re Entering Little Ice Age’ (Daily Record, January 10, 1978)
1978 – Geologist Says Winters Getting Colder (Middlesboro Daily News, January 16, 1978)
1978 – It’s Going To Get Colder (Boca Raton News, ‎January 17, 1978‎)
1978 – Another Ice Age? (Kentucky New Era, February 12, 1978)
1978 – Another Ice Age? (Reading Eagle, ‎February 13, 1978‎)
1978 – The Coming Ice Age (In Search Of TV Show, Season 2, Episode 23, Host: Leonard Nimoy, May 1978)
1978 – An Ice Age Is Coming Weather Expert Fears (Milwaukee Sentinel, November 17, 1978)
1979 – A Choice of Catastrophes – The Disasters That Threaten Our World [Book] (Isaac Asimov, 1979)
1979 – The Sixth Winter [Book] (John R. Gribbin, 1979)
1979 – The New Ice Age Cometh (The Age, January 16, 1979)
1979 – Ice Age Building Up (Daily Record, June 5, 1979)
1979 – Large Glacial Buildup Could Mean Ice Age (Daily Chronicle, June 5, 1979)
1979 – Ice Age On Its Way (Lewiston Morning Tribune, June 7, 1979)
1979 – Get Ready to Freeze (Daily Chronicle, October 12, 1979)
1979 – New ice age almost upon us? (The Christian Science Monitor, November 14, 1979)


P.s. friends; go to your newspaper office and ask them to see their prints from the 70’s – they all have it on microfilm – you can find there lots of scaring the people about: ”will be Ice Age by year 2000, because CO2 creates Dimming Effect” At that time they were exaggerating colder days on many places and were ignoring the warmer places at that same time. Same as, now they exaggerate some warmer days than normal, and conveniently ignore where is simultaneously colder than normal places. That will pull the green carpet from under their Red feet!

Also: check in the 80’s -90’s papers, all the ”predictions” that: by 2060 the global temperature will be warmer by 5-6C. Before anybody knew that China, India will quadruple CO2 emission!

Posted in Archives, Recent Possts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments


HOW THE EARTH IS GETTING COOLED; cutting edge science, in simple words   ©          THE HOLY GRAIL IN CLIMATOLOGY::

In space the earth orbits around the sun, the temperature is colder than minus -90C, (-130F). It’s about 5 times colder than inside your deep freezer. The only reason we survive on this planet is: because it receives enough radiation from the sun, to produce some heat, to make it liveable for the most part of the planet. We should rejoice that it gets warm enough on most of the planet, to sustain life! Almost ALL the warmth is produced on the ground and in the water; insignificant amount of heat is produced in the clouds, where cooling is much more efficient. Which means: some sunlight is intercepted by the H2O +CO2 clouds => a bit ‘’less heat created on the ground => day temp lower by 0,01C, or less, on the ground / night temp up by as much; because H2O is as shock absorber.

If for ANY REASON extra heat than normal is produced on the ground or in the atmosphere – the air, oxygen & nitrogen expand instantly and  disperse the extra heat in a few minutes. Those two gases are doing a simple but very important job: when there is extra heat -> disperse that extra heat, to be collected by the unlimited coldness in the upper troposphere. A bit as; if you have two bucketfuls of hot water in a cold backyard – one bucket of water at a temperature of 80C, the other one at 100C – then take the hotter one of 100C sprinkle it in the air = that ”hotter” water will cool faster than the water that stays in the bucket, not dispersed. ”Dispersing the heat” is the most important; but it confuses both camps… (the thinner the air in upper atmosphere is -> the more of the unlimited ‘’cold vacuum’’ that we are travelling through, enters into the troposphere, as Earth zooms through space) Earth is orbiting at about 108000kmh around the sun -changes her location every 9 minutes,  so there is no time for that space to be warmed up! That ”warmed” cold vacuum that penetrates into the atmosphere, cannot be taken by the earth; because it doesn’t have gravity or friction – the earth goes constantly into a new cold vacuum. Therefore: that ”cold vacuum’’ can never get overheated! Refrigerator works on the same principle (gas expands and releases heat – heat ‘’radiates’’ from one micron to couple of feet distance, if temp is over 200C) so: O&N / vertical winds release the heat into the ”cold vacuum” – whatever heat is released into that ’cold vacuum’’ -that heat which is released this minute, tomorrow will be in that same ‘’cold vacuum’’ which will be 2,5 million km behind! This different approach is correct, isn’t it; The heat from the ground is dispersed into the space from 2-10km altitude, it’s neutralized by the ”cold vacuum” instantly, it does not linger as a shroud in the atmosphere, to accumulate!

COOLING WITH PRECISION:  A campfire radiates heat 3 feet – those 3 feet of air expand and becomes 6 feet of hot air by volume; therefore ”around” the fire, instead of 5m3 of air, becomes 10m3 of air – that’s extra 5m3 of ”air volume” created.  All that 10m3 is warmed and tries to expand a lot, but doesn’t expand as much as it wishes, because there is one atmosphere pressure on the surface – instead, that ‘’warmed’’ air goes up towards the upper troposphere, carrying all that heat (the same as when you try to blow up balloons on the bottom of the swimming-pool – balloons instantly go to the surface and jump a bit out of the water) Every 10 seconds, as long as the fire is burning; 10m3 of hot air is moving up,  and ‘’increases the volume of the troposphere by 5m3’’.

When heated molecules get to 2-5-8km altitude,  the air is very thin – in-between that thin air is plenty of that ’cold vacuum” zooming through -those 5m3 of air molecules expand and release the heat into that cold vacuum -> they get cooled/ become colder than all the O&N below, so they shrink – becoming smaller per volume than the air below->thus instantly fall down to the ground as super cooled, to collect more heat. Therefore: the troposphere is larger by volume of 5m3 as long as the fire burns – encompasses  in, ”extra volume of cold vacuum’’ heat is ‘’released’’ into that ‘’cold vacuum’’ that is plenty of it from 3-10km altitude -> that ‘’warmed cold vacuum’’ stays there BUT the planet moves ahead into new cold vacuum every 9 minutes. Therefore: no matter how much heat is released – if the first 9 minutes of ‘’cold vacuum’’ doesn’t neutralize it completely, the second one will. (as it is the case when a jumbo jet releases 300C heat – after 20 minutes the bi-product from burning the fuel is still there, but NOT THE HEAT, all neutralized! There are many 9 minutes in 24h, and many more in a whole year.

When the fire is dead -> convection stops, instantly; no extra heat is released – self regulation! The fire produces lots of CO2, BUT: the CO2 doesn’t prevent heat from going up; CO2 takes heat up, same as O&N do – after all, every CO2 molecule has two oxygen atoms – when warmed, expand and go up together! Now we are getting into the tricky truth/reality, the most important part:

Heat doesn’t ”radiate” out in space, as the propaganda says!!! All heat is neutralized by the NEW ”cold vacuum” that penetrates through the troposphere every 9 minute -and is neutralizing the heat between 2-10km altitude – although, sometime super-heated gases from volcanoes and nuclear explosions go up to 12-17km. CO2 causing ice ages and global warmings is the grandmother of all lies!  Because that cold vacuum” that constantly zooms through the atmosphere  doesn’t  have  friction or gravity – the earth cannot take it with her! How deep the ”cold vacuum” penetrates into the troposphere?! Well, on Kilimanjaro mountain in Africa ”in the tropics”  there is permanent snow and ice on the top of the mountain.  Kilimanjaro is one of the closest point on the earth to the sun – lots of sunshine, plus lots of heat, up to 45C from surrounding valleys goes to the mountain, but there is ice and snow there = the ”cold vacuum” penetrates so deep into the atmosphere that the warmth is almost instantly neutralized. Actually the ‘’cold vacuum’’ penetrates down to sea level also; where there is one full atmosphere pressure, but slightly less. As it goes higher from sea-level – the air is thinner and the presence of the ”cold vacuum”  penetrates more and more; that’s why at higher altitude cooling is much more efficient! Warmed CO2 during the day goes high up and IS COOLED DIRECTLY BY THE cold vacuum! No ”radiation” of heat out in space, and albedo is completely misleading crap!!!

Let’s repeat: the heat doesn’t ”radiate” out into space – the ”cold vacuum” penetrates through the troposphere and is neutralizing the heat in the first 1-7-10km altitude, if it wasn’t one molecule of CO2, heat wouldn’t ‘’radiate’’ out into the void! THAT MAKES ALL THE DIFFERENCE! Therefore: Mohamed doesn’t go to the mountain -the mountain comes to Mohamed! All the literature written by the 30000 scientist and other freelancer commissars, is ALL misleading / harmful / destructive crap! In the morning, the sun warms up the carbon atom -> that warms up the two oxygen atoms in the CO2 molecule, and up they go, to where it is cooler, to keep releasing any heat during the day. Because the surrounding O2&N2 don’t have the benefit of carbon intercepting UV&IF, they stay cooler. Therefore: CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas! (roof of a normal greenhouse doesn’t go up to 2-9km, to cool itself, warmed CO2 does)

Almost all the heat is created on the surface of the land &water; only a minuscule  amount by CO2 – no matter whether it is warmed oxygen &nitrogen, or CO2 – all heated molecules rise a few km up and cool instantly – if molecules are heated more  – then they just go 100m/1000m.  higher, where the temperature is colder by virtue of additional cooling from the extra ’cold vacuum’’ and cools as fast as the less warmed below, = the more warming->the more expansion-> the higher and faster the flight to the cooler altitudes. Only in exceptional circumstances, when air is super heated; as for example by volcanoes, or nuclear explosion – do super-heated molecules go more than 10km altitude, spread as mushroom and then  cool just as easily! Which means: there is much more than necessary cold vacuum penetrating into the troposphere, to handle any heat. BUT: if necessary, extra warmed troposphere can ”EXPAND” a lot extra, and let extra ”cold vacuum” in, to do the job. Also: extra expanding troposphere by volume ”encompasses” extra ”cold vacuum”!  Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism (TSAM) is  infallible!  (CO2&H2O greenhouse gases theory is a concocted con = should be called appropriately ”shadecloth effect”) they make milder climate => cooler days / warmer nights, not warmer planet! (less CO2&H2O in the atmosphere=>hotter days/ colder nights – overall always same temperature!) Also: CO2 is 300-400ppm = as a roof on a greenhouse would have being as a postage stamp, or a fishnet roof!

Only 8-10km above the ground in the tropics, the temperature is as cold as it is on Antarctic. We should warship any warmth the earth produces!

So, if you live in the tropics or subtropics, Antarctic’s temperature is only 10km away from you, just above your head; if you live in a temperate climate, such  as US, Europe, where most of the Warmist swindlers are – Antarctic’s temp is even closer to you. Just think of a landmark, down the road from your house that is 8-10km away – that’s how close you are to the Polar temperature, in which  nothing grows, and a certain death is assured in winter!  Just a small decrease in heat production – then that freezing cold is closer to your house, think about it. So: 99% of the heat created on the earth, can’t make it to 10km 6miles altitude; NASA lies that they detect all the heat ‘’radiating’’ out in space… shame, shame conmen! 2] Even those who visit the Polar caps in Summer, need all the support from warmer climate; such as food, blankets and heating, produced in ‘’warmer climate’’.

3] Therefore: excluding polar caps – on the rest of the planet temperatures that can sustain life are only 4-5km from sea-level up. Dangerously cold temp is only 5km (3miles) above your head! The universe is a very cold place, for example: the ”cold vacuum” in the orbit the earth is travelling, is colder than -90C / if you stick a thermometer outside the space station, in the shade – thermometer will say: -90C. In the orbit Saturn’s moons travel – the message came from the travelling satellite that is -178C; further more: the space between our solar system and the next star system is only two degrees above ”infinite zero Kelvin”’ that is very, very cold! Most of the universe is made of very ”cold vacuum! Complaining about heat, is lunacy… BOTTOM LINE: heat doesn’t ‘’radiate’’ out into the void – ALL heat is NEUTRALIZED in the first 10km attitude from sealevel most of it on the first 2-7km!!!

The Warmist only weapon: Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment 160y ago, used first by Svante August Arrhenius, an Swedish scientist 110y ago, to con the people about CO2 producing global warming.  He is acknowledged as the first conman of the ”CO2 driven global warming”… after him for the last 100y were ”predicted” four ”ice age is just around the corner AND four global warmings AND: the last one was global warming by 5-6C, by year 2060 – then they moved it to 2100 – then they lowered it to 3C, if we do everything they say; as if it is a button on the air conditioner – the truth is: if we do everything they say or all opposite, will be zero global warming, all is proven here) : let’s get back to Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment: heating CO2 in a tube is not same as warmed CO2 in the atmosphere- which goes instantly up, when warmed, to cool down! Even the cavemen knew that; reason they invented the chimney!!! In the tube/  sealed chamber, warmed CO2 cannot expend, but keeps warming up when heated, AND IS CREATING IT’S OWN PRESSURE – on the other hand: in the air, as soon as CO2 warms up-> INSTANTLY goes UP, where is thinner air and much colder, to release the heat!!! Comparing CO2 warming in the sealed tube, AND: free CO2 in the air, is same as comparing a bird on the branch of the tree, with a bird in the pressure cooker. That’s what the 30000  criminally oriented  ‘’questionable  scientist in what fields’’ are trying to con the public, for fleecing the Urban Sheep! And for Marxist /Bolsheviks model oppression! #2: Methane & carbon dioxide (CO2&CH4) are the new western Marxist Hammer and Sickle. P.s. the 160y old Stefan Boltzmann’s law / experiment was not mentioned ones, in the 60’s-70’s! Because same shonks at that time were promoting; because of CO2 dimming effect, will be Ice Age by year 2000. Why are they constantly lying, you ask – A: -if they say the truth, that: ”it will be exactly same temperature in 100y” the suffering taxpayers get stingy with their money = the Shonks are not stupid! Using CO2 for fleecing the Urban Sheep is fun and lucrative – to make the politicians; to rob the people and reward the green topcoated Reds… 

When the truth is known – the phony global warming will be treated as the biggest sick joke, for long time. What do YOU think should be done to the leading swindlers, including NASA, Australian SCIRO, for billions squandered and kids brainwashed in school and university?! AND: because where is bad climate, because of no water, is not improved. Badmouthing CO2 => many bad domino effects…!

Example: when you warm up your room, there is more warmth close to the ceiling, than close to the floor. BUT, on the foot of Kilimanjaro mountain gets up to 45C (113F) – by the time that heat goes up the mountain 6km, altitude, the temp is below zero centigrade. Which means: the ”cold vacuum” is already neutralizing the heat even in the lowest part of the troposphere, because it penetrates that deep. Penetrates to sea level also, but much less.

FROM THE GROUND UPWARDS  THE AIR IS COLDER, AS ALTITUDE INCREASES, AND AS THE AIR GETS THINNER/ MORE ‘’COLD VACUUM’’ PENETRATES IN -> ”PROOF” THAT MORE AND MORE COLD VACUUM PENETRATES CONSTANTLY IN, AND CANCELS ANY EXTRA HEAT  AVAILABLE! (unfortunately, lots of debate on the net how much ”stratosphere” is getting warmed up… in reality; the whole stratosphere is close to minus -90C  (-130F)all the time, day and night – without checking, they make up stories and make those stories official) Same goes with Mt. Everest: on the foot of the Himalayas, (subtropics) it gets up to 40C, BUT on Mt Everest people get frozen fingers in middle of summer and those fingers get amputated / in winter there would have being certain death!  It proves that: most of the heat that is created on the ground, on low altitude, by the time that heat goes up to 3-6-10km altitude, that heat is completely neutralized by the cold vacuum”  which constantly penetrates into the atmosphere. Unless the science adopts my facts = both camps are wrong! Whatever I say is no guessing, can be proven now, no need to wait 100y and see that everybody was wrong. NO ‘’radiating’’ heat, therefore: if there  wasn’t one single molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere, the heat  wouldn’t be  ‘’radiating’’ to the void, any heat at all! 99% of the heat never reaches more than 10km altitude, is neutralized long before that altitude!

The ground, at night is cooled every day by average of 15C, that is lot of heat. Of course, the cooling happens during the day also / even more – if all that heat was going up by ”radiation” and by the vertical winds up to the stratosphere, stratosphere would have being almost as warm as on the ground, but is not. Because that heat is getting cancelled slowly as it goes up. (similar as: when you put a big ice block in a pot of boiling water -> water cools down / coldness from the ice neutralizes the heat, without any  stupid albedo or ”radiating” that heat out in space)  Therefore: forget about ”albedo” and heat” radiation” that gizmo is concocted for brainwashing and confusion. What I say, can be ALL  proven now, no need to speculate, or wait 100y and see that the ”shonky science is wrong”!

B] that cold vacuum on the polar caps goes to the surface of the planet, the planet fights back, to minimize penetration of the ’cold vacuum’’  by increasing the density of the air (otherwise would have being even colder) – lots of heat is released in Arctic from the warm currents coming from the North Pacific, plus some heat is produced by the summer sun, plus geothermal heat released, but it is getting all destroyed / neutralized on the spot, by that ‘’cold vacuum’’

C] In the permafrost, that cold vacuum penetrates deep into the soil and keeps destroying the heat that comes from below, from the geothermal heat. Therefore: the only reason that ’cold vacuum’’ doesn’t zap us on the ground is: because the earth is constantly producing a bit of heat to fight that ’cold vacuum’’ otherwise the severe cold reaches to the ground; but of course most of the planet is saturated with some warmth (especially water releases slower heat) therefore: the more warmth = the better, safer!

Now the tricky part:

The Earth produces enough heat, to warm up that cold vacuum from the surface, to 25km up, in one week, why does it not do so? That cold vacuum’’ when warmed a bit, doesn’t go anywhere, but: THE EARTH GOES. The earth cannot take that ”warmed ”cold vacuum” with her, because THAT COLD VACUUM  DOESN’T HAVE ANY FRICTION, OR GRAVITY.  Therefore: by spinning around itself and orbiting around the sun as a Frisbee, the earth in a week will be millions of miles away. So, trough the earth’s atmosphere goes new” cold vacuum every 9 minutes (the orbit in which the  Earth / moon are travelling – that ‘’COLD VACUUM’’ the temperature  is minus -93C (-135,4F) So: ‘’warmed’’ O&N and ”warmed CO2’’ are releasing / or radiating, if you will, that warmth by only ONE MICRON, into that cold vacuum, which constantly penetrates into the troposphere – as the planet moves away – ”warmed’’ cold vacuum stays where it was” but the planet doesn’t, please don’t forget the truth! For example : if your car engine works all day in the garage, the heat of the engine and exhaust would warm up the garage, BUT, when you travel 100kmh on the road, the road is not getting hot, as you keep going, you are releasing heat behind you. The earth travels 108000kmh, which is much faster through that cold vacuum, than your car!

b]As when you drive on the road, where there is 2 inches of water – the water gets into the grooves / tread of the tire -> collects dirt and stays there on the road, where you stepped on it – your tire goes into new water all the time = that ’cold vacuum’’ penetrates into the atmosphere, as water into the tread of the tire – collects heat and stays with ‘’that heat’’ where it was / the planet moves into new coldness. (your car tire spins around itself and simultaneously goes further down the road / In exactly the same way  the Earth ‘’spins around itself and orbits around the sun’’. Therefore: Warmist &Skeptics keep repeating: ‘’radiating, radiating heat from the surface to out of the stratosphere, or heat from the CO2 in the atmosphere ‘’radiating’’ that heat back to the ground…?!?!  The truth: ‘’radiation’’ of kinetic heat is only mostly from one micron, to few feet distance max, if 300C heat! b] ALL the heat is getting  neutralized IN the troposphere by the ”cold vacuum”!!! example: aircrafts are pressurized – if you open the door at 10-12km up -> the COLD VACUUM” will ”vacuum” half of the air out of the aircraft and from your lungs, as a vacuum cleaner – further up there is much more of that cold vacuum The  pressure in the aircraft is maintained to be similar as it was on the ground; when the doors were open -so: because of the presence of lots of ”cold vacuum’’ on 10-12km altitude – the ”cold vacuum” would ”vacuum” the air from the aircraft. B] when a cosmonaut fixes something outside the space station – if he didn’t have a pressurized uniform – the ”cold vacuum” would have  pulled him apart (I already had complaints and insults that: ”cold vacuum”  doesn’t exist, that is warmer all the way to the sun” from both camps) That kind of ignorance is very prolific on the net…but, they make the numbers that politicians count…)

Therefore: if you adopt the new/ my approach, you will win the war against the Warmist:
The universe is very hostile place, very cold. b] the earth is travelling trough a ”very cold space” If you put a shielded thermometer from the sun, in the space where the satellites orbit – it would be colder than -93C (-130f) (this is the reason why when the cosmonauts are repairing something outside the space station; ”in the shadow” of it – their suits must be pumped lots of warmth by umbilical cord – otherwise he would be frozen stiff in 7 minutes) BECAUSE LONGWAVE ‘’heat radiation’’ FROM THE EARTH  DOESN’T  GO UP, TO WARM UP THE  COSMONAUT – because ”ALBEDO CRAP  DOESN’T   EXIST;  therefore:  THAT ‘’COLD VACUUM’’ neutralizes the heat here, on the first 10km altitude, most on 2-7km!

That ”same” cold vacuum cools in Sahara, from 45C, in 12h, at night  down to 10C; 35C cooling  in 12h! In a rainforest on that same latitude goes from 33C down at night to 22C. The warmer it gets during the day – the higher that warmed air goes, collects more coldness, drops down at night; colder it gets during the night (pendulum effect) overall is same amount of heat in 24h, if you take into account the heat for every minute in 24h. The Warmistas instead lie that the planet cannot cool 2C extra in 100years… WOW!

Most important sentence: The warmer surface gets -> vertical winds SPEED up, and GO MUCH NIGHER -> cooling INCREASES! !!!    (Ask the people with hang-gliders!)

If the earth was ‘’radiating heat’’ as the Warmist are lying / Skeptics are buying into it – that ‘’phony radiation’’ from the earth would have kept the cosmonaut warm in the shadow of the space-station b] no need to go under the space station, to know that their theory is wrong regarding ‘’radiating heat’’ If ‘’radiation’’ and ”albedo” was happening that far – you would have got suntan from a  full moon… moon-tan…? Why is the Earth not warmer than normal; when the Moon is full, when all the sunlight reflection and plus ‘’radiation’’ from the moon is pointed to the earth?! So much about: ”albedo crap” ‘’radiating heat / long wave radiation’’ for long distances is only meant to deceive and create confusion; busted! They are only degrading people’s brains by that so unscientific crap / lies… c] They will never leave a person on the moon; when it becomes night for two weeks, the temperature gets to minus -120C  They would need to carry there lots of fuel for heating + oxygen, for that fuel to burn – on the Moon, the night is 14 earth days long – solar panel batteries will not last that long, to counteract that much coldness, no wind turbines would work there. What I’m getting at is: ‘’ the side that is night on the moon (new moon) is facing the earth! Earth is much bigger than the moon; if that ‘’phony heat radiation and albedo’’ was happening on the earth = that radiating of heat &albedo would have warmed the ‘’dark side on the moon, but this is not the case; that’s a natural unadulterated experiment! Warmist & Skeptic’s ‘’kinetic heat ” ‘’radiating’’ for long distances DOESN’T EXIST’’!  busted!

Therefore: we should rejoice that: the earth is producing heat, to fight the ”NEW cold vacuum” the earth is travelling through, all the time – otherwise everything would have been frozen stiff ! (At some point  the astrophysicists might discover that: ‘’the dark matter / anti-matter they are talking about, is nothing  but; the space where nothing exists but the temp from ‘’infinite zero Kelvin, up to any solid object”; if somebody can cool a space  ‘’below infinite zero Kelvin’’ that space will disappear; but we are not going to get into that now) All I want to emphasize is: the Earth cannot warm up all that empty / cold space from here to the next star Alpha Centauri, 2 light years away –we are not even going that way…?

‘’INTENTIONALLY CONFUSING’’ short waves ‘’IR&UV’’ cold radiation for long distances from the sun, with ‘’long wave IR’’ which is: radiation from ‘’existing / created heat”, which is kinetic energy/ heat; radiates only few microns; is the ”smoking cannon / scam” in both camps, by which I mean the Warmistas and the phony skeptics who subscribe to the” back radiation theory”.

I was told that: most of the climatologist are not physicist, but Jim Hansen is; therefore: if he is put on a witness stand, under oath – he would end up in long term jail. Everything in the solar system is controlled / regulated by the ”HONEST” laws of physics! Engineers that created radio, TV, mobile telephone, X-ray machine, atom bomb, microwave Owen; they had to deliver the goods, by utilizing radiation, they cannot sell lies to get cash, like Met offices, EPA and IPCC. Confusing different radiations that are same, for confusing the ignorant – is the mother of all lies!

1] there are many different radiations – as for example: shortwave IR /UV that comes from the sun to the earth – they don’t carry any heat, they ‘’create heat’’ by vibrating atoms and molecules on the earth – they vibrate CO2 in the atmosphere, soil on the ground, and surface of the water – that ‘’vibration’’ which rubs molecules / atoms from each other,  ‘’creates’’ the heat on the spot. To repeat for the most ignorant, again: the empty space between earth / sun is COLD! Stratosphere is just as cold, no warming of the whole planet overall possible!

2] same as your microwave Oven, doesn’t produce heat, but vibrates the water molecules in the cup, that ‘’friction’’ boils the water in 2 minutes. The same as when you rub the hands, to warm up (water molecules vibrate much faster) then; that heat in the cup is ‘’kinetic energy / heat’’, and doesn’t ‘’radiate’’ heat for more than an inch, even though is 100C.

3] same as the ‘’cold’’ shortwave IR / UV from the sun’’ vibrate the CO2 in the atmosphere and the soil, water, and ‘’create’’ the heat in it. Then, ‘’that kinetic heat” radiates only by one micron from the CO2 –that heat is collected by O&N and taken higher, to waste it (most of that heat from CO2 is neutralized ON THE SPOT by the ‘’cold vacuum’’  which constantly penetrates into the atmosphere) CO2 during the day goes up 3-7km, It is  always very  cold at those altitudes. CO2 doesn’t ‘’radiate’’ heat back down to the ground, doesn’t ‘’radiate’’ that heat up into the stratosphere; because longwave heat doesn’t radiate for more than a micron from the CO2, and the ‘’kinetic heat’’ from the ground radiates only few inches. All the cooling is done by O&N taking the heat up / horizontal winds collect the heat -> vertical winds are dispersing it up, for the ‘’cold vacuum’’ to neutralize it. Repeat again the most important sentence: when it gets hotter than normal -> vertical winds increase, INSTANTLY, AND GO HIGHER, and equalize in a jiffy!

One more experiment:  warm up your oven to 300C (570F) – open the oven door – that 300C kinetic heat will radiate (longwave IR) about a foot – that air will be warmed and will expand to two feet. Therefore: 300C (570F) radiates longwave IR only one foot – how the hell they think that: 30C (86F) on the ground can ”radiate’’ from the ground to out in space and CO2 to prevent that?!?! Mother of all stupidity, misleading nonsense!

(Most people from both camps believe that: CO2 distribution is evenly distributed in the atmosphere all the time -WRONG!!! They brag about CO2 getting ”WARMED” by the sun during the day – but don’t know what the caveman did know, that: warmed CO2 goes high up during the day – that’s how the caveman invented the chimney. (Fundamentalist Warmist & Skeptics should update their knowledge to that of a caveman) the truth: most of CO2 exposed to the sun during the day rises, as it is warmed -> intercepts sunlight there, where cooling is much more efficient – isn’t this what all the fuss is about; CO2 gets warmer than other air?! When warmed CO2 goes high up, ONLY DURING THE DAY, where is a lot of ”cold vacuum” penetrating, and is cancelling that heat, directly from the CO2 molecule-which means: that small amount of radiation that CO2 intercepts high up, as DIMMING EFFECT = a bit LESS radiation comes to the ground = cooler by 0,1C during the day. Is that bad? Same as WV does, only is more water vapor in the air than CO2, so does much, much better job

After sundown, CO2 loses benefit from the sunlight / cools and falls to the ground – that’s when the trees and crops are most active, after 8pm. In the morning the sunlight lifts CO2 up again as it does with a fog. Why does  the CO2 rise during the day? Here is why: every CO2 molecule has two oxygen atoms – from UV&IR, vibrating carbon atom warms up the two oxygen atoms in the molecule -> the two oxygen atoms expand and lift him up, to appropriate heights, where there is appropriate extra ”cold vacuum” to neutralize any extra heat created!  Warmist DO NOT HAVE A CASE! It is easy to prove the truth, now; no need to wait 100years and see that they are lying!!!

4] so: longwave and shortwave radiation is what they confuse, to con. The heat in the cup, heat into the CO2, heat into the soil AND the heat on the sun surface are kinetic energy / heat; the same heat that is produced by burning coal, to melt iron ore. For melting iron ore  2000C is required, and people can stand 15 feet away from such a  fire – on the surface of the Sun it  is only 4500C -21000C; which is only two and a half times of that in the smelter. Yes, deep down into the sun, where fusion is created, heat is in millions of degrees, but that is deep, deep down. Also the ”sun-flares” release millions of degrees of  heat BUT: that heat doesn’t even reach to the orbit of Mercury (on the dark side of Mercury is much colder than on Mars – because Mercury doesn’t have axle, same side is always facing the sun)

5]  Even those radio waves on TV, radio, mobile telephone are of different frequencies; kilohertz / megahertz. Shouldn’t, must not be allowed to be confused with long wave radiating from heat, which travels very, very short distances; as few microns only

6] those ‘’cold short waves’’ from the sun, travel though a very cold place, for long distances, to get to the earth – because in-between there are no gases or solid objects to vibrate and produce heat – the temperature between the earth and the sun is five and a half times colder, than in your deep freeze (apart from when Mercury every couple of months, and  sometime Venus end up between the Earth / Sun and they intercept those cold short-waves and create heat / kinetic energy, there) The Moon intercepts ‘’short wave radiation’’ from the Sun -> heat is created there; that kinetic heat doesn’t radiate from the moon to the earth – because ’long wave radiation’’ doesn’t get far! It radiates a foot from the ground and is neutralized by the ’cold vacuum’’  because the moon travels faster than the earth into ‘’new cold vacuum’’ it’s all neutralized in the path of the moon. Both camps  emphasize that: the moon is colder than the earth, to badmouth the CO2 BUT nobody takes in consideration  that: THE MOON TRAVELS almost TWICE AS FAST THROUGH THAT ”COLD VACUUM, than the earth”!!!  (because the Moon travels the same orbit with the earth around the sun, PLUS: simultaneously the moon orbits around the earth 13 times in a year in a big radius) Also: the real greenhouse gases on the earth, oxygen &nitrogen; let the sunlight through, to warm up the surface, but keeps most of the ‘’cold vacuum’’ 2 -10km away from the surface, on the moon 100% of the ‘’cold vacuum’’ touches the surface. Plus the earth generates geothermal heat, no such thing on the moon, plus water is as shock absorber for heat on the earth! (they can’t notice all that, and that is no water on the moon, Venus. Why, are they so stupid; OR they think that; the public is so stupid?!)

Therefore: it’s not: ‘’IR radiates from the sun’’ comes in – ‘’IR’’ radiates out, from the ground to out in space; this  is the con; kinetic heat doesn’t ”radiate” from one micron most of the time, to a few feet, in exceptional circumstances (volcanoes etc). All the heat created on the earth, is neutralized by the new ’cold vacuum’’ that constantly penetrates deep into the troposphere = Warmist don’t have a case!!! Hansen as physicist, can be put in jail, easy; if it wasn’t for this: Warmist keep creating bull – Skeptics keep shovelling it… The truth will win, only it will take longer. P.s. physicists and engineers in the ‘’Skeptic’s’’ camp, should be in the same jail cell as Hansen, only for longer period. Because: they play the cop, but are assisting the bank-robbers! In every country, under the existing laws – the cop gets bigger penalty than the robbers; when they are ‘’assisted’’ by the cop. When those ‘’phony Skeptics’’ are blaming the Warmist for robbing the people – I feel like eating more – so that  I can throw up more… (they are misleading about Venus, the moon temperatures, just to badmouth CO2!)


Q: do you know that: oxygen + nitrogen are 998999ppm in the troposphere, CO2 only 260-450ppm?

Q: do you know that O+N expand /shrink ”INSTANTLY” in change of temperature?

Q: do you know that: where they expand upwards and encompass more of that cold space, on the edge of the troposphere  is minus -90⁰C?

Q: why do  O2&N2 expand more, when warmed by 5⁰C, than when warmed by 2⁰C? A: when warmed by 5⁰C, they need to rise further up, to release more heat /to encompass, intercept more, extra coldness (cold vacuum), to equalize (to increase more the volume of the troposphere and let in, AND ‘’encompass’’ extra ‘’cold vacuum’’).

Q: if O&N are cooled after 10 minutes to previous temperature, why don’t they stay expanded for another 5 minutes extra? A: not to intercept too much extra coldness, to prevent too much cooling. A2: they stay expanded precisely as long as they are warmer – not one second more or less – that’s how they regulate to be same warmth units ‘’overall’’ in the troposphere, every hour of every year and millennium!

Q: do you know that: if the  troposphere warms up by 2⁰C extra – troposphere expands up into the stratosphere by 1km; do you know how much extra coldness there is to intercept? A: unlimited coldness intercepts heated molecules with  appropriate “coldness” to counteract the extra heat in 9 minutes -> that extra coldness falls to the ground in minutes, not years!

Q: if O+N are warmed extra for 30 minutes, why they don’t shrink after 15 minutes, or after one day? A: if O&N after being cooled to previous (unheated / normal) temperature; stayed expanded for a whole day extra -> they would have redirected enough extra coldness, to freeze all the tropical rivers / lakes in ONE day.

Q: can CO2 of 260-450ppm PREVENT oxygen & nitrogen (998999ppm) from expanding, when they warm up? A: O2&N2 when warmed  – they expand through the walls of a hi-tensile hand-grenade. Q: do you believe in the laws of physics, or in IPCC and the Warmist / Fake Skeptic’s cults? The laws of physics say: part of the troposphere can get colder than normal – only when other parts gets warmer than normal. B] if the WHOLE troposphere gets colder-> air shrinks-> releases LESS heat /intercepts less coldness on the edge of the troposphere > retains more heat and equalizes in a jiffy, this is a continuous process. C] both hemispheres cannot get warmer simultaneously for more than few minutes – if they do -> troposphere expands extra->releases extra heat / intercepts extra coldness and equalizes almost immediately/the more troposphere expands=> the more ‘’cold vacuum’’ encompasses AND lets in, to do the job.

Q: do the O+N wait to warm up by 2-3⁰C, before start expanding, or expand instantly  when they warm up by 0,000001⁰C? All those things can be experimented / replicated now, IN THE CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT; there is no need to wait 100y to see that: all  the IPCC&EPA, Met office do is: they keep coming up with immature lies.

Q: why is on every 100m from the ground up, colder and colder? A: the thinner the air is-> the more ‘’cold vacuum’’ penetrates in, and neutralizes any extra heat! SELF ADJUSTING!:

If you collect all the EXTRA heat that will be accumulated on the earth since 97 Kyoto conference to year 2100 – you wouldn’t have enough of that ‘’Extra’’ heat – TO BOIL ONE CHICKEN EGG!!! EXTRA HEAT ON THE EARTH IS NOT ACCUMULATIVE,  because of the brilliant ‘’Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism’’ (TSAM)

B] The Earth’s orbit around the sun is ”elliptical” which means: around Christmas time, the Earth is much closer to the sun, than in June; –  because of that, in  December and January the earth gets a much higher concentration of radiation from the sun = produces more heat, but is no extra heat on the planet in southern summer than in northern – because O2&N2 expand extra INSTANTLY and keep  same  overall  temperature. (The alarmist, to be more pathetic – their ”temperature data” from their thermometers show that: in southern summer the planet is ”cooler by 3,8C…)well that’s only because they have LESS thermometers on the S/H, than on the northern AND because they use only the ”hottest minute” in 24h and ignore all the other 1439 minutes in 24h. Because the  S/H has more water = days are cooler, but nights are warmer = overall it is same temp! So much for their temp collecting on the ‘’whole’’ planet…

Q: how does the troposphere knows when to shrink, OR expend with such a precision? A: the good Lord inserted a thermometer in every atom of oxygen and nitrogen + every CO2 molecule has two oxygen atoms – those thermometers are ordering to every atom and molecule; when to shrink, or expand, AND, ”BY HOW MUCH TO EXPAND”.

Both camps believe in the Pagan propaganda that: planet earth was a ”snowball” AND there was a time when there was no ice on either polar caps.


1] temperature  from midday to midnight cools on average by 15C – if there was a ”snowball earth” the O&N (troposphere would have shrunk in volume by half = would have discharged / wasted only half the heat created during that day 7,5C in 24h saved= the other half of 7,5C would have being saved tomorrow -> increase by 15C in two days would have melted the crap out of any ”snowball earth” BUT, because oxygen & nitrogen do not wait for  the planet to cool by 15C before they start shrinking = they are shrinking INSTANTLY when they get colder by as little as  0,0001C are the best proof that ”snowball earth” didn’t exist!!! Tilting of the planet (Milankovich) made ice imprints on places where is now warm latitudes, BUT: at that same time was warmer on places where is cold now! It’s BBC Marxist science…  Also: when the planet warms up by 0,00000001C -atmosphere starts expending, instantly and equalizes any extra heat!!! O2&N2 don’t wait the atmosphere to warm up by 2C, then to start expanding; all literature about the past ‘’global’’ warmings / ‘’global’’ ice ages and ‘’global’’ cycles is WRONG, they were never global! Those things if happened, were always localized events, or freak weather events for few days, were interpreted as ‘’global’’ cooling, or ‘’global’’ warming for hundredths or thousandths of years; by the unemployed geologists and ambitious / opportunistic palaeontologists, to get media attention and taxpayer’s cash!!! Climatologist didn’t start lying in the 80’s, lying has always being their bread and butter! When Darwin told them that: St. Peter doesn’t control the weather / climate; those shonks went into overdrive – and every freak weather for few days in the past made some imprint; was interpreted as: ‘‘global’‘ warmings, ”global’‘ cycles or ”global” coolings…? I call it ”Pagan beliefs” – when was believed in St Peter, was less looting..?

2] ICE FREE POLAR CAPS CRAP, MISLEADING: on the Polar caps the temp is minus -75C (-103F); for both polar caps to melt, the planet’s temp needs to warm up by 76C.  cool – if the planet warmed by 76C and add  another 37C  (98F)which is the temperature today in the tropics and subtropics 76 + 37 = 113C which is (235,8F). 113C is 13C above the water  BOILING point (23,8F above water boiling point) From bacteria, trees, grass, animals and birds; all of them have water in their body = everything would have being cooked and  sterilized in less than 10 minutes in the tropics and subtropics!!! Do you believe that the planet got  sterilized?! ”Pagan beliefs” which are the ”Skeptic’s” gospel AND the Warmist used those same pagan beliefs, to create their LIE that is going to be warmer planet in 100 years is 100% WRONG! On 70C everything gets  Pasteurized / killed, dead, kaput in 10 minutes, 113C is another 43C on top of that! In US, Europe where the propaganda is created – say that polar ice will melt again… well, if in US &Europe get warmer only by 8C above water boiling point… make an experiment: deep your hand in a pot of boiling water for 20 minutes, AND: pretend that outside the pot is 8C warmer than in the pot’’ I bet on that temp, you are not going to worry much about the polar bears and Bangladesh; because Bangladesh would have being 10C above water boiling point. Q: are university books and ”peer reviewed papers”  correct, or me?! They were coming up with any crap in the past, to create themselves a profession -not being scrutinized.

Let me tell you the ”PRECISION” the earth’s  ‘’TEMPERATURE SELF ADJUSTING MECHANISM” (TSAM) has:

Example: when you light a cigarette – it produces heat for the one cubic inch around where is burning – that cubic inch of air expands and becomes two inches by volume – the extra cubic inch doesn’t go in the yard, because is already air there – instead, as warmed, it goes up high in the troposphere and discharges that heat – swaps it for enough coldness to cancel the heat produced by the fire – and one cubic inch of air continuously going up and down every few seconds, until you put the cigarette off, then it stops instantly, not to bring more coldness than necessary. That same thing happens for heat produced by CO2, plus heat from the erupting volcano, heat from smelters for melting iron ore, and for any other heat. The  Troposphere expands and shrinks constantly, as required, like piano accordion. It can expand by one cubic inch, by 3m, actually, the troposphere can double in volume, instantly and encompass extra cold vacuum = can discharge double the amount of heat in minutes. Also: when warmer-> vertical winds SPEED UP and GO MUCH HIGHER!

The troposphere is a living organism, and constantly alert, constantly keeps readjusting. She knows when the volcano gets active and instantly reacts to it; to get read of that extra heat, OR heat from the campfire you made, OR: when you put the cigarette off -> troposphere stops instantly releasing less heat for as much as the heat was produced by the burning cigarette! That’s how sensitive and precise she is. Even nuclear explosion that produces million degrees heat – because very hot -> hot gases go much higher -> spread like mushroom, to be easier neutralized by the ”cold vacuum” which is more of it coming / going on 15-17km than air. Self adjusting mechanism. Lots of talk that ”upper troposphere is getting warmer, even the stratosphere getting warmer…? That is same as: searching for the ” missing heat on the bottom of the sea” TRUTH: nothing, nothing can increase the upper troposphere temperature for more than an hour, AND: no heat is ever taken into the stratosphere! Unless shooting star / meteor makes some heat, or satellite re-entry. BUT: the amount of ”cold vacuum” goes trough the upper troposphere AND especially in the stratosphere every 9 minutes – talking about those places getting warmer than normal, is same as saying ” on the bottom of the sea is getting dryer than normal…?!?!”

(let me tell you something: they can see that volcano lava brings lots of heat to the surface and warms the atmosphere. Plus, volcano produces lots of CO2 +SO2 and water vapor in the atmosphere; BUT: atmosphere doesn’t get warmer; BECAUSE OF  THE TEMP SELF  ADJUSTING MECHANISM. But, because they don’t understand the power of that mechanism,  actually they don’t even know that it exists… they concocted that: it must be aerosols produced by volcanoes are cooling the planet…WOW… what a science…) Aerosols have nothing to do with temp regulation! It’s the O2&N2 + cold vacuum, stupid!

Q: how does the troposphere knows how much exactly heat to waste for every individual day?! Some days more heat is produced , other days less, by industry, by volcanoes, plus by Christmas the earth is ”closer” to the sun = extra radiation concentrated / because of elliptical orbit, than in midyear, in June. Here is the answer again::

A: the good Lord inserted a thermometer in EVERY atom of oxygen & nitrogen – those thermometers are ordering the atoms how much to shrink / expend, AND by how much to expand ”precisely” according to heat/ coldness! The extra heat produced in individual day determines  the ”precise” volume of the troposphere AND the speed of the vertical winds. That’s where the ”sensitivity” is guys, not your ”climate sensitivity” from the phony global warming” wrongly referred for confusion, as ”climate change” to be used for brainwashing and confusion of the ignorant

Therefore: for the last 150y, the sun produced lots of heat on the earth, lots of additional heat produced by the geothermal, lots of heat produced by burning fossil fuels – all that heat is gone, all of it – Since the ”middle” of the phony LIA until today, hasn’t accumulated enough ”extra” heat ”overall than, what one cigarette burning can produce!!! That’s infallible precision. If you collect ALL the ‘’extra’’ heat accumulated for the last 10 000y, you wouldn’t have enough heat, to boil one chicken egg. Extra heat in the earth’s atmosphere is NOT accumulative!!!

The Little Ice Age (LIA) is the Skeptic’s biggest weapon – what was it?

A: The river Thames was frozen for few days, because of freak weather- picture of people scatting on river Thames – WOW! (people record unusual events) Danube was frozen for 2 weeks few years back, thousands of color photos were taken; was that Midi Ice Age (MIA) ?(at that same time was record heat in Australia)

What was the Medieval ”Global” Warming?

A: Their genuine proof exists, a written record on a goat’s skin; from a farmer in Buckingham-shire who  was producing an ”extra” bushel of grain per acre, than during the Renaissance – another WOW! (150y before paper was introduced and half a millennium before thermometer was invented; they know the ”GLOBAL” temp with a precision, from a perishable goat’s skin; for every year, FOR THE WHOLE PLANET – look at their ‘’global’’ temperature charts, for the last thousands of  years…)

Friends, The  planet is a very big place – the ”globe” is NOT spinning around  England, would you believe that? When record heat in Australia and people were burning in forest fires – in England, Germany people were freezing to death. When river Danube was frozen few years ago, 10000’s pictures made – shonks didn’t declare it ‘’global’’ cooling, why?

#1: producing same crops on same land -> by the phony LIA, the land was poorer and produced less (they didn’t have synthetic fertilizer) Honest people call it ”Dark ages and Renaissance”

#2: During the PHONY Medieval Global Warming (Dark Ages); farmers were more religious and were reporting correctly; for paying 10% of their product to the bishop – after in the Renaissance (the phony LIA), the mongrels were lying, to pay less tax.

#3: Having records from a  few farmers in Buckingham Shire,  doesn’t represent ”the WHOLE globe”  That can be proven; same laws of physics were then, as they are now, OR am I wrong?

#4: At that time paper didn’t exist, so they wrote on expensive treated goat’s leather, to keep all records for temperature…?! Was Merlin collecting temp data from the ”WHOLE” globe with a telescopic thermometer every day and recording it on ”perishable” treated leather, for today’s ”Skeptics?! Think! Shonky ”researchers” came up with any crap, knowing that they can con you… This is a Proof why the ”Skeptics” are born losers… (look at their ”global” temp data: 1221AD the temp was gone up by 0,028C than the previous year – then next year another 0,05C up, then the next year going down by 0,025C and so on… even today’s thermometers are not calibrated to one hundredth of a degree, like Merlin’s thermometers… (if you have any money, invest in the Straight Jacket manufacturers – there will be a big demand for that product, when the truth is known)

Yes there was an ice age for 12000 years, but it wasn’t ”global”  it cannot be global – the ”honest” laws of physics don’t permit that – unless you have abolished those laws of physics by legislation in parliament and in UN – otherwise, those laws don’t compromise!!! Please learn first about the ”self adjusting temperature mechanism the planet earth has” and use that knowledge.

2] Day’s OR night’s  affects of CO2 are opposite,  so they cancel each other out.  Dimming affect during the day is not warming! 1] the effect is so small; is not worth writing home about it 2] daytime effect is as having the smallest sun-umbrella = small shade to the earth’s surface 3] at night, it slows cooling = zero net effect, apart from creating a very small effect ‘’milder climate’’  cooler days / warmer nights! What’s wrong with that?! Only for the Flat-Earthers it is daytime, OR night-time, all the time…

Bottom line:

1] Heat in the atmosphere is same as a full bucket of water – in a full bucket of water, you cannot fit another cupful of water, would overflew.

2] The only way one part of the planet can get warmer is: if another part gets colder, simultaneously, by shrinking to accommodate the expended air from the warmed part! The same as a children’s ‘’see-saw plank’’ the higher one side goes up – simultaneously, the other side goes down more. Both sides cannot go up, OR down, simultaneously! which means: when it is warmer than normal some place / air expands more – simultaneously other place/places it is ”colder” than normal / to accommodate the ”extra” volume of air from the warmed part of the planet. So: if you keep pointing only the warmer places than normal and ignore the rest where is colder = you can make case for phony GLOBAL warming. (in the 60-70’s they were selecting places where  it was ”colder” than normal for few days, and were ignoring where it was SIMULTANEOUSLY warmer than normal and were making a case for ”global” cooling = in reality: in the 70’s wasn’t colder than in 2014, by enough coldness to cool one beer. This shows that:  there is not many active secular Skeptic or Warmist left in the blogosphere, capable of thinking for themselves… they just keep parroting what is fashionable…

3]The Troposphere is like a piano accordion – when it is  warmed ”extra”  it expands ”extra” instantly, and ENCOMPASSES in itself extra cold vacuum to waste the extra heat into it. When the troposphere enlarges by 5m3, or by 5m upwards -it intercepts EXTRA of that cold vacuum / otherwise: if not necessary: the atmosphere zooms through ”LESS” of that ”cold vacuum”, and releases ”less” heat; always as required! Therefore: that ”self adjusting mechanism ”doesn’t allow extra heat ”overall” to accumulate in the atmosphere” (look at the Warmist & Skeptic’s ”global” temperature charts for the last 10000 years, looks like seismograph… the biggest con that ever existed… The Grandmother of all lies) 

This paragraph is the Holy Grail: The Laws of Physics  make oxygen &nitrogen atoms to expand when warmed and let more ”cold vacuum” in-between, AND encompass more ”cold vacuum”, then shrink when cooled and let ”less cold vacuum to penetrate in-between, and encompass less cold vacuum, by volume: imagine your car radiator was rubbery, can expand / shrink as a piano accordion – the water cells columns compress and let much ”less” air to go through the radiator + radiator->gets smaller by volume and encompass ”less” air – because cold air doesn’t go between the water cells =”less cooling” = ”preserves heat. Then when warmed extra the engine – those water columns / cells expand to spread and allow more cold air in-between them to pass and collect / neutralize the extra heat AND vertical winds speed up and go much higher

Note to remember: 

When the Atmosphere /Troposphere get expanded, the atmosphere encompass extra ”cold vacuum  1]encompassing more cold vacuum 2] plus: more cold vacuum goes between the oxygen &nitrogen atoms = increases cooling, AS REQUIRED, precisely!  B] there is never any ‘equilibrium” – because every minute different amount of heat is produced, the troposphere constantly keeps readjusting! The troposphere constantly keeps shrinking / expending, according to the amount of heat! Because even one extra cigarette burning – creates need for readjusting. The troposphere is constantly straggling, adjusting for equilibrium. The word ”equilibrium” is used too much by the shonks… in reality: ”equilibrium” can only be  declared, if horizontal and vertical winds stop for a whole day, or a whole year, on the whole planet!

Atmosphere ”as radiator” goes at 108000kmh through that cold vacuum that is below -90C (-130F) – They are insulting the guy that created the basic laws of physics  for this planet; when lying that the planet will overheat! The ”honest laws of physics” are my; Lord’s 10 commandments.

They are squandering billions on the phony global warming – they are brainwashing the kids in school and university = tremendous damage is in progress…  Our truth will win! Galileo and Darwin had similar problems, because of ”established beliefs” The truth is more important, than a million ”believers”! Heat ”radiating” out in space and albedo gizmo are grotesque lies, used by both camps!… HEAT IS ”NEUTRALIZED” INSIDE THE troposphere; BY THE ”COLD VACUUM” CONSTANTLY PENETRATING IN!  THE TROPOSPHERE  EXPANDS / SHRINKS, EXACTLY AS  NECESSARY  –  ACCORDING BY THE AMOUNT OF HEAT THAT  IS IN THE  ATMOSPHERE!!!     ”Extra heat -> Atmosphere Expands -> Extra Heat Releases”  (EH->AE->EHR)- or: ”Extra Coldness ->Atmosphere Shrinks-> Less Heat Releases”    (EC->AS->LHR) No matter what’s producing that ”extra” heat, O&N respond!!! Plenty ‘’cold vacuum avilable!!

The Same as: when you feel warm in the car -> stick your arm outside the window – your arm intercepts extra coldness and cools you down – the blood brings that ”extra” coldness to the rest of your body – that’s how O&N are taking heat up and bring ”extra” coldness down, to counteract the ”extra” heat. Troposphere can double in volume and encompass twice as much of that ‘’cold vacuum” IF necessary, and as quickly as necessary!

The ”cold vacuum” goes trough the atmosphere and constantly collects /neutralizes the heat – IF THERE IS ANY EXTRA HEAT TO NEUTRALIZE, IT NEUTRALIZES IT – IF NO EXTRA HEAT – THE UNLIMITED COLDNESS JUST ZOOMS TROUGH THE UPPER TROPOSPHERE, underutilized, or not utilized at all, especially the one in higher altitudes, over 5km and upwards. Can neutralize three times, 300% more heat, IF any gets available!!! (reason; the warmer gases, the higher and FASTER they go) Can CO2 prevent expansion? NO, CO2 expands together with them.

To be more precise: THE ATMOSPHERE / THE EARTH ZOOMS THROUGH, THE”COLD VACUUM” STAYS WHERE IT IS; BECAUSE DOESN’T HAVE ANY FRICTION OR GRAVITY, TO BE TAKEN AWAY BY THE EARTH. So: no matter if you release more, or less heat into that ‘’cold vacuum’’ by tomorrow  that extra warmed ‘’cold vacuum’’ will be 2 million km behind!

Obviously,  ”cold vacuum” is minuscule on the sea level, because of one atmosphere pressure, BUT as you go in higher altitudes, that ”cold  vacuum” INCREASES – by 10km altitude; the aircraft must be pressurized inside the aircraft (climbers on Mt Everest carry oxygen bottles, because the air is too thin). By 25km altitude is half air / half ”cold vacuum” and on 35km altitude human body would have exploded; because there is more ”cold vacuum” than air. That’s where warm O2&N2 go when they are ”extra” warmed on the ground -> expand into that half vacuum and release any extra heat. ANY amount of EXTRA heat there can be neutralized, not just few degrees warmer, but even if is million degrees warmer, from a bomb. ”Global” warmings are a sick joke!

Conclusion: for the last 20y, Warmist used the theory: ”CO2 is as a blanket / greenhouse gas; it prevents heat ”radiation” from the ground to out of space” The truth: ”that blanket is a fishnet or a postage stamp’’! B]the heat from the ground doesn’t ”radiate” for more than a foot -> Oxygen  &Nitrogen (horizontal winds collect &vertical winds disperse that heat, to be neutralized by the ”cold vacuum” that constantly penetrates into the troposphere and ”neutralizes”  the any heat available! Therefore: The relevance of CO2 existing in the atmosphere or not, ”radiating / IR out”  or not, makes zero difference ; the ”cold vacuum”  neutralizes all the heat, INCLUDING the heat from CO2 molecules!- CO2 as a greenhouse gas – exposed / busted – Warmist Organized Crime (WOC) should be treated like any other organized crime (carbon tax is nothing but ”Protection Money”)**

All those past ”global” warmings and ”global” coolings and ”global cycles” were NEVER global. The normal laws of physics don’t permit the ”whole” planet to be warmer, or colder for more than a day, there are logical explanations for that! Therefore: same laws of physics will be in place 100y from now, as they are now and, as they were in the past = best proofs that there will be no ”global” warming in 100y. b]As long as people on the street think that; the earth’s temp goes up and down as a yo-yo = Warmist won, will rob and oppress the world, based on fairy-tales. You people should learn about ”the Earth’s Temp Self Adjusting Mechanism”: a] Earth’s troposphere is like piano accordion – constantly shrinks / expands, as required and wastes all ”extra” heat in minutes. b] why did the engineers build bigger radiators in a truck than in small car?.A: truck engine produces 3 times more heat, BUT has the same temp as a small car – because the truck has a bigger radiator – the troposphere (O&N) are the Earth’s radiator; can double in size in an instant, if necessary; and ‘’encompass’’ much more of the ‘’cold vacuum’’ and ”cool” much more) when for ANY reason gets warmer than normal, which is most of the time close to the ground –the ”vertical winds” speed up = same as: when you rev the engine more -> instantly car moves faster +fan next to the radiator speeds up and water pump pumps faster because: the engineers that build trucks, cars; are smart people and put different size radiators. On the other hand; on the blogosphere, for them the earth’s radiator O2&N2 doesn’t exist. Reason they are ALL comparing earth with the moon and Venus. Warmist are producing bull, Skeptics keep shovelling it, and getting lazy / fat on it… will be lots of regretting, when the Reds under green camouflage win…

The ”correct” monitoring is completely WRONG, not only the manipulated data; therefore: the overall ‘’global’’ temp is the same every year, BUT hypothetically: even if there was any fluctuation in temp, nobody would have known, because nobody is monitoring on every 10m3, for every minute in 24h!!! ”Trend” is impossible for the whole atmosphere, when on 99,999999999999% nobody is monitoring.

B}Satellite monitoring is for bullshine adicts, nothing more. They are not even monitoring – the ”pretend monitoring” is for justifying expenses and abuse of NASA’s name. There are variations in temp on every 10m altitude, but not on NASA’s infrared picture. If you are a big city slicker – go to hi rise building and check trough the window – as you go higher, temp drops. On NASA’s picture is same temp on the top of 5km mountain as on foot of that same mountain on sea level = proof that they are lying. #2: IF satellites did monitor, their infrared photos would have being showing the difference in temp between sea, lake and dry land, Because, water is colder on the surface, BUT warmer 3-7km altitude in the troposphere = on dry land is hot on the ground, but higher troposphere always colder! No contrast on NASA IR pictures, are they saying that: they cannot pick up difference in temp of UP TO 50C? Using the word *AVERAGING THE DATA* –is the biggest con that doesn’t hold water. When honest person averages the temp for the top of the mountain and foot of the 3-5-6km high mountains, and is SAME temperature top and bottom = NASA’s commissars became very destructive for humanity and NASA’s integrity accumulated in 60’s ans 70’s. I wish I can put those commissars on a witness stand, under oath..!!!    

1] monitoring only for the hottest minute in 24h and ignoring the other 1439 minutes, in which the temp doesn’t go up, or down, as in the ”hottest” minute…. statistically 1439 minutes against one…?!?! Hello ”statisticians! It’s the same as: if the car is made of  1440 different parts, but you are ‘’reconstructing’’ that car, ” from one bolt only” you will not get very far…! In some places, sometimes warms by 5C from midnight to midday – other places at different times, from midnight to the hottest minute in the day – it warms up by 20c-25c- and 30C, in 12h difference. Therefore: ”the hottest minute in 24h misleads by at least 10C!!! They conveniently overlook that; then ”pretend” to know to a hundredth of a degree precision, for the whole year, for the WHOLE planet?!?! Every day, on every place is different; ‘’trend’’ cannot be extrapolated!

2] the ”highest temp minute’’ in 24h, is not at the same time every day! Sometime is the ”hottest at 11am, most of the time is after 1pm = that is many more warmer minutes than the previous day.

3]Example: tomorrow will be warmer by 2C than today, that happens many times; and they will record 2C warmer – because the ”warmest” minute was 2C warmer, not ALL the rest of the 1439 minutes since midnight were warmer by 2C. b] question is: ”is it going to start from midnight, every minute to be warmer than the same minutes in previous day?! Therefore: recording only the hottest minute is meaningless and grotesque con! Nobody knows what was the temp yesterday, or last year on the WHOLE planet… but most of the fanatics in the blogosphere pretend to know with precision the temp for the whole year, for the last thousands of years…  What repetition and aggressive propaganda can do to a grown up person’s brains, tragic…

4] On a small hill, put a thermometer on all 4 sides; all 4 will show different temperatures on a different days when  measured simultaneously – That is an illustration for a small area, in Global Warming Science, when you take into account that: on many places one thermometer represents millions of square kilometers, where there are thousands of ”independent” variations, every few minutes, on every different altitude = gives a clear picture about their ”global temperature” for last 50years… or 5000 years, or for the last two years. If a small part of the planet is warmer for few weeks than normal – they declare it as: ”warmer year”… what a science… a couple of months after, when in that same place it is colder than normal – they avoid that place and point out instead, some other place if is for 3-4 days warmer than normal, what a brainwashing scam…

5] Pointing at some place that is warmer than normal – is the  SAME as saying: ”the planet is warmer by 12C at lunch time, than before sunrise…? taking into consideration the size of the planet: one thermometer or 6000 thermometers, wouldn’t make any difference! (look at their ”global” temp charts… they look like seismographs… with ”precision” to one hundredth of a degree, for the last thousandths of years) = the biggest con /lies since the Homo-Erectus invented language…

6] A thermometer can monitor the temp in a room; one thermometer for 10 000km2?! Even in a small  room, close to the ground is occasionally 1-2C cooler than close to the sealing.

7] even those ”few” (6000) thermometers are not evenly distributed; no honest statistician would have taken to make any  ”statistics” if he wasn’t told: ”how much area each individual thermometer represents”. For example: if the workers in 4 countries have their pay packet increased by a dollar, and in 2 countries had ”decreased by a dollar Q: would the ”overall’ all workers in those 6 countries get more money, or less? Of course, statistic would say: ‘’yes’’ (the 4 countries were Luxembourg, Monaco, Belgium and Portugal, increased by a dollar. The other two were India and Chinese workers, decreased by a dollar) statistic would be wrong; because two thermometers represent a much larger area than the other four combined. So much about the ‘’correct’’ temp data… (there are more thermometers in England monitoring for IPCC, EPA and Met office, than in Russia… England is a small dot on the map (but most of the lies come from there) Warmist Poms were /are the most shameless liars… especially about the distant past!

8] when it is sunny – on the ground is warmer / in upper atmosphere it is cooler – BUT, when it is cloudy, upper atmosphere is warmer, on the ground cooler – overall is same temp; BUT, because ALL thermometers monitoring are on the first 2m from the ground = they are completely misleading! There is much less heat in the first 2m from the ground, than in the rest of 10km up. The rest of 10km up, is not on their ”globe”…?! 

9] For the propaganda, northern hemisphere summer is warmer by 3,8C than S/H summer. That is the height of stupidity; they can’t get it correct for even any one  year. They are WRONG by 3,8C for two different reasons: a] N/H has more deserts, southern hemisphere has more water. Desert has warmer top temperature, BUT the night temperatures are cooler – by not taking all minutes in 24h, they are wrong by +/- 3C.  In deserts it gets to 45-50C at day time, but nights are cold -/ on islands in the South Pacific between day / night temp is different 3-7C  B] on Southern Hemisphere there are ”LESS” thermometers = less thermometers cannot record the correct temperature AGAINST the N/H where there are more thermometers, when you summon up all the numbers, you have stumbled upon the statistical errors of poor record taking.. So: only by those two factors they are wrong by +/- 3C, but when you say the last year’s temp was cooler by 0,28C than today’s = it shows the sick propaganda… they call themselves ”scientists” Instead going to Antarctic, Arctic to get rheumatism and spend millions, they can get the whole truth on my blog; but they are scared from the truth as the devil from the cross… The truth: if they have same number of thermometers, distributed evenly AND every minute in 24h is taken in consideration, for the whole troposphere = would have shown that: every day and every month of every year and millennium is ”overall” always SAME temperature on the whole earth!

10]for the ”climatologist” almost all of those 6000 thermometers collecting data ; are distributed on land – water covers 2/3 of the planet!!! If you don’t understand what that means… you are qualified to be a ”climatologist”…

11]When you point out to them that: ‘’6000 thermometers cannot monitor the temp in the whole troposphere – a thermometer is good to monitor an approximate room temp, but not one thermometer for 1000 km2! – 6000 thermometers is not enough to monitor the temp in all Hilton Hotel’s rooms’’ -> they instantly point out that: ‘’there is satellite temperature monitoring’’! Well, ‘’satellite’’ is a great technology, very impressive; unfortunately, they don’t have 350km long thermometers, to monitor from space the temp on the ground! They use infra-red two dimensional photos in a three dimensional atmosphere, that never cover the whole planet, but show temp. in two colors blotches for the whole of Pacific, or for the whole of US. The ‘’two’ colors represent THE different temp, BUT: if you look the evening weather report, it says that are many variations in temp even for the big cities in USA; would be much more variations if they were reporting for every square mile! B] temp distribution is three dimensional in the atmosphere and constantly changes, cannot present it on a two-dimensional picture!  Satellite monitoring is the biggest con!  Unfortunately, person responsible for analysing those pictures will not admit the truth – because he prefers to be seen as very important, by the gullible foot-soldiers and  the lower genera and IQ Warmist & Skeptics…(somebody should ask an honest senator, or congressman: to demand all the data from satellite monitoring – satellites are paid by the taxpayer – The Senator has a right to ask: #1: NASA to demonstrate ‘’ how efficient is that non-existent thermometer in the satellite for monitoring the whole three dimensional troposphere – if accurate, why wasting millions, to collect data on the land, collecting data individually?

 #B: to show all the data since 70’s until today – the data they are bragging about; and do they have the 3 dimensional temp for all the atmosphere, for every day’’.   This would  expose their grotesque misleading and relaying on their ”findings”!

12]Earth’s temperature is not the same as the  temperature in a human body I.e. if under the armpit temp goes 0,5C = the whole body is higher by 0,5C, arms, legs, the lot. Therefore, one can tell if temp has gone higher or not. Not for the WHOLE atmosphere! Atmospheric temp fluctuates independently!

Earth’s temp is different on every 100m and FLUCTUATES ”INDEPENDENTLY”! Which means: one thermometer cannot tell the temp correctly for 1km2, when one monitors for thousands of square kilometers = Warmist can get away with that sick trick, thanks to the ignorant phony Skeptics and bias media… (Skeptics don’t need even thermometers, a peat-bog on each hemisphere is sufficient for them… Nobody knows what was the Earth’s temp last year – to save his / her life! They ”pretend” to know what was the correct earth’s temp for thousandths of years = that’s Warmist & Skeptic’s honesty!

Using only those 12 points above; to put any leading Warmist on a  witness  stand, under oath => he will end up in jail; for using the ”temperature data / charts” as factual =/ Skeptics & Warmist of lower genera and IQ in a nuthouse, for  believing in warmer / colder years. Warmist only prosper and flourish, thanks to the Skeptic’s outdated Pagan  beliefs…

Therefore, the truth: in the 70′s was exactly the SAME temp as today, and will be exactly the same ”overall” GLOBAL temp in 100y = Warmist in jail! unfortunately: in the 70′s they were scaring the people from: CO2 ”dimming effect” that will produce cooling by year 2000 – so they were manipulating the data to reflect ”cooling planet”. After they started scaring the people with global warming and manipulate data ”as warming” — people compare those two ”manipulated” data and confuse the crap out of themselves… Therefore: ”nobody knows what was last year’s ”global” temp, to save his / her life! When they are comparing this year’s temp with the temp of 200y ago, or 800y ago, or 2000y ago, it’s even more wooffy, offensive to the nose…

Aristotle said: ”the truth is much more important, than a million believers
The truth always wins on the end.

Past ”phony global warmings” do not  prove that there is NOT going to be a global warming in 100y! It only confuses the honest people on the street that the ”global” temp goes up and down at a drop of a hat = the phony ”Skeptics” are spooking the people on the street that the ”overall global temp” goes up and down as a yo-yo, and are doing the Warmist’ dirty job… Remember: NO equilibrium! When you put the cigarette off, the troposphere recognizes that, and responds INSTANTLY! Can you compare the ”heat from ONE cigarette V the heat on the whole planet by 2C”?!?!

The truth: in 2100, if you collect ALL the ”extra” warmth accumulated since the Kyoto conference in 97, you wouldn’t have enough extra heat, to boil one chicken egg! extra heat in the earth’s atmosphere is not accumulative!!

So, these are the ”things’’  that I say, and it can be ALL proven now, in a controlled environment, or in nature; no need to wait 100years, when the Warmist spend the money and are gone (Nostradamus tactic)

Q: Skeptics, can you remember in 100y from now, to ask them for the money back? The Warmist know the answer to  that question. Using the Pagan beliefs about the past PHONY ‘’global’’ warmings; it’s like Viagra for the Warmist – for screwing the nations better. Warmist do have a few very clever people; they can decimate the Skeptic’s pagan beliefs, in 3-4 days, but they choose not to; because it suits them to have fake skeptics to continue the propaganda,  to  mislead the people  “ that the overall ”global” temp goes up and down as a yo-yo…” (people on the street rely on those Skeptics… tragic)

THE BOTTOM LINE: In order to understand better the ”increasing cooling” and ”increasing warming” for prolonged period here is an example : if the earth starts orbiting slower around the sun – say; a year becomes 370 days long -> the planet will travel trough less of that ”cold vacuum” per hour b] if the year gets shorter, 360 days in a year – which means: the planet travels faster trough that cold vacuum -> the planet will not get colder. For that much difference in orbital time , the earth’s ”temperature self adjusting mechanism” can adjust; by the atmosphere shrinking if the planet was travelling faster, to conserve heat – or expanded troposphere to release more heat if the planet was travelling slower by few days a year trough that cold nothingness orbiting around the sun. BUT, if in the past the earth was taking ”less” than 360 days to orbit the sun, OR more than 370 days to orbit the sun; to produce more warmth  or cold for the whole planet… well I will leave the speculation to you guys. It’s like this: if you seat at the back of an open pick-up truck and the truck is travelling 100kmh on a very cold, open road, but you have warm clothes = the temp is perfect for you 2] then the truck starts travelling at 115kmh -> you instantly shrivel in a fetus position, with less surface area for cooling, you begin to feel pleasant again 3] if the truck slows to 90kmh – because of the warm cloths (atmosphere has many km of oxygen &nitrogen as blanket) anyway -> you will start feeling warmer -> instantly you stretch arms and lags on that truck to expose more surface and you will cool back to pleasant temp. BUT, if the truck slows to 30kmh, or speeds up to 150kmh… well… if the earth was travelling/ orbiting much faster or much, MUCH slower in the past – to produce GLOBAL warming, or GLOBAL  cooling…well I need your help for that one (maybe she was in closer, or more distant orbit to the sun, things like that can increase / decrease the overall temp. BUT definitely not because of CO2, or because of the Skeptic’s  pagan beliefs

#2: if the day/night gets to 30h -> it will be much warmer days, but colder nights; in that case the ”OVERALL” heat would be still the same as it is now. b] if day/night gets down to 20h – the overall heat will be still the same, but: night and day temp will get much closer = warmer nights / cooler days – I believe that was the case when the cold blooded dinosaurs was prospering

(TSAM) all scientifically proven, to assist in the Involuntary Euthanasia of the IPCC.  Most of the volcanoes and hot vents are on the bottom of the sea – when they get more active -> more heat is released into the seawater -> evaporation increases (evaporation is cooling process) more evaporation => more clouds – clouds are the ‘’sun umbrellas’’ for the surface – intercept lots of sunlight high up (where cooling is more efficient) = less sunlight to the surface, colder on the ground B] more rain – rain brings coldness to the surface from high up, SELF ADJUSTING THE TEMPERATURE!  (for the Green people water vapor is evil)…There is no water vapor in the Sahara / plenty of it in Brazil / Sahara has hotter days, colder nights than Brazil = there is a more extreme climate in the  Sahara. If you don’t know what is a good or preferable climate, ask the trees! – Nothing green about the Warmist – for plant growth  needs extra H2O + CO2!!! These are vital components of growth and life on Earth.(some bacteria survives without oxygen, but nothing without H2O and carbon; CO2 is the ‘’deliverer’’ of carbon to trees and crop. CO2 is the good guy / carbon molesters are naughty!!!2]Tectonic plates move in the  same manner, as you do : left foot, then right foot, sometimes you stop => in El Nino one side of a  tectonic plate moves and activates submarine volcanoes and hot vents, then another side for La Nina, in some years they stop-this is neutral . B] Overall ‘’global’’ temp is always the same; BUT: because where El Nino affects more, there are more thermometers => they lie that it is warmer planet! Also: because they use only the hottest minute in 24h – in El Nino days are hotter, but night colder than in La Nina; otherwise it is same ‘’global’’ temp ‘’overall’’ always. Not using all 1440 minutes in 24h is the Father of all Crimes and misleading!!! A statistical disaster deliberately propagating erroneous data. Some Science blames ‘’sunspots’’ and ‘’solar cycles’’ for El Nino / La Nina natural phenomena. Fact is that: those sunspots are not active for 12h, when over Chile and stop being active when the sun is over Australia, the Earth turns and  repeats like that every day = therefore: it’s very naive to blame sunspots and solar cycles! For example: If the Pacific Rim of Fire is more active off Chilean coast = El Nino / warmer surface water off Chile – then it switches the movement / activity in West Pacific and Australia gets more rain in La Nina. If the truth is adopted; by monitoring where the activity starts on the Faulty line, then we can in advance predict if it is going to be El Nino or La Nina, or neutral for next many months. Therefore: when extra heat is in the water, that heat is created on the bottom – spreads by currents and up-welling. 2] ‘’Hotter atmosphere’’ would not warm the seawater – it’s difficult to inject heat from the atmosphere into the water; because warmer air increases evaporation on the surface – evaporation is cooling process. Whilst  on the subject: the non-existent ‘’missing heat’’  has  not gone deep down into the sea, it just doesn’t exist!(water is fluid, readjusts itself by temperature). If you pump warmer water deep down via a pipe, it will surface instantly, because of ”less density”  of warmer water / colder water is heavier and sinks down instantly and pushes warmer water to the surface, in minutes! Experiment: Take a bucket of water – fill up a syringe with olive oil, or old engine oil, for contrast – inject that oil on the bottom of the bucket – use a stop watch, and monitor: ”how long will take for the oil to get to the surface of the water in the bucket” That’s how long would have taken for ” the ‘’missing heat’’ deep down in the sea to surface” Because oil is a bit less heavy than water -> water pushes it to the surface quickly!!! In the same manner, warmer water gets pushed to the surface in a jiffy; because colder water is a bit heavier than warmer water! Water at 4C (39F) is the heaviest – the warmer the water, the closer to the surface gets – because water is fluid, it readjusts itself, by temperature. Dear visitor; you can do the correct / reliable experiment by $2 syringe and an old rusty bucket. Grown up people, calling themselves ”scientists” are going deep down in the sea, with sophisticated gadgets that cost millions of bucks – to lie to the public…  Should be made to reimburse the taxpayer’s money, with modest interest! Missing heat deep down in the sea is the daughter of all lies! (TSAM) all scientifically proven, to : Assist in the Involuntary Euthanasia of the  IPCC and EPA

The hotter the surface of the land gets -> air above collects the heat -> gases ‘’instantly’’ expand! (scientific proof: warmed gases propel the bullet out of the gun) The hotter they get, the more they expand AND HIGHER THEY GO, O2&N2, including CO2!  (CO2 has two oxygen atoms in itself)   (proof: after 30 minutes hot air balloon up, there is lots of CO2 inside it; but the warmed gases O&N AND CO2 in the balloon lift and keep ½ ton high up) b] the more gases warm up -> the more they expand -> the more expanded ->the faster AND higher they go; where air is thinner and lots of ‘’cold vacuum’’ zooms through! (experiment: release simultaneously a soccer and tennis ball on the bottom of a swimming pool -> soccer ball will travel up faster, and jump out of the water much higher than tennis ball / that’s how ‘’hotter’’ / more expanded gas atoms / molecules go up faster and higher AND cool as quick as the not much warmed!) 2] the ‘’higher’’- the thinner the air is, AND more ‘’cold vacuum’’ zooms through it (example: aircraft gadgets tell the altitude by monitoring the air density =  all scientifically proven) I’m in the tropics, at sea-level – only 10km above me is colder than on the polar caps –in US, Europe that coldness is even closer to the ground (where most of the Warmist Organized Crime (WOC) is located). We should be grateful that the earth produces some heat, to fight the unlimited coldness the earth is travelling through; otherwise there  wouldn’t be any Warmist alive, no trees, birds or animals! The ‘’proofs’’ exist; Warmist & Skeptics avoiding the real proofs = proof that they are not interested in the truth = skeptics are condemning the next 5-6 generations into Marxist oppression! ‘’Laws of physics’’ were same in the past, as they are today- and will be same in 100y from now! Best proof that: past phony global warmings / coolings were NEVER global, but were ALWAYS only localized!!!

Past and future ”GLOBAL” warmings are phony BUT: climate always changed in the past, and always will change in the future; and that is essential, H2O changes the climate, not CO2. The best proof that: the climate was always changing in the past, is: in most of the critters and plants – most of their genes have degenerated / useless, those are the ”junk genes” BUT: the ”genes for adaptation and diversification” are still alive, functioning in every plant and critter – to keep those genes functioning; that’s why the good Lord made climate to be in constant change. The old saying: ”use it or lose it” couldn’t be more truth; whoever said that, must have being a clever person.   ***************************

BOTTOM LINE: the misleading propaganda is: -cooling is done by radiation, conduction and convection BUT CO2 is preventing those cooling factors. Stefan Boltzmann / second law of thermodynamic crap. The real bottom line: IF NOT ONE MOLECULE OF CO2 EXISTED IN THE ATMOSPHERE – WOULDN’T BE ”RADIATED” ANY HEAT INTO THE VOID! ALL HEAT IS NEUTRALIZED INSIDE THE TROPOSPHERE, INCLUDING if ANY HEAT PRODUCED BY CO2!

THE TRUTH: #1: ”radiating heat is from one micron to few feet max, when the heat is over a few hundred degrees; it has nothing to do with heat from the ground! From the ground to out of stratosphere is much more than a few microns; can YOU prove that?

#2:conduction of heat is zero! Because the troposphere is made up of 998,999ppm of oxygen &nitrogen; they are brilliant insulators, not conductors of heat – the reason they are useful trapped in double glazing,  refrigerator’s double walls, and trapped in any other insulation => ”conduction” of heat in the atmosphere is zero, their most stupid reason!!! #3: heat is ”dispersed” by ”convection” up to 3-10km altitude; to be neutralized by the ”cold vacuum”. ”Radiation” heat from the ground OR from the vertical winds to out in space is THE mother of all deceits! Only super-heated gases from a volcano, or from nuclear explosion go higher than 10km. BUT: the fact is that: if the gases as O&N need extra cooling – they can go much higher than 10km – there is twice as much coldness  available, ”if needed”! Lying that: 2-3C extra heat cannot be cooled in 100y, tops the stupidity and arrogance; when the warmer it is -> cooling increases: in Sahara cools by 30C from midnight to midday, in 12h!!! Warmed CO2 also goes upwards -> to release the warmth  ”DIRECTLY” into the ”cold vacuum” which is abundant on 3-10km altitude, further up, even more ”cold vacuum” is available! Look at chimneys, forest-fires, including the CO2 inside the hot balloon, which: after 2h in the air, most of the gas inside the  balloon is CO2; still lifting 1/2 ton balloon and 7-8 people upwards, to release the warmth ”directly” into the ”cold vacuum’ – warmed CO2 is going up; WV + CO2 as a  ”greenhouse gas” is the biggest lie in the last 150 years!      B U S T E D!

Who is going to help me; we  can make it even more specific: – at 10km altitude it is -90C (-130F) – from the ground up to 10km altitude calibrate on every 10m as shelves; every shelf is higher and is colder by 0,01C or whatever / because air is thinner and more ”cold vacuum” goes through. Next: by every degree oxygen &nitrogen get warmer closer to the ground -> the more they expand -> go up higher, and that’s how they classify themselves how high they should go. Extra heat -> more expansion, the higher they go and cool as fast. For visual experiment as example: put a cup of boiling hot water 100C in your deep freezer compartment and another cup at 50C down in the fridge. Both cups of water will cool down simultaneously, down to 4C (39F) which should be normal temp on the bottom of the fridge. Same with hotter or not so hot gases go up to different altitudes and cool simultaneously (super-heated gases from volcanoes, nuclear explosion go up to 15 -20km and spread like mushroom for the ”cold vacuum” to neutralize the heat easier– because more cooling is required). But all other heat is cooled / neutralized in the first 10km. No need to go higher, but if needed, they can. Well at 10km altitude the temp is -90C, who the hell needs colder than that?! So: whoever invented the phony ”global” warmings and ”global” coolings – is insulting the ”honest laws of Physics” . The physical mechanism of expansion and shrinkage is inherent in every atom of gas, gases shrink when cooled / expand when warmed  AND: the thermometer that the good Lord inserted in every atom, orders instantly: BY HOW MUCH TO SHRINK OR EXPAND. The word ‘’explosion’’  means: expansion of warmed gases! No ‘’delay’’ for 100 years. All gases, including warmed CO2, rise in the atmosphere – to classify themselves as to how high they need to go, to cool themselves is relative to the temp, of other molecules, lighter expanded molecules, when cooled will fall.. If you explain that picture to somebody and he doesn’t want to understand = proof that the character doesn’t want the truth to be known! Make it as ‘’gauge for monitoring person’s honesty and IQ’’.

So: ”vertical winds” same as a conveyor belt collects any heat available on the ground – if no extra heat-> conveyor slows down. For example: forest fire produces lots of heat and CO2 -> nitrogen, CO2 from the fire at 300C go up to 7km altitude – that heat is given to the ‘’cold vacuum’’ and is neutralized in minutes. Now the most important question in the new millennium Q: ‘’what happens to that ‘’cold vacuum’’ when is no forest fire?!”  A: between 3-10km altitude every 9 minutes new ‘’cold vacuum’’ zooms through – most of the time is no extra heat to collect /neutralize – that ‘’cold vacuum’’ goes empty handed,  or  underutilized BUT: it’s so much of it constantly going through; ready to neutralize any extra heat!! B] like if in front of your house garbage truck was passing every 9 minutes in the year, day and night, and weekends – if you put any rubbish – the truck collects it – if you don’t have rubbish -> truck goes empty. That un-utilized cold vacuum that zooms between 3-10km altitude can cancel any extra heat – not just 300C from the fire, or 0,0003C from the CO2, but 1000 times more extra heat! Which proves that: the Creator of our planet had brains!!! He made it to function perfectly under any circumstances; more heat OR even much less heat! Which is better example dear visitor? Maybe you can think of another, even better example – give your name to that example. Skeptics comparing different data obtained from Met Office or IPCC, to prove them wrong = is same as 3y old children comparing the grains of oats Santa gives to Rudolf on different days – instead of saying: Santa doesn’t exist, we’ve grown up!


I’ll tell you, how YOU can take charge of the informative debate; first, you get the experiment, by correct observation: in the morning, you drink your coffee in the yard and observe: the soil is warming up, and vertical winds start speeding up, by 11AM those vertical winds are so strong, can keep high up a man and the glider together of 100kg for hours (they cannot be noticed on the ground, because is their starting point BUT: from 30-50m up, they are already speeding up, reason men with the gliders jumps off the cliff to take off) So: in the morning the vertical winds go up to 2km altitude, by 11AM they go up to 4km altitude – you make a fire in the backyard – the heat from the fire will go up to 6km altitude, to be neutralized by the constantly incoming ‘‘cold vacuum” – heat is produced from that big forest fire on the hills you can see in the distance-> the hot air, including the CO2 produced, will go up to 7km high, for all that heat to be neutralized. Now, start calculating: how much coldness was wasted; from 2km latitude to 20km latitude early morning; then how much is wasted from 4km up to 20km after 11AM, and how much coldness is wasted from 7km upwards, when is no forest fires for the rest of the year (not to mention at night?! ) At night, not that just vertical winds don’t go high up, but they slow down to a breeze, because is not much to cool; but: if it was warmer – they would have being going higher AND would have being faster – instead I don’t think that at night I would have gone up on a hang-glider. YOU calculate all that coldness that zooms trough the troposphere  underutilized from few hundred meters up to 18km altitude, or not utilized  at all?! After you calculate all that, you will know that: there is enough EXTRA coldness in the troposphere, to neutralize 2-3 times(200-300%) times more heat than the earth normally produces.

Therefore: imagine that in this moment is imaginary global warming of 3C– all it would need for those ”vertical winds” to go 150m higher than normal, for 9 minutes, and that extra warming to be neutralized permanently! Now you know how much more extra heat the troposphere can get read off, in no time at all. Would you still approve of the shonky scientists wasting billions in searching for the non-existent global warming?! Should the traitors of humanity academics keep brainwashing the kids in school and university?! I told you the details; now, you tell me about your honesty and honor, should they, should they be stopped?! So: when any extra heat, produced for any reason: #1: vertical winds speed up #2: vertical winds go higher #3: the troposphere enlarges!!! Can CO2 prevent all those natural phenomena? NO, CO2 is integral part of those processes!!!

IF you have done the observation; now you know how the earth is getting cooled; you know much more regarding the cooling, than any ” climate scientist” on the planet! You know THE TRUTH, they have only lies.


My theories / ”Stefan Mitich theories” will win; because the truth always wins on the end. Spread the good news to the public, that: the phony ”global” warming is just that, phony! Both camps are barking up the same wrong tree!

Do ANY of those ”Climate Modellers” take into account the truth and all the proven facts here?! #2: show this post to any Fundamentalist Warmist & Skeptic, you will see: if that person was ever interested in the truth, or is wasting his life in fairy-tales and fanaticism. Genuinely concerned person about the phony global warming – would have appreciated real proofs; that there is no such a thing as ”global” warming, therefore: will not be any in 100y from now! In 100y, same as today, some places will be warmer than previous year – SIMULTANEOUSLY other places will be cooler than previous year = ”OVERALL” temp will be always the same – that’s the real ”global” temperature! Taking some  warming in some place for few days, and presenting it as ”global” is the sleaziest Warmist’ trick / for the ”Skeptics” it  is a norm, to do that by ”proxy”… Please spread the good news and the truth to the public – not many secular Skeptics & Warmist left on the global warming blogosphere, needs to be presented on every other chat show, Facebook and most important, direct to the public! 90% of the public on the street prefer the truth

P.s if you present any fact / proof from this post to a person from any camp and is trying to avoid the truth, or tries to silence you = the person is either part of the Warmist Organized Crime; or is already a ”collateral damage”, from the aggressive misleading propaganda. Warmist are ridiculing the Skeptics for ignorance – because: The good Lord put their own dirty asses on a place where they can never see it, BUT others can see it! Calling somebody ‘’climate change denier’’ is the biggest lie; climate is in constant change; we are GLOBAL WARMING DENIERS!!!                                                                                 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Both Emperors are Naked!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted in Archives, Recent Possts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 43 Comments

Global Warming ”OR” Climate Change

Yes, Global Warming ”OR”  Climate Change? 

Those are two different things – climate is in constant change – ‘’global’’ warmings are a con. Obviously the leading Warmist know that; reason they don’t call themselves: ‘’Intergovernmental  Panel for Global Warming’’ because they obviously know that isn’t any GLOBAL warming!

Wet/sunny weather – good/bad weather = that’s weather; for few days.

Summer climate – winter climate – sea-level climate – high altitude climate – tropical climate – temperate climate – desert climate – rainforest climate – wet climate – dry climate; BUT, sometimes wet climate gets dry / dry climate gets wet / rains. On the other hand, ‘’GLOBAL’’ warming, or global cooling overall doesn’t exist – that’s what the NORMAL laws of physics say! Some places gets hotter days than previous years – other places instantly / simultaneously gets colder days (but warmer nights) than previous years – otherwise the winds would have stopped; the planet is a big place! Q: can you prevent going from ”winter climate” into ”summer climate” by imposing carbon tax?

Past and future ”GLOBAL” warmings are phony BUT: climate always changed in the past, and always will change in the future; and that is essential, H2O changes the climate, not COT. The best proof that: the climate was always changing in the past, is: in most of the critters and plants – most of their genes have degenerated / useless, those are the ”junk genes” BUT: the ”genes for adaptation and diversification” are still alive, functioning in every plant and critter – to keep those genes functioning; that’s why the good lord made climate to be in constant change. The old saying: ”use it or lose it” couldn’t be more truth; whoever said that, must have being a clever person.

B]Concentrating on a small place difference in temp and referring it as ‘’GLOBAL’’ was the basic climatologist lie since Darwin published his book= they started playing god…? climatologist didn’t start lying in the 80’s, lying was always their bread and butter. C] ”Skeptics” using the shonky ”proxy data” are assisting blindly the Warmist – if the skeptics didn’t exist – the Warmist would have invented them…

The story goes: heat is ‘’radiating’’ from the ground up to the stratosphere B] from CO2 in the atmosphere – heat ‘’radiates’’ down towards the ground and keeps the planet warm. In reality, ‘’radiation’’ of heat is very, very lousy, because in-between is lots and lots of oxygen & nitrogen; which are very good ‘’Insulators’’ of heat! The Truth:

1]Listen to this: from a campfire of 700C – radiates only about 3feet, that’s from 700C. The ground, especially in the tropics, gets hot up to 70C-80C, and it ‘’radiates’’ heat about a foot; that’s why dogs suffer much more than human from heat in the tropics, because dog’s head is about a foot from the ground / definitely the heat is not ‘’radiating’’ from the ground for tens of km up into the atmosphere! Everybody knows that: in the fridge walls / door and in the walls of the cool box is air/ oxygen& nitrogen, to insulate heat from coldness, BUT, when it comes to the phony GLOBAL warming… everybody forgets the insulating properties of those two gases. Actually, everybody forgets that those two gases even exist in the atmosphere… precursor of all evil.
In the thermos flask bottle is kept your coffee hot for a whole day, by a small amount of O2&N2 trapped in the walls of the bottle! From the ground to the stratosphere there is 30km tick layer of those two gases = no ”radiation” like that, as promoted, exist!

So, the soil radiates heat a foot above the ground -> horizontal winds collect that heat; and then: the heated air / O&N try to expand – because of the atmospheric pressure – the heated air instead get squeezed upwards, to 2-3km up; when super-heated gases from volcano or atom bomb go to the end of the troposphere and even jumps a foot into the stratosphere (troposphere is; from the ground, up to where is oxygen and nitrogen. O.K, it does the same as: if you start to blow up a balloon on the bottom of the pool, or just get a tennis ball to the bottom of the swimming pool and release it – it will instantly go to the surface and even jump a bit into the air. So, when the hot air goes up, where air is very tin -> expands and releases the heat in that very cold place -> becomes gets very cold -> instantly shrinks and, as heavier per volume from the air below -> that air sinks back down as shotgun pellets, to take more heat. In other words: oxygen & nitrogen are ‘’SHUTTLING the heat up’’ not by the Warmist stupid ‘’radiation’’ of heat, but the vertical winds! That is; the ‘’vertical’’ winds that people with hang-gliders are using, keeps them up in the air for hours, b] the strength of hot air lifts half a ton hot air balloon up. That air in the upper troposphere can never get hot for more than few minutes; because the ”cold vacuum” that we are traveling trough – penetrates in the ”thinner air” every 9 minutes! The earth cannot take with her the ”warmed cold vacuum” because it doesn’t have friction or gravity! The earth is traveling at 108000kmh – that makes that the earth is into ”NEW  cold vacuum” every 9 minutes!!!

2] in the morning, the sunlight can see the CO2 close to the ground – warms it up, and by 9am, most of the CO2 lifts high up to 5-7km altitude. Up there is very cold from the constantly ”new cold vacuum” zooming trough – sunlight keeps the CO2 just a bit warmer than the surrounding air, so that it will stay there all day. In the evening, by sundown, CO2 loses the benefit from the sunlight -> cools instantly and falls down to the ground; that’s the time when the trees, crops are gorging themselves on the good stuff. (at night CO2 is close to the ground as invisible fog)

Which means: ‘’during the day, when the sunlight is on; on that high altitude CO2 cannot get much ‘’warm’’ it’s about zero degree centigrade up there, even in the tropics – that ‘’heat’’ of around zero centigrade cannot warm the warmer air down close to the surface, for a start heat goes only upwards, not down B] you guessed correctly: that heat from the CO2 molecule cannot ‘’radiate’’ to far below; because in the atmosphere, every CO2 molecule is surrounded by lots of O2&N2, as perfect heat insulators! C] experiment: take a red hot iron and place it one foot below your feet -> you will feel the heat, Then place it a foot above your head – you will not feel the heat. Because under the ‘’normal’’ laws of physics: heat goes upwards / coldness goes down. In other words: warmed oxygen, CO2 and nitrogen, when warmed extra, they instantly expand and go up. Speaking of ”radiating heat” is naive; should be referred as: ”O&N SHUTTLING HEAT”:  The truth: Warmist theory busted!!! Can you see why both camps are trying to silence me? Why not one of them mentions ever: ‘’oxygen and nitrogen’’ as if they didn’t exist..  they are 998999ppm in the troposphere. 

Same as in normal greenhouse glass roof – oxygen &nitrogen let the sunlight trough to warm up the ground – then same as glass roof, O2&N2 are slowing down cooling = O2&N2 are the real ‘’greenhouse gases’’. Those two gases don’t exist on the moon. B] CO2 is wrongly referred as a ‘’greenhouse gas’’ because of the minuscule amount; it’s same as putting a postage stamp instead of a roof on the greenhouse – then ad up another 3 postage stamps to represent water vapor, still 99% of the roof would be still open. So much about CO2&H2O being greenhouse gases = all is CON!

And Another Thing:

They ‘’compare: ’’the moon and Venus with the earth; because the moon doesn’t have CO2, earth has some, and Venus has a lot of it = in their opinion reason Venus is the hottest, is CO2’’ 

But, they conveniently overlook that: the moon doesn’t have oxygen &nitrogen – Venus has a bit, but the earth has a lot of it + water; not much water on the moon, or on Venus, is it? They never say that: on the side that is night on Venus, is COLDER than on Antarctic; because the night is 4 months long= they are not comparing apple with oranges, but are comparing apples with a watermelon

On the earth, sunlight goes trough transparent oxygen &nitrogen and warms the surface – then are ‘’slowing’’ cooling at night, because between the surface and the stratosphere, there is 30km thick layer of O2&N2. On the moon on the other hand – as soon as it gets dark, the coldness of over    -100C is touching the ground, instantly. Therefore, on the earth lots of heat is left for next day, AND 2/3 of the earth’s surface is covered with water, which releases heat even slower. How come nobody from both camps cannot notice all that water on the earth, and ALL the oxygen and nitrogen? See what an intensive bias propaganda  can do to grown up people?

2] Venus is closer to the sun and concentration of sunlight per square meter is greater than on the earth or the moon. B] because Venus is closer to the sun; because the sun is much larger / because of the proximity to the sun – about 52% of the surface of Venus is under permanent sunlight and that is accumulative heat created / on the earth is only 50% of the surface area under sunlight. C] on Venus both polar caps are under ‘’permanent’’ sunlight / on the earth one polar cap or the other is in darkness all the time, big difference, isn’t it? On Venus, during the day, the CO2 atmosphere absorbs the sunlight; only about 600m of oxygen is on the surface – when it gets dark, the CO2 atmosphere loses the benefit of sunlight and drops to the surface and pushes the small amount of oxygen outside. That oxygen when spreads on the top of the CO2 atmosphere – slows cooling of the CO2 atmosphere below, even though by than is only 400m thick – that’s enough to keep the heat below. Remember: in the fridge walls and in the hot thermos only few millimeters of oxygen& nitrogen prevent radiation, the heat from escaping?!

And Another Thing:

Skeptics say: Greenland’s ice melted in the past; and because of that, the sealevel was higher by 7m than today, simple arithmetic. So, the Warmist ‘’predicted’’ that: Greenland’s ice will melt again from the non existent global warming and whoosh, will rise the sealevel again! Panic!

Reality: on few places indicates that sea-level was higher, maybe by 7m, I will not argue how much exactly. 2] northern half of Greenland is almost on the north poll – which means: on the northern half of the island, the average temp is -70C, that’s 71C below melting point. If the planet was warmer by 71C, so that the ice can melt = on the equatorial regions the temp would have being 106C, that’s 6C above water boiling point. Everything, trees, animals and bacteria would have cooked in one hour flat, sterilized / evaporated everything… did that really happened?

The truth: for over 100 000 years Gibraltar was closed. There was land bridge between Africa and Spain – the Mediterranean sea didn’t have any contact with Atlantic. 2] about 60 000 years ago, human discovered how to make fire artificially, by rubbing two sticks of wood. Before that, fire was only coming from electric storm – that fire didn’t spread, because was associated with rain; and fire was occasionally created by volcano eruption, which was localized and not regular.

With artificial fire, was regularly, every season – after 20-30 fires on the same place – burns all the vegetation and nutrients; vegetation didn’t come back anymore. Human created big deserts on every continent, just by rubbing two sticks. The mongrels had lots of fun with fires, wasn’t any helicopters, to put the fires off… (which means: human is powerful enough, to destroy the climate by creating deserts – also human is powerful enough, to bring water back in the desert and re-vegetate – only if it wasn’t today’s sick propaganda that: ‘’ CO2 changes the climate’’) 

So, they turned Sahara into desert- desert creates dry heat – evaporation in the Mediterranean sea increased. There wasn’t enough tributaries, to replace the deficit of water evaporated. Creeks and rivers in Sahara dried, Nile decreased water = Mediterranean sea dried – when I say Mediterranean, it included Adriatic, Ionian sea, Aegean and the sea of Marmara (they are all connected) When those seas dried, also Black sea, Aral and Caspian dried, because they are even further away from the ocean. Well, where was all that water gone? Yes, you are correct; that water was gone in the oceans. Those, then ‘’inland seas’’ now they contain twice as much water, than all the water that is trapped in the Greenland’s ice – that’s the water in the past that made the ocean’s level to rise, NOT water from Greenland’s ice! Please note: that scenario today is not possible, because Gibraltar is opened for business; there is direct contact from Atlantic to Black sea. Greenland not guilty!! 

And Another Thing:

Skeptics bit themselves in the chest: 17 years of no ‘’significant’’ warming, they think that will bring them victory…?

In reality, that’s the sneakiest trick the Warmist have pulled. Reality: even if there was any warming, or cooling, they wouldn’t know – because nobody is monitoring on 99,999999999999% of the whole planet. The truth: ‘’by stating that was no ‘’significant’’ warming – the Warmist succeed two things a] to build trust, that they are honest – that’s the most important for any crooked person – Because is in the Warmist’ computers – they can lift the temperature again, when it suits them and b] they don’t say that it didn’t warmed, but ‘’no significant’’ warming…  Which means: ‘’they can monitor even ‘’insignificant’’ warming – WOW! Nobody is monitoring on 99,999999999% of the planet, but they can come up with even ‘’insignificant’’ warming = mother of all lies – unfortunately, the ‘’Skeptics’’ are buying the crap  (stand by, they are for a big shock)

And Another Thing:

Some people don’t trust the 6000 ”TELESCOPIC” thermometers on the ground, that’s monitoring the temp for the scientists; but they trust Satellites are monitoring temp on the ground, WOW! I was told that: on 14 satellites there are thermometers and are monitoring the WHOLE planet’s temperature. 1] there are 24 time zones, therefore: the ‘’14’’ thermometers are overlapping on different time zones. That’s not science! 2] you wouldn’t believe that: from the hospital, the doctor with his thermometer can monitor the temp of every citizen in town, without them going to the hospital… Why don’t you believe; it’s only 5-7km radius! BUT, they want you to believe that: with 14 thermometers from 400km distance, to monitor every variation on the surface temp; which are billions of variations…?

What they actually do is: they take ‘’two-dimensional’’ photo, from the three dimensional atmosphere; just to say that they are doing something and justify for the expanses. Those satellites are not doing much more than what you occasionally see on the weather reports! If the satellite temp monitoring was reliable – they wouldn’t have being spending millions of dollars and billions of man hours, to monitor on the ground. The satellite’s ‘’global’’ temp monitoring is a CON!

Funny enough, some skeptics don’t trust the contemporary monitoring with 6 000 thermometers, BUT, they fanatically, religiously believe in the monitoring from 100y ago, when was only few UNRELIABLE thermometers in Rome, Paris, London and New York only, and nobody was monitoring on the rest of the planet… hypocrisy at its best… They actually ‘’believe’’ the ‘’precise’’ temperature charts for thousand years before the thermometer was invented; when the planet was flat, and half of the planet didn’t exist…? that is aphrodisiac for the Warmist, to screw up the nation much better – knowing that they don’t have mature opponents… Warmist love Skeptic’s hypocrisy.

And Another Thing:

To avoid admitting that is no such a thing as GLOBAL warming – they concocted that: the missing heat is gone deep down in the ocean, and in few years will surface’’   That one is my favored classic; but many already created zombies are debating seriously the subject.

Dear friend: ‘’if you PUMP warmer water trough a pipe deep down – will surface in a jiffy; because ‘’HEAVIER’’ colder water from above will squeeze  the warmer water up, because ‘’warmer’’ water is not as heavy. Same as cooking oil, or fat, doesn’t stay in the middle of the pot of water, or below – because is not as heavy per volume. Having in mind that: that con came from leading Warmist… they are not very smart; only cunning and shameless liars = they know that they can get away with anything, they treat the opponents like 3y old children. No need to wait few years and see that was no missing warmth surfacing. B] no need to go and look for it; the normal laws of physics are the most reliable guidance. Experiment can be replicated in the kitchen.

Water temp at 4C (39F) is the heaviest – that’s how the learned people of the world invented ‘’kilogram’’ one liter of water (10sm3) of water at 4C is one kg heavy; warmer, OR colder water than 4C expands, and is not as heavy per volume. Therefore: water at 4C goes to the bottom and every layer above is by one degree warmer as it goes to the surface water, which is always the warmest, depends on what latitude, to how high it goes. (Only exception is: water of temp 3C to zero degrees CAN be found just above 4C; but that’s self explanatory why – because from 3C  down to zero are not as heavy as at 4C, actually; seawater is liquid to far below zero degrees) which is most of the water in every sea, including in the tropics; because below 100m deep is always dark and cold, cold!!!

2] water is ‘’FLUID’’ and that’s why instantly readjusts itself, by temperature; you cannot have ‘’warmer’’ water below the colder, for more than few seconds, because of readjustment per weights / temperature. Water is not as solid object, which means: you can put block of polystyrene on the bottom, then put brick on the top of it, then put a lump of lead on the top, and will stay that way, BUT with fluid water… NEVER! Don’t let anybody con you that: saltier water can pull and keep higher temp below; because: there isn’t any adhesion between the salt and water molecules. experiment: if you pump via pipe very salty hot water – down to the bottom  in a cold-water pot -> the hot-water will drop most of the salt and will surface instantly. To see that adhesion  between water and salt are almost non-existent: put a very salty cup of water in a pot of fresh water – stir it few times and the salt will instantly disperse to every other molecule of water. Therefore: the lie about: ”the missing heat is deep down in the oceans” is not helping much the professional conmen, on taxpayer’s expenses!

 And Another Thing:

How LIA started:////
Just before LIA, population in north Africa increased – uncontrollable wildfires made Sahara bigger and started producing ”extra” dry heat – that extra dry heat increased evaporation in the Mediterranean, Mediterranean doesn’t have any tributaries to replenish the water deficit from higher evaporation- it’s only Nile – decreasing vegetation upstream decreased water in Nile also. Therefore: EXTRA warm-water from the ”Gulf-stream” was going from Mexican gulf into the Mediterranean – ”gulf-stream” supplies water to Mediterranean and in North-Sea / Baltic – more into Mediterranean = LESS share warm tropical water going to Denmark and Latvia = less warmwater to evaporate around England and less warming the area = LIA. was created.

You will instantly say: but now Sahara is just as big, why and how LIA finished?!! Constant debate when LIA finished, because in the finishing years might influenced other freak events, so, it’s unclear for them, BUT, YOU will tell them exactly which year the LIA officially finished! I’ll tell you how: you go to the library, or Google and find out what year exactly the Suez canal was opened. BECAUSE: from that year on; some of the water ”deficit” from evaporation in Mediterranean was supplied by water coming from the Red sea into Mediterranean (I think was 1883, can’t remember) ”Less gulf-stream hot water” needed to come to Mediterranean = BIGGER share started going to Denmark – more tropical hot-water started evaporating around England and was warming the area = LIA finished!

Plus: you will find out that: since finishing day of LIA until today; LESS water from river Rheine  AND river Seine from Paris drains now in the sea; plus many other small rivers and creeks; because of use lots of water for industries, for bigger cities, much MORE irrigation = LESS cold water from the Alps drains into north sea from Rheine, probably only half of the water now, than during LIA. What that means: because is high evaporation there where hot and cold water meet = north sea and Baltic started sucking EXTRA tropical warm-water from the Mexican gulf – when more warmwater evaporation, warms more England. Do you think that those events affected the WHOLE planet. The ”Skeptics” think so…
The biggest proof of LIA you have is: on a picture people scatting on frozen river Thames for few days. Well, two years ago, 1000miles south/ closer to the equator; in Serbia and Romania rive Danube 10 times bigger river than Thames, was completely frozen for two weeks, well recorded, same as Thames frozen scatting (people record unusual events, good days are boring) , BUT – now the shonks were not able to declare it as: midi ice age for 150y, because: when Danube was frozen and people were dying from cold in England, Poland – at exactly the same time was record braking heat in Australia and people were dying in the big bushfires. Now you know how and why LIA happened – tell the world in your English.

There is logical explanation for all those ‘’cycles’’ phony ‘’global’’ warmings in the past and phony ‘’global’’ ice ages. The ‘’normal / honest laws of physics’’ don’t permit for those events to be ‘’global’’!!! Temp in the atmosphere is as water in the full bucket I.e. you cannot fit another cup of water in the full bucket, it would overflew. B] temp gets to extreme on different places, but NEVER on the whole planet – same as the children’s ‘’see-saw plank’’ the higher one side goes -> the lower the other side goes, simultaneously; both sides of the plank can’t go up, OR down, simultaneously!


fault #1:
All those past ”global” warmings and ”global” coolings and ”cycles” were NEVER global. The normal laws of physics doesn’t permit the ”whole” planet to be warmer, or colder for more than a day, there are logical explanations for what was really happening on individual occasions! Therefore: same laws of physics will be in 100y from now = proofs that is not going to be ”global” warming. b]As long as people on the street think that; the earth’s temp goes up and down as a yo-yo = Warmist won, will rob and oppress the world based on fairy-tales. You people should learn about ”the earth’s self adjusting mechanism” ::: a] earth’s troposphere is like piano accordion – constantly shrinks/expands, as required and wastes all extra heat. b] why did the engineers built bigger radiator in a truck than in small car?.A: truck engine produces 3 times more heat, BUT has same temp as a small car – because truck has bigger radiator – the troposphere (O&N) are the earth’s radiator; can double in an instant, if necessary b] when for ANY reason gets warmer than normal, which is most of the time close to the ground – the ”vertical winds” speed up = same as: when you rev the engine more -> instantly car moves faster, fen next to the radiator speeds up and water pump pumps faster BECAUSE: the engineers that build truck, cars they are smart people and put different size radiators. On the other hand; on the blogosphere, earth’s radiator O2&N2 don’t exist. reason they are ALL comparing earth with the moon and Venus………

fault #2:
the ”correct” monitoring is completely WRONG, not only the manipulated data; therefore: the temp is same every year, BUT, even if there was any fluctuation in temp, nobody would have known!!!

1] monitoring only for the hottest minute in 24h and ignoring the other 1439 minutes, in which the temp doesn’t go up, or down as in the ”hottest” minute…. statistically 1439 against one…
it’s same as: if the car is got 2440 different parts, but you are building that car, ”with one bolt only” you will not get very far…!

2] the ”highest temp minute in 24h, is not at the same time every day!!! sometime is the ”hottest at 11, 50AM, most of the time is after 1pm = that is many more warmer minutes.

3] pointing some place that is warmer than normal – is SAME as saying: ”the planet is warmer by 12C at lunch time, than before sunrise…?

4] a thermometer can monitor the temp in a room; but one thermometer for 10 000km2?

5] even those ”few” (6000) thermometers are not evenly distributed; no honest statistician would have taken to make ”statistic” if he wasn’t told; which individual thermometer, how much area represents.Example: if the workers in 4 countries have their pay packet increased by a dollar, and in 2 countries had ”decreased by a dollar Q: would the ”overall’ all workers in those 6 countries get more money, or less?
(the 4 countries were Luxembourg, Monaco and Belgium and Portugal, increased by a dollar. The other two were India and Chinese workers, decreased by a dollar

6] when is sunny – on the ground is warmer / in upper atmosphere is cooler – BUT, when is cloudy, upper atmosphere is warmer, on the ground cooler – overall same temp; BUT, because ALL thermometers monitoring are on the first 2m from the ground = they are completely misleading!!!

Therefore, the truth: in the 70′s was exactly the SAME temp as today, and will be exactly the same ”overall” GLOBAL temp in 100y = Warmist in jail
unfortunately: in the 70′s they were scaring the people from: CO2 ”dimming effect” that will produce cooling by year 2000 – so they were manipulating the data to reflect ”cooling planet”. After they started scaring the people with global warming and manipulate data ”as warming” — people compare those two ”manipulated” data and confuse the crap out of themselves…

Aristotle said: ”the truth is much more important, than million believers”:
The truth always wins on the end.
Past ”phony global warmings” don’t prove that is not going to be global warming in 100y!!! It only confuses the honest people on the street that the ”global” temp goes up and down as a yo-yo

The truth: in 2100, if you collect ALL the ”extra” warmth accumulated since the Kyoto conference in 97, you wouldn’t have enough extra heat, to boil one chicken egg!!! extra heat in the earth’s atmosphere is not accumulative!!!

so, they are the ”two things” that I’m correct and can prove everything now, no need to wait 100years, when the spend the money and are gone
Q: can you remember in 100y from now to ask them for the money back? The Warmist know the answer on that question

And another thing:

Those posts and pages on this blog cannot get outdated; they are all related, it’s not much, so, read the bloody lot

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments



BOTTOM LINE:  THE ‘’OFFICIAL GLOBAL TEMPERATURE’’ IS: ALL THE HEAT IN THE TROPOSPHERE OVERALL, is ‘’the EARTH’s GLOBAL  TEMPERATURE’’ Forget about USA temp, or Arctic ice, or Antarctic, or Mediterranean, temp in your oven, or heat stored in the sea, in the fossil fuel, or heat stored in plutonium, or in new trees. All the heat they have is: ‘’STORED HEAT’’. Unless is ‘’ALL’’ the heat combined in the troposphere ‘’ONLY’’ and NOTHING MORE = everything else is  misleading / smokescreen for confusion by the Warmist; ignorance, by the Fake Skeptics! Cut the rot / dead wood; to get to the solid proofs / facts.  Cross the irrelevant zeroes – cut the ‘’empty talk’’

2] USING ‘’SEA TEMPERATURE’’ AS ‘’ part of the GLOBAL TEMPERATURE, IS SAME AS INCLUDING THE STORED HEAT IN THE CENTER OF THE EARTH. Con!!! Seawater temp is very important for meteorologist = rain or dry days ahead. Climatologist using the sea-temp anomaly, is only proof of their misleading lies, or ignorance!!!

3] USING THE AMOUNT OF ICE on the polar caps, as indicator for increasing / decreasing of the GLOBAL temperature – is another sleazy / dirty CON JOB! Other factors influence the amount of ice on the polar caps, NOT imaginary increased temp. Average polar temp is minus -30C / water freezes at zero C. That means: needs the planet to warm up by 30C, the temp to start melting the ice. Anybody suggest warmer planet by 30C?! it depends on: A] amount of row material reaching the polar caps for renewal the ice b] speed of the currents below the ice on Arctic C] depends how much freshwater drains from the Russian rivers and that water spreads on the top of the heavy / salty water and protect the ice from the salty water – less or more freshwater makes big difference. By the way: when is ”less” ice on Arctic’s waters -> USA & Europe have harsher / colder winters; laws of physics.

4] ’SEA TEMPERATURE’’ Forget about the temperature in the sea; submarine volcanoes /hot vents when active, increase the temp. Because the earth’s crust is much thinner on the bottom of the oceans; 97% of the active volcanoes / hot vents are on the bottom of the sea, plus: 95% of ‘’the Faulty Line’’ is on the bottom of the sea / most of the activity is around the ‘’faulty lines’’– all that heat released there, is 100% absorbed in the water and spread by the currents B] there is no difference if that heat is still part of the hot magma in the centre of the earth / geothermal heat, or is in the sea-water – that heat is unofficial earth’s heat; same as heat stored in plutonium, or stored in the new trees. Not an OFFICIAL GLOBAL HEAT. ‘Official heat’’ is same as cash – ‘’unofficial heat’’ is as ‘’assets’’  Not surprising,  Warmist are cherry-picking and including the energy stored in the sea; but not energy stored in the new planted trees, or the geothermal heat. Because is suitable for brainwashing, but not the other.

The instance stored heat is released into the troposphere – oxygen & nitrogen (troposphere) by expanding INSTANTLY – waste that extra heat in less than 10 minutes; which was previously stored. But, O&N cannot waste the heat that is ‘’STORED’’ in the center of the earth, or stored in the trees, or stored in the sea-water, or in the fossil fuel, or stored in the plutonium, before is released. (assets are wasted, after they are converted into cash). Fakes on the other hand, are too close behind the Warmist – because of being too close to the Warmist butts, the Fake Skeptics can’t see the reality. Unless the Fakes learn to distinguish between ‘’official’’ and ‘’unofficial’’ ‘’GLOBAL heat’’ they will stay as the ‘’Warmist Puppets’’ born losers = Warmist will keep talking via Fake’s mouths…  the Fakes Skeptics will keep doing the Warmist’ dirty job… (I’m glad that we cleared that one out)

5]winds, ruff sea; cools the surface water by evaporation– winds and ruff sea change locations and strength constantly. Winds from land onto the sea and from sea to land are constant = monitoring in details is theoretically impossible. Nobody can and does monitor, on the 2/3 of the planet = reports are useless and empty talk – apart for confusion and brainwashing. C] below the surface of the water; if is 10cm of 20C, and 55m of 23C; or is the opposite, nobody notices the difference; even though is tremendous difference in the AMOUNT of stored heat. B]‘Self adjusting’’ in seawater, heat regulation is ignored also: as soon as it gets warmer water than normal -> evaporation increases – evaporation is the cooling process. Plus, when evaporation increases -> cloud cover increases – cloud cover over the sea or land gives (I’ve given it in my book the name ‘shade-cloth effect’’. Like sun-umbrella for the land / sea -> clouds intercept big part of the sunlight high above the sea / land = less heat in the seawater – brilliant ‘’self-adjusting mechanism’’ ** Instead, the Shonks declared the non-existent extra heat(missing heat) as: stored heat in the sea…? WOW!!! Double lie, first, that extra heat doesn’t exist. B] if there was any ‘’extra heat’’ in the sea, nobody would have known ( because nobody is monitoring on every depth. Latitude and longitude) C] when is the water on part of some oceans ‘’warmer than regular’’ is from submarine volcanoes and hot vents.

C]Tectonic plate’s locomotion is same as yours – left foot – right foot. You don’t go 10 passes with your left foot, than start with the other. Same with tectonic plates – on some parts move = increased movement – activates the submarine volcanoes + hot vents -> is El Nino – then other parts readjust and create La Nina = increase heat / evaporation on some places – decrease on others. Around Australia is constantly monitored the water temp SOI, but why is happening, is a taboo, because in the climatologist Pagan beliefs, the sun suppose to be doing it. WRONG! Sun Not guilty!! It’s same sunlight where is El Nino and La Nina. Some years SOI is neutral / boring; in other words: not much movement of the plates. On the other hand, ‘’extreme’’ La Nina or El Nino are associated with big earthquakes, tsunamis. Sun-flares, sunspots are affecting electronic gadgets, but not the overall global temperature! Same as: solar eclipse doesn’t produce enough extra coldness, to cool one beer. Even though reflects a lot of sunlight, but O&N shrink instantly / release less heat for the duration of the eclipse – temp overall stays the same!!!

D] moist / dry winds, increase / decrease regularly – lots of evaporation = cooling of the water happens at night… but for them is important only the ‘’hottest minute’’ E] yesterday’s rain brought coldness from high up and cooled the ‘’surface’’ water; below hasn’t changed – but record will show: the Whole ocean as colder by 2C. F] When humidity increases above the sea -> evaporation / cooling decreases. SATELLITE DATA IS THE MOST INACCURATE, otherwise they would have used satellite collected temperature for the land also; wouldn’t have to waste millions of dollars on thousands of people to record temperature for every day on land. Energy / heat in the troposphere is 3 (three) dimensional. It’s stupid data for immature people. Designed exclusively for the fundamentalist and for the Urban Sheep. Instead of monitoring the temperature in the 10-11km of the atmosphere, above the sea – WHICH IS THE BIGGEST PART OF THE ‘’OFFICIAL EARTH’s temp” instead they are into the water temperature, but completely ignore the official temp ABOVE the water; WOW, that’s called: ‘’CON AND A HALF!’’

‘’Sea-water temp is ESSENTIAL for meteorologists – tool for misleading about ‘’OVERALL ‘’GLOBAL’’ temp for the ‘’climatologists Swindlers’’

2]Forget about Arctic temperature, or surface temperature, or Antarctic temp; they are all for confusing the ‘’already confused’’ The whole temp of the troposphere is earth’s temperature!!! If one is taken on Arctic in July, was warmer than normal, England was warmer than normal in May, Brazil in December was warmer than normal, Australia was warmer than normal in January, they are emphasizing – but avoid / overlook places that was colder that normal at those same times at OTHER PLACES… it’s all meaningless crap. Smokescreen / puling wool over ignorant eyes. To get from 10 light years away from the truth, down to only 9 light years: they should take on every monitoring place temperature simultaneously, on the whole planet. For example: at 12 pm Greenwich time to be taken temp on every monitoring place on the planet; then to take it at 8am Greenwich time ‘’on the whole planet’’ and compare those two. Lets call it: ’People’s request, model for monitoring’’

3]Forget about the temperature in the stratosphere. That temp doesn’t fluctuate. B] in the stratosphere are gases as aerosol, helium, ozone. Those gases just seat / spin there and never come to the ground to bring any coldness = they are irrelevant for the planet’s temperature regulation. Are used frequently, for confusion. B]  There is no methane in the stratosphere, it’s a lie. Methane sinks in the ground, because is produced together with other compounds. If some goes up in the atmosphere  at night – as soon as reaches altitude where is sunlight, UV, infrared; zaps it instantly and turns every molecule of methane into 2 molecules of water and one CO2. Staying 10y in the air, is a lie!

4] Forget about cherry picking, always is someplace warmer than normal; unless the Swindler finds out and reports the other place where is colder than normal; he is lying to you; or fundamentalist is usually lying to himself also / reassurance, fear of reality.

5]Forget about the heat in the smelters, converting ores into metals / my oven was yesterday 240C, making roast; does that means that GLOBAL temp is gone up by 225c? Idiots! Energy that came from the sun yesterday and was locked in the trees or crops – then released in 6months or 25y (the word: ‘’energy budget’’ is crap – energy budget = honesty deficient; sky is the limit). Red soil absorbs more heat than rocks – irrelevant if released in the air at 12pm or 11am. It’s not difference than; them talking about the energy locked into the fossil fuel, or into the atoms = con job. Those ‘’energy budgets, positive / negative signals and albedos’’ should all go into Hansen’s & Plimer’s arrses. Sand exchanges heat different than red clay. Fundamentalists from both camps: Q: what’s the difference if CO2 in the air releases the heat 2minutes before, during, or 10minutes after the ‘’hottest minute of the day?! Grow up, guys!! When is windy – oceans cool more; is it windy at same time of the day / night at every place of every sea?! Who is monitoring the fluctuation, is all that data included in the Shonky’s models?!

Rocks and clay don’t go up towards the stratosphere, to release / waste heat and exchange it for coldness. It’s the oxygen + nitrogen; they are 998999ppm, stupid! The amount of wool the Warmist pulled over the Fake Skeptic’s eyes; to keep the Fakes warm and cook their brains, is bigger than Mt Ararat. They will start ‘’researching’’ if the stew, goulash, soup, or french-fries have bigger energy budget and which of them is releasing heat faster ‘’and producing GLOBAL warming… As long as the Fakes are assisting them. There is money to be made on shonky researches. There is no money into acknowledging that: ‘’overall global temp is ALWAYS the same; that’s what the laws of physics and my formulas say!!! Fakes will ‘’search’’ for the ‘’non-existent missing heat’’ in the galaxy and ‘’stupid galactic dust, in sunspots, under the rocks and in the Warmist’ crevices; as part of doing the Warmist dirty job

6]Forget if the sea-level goes up or down, that has noting to do with any phony GLOBAL warming. There are real reasons for it.  ***

7]Forget about the ice on the polar caps + glaciers. They don’t depend on temperature.  Up there average temp is minus -30C. On the land, ice is melted from below, by the geothermal heat / on the sea is melted by the salty water / sweater can melt ice below zero centigrade. Ice regularly sacrifice some of itself – melts and as freshwater separates the rest of the ice from the salty water. B] if the currents increase speed -> take that ‘’freshwater’’ away – needs more and more ice to melt = less, or no ice. 2] 80% of the Russian rivers drain into the arctic – that freshwater spreads on the top of the heavier salty water and shields the ice from the salt. Less water drains from the rivers = less ice on arctic -> the con-artists from both camps are blaming the phony GLOBAL warming. Then next year more freshwater from the rivers drain and protects / creates extra ice -> the Fake Skeptics start beating themselves in the chest that: it’s more ice, must be colder planet… which is even more stupid and wrong, than what the Warmist promote. More ice / less ice; 100% depends on the availability of raw material for renewal of the ice every winter. That raw material ‘’water vapor’’  in the air, is treated as ‘’ bad for the climate’’ by the fanatics from both camps. Are Sahara and Brazil not big enough differences, as proofs, to notice the truth?

On Antarctic ice is melted constantly; day and night; summer and winter, by the geothermal heat. Needs replenishing every season. In El Nino year – more moisture goes on the side of Antarctic that is supplied with moisture from the eastern part of south Pacific – Antarctic peninsula gets more ice created -> the Fake Skeptics get in overdrive: yes, yes, there is more ice; planet must be getting colder!!! Then La Nina comes -> Warmist start with their bigger noise: look, look; ice is disappearing, panic, BOO!!! What a science… what a criminals… They cannot see and connect that: Australia gets one year more rain on the East-coast, another year on the west-coast. Well, rain is made from the same thing that replenishes the ice on the polar caps, idiots! Instead of paying attention to that thing, extra  ‘’water vapor’’ creation – the maggot brains are into CO2 molesting

They will stop molesting the ‘’ESSENTIAL CO2’’ when the people on the street know that: as soon as heat is released from wood, coal, volcanoes, smelter, plutonium, from the sea, from your oven, into the air; ‘’then it becomes /belongs as ‘’GLOBAL temperature’’. Oxygen & nitrogen cannot get read of the heat that is stored in the seawater or in the volcano, before is released into the atmosphere – when is released, no matter how much extra – O&N get read of it in less than 10 minutes. No matter if its heat in your room, backyard, Arctic, equator, 2-40-700m  in the air, or on 1-5-20km altitude. That is GLOBAL temperature. ALL OF IT, COMBINED!!!

Cherry picking every day; is for confusion, not science. For the last 20 years they have being cherry picking for warmer places – they could have being successfully cherry picking for COLDER places than normal, also; because simultaneously always is colder than normal on other places. Same as moving dollar coins from one pocket into the others = you have pockets with more dollars / but simultaneously have pockets with less dollars. That doesn’t make you richer or poorer = that doesn’t make GLOBAL warming; if England or Texas is warmer than normal, because some other places is colder than normal at that same time. Same goes for the Fakes to know: if Texas, England get colder than normal – it doesn’t mean that the WHOLE planet is getting colder! It only means that: the Fakes are even more stupid than the Warmist B] some other places simultaneously is warmer. Not very complicated, is it?

GLOBAL cooling is for the Fakes, if is colder than normal some places – because is warmer other places, or warmer in upper atmosphere. HEAT in the TROPOSPHERE IS THREE DIMENSIONAL, and changes every few minutes on different latitudes / altitudes!!! Using in account the temp only 2m above the ground, on few places; is top stupidity. Must be the warmth in the ‘’WHOLE’’ troposphere taken into account! All other crappy staff is for creating zombies / fanatics / rip-off and destruction of the democratic west. CO2 is increasing, not a hint of GLOBAL warming; fake Skeptics are looking for reasons why. Because isn’t such a thing, idiots, stop helping the Warmist. The Fake Skeptics are the biggest Sadomasochists. Stop looking for the ‘’imaginary’’ missing heat in the galaxy, sunspots, or under the rocks, or in the Warmist’s crevices; to shield the Warmist. Warmist must present the extra warming – or admit guilt. Not when the Fake psychos are looking for the missing phony  heat – instead of demanding justice for the Warmist Swindlers.

IF THE ”SKEPTICS” DIDN’T EXIST – WARMIST WOULD HAVE INVENTED THEM. Many of them are actually Warmist – as ”pretend Skeptics – to give impression that they are arguing about the non-existent GLOBAL warming – which they all support, by using loaded comments, as: -”because of the ”GLOBAL warming” since the 60’s..” NO, fellas, in the 70’s the same shonky profession was promoting: ”Nuclear Winter for year 2000” BECAUSE OF CO2 DIMMING EFFECT. B] or: it’s natural GLOBAL warming since the last ”LIA”……….. WRONG!!!  LIA wasn’t GLOBAL cooling – it was colder than normal in Europe for few weeks in the year, wasn’t colder the WHOLE planet, you Sadomasochists!!! Stop shooting yourself in the foot with a machine-gun.

When any extra heat is released, or produced in the air / troposphere; on the place / places released -> that O+N expand upwards, according to the extra amount of heat released. Intercept EXTRA coldness, to equalize, than instantly shrink again; not to redirect too much extra coldness. That’s what regulates the global temperature. Any other heat than the heat in the troposphere; is a smokescreen. No matter if is Arctic’s, Antarctic’s heat, or heat in the sea, or heat stored in the atoms, in the fossil fuel, or in your oven; ONLY becomes GLOBAL temp, when is released in the air, not before. All the solar/galactic influences on the earth’s climate is much less than one Al Gore’s fart!  Phony Skeptics, go and catch that fart, to prevent your phony GLOBAL warmings.

1] Presenting the unreliable ‘’IRRELEVANT’’ seawater temperature; to insinuate that the WHOLE planet is warmer, or colder; is bottom of the septic tank job / science!!!

2] presenting the amount of ice on Arctic ocean; as indicator of warmer / colder, the Whole planet; is from the bottom off the same septic tank! B] Where Greenland has 1km thick ice – on Same latitude, in Finland, Norway tomatoes are growing – on SAME latitude in Siberia is permafrost (permafrost is desert in a cold country) Climatologist not knowing that: the amount of ice on the polar caps depend on the ‘’availability of raw material’’ to replenish the ice deficit – is not a climatologist; but an arrogant dumb lunatic… or a professional extremist Swindler. Nobody knows what was the earth’s temperature last year, to save his life – the Fakes ”pretend” to know exact temperature for hundreds and thousands of years ago= by that, only advertising their dishonesty and stupidity; as born losers…

All the Warmist and most of the Skeptics work on atmosphere without oxygen & nitrogen; as if the atmosphere was made exclusively from CO2 & methane, big mistake.


 All normal greenhouses have solid glass roof. Glass is transparent for the sunlight; but ‘’SOLID’’ prevents hot air of getting out. On the other hand; CO2 is NOT transparent for the sunlight – intercepts sunlight high up = less comes to the ground.

 b] CO2 & water vapor are less than 3% of the atmosphere, the rest is oxygen &nitrogen. Which means: ‘’ if one removes 97% of the roof off a normal greenhouse – that wouldn’t be a greenhouse anymore!’’ When there is a small hole on the roof of a normal greenhouse – farmer instantly plugs the hole – heat not to escape out. Warmist are lying for profit and power / why are the ‘’Skeptics’’ misleading for, by referring CO2 &H2O as ‘’Greenhouse Gases?! Because of ignorance, or b: because they are born losers??

There is no such a thing as warmer the WHOLE planet – therefore, the Warmist don’t have a case / it’s all lies; but the Fakes are covering up the Warmist lies / shame – by inventing phony GLOBAL warmings = the ”Skeptics” became Warmist’ Fig Leafs

why is rising CO2 in the air seen as bad? Why depletion of the essential molecule CO2 is not seen as bad?!

Rain washes the CO2 into the sea, the more of it is – the more it washes down. Coral, algae, shellfish collect CO2 from the water – when they are dead -> get buried and cemented carbon for millions of years in form of limestone… Before the industrial revolution, CO2 was depleted to critically low level for the trees & crops. What’s wrong of having a bit more of it?!!! DOESN’T FIT THE CONTEMPORARY PROPAGANDA!!!


If there wasn’t one molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere; temperature would have being exactly the same as it is now – because CO2 has NOTHING to do with the temp; which is completely / 100% regulated by oxygen &nitrogen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments



 YOU WILL NEVER WIN, BY SPOOKING THE PUBLIC THAT; THE EARTH’S TEMPERATURE GOES UP AND DOWN AT A DROP OF A HAT! IT’S MISLEADING, AND ONLY HELPS THE WARMIST PROPAGANDA! Shakespeare said: -‘’ you have to be cruel, to be kind’’ So: if you are clever, you’ll take a hint:

THE ORIGINAL SINNERS, WERE / ARE, THE LEADING ”FAKE SKEPTICS’’ The only way sceptical people can get on the front foot, and win; is to expose their own leaders, still promoting the original misleadings, of the past; ”localized warmings, as GLOBAL; which was the Genesis /had given inspiration to the Warmist. Warmist are 100% wrong; therefore, the skeptical people are correct; but will never win by using the old Pagan lies.

If the ”Skeptics” can understand that: ’’climatologist didn’t start lying in the 80’s; lying was, and it is their bread and butter. They cannot produce anything that can be sold in the supermarket => all the lies they produced in the past – the ”Skeptics” are using them as factual; by using those lies, they are trying to disprove about the latest lies ”global warming in 100 years”…?! THE TRUTH: localized temp changes every 10-15 minutes, otherwise the winds would have stopped-BUT: overall global temp is ALWAYS the same! Because of the Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism (TSAM) Extinctions in the past were not happening because the whole planet was getting warmer or colder! Here are some proofs:

Past localized warmings / coolings; were presented by them as, GLOBAL. Warmist are exploiting the leading Skeptic’s misleadings as shield – are keeping those leading Skeptics in ‘’check mate’’ position. If the leading ‘’Skeptics’’ admit that the past warmings / ice ages were localized = Warmist castle will collapse. But that would be admission that Skeptic’s Fairy-tales were the foundation for the Warmist lies – simultaneously exposing the leading Fake Skeptic’s smelly skeletons in their closed. Well, lets expose some of those lies / smelly skeletons:::

Mythology#1: Little Ice Age is, LIAR’s Lie / Fake’s Flagship, ‘’Smoking Cannon’’

Their proof is: river Thames was freezing in winter for 10 days; they have a painting of people skating on the river – that is a proof of the phony GLOBAL cooling for 300y, wow, WOW!!! River Thames frozen for few days, because of freak weather = the WHOLE planet turned for them into an ‘’Ice Age, for hundreds of years’’  We are lucky that they don’t judge by Australian rivers. Most get dry for few months in the year = they would have declared that ‘’planet earth doesn’t have a drop of water for the last 1000 years’’ #2: River Danube frozen risontly was ignored – even though is 10 times bigger river and 1000 miles closer to equator.

P.s. I was reprimanded that they have more proofs for their LIA; so I’m inserting into this old post:: proof#1: in old literature discovered that in March in china orchard suffered from frost. Well that was 11 years before than river Thames was frozen. When Chinese orchard was suffering from frost because of cold came for few days over Siberia, was nothing wrong with Thames. Proof #2: in literature is discovered that ” emigrants to America suffered from too much cold” -/- I believe that they were suffering from cold, same as now Syrian refugees on the Balkans are suffering from cold, because they didn’t have roof over their heads and dry cloths, nothing to do with any phony LIA. By the way – because they stretched it to 100y, then became 300y LIA – during those years was 1000 heatwaves on 100 places around the planet, but that was ignored, because didn’t fit the Hubert Lamb’s theology, wasn’t on his globe…?!

How LIA started:
Just before the phony LIA, population in north Africa increased – uncontrollable wildfires made Sahara bigger Sahara, and started producing ”extra” dry heat – that extra dry heat increased evaporation in the Mediterranean; Mediterranean doesn’t have any tributaries to replenish the water deficit from higher evaporation- it’s only Nile – decreasing vegetation upstream decreased water in Nile also. Therefore: EXTRA warm-water in the ”Gulf-stream” was going from Mexican gulf into the Mediterranean – ”gulf-stream” supplies water to Mediterranean AND in North-Sea / Baltic – more into Mediterranean = LESS share warm tropical water going to Denmark and Latvia = less warm-water to evaporate around England and less warming the area = LIA. was created.

You will instantly say: but now Sahara is just as big, why and how LIA finished?!! Constant debate when LIA finished, because in the finishing years might have influenced other freak events, so, it’s unclear for them, but, YOU will tell them exactly; which year the LIA officially finished! I’ll tell you how: you go to the library and find out what year exactly the Suez canal was opened. BECAUSE: from that year on; some of the water ”deficit” from evaporation in Mediterranean was supplied by water coming from the Red sea into Mediterranean (I think was 1883, can’t remember) ”Less gulf-stream hot water” needed to come to Mediterranean = BIGGER share of warm-water started going to Denmark – more tropical hot-water started evaporating around England and was warming the area = LIA finished!

Plus: you will find out that: since finishing day of LIA until today; LESS water from river Rheine  and river Seine from Paris drains now in the sea; plus many other small rivers and creeks from Latvia to northern Spain; because of use of lots of water for industries, for bigger cities, much MORE irrigation = LESS cold water from the Alps drains into north sea from Rheine, probably only half of the water now, than during LIA. What that means: because is high evaporation, where hot and cold water meet = north sea and Baltic started sucking EXTRA tropical warm-water from the Mexican gulf – when more warm-water evaporation, warms more around England. Do you think that those events affected the WHOLE planet? Most of the ”Skeptics” think so… For most, England is ‘’the globe’’

The biggest proof of LIA you have is: on a picture people scatting on frozen river Thames for few days. Well, two years ago, 1000 miles south/ closer to the equator; in Serbia and Romania river Danube 10 times bigger river than Thames, was completely frozen for two weeks, well recorded, same as Thames frozen scatting (people record unusual events, good days are boring) thousands color photos were made, BUT – now the shonks were not able to declare it as: midi ice age for 300y, because: when Danube was frozen and people were dying from cold in England, Poland – at exactly the same time was record braking heat in Australia and people were dying in the big bush-fires. Now you know how and why LIA happened – tell the world in your English: when the person was painting, people scatting on Thames – at same weeks in Australia was scorching heat, hotter than normal!

The ”honest” people refer for the phony LIA as the Renaissance. It was the time of biggest prosperity in Europe. They introduced paper, invented the printing press. From America were introduced in Europe potatoes, corn, capsicums, pumpkins and other crops (I’m not going to mention tobacco) They were bringing wealth from the colonies, great prosperity! To make a phony LIA from a photo; needs fertile imagination for crap… (there are pictures taken from Australian Aboriginal people, ”naked” over 200y ago, even in snowy Tasmania) Therefore: – Australia was on different globe during the phony LIA…?!

There is logical explanation for all those ‘’cycles’’ phony ‘’global’’ warmings in the past and phony ‘’global’’ ice ages. The ‘’normal / honest laws of physics’’ don’t permit for those events to be ‘’global’’!!! Temp in the atmosphere is as water in the full bucket I.e. you cannot fit another cup of water in the full bucket, it would overflew. B] temp gets to extreme on different places, but NEVER on the whole planet – same as the children’s ‘’see-saw plank’’ the higher one side goes -> the lower the other side goes, simultaneously; both sides of the plank can’t go up, OR down, simultaneously! Spooking the public that the overall global temperature goes up and down at a drop of a hat, because of the established Pagan beliefs, tops all stupidity…!!!  Warmist lie that is warmer, AND: Skeptics are refusing that is ‘’man made’’ and are searching; what is making that global warming – instead of saying the truth, that: -‘’is not man made, or women made, it just doesn’t exist, planet is not warmer! Stop assisting the Warmist, idiots!

Warmist are disowning  “LIA”  as GLOBAL cooling – that makes them a bit more honest; than people in Plimer’s camp, and few others. Because of them, Warmist are still prospering, and will run all over the skeptical people; until the ‘’original’’ scam is exposed. A] there is no ‘’pause’’ – instead of Warmist admitting that is no global warming – they invented the ‘’pause’’… Skeptics embraced as a god given present… because: in their theology, either is getting warmer, or colder – same temp for prolong time never happens. So; Warmist proved to the politicians and the media that: Skeptic’s reasoning and understanding of the phony global warming is as a 5y old child, or a 25y old fencepost…

FAKE’s Mythology#2: Vineyards in England, in medieval ages; their proof of former Global Warming “on the whole planetIn reality, as it was getting colder for their mini ice age on the northern hemisphere, nature made another confusion for the Skeptic scientists; Fakes to have another phony proof… please join the circus1] They were growing vineyards in southern England. It was warmer climate than today – without factories and carsThe truth: you can grow vineyards today in the same place and will grow perfectly. But you will not get much crops for vino out of it. Vineyards don’t like damp soil and the worst is: the grapes don’t like rain, when ripening. First shower splits the grapes, the second makes them to rot, instead of ripening. 70km south, cross the channel in France are the best vineyards. They have dryer climate, nothing to do in 70km difference in Fake’s global warming without CO2. So, they were growing in England vineyards, not to buy vino from “the enemy” France. They had some grapes to eat; when they realized that is uneconomical, they gave up. The land was better to be used for what is economical. English started getting much better and chipper wine from Rhodesia and South Africa*  Same as: Australia was producing lots of tobacco – for the last 3-4 years, not a single twig of tobacco; because they can get it much cheaper from Indonesia, Philippines. That should be declared by the ‘’English Vineyards, Conmen’’ as ‘’GLOBAL cooling’’ because in Indonesia is warmer than in Australia. That tells about their integrity and fertile imagination; not about the global temperature. (Reason they are obsessed with silencing me) you can’t silence the truth guys! (people have being growing grapes for 1500 years in southern Siberia, and in Canada for 300 years) now they are scaring people of warming, in that fridge called Canada…

B]If there is 50y war between England against France and Spain, English will start growing vineyards again. Not to bring on horseback grapes and vino from Italy. (That was before the steamships). Especially after Britain colonized lots of warm countries with cheap labor – they were not stupid to have vineyards in England. But for the shonky experts, in 13 century the Poms produced wine = must have being warmer planet – because in the 17-19 sentry didn’t produce = must have being colder the WHOLE planet. What kind of science is that? They were not producing it, because was coming from Rhodesia and south Africa for half price +much better wine. In Australia we didn’t stop producing shirts and socks, because of the phony global warming; but because is cheaper to be produced in Fiji and China. (previous sentence should stay as record – in 500y some shonky scientists not to use it as: in 2010 Australians stopped producing socks and shirts =proof of global warming / or: Australian aboriginal people started to use socks for the first time = must be the biggest GLOBAL Ice Age ever). 

In Cornwall, Devon (England) the climate is on average a degree or two warmer/ milder than in Paris! In Austrian Alps is colder than in southern England – Austrians have perfect vineyards. Grapevine is very versatile, can grow in the tropics (if is not too wet) can also grow in very cold climate. Poms as experiment should plant some vineyard on some undulating area with good drainage, will grow better than in Italy (they will not have much to harvest, but rotting grapes – because of, wet climate is bad for that fruit)

The truth: because was less ice covering the arctic’s water = colder water was going from there to Mexican Gulf and then to Baltic / North Sea = less humidity England had less rain = better/ “dryer” climate for vineyards. Climate is controlled by H2O / water- regarding global temperature distribution – is controlled by oxygen + nitrogen – shrinking / expanding in change of temperature. There is no ‘’unknown unknowns’’ What kind of twisted mind will declare ‘’the WHOLE planet warmer, because of few Vineyards in England?! As long as they keep the propaganda on the front pages = taxpayer’s money will be wasted on shonky researches for no stone unturned!  Crimes shouldn’t pay!!!

Mythology #4: old European paintings with clouds; as proof of their warmer / wetter  “the WHOLE planet” WOW! That one is my favored classic con.** Paintings are, paint on canvas; more of a wishful thinking than reality. I live in the hot tropics – have background picture on my computer monitor; a picture of some hills covered by snow – when it gets intolerably  hot =it’s a feel good, looking at the snow (if any of those fake Skeptics travelled from 2500, back to now – looking at my monitor, would have declared: in 2012, the planet was COLDER by 36C to have so much snow in the equatorial regions…?) As it is pleasant, to look at the snow covered hills; when in summer climate is same as in a Turkish bath = was pleasant for the rich landholders to look at a painting with clouds. Yes, they were able to commission / buy paintings; there was no big factory’s owners.  But the ”scientists” in the ”Climatology Prostitution” have fertile imagination; because their heads are stuffed up with hi doses of red/green bullshit. They didn’t start lying about the global temp in the 80’s, lying was always their bread and butter.

B] instead of Congo, Libya has green flag, as a desert country. C] the biggest white island on the planet is called Greenland. D] Mr. Homer Simpson can do better stunts, than Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Homer is doing his own stunts (he doesn’t need a double, as Arnold, because is ”pictures” in picture can put anything). But for the Skeptic’s voo-doo science: when clouds on some European old paintings = “wetter” climate on the WHOLE planet, if wetter, must have being warmer…?!WOW! I tell you what: when is raining heavily, paint a picture with clear sky – see if the rain is going to stop. Some kind of ‘’rain dancing, in reverse’’ If it works = the leading ‘Skeptics’’ are correct; if it doesn’t, everybody has being conned by them.  Under the Fake’s woo-doo science; should be: Australia is the driest continent – because is no enough Picassos in Australia; marvellous voo-doo science. Plimer should take his crayons to inland Australia in the deserts and paint paintings with lots of clouds; to bring rain into the deserts. BUT not too big clouds, to cause floods…?! It’s called: ”Skeptic’s Rain-dancing Science”

Mythology #5: Norwegian kayaker /explorer in 1884 did go further north; where is today ice on Arctic. (Fake’s proofs of ‘’warmer planet’)  The Fakes  are not just wrong, but back to front as well!

A] the amount of  ice on the polar caps doesn’t depend on the atmospheric temperature. B] on the polar caps is enough coldness, to build another 20km thick ice on the top of the existing one – in one season! It only depends on the ”amount of row material for ice going there / water vapor. When you are having coffee on the polar caps – water vapor from the cup comes out at 95C  (203F) By the time that hot water vapor goes 7-8feet, turns into ice crystals, in 30-50 seconds – for Secular skeptic, that would be enough to understand that: temp for amount of ice on the polar caps is irrelevant C] ice on the Arctic ocean seats on the top of salty seawater (salt is anti-freeze) The ice regularly sacrifices some of itself; melts on the bottom – produces some freshwater – to keep itself separated from the salt – if currents get stronger -> need to sacrifice more and more. Therefore, depends “on the amount of raw material” in the atmosphere arriving there – by freeze-drying the moisture from the air = for regular replenishing.

D] 80% of the water from the Russian rivers drains into the Arctic – that freshwater spreads on the top of the heavier salty seawater and is protecting the ice – less water drains = less protection! (south of the water catchment areas for those rivers, is the great Aral Sea, turning into a salt-pan – more dry heat produced around the Aral ‘’swamp’’ – dries the air north = less water in those rivers to drain into Arctic = less protection for the Arctic’s ice! Is the truth so boring for them? There are always legitimate proofs!

E] Mediterranean system is very close to Sahara and Arabian deserts – the more Sahara expanding = more dry heat produces = higher evaporation in the Mediterranean. No big rivers to replenish the deficit of the evaporated water. That deficit comes by the Gulf-stream, from Mexican Gulf – Mexican gulf must siphon extra water from the Arctic ocean – Arctic to replenish the deficit – gets extra salty warm-water from north Pacific – that enlarges the ‘’North/west Passage, and – via the Norwegian current; goes south into Atlantic. In the process goes under the Arctic’s ice and is melting it. F] river Nile is to a trickle, but river Danube on some years produces extra water – that slows the water going from North Pacific via Arctic via Mexican Gulf. Please note: speeding / slowing of those currents; ‘’affects the climate on different places / countries, differently’’!!! G] Sahara’s dry heat goes west into north Atlantic – more dry heat = destroys more of the ‘’raw material’’ for replenishing the Arctic’s ice. None of those natural factors that dictate the amount of ice is taken in consideration by the Demagogues, from both camps! Human can help increasing the Arctic’s ice, instead of decreasing it; by slicing regularly chunks of it, by the Ice Crusher Sips!!! Arctic’s water without ice as insulator, absorbs much more coldness -> colder currents go into Atlantic -> less evaporation -> less raw material for replenishing the ice. Not complicated, is it?

H] Couple of years before the ‘’Norwegian kayaker’’  went kayaking north – ‘’working people”  built the Suez Canal – some of the deficit evaporated in the Mediterranean system – started to come from the Red Sea. It’s a small contribution; BUT IS ACCUMULATIVE! Every year a bit more = ice on Arctic built up gradually – became milder climate. People can prevent bad things; but because of the carbon misleading and the phony GLOBAL warmings; both camps are part of the same crime, by blaming co2 for every problem. For big crimes, should be appropriate penalties.

Fake’s / Warmist mythology #6: ice is white = reflects the sunlight – no ice on Arctic to reflect the sunlight = GLOBAL warming, panic, BOO”!!!

A] water has mirror effect, reflecting the sunlight also. B] for 6 months in a year, on Arctic ocean is NO sunlight to be reflected. C] white ice, as polystyrene, is full of air – air is the perfect insulator. In winter, temperature above the ocean drops to minus -70C. Less ice as ‘’insulator’’ ->water absorbs EXTRA coldness (they are not just wrong, but back to front on everything) Ice was decreasing – Warmist were hoping for GLOBAL warming / Skeptics were searching for new lies – then a week after ‘’the Copenhagen Flop’’ USA, Europeans started freezing to dearth; confused both camps. Grandma’s saying: ‘’the Devil doesn’t have any other job; but to help idiots to make fools of themselves’’

It happened for 2 winters – by having less ice – water was absorbing extra coldness – with double strength, as ripples, that coldness was intercepting all the moisture in USA / north Europe and created blizzards there. In the process – colder water was going south and then to the Mediterranean -> decreased evaporation -> current slowed -> ice replenished itself (self adjusting) The Fakes spotted more ice on Arctic – started dancing; GLOBAL warming stopped! In reality, GLOBAL warming never even started – unfortunately,  the section of their brains for honesty and common sense is clinically dead.

That confused the Warmist Swindlers also – they were expecting warming; instead, the ice started replenishing / opposite than their mythology… So, the Russians, with the biggest nuclear Ice Crusher Ship started taking every second week;  tourist direct to the North Poll. Because Arctic’s ice moves clockwise, they cannot use same corridor; they were slicing a new corridor every two weeks. Those slices floating south, created gap without ice – absorbed EXTRA coldness – the winds took that extra coldness south to central Europe -> the coldest winter in living memory. What I’m saying: when you know from which part of the arctic, in which direction wind blows- see which part of Arctic’s waters don’t have ice = you can easily predict where the blizzards are going to hit. B] if people know that the truth is opposite – can prevent senselessly vandalizing the ice! C] for now, because of their wrong mythology and refusing to recognize the truth from me; it makes both camps ‘’Premeditated Mass Murderers’’

Fake’s mythology #7:VIKINGS ON GREENLAND

Vikings were going to Greenland in medieval ages; but they were calling ‘’Green-land’’ the southern patch of ground on the biggest white island on the planet, NOT the whole island. The ‘’bull’’ fertile imagination of the Shonky ‘’researchers’’; declared that: ‘’big part’’ of the island was green, because of its name, and the WHOLE planet warmer… ? WOW! It was a bit LESS ice then, because was ‘’colder’’ not warmer area (definitely nothing to do with the WHOLE planet!) Southern tip of Greenland is the ”globe” only for the common sense and honesty deficient people…).  Arctic ocean had less ice at that time – currents were taking ‘’COLDER’’ water into Atlantic – > therefore, it was LESS evaporation = therefore it was ‘’less raw material’’ to replenish the ice deficit on Greenland. (ice on Greenland (Terra Firma) is melting constantly; summer and winter; from below, by the geothermal heat) Therefore, the  amount of ice depends on the availability of raw material, for replenishing the ice. That ‘’raw material’’  ‘’water vapor’’ is declared as BAD FOR THE CLIMATE, by both camps. None of them can notice that: where is now 1km thick ice on Greenland – on SAME latitude in Norway, Finland  is forest and potatoes growing – further east, on SAME latitude in Siberia is Permafrost (permafrost is desert in a cold country)

Because Greenland is wedged between Atlantic and Arctic oceans – ‘’water vapor from Atlantic going north, is intercepted by Greenland. Norway is far away from Atlantic – Siberia even further away. So, on places where lots of ice is accumulating in winter, that ice, keeps more coldness than air can – protects itself in summer. Reason you put in your cool box ‘’cold ice’’, instead of ‘’cold air’’ Is it starting to make sense? In your cool box 2-3kg of ice, keeps cold for 2 days. On Greenland is much more than 4kg of ice / on Antarctic is much more than 8kg of ice; to keep it frozen; if for few days in a year the temp gets over zero C (ice melting point).

B] the ‘’researchers’’ found that: Viking’s artefacts are getting exposed by the melting ice on Greenland = that’s their proof that: at that time, the WHOLE PLANET was WARMER?What a science (Greenland is their ”globe”)

C] let me tell you something: during WW2, number of US aircrafts, on the way to Europe, landed on the top of Greenland’s ice. Those planes are now 178m below the surface of the ice. Next year will bee deeper by 2m. In another few hundred years; because ice is constantly melted from below, by the geothermal heat – and similar amount is added on the top, by freeze-drying the moisture from the air, they will be on the solid ground, on the bottom, covered by a 1km thick ice, on the top of them. Did the Vikings fly DC3 aircraft? 2] some Viking must have lost his compass and ventured to the far northern part of Greenland – frozen to death. By now, his skeleton is down on the solid ground. If discovered by drilling for some minerals or other reason, the Fakes will declare that: 90% of Greenland was a green pasture / they found the Viking ”Sheppard in sheepskin” on the bottom. Magic for the ignorant, which believe the shonky ‘’researchers’’. If any of those WW2 pilots lost sunglasses on the northern part of Greenland’ when they gradually sink to the bottom -the Fakes will declare that: the Vikings were going to north Greenland’s beaches, on summer holiday… (in 20y they will be finding discovered mobile telephones 40m deep into the ice – for the science 40m represents 15000 years)

Time to start believing in Stefan’s theory, that: the ice on Greenland, Antarctic is melted from below; by the geothermal heat / day and night, summer and winter. The deficit must be replaced by freeze-drying the moisture from the air. When no deficit replaced, because of no sufficient water vapor’’ in the air = Warmist go in overdrive: look, look global warming, because is less ice. B] when more moisture comes to there = more fresh ice gets created = the Fake Skeptics, as the dumbest of the dumb; go into overdrive; look, look, more ice, must be GLOBAL cooling! (the truth: up to 2m of ice is melted on the bottom every year, by the geothermal heat / similar amount is created by freeze-drying the moisture from the air. Same way, as the old freezers were creating ice, with ZERO snow / rainfall in the kitchen – from the humid air, when often the fridge door is opened -> ‘’water vapor’’ gets on a cold place = ice; called: ”freeze-drying the air from moisture; Greenland & Antarctic don’t have doors!!! For  the Swindlers from both camps; water vapor is bad…? Vikings were not dumb, as the contemporary ‘’researchers’’ Those researchers inserted that; Vikings were growing even vineyards on Greenland. WOW, they were growing maybe pineapples and bananas on Greenland…? Make it more interesting and convincing of being warmer the WHOLE planet, guys

Instead, the con Artists, made it into ‘’GLOBAL warming’’ because of the adventures /opportunistic Vikings. That was long before the thermometer was invented. B]Vikings were going from Scandinavia south to Sicily ”at that SAME time” that should be for them as equal proof of GLOBAL cooling?! (at the same time when they were going to Greenland, one Viking married a Sicilian princes – as man was in charge of everything- he brought his mates and Vikings occupied Sicily for nearly 100y – was it for those Viking ”global cooling” for coming to Mediterranean climate / when ”SIMULTANEOUSLY” was global warming for the Vikings on Greenland?! Lucky Vikings, they had two ”globes” for themselves…?!) Even today doesn’t exist long enough thermometer, to monitor the temperature in Oceania, Antarctic ocean, Africa, from Greenland; did the Vikings really monitored the temperature in Australia, Patagonia, from Greenland; for the contemporary Evil Cults?! When the Vikings were going to Greenland; they had ”Long Boats; but I don’t think that they had Long Thermometers – to reach from Greenland to South Pacific, south Atlantic, and the rest of the planet. People believing that: because of more / less ice on Greenland; is a proof of ‘’GLOBAL’’ warmings / coolings – should take the leading con Artists from both camps, in a class action; for ‘’Brains Degradation’’  The Fakes use Greenland’s ice / Viking’s settlements; as a phony ‘’GLOBAL warming’’ against IPCC…?!  Truth: availability of raw material for replenishing the ice; dictates the amount of ice on the polar caps, not temperature! Lack of normal science in the Fakes, makes them to shoot themselves in the foot, by a machine-gun, instead of pistol; on the honest people’s expense. Instead of admitting that: warmings / Ice Ages are NEVER GLOBAL – to win the war against the Warmist. The Fakes are prepared to die in the trenches, to support the Warmist lies that: even though warmings are never GLOBAL, will keep presenting them as global. Because; if the truth is known that: ‘’OVERALL’’ temp on the WHOLE planet is always the same = Warmist lies will collapse instantly; because they don’t have a case. Who’s more guilty?

8]RHINO BONES IN SPAIN = because of it = was global warming! WRONG!!!

(I prefer to see the Spaniards fighting rhinos, instead of molesting the poor harmless bulls) If the person discovering the rhino bones, said the truth; he wouldn’t got any funds and grants + the front page; big news in the media. So, characteristically for climatologist / he preferred to tell lies. (now there are two rhinos in Madrid zoo = double ”global” warmings)

We will tell the truth: when that rhino lost his compass, to turn during the winter back to Africa – Gibraltar didn’t exist – was a landmass between Spain and Africa, for those 17km. Sahara was Savannah, lots of grass and water and rhinos B] today are lots of rhinos in South Africa; which is got similar temp as Spain. There were even MORE rhinos in South Africa, 200y ago; does that mean: because of that, was bigger phony  ”GLOBAL” warming 200y ago, for the Fakes…?! Was it LIA in the European ”globe” and ”global” warming in Africa, at the same time…?!

Probably that rhino went to Spain, to watch bull fighting / or, to help the production of Bullshine, by the shameless Fakes…? What do you think? If rhino bones in Spain can produce warming on the WHOLE planet… all it will take is: to bring some reindeer bones to Spain – to cool the planet, to produce GLOBAL cooling; it’s not funny!!! Those morons are the Warmist’s Fig Leafs… covering up the Warmist shame. Those morons con the conservative politicians; that GLOBAL temp overall, goes up and down as a yo-yo… Same con artists lie that  7200y ago the planet was warmer than today. They don’t know what is the overall global temp today – they lie about 7200y ago; then turn around and call the Warmist liars. ? my favored proverb: when the cow was ridiculing the young girl; for flashing herself – not because the girl had a mini skirt, but because the cow doesn’t have capacity, to see her own shame, fully exposed.

7200y ago, Sahara was a Savannah – wasn’t destroying all the moisture created in the Mediterranean waters – it was milder climate in Europe /north Africa – not GLOBAL warming! Children get brainwashed in school / university – people robed for billions of dollars, on a pretence: to prevent the non-existent GLOBAL warming; thanks to the Fakes, pretending to be ‘’skeptical’’… Skeptical about WHAT?! The only reason they can’t get any lower, is; because of the concreted bottom of the Warmist’ septic tank.

Myth no. 9:  The shonky scientists say that: during the Roman Empire, was warmer  on the WHOLE planetB] their ‘’scientific’’ evidence: because for the captains of the Roman ships was fashionable to present themselves naked when arriving to the dock. What a science… No, it was not warmer – but was milder climate closer day and night temperatures.  A] around Mediterranean was milder climate; because was higher humidity. Reason for it was: because Sahara, Arabian peninsula deserts were producing less dry heat than today = ‘’less’’ dry heat, was destroying less humidity in the air – reason then was no big bush-fires in Greece, Spain, as it is the case today. B] another reason why the ship’s Captain was naked; lots of metal parts on his uniform – metal parts get very hot on the ship’s deck with no shade, on the Mediterranean sun. Fact: was no enemy in the area, was no smart missiles to come suddenly from distance  = the captain was smart to take the hot uniform off.  C] they were taking portrait of the ship’s captain – he was able to afford a picture made of him – but not the peasants that 3 months after his picture was taken, they had double sheepskin coats on, shivering in winter.  D] it was before the Christianity imposed modesty, stupid!!! Today, most of the sailors would have walked naked to the dock; but would get arrested. In roman times, maybe the cops were naked…? (prof. Plimer should take photos from people on a nudist beach and declare ” the whole galaxy global warming”)

Q: what kind of shonky science uses religion’s /fashion, as proof of GLOBAL warming? Conclusion: if paganism turning into Christianity can produce global cooling = contemporary western Reds, by putting green topcoat on, to camouflage their real colour, can produce global warming… 2: Fake Skeptics, here is another one: day before the industrial revolution, aboriginal people of Australia were walking naked = must have been global warming during your LIA. Now with the industrial revolution CO2 pollution, they have cloths on = today must be global cooling?!?! Only con artist can state that: evidence from a picture in Mediterranean – the ‘’WHOLE’’ planet was warmer. Milder means: the nights were warmer / days cooler –it was just more humid = was better for growing crops.

Who was taking  temperature data in America, Australia, Oceania at that time?! The thermometer was invented in 1700’s, that is 1650 years after Jesus. What kind of science is that, con artists? Used to be: ”only 3 lies, and you get labelled as a chronic liar”

When he or she categorically states that: because a Captain on the Roman ship was painted without cloths on, ‘’in the Mediterranean’’ = must be, guarantied that the whole planet was warmer?!?! Fact: in Roman times for the officers was very important, to portray himself as a Macho man; you can’t be more macho than naked on the front of the ship, when arriving in the dock. Yes, agriculture increased during the Roman control of the known world. They spread more, and different varieties of plants. Ironically, it was less wars, than before – the Romans stopped different tribes of constantly fighting with each other – made those warriors to work instead, and contribute. Fact B] the crop production in Europe increased by discovery of the American continents also. Corn, potato, pumpkin was not known before in Europe; and of course, the humble tobacco. Producing corn and potatoes in Europe shouldn’t be a proof of warmer or colder planet. Same as with Roman’s movements – better and more varieties of crops was spread = humanity increased. Not because was warmer, but because they exchanged experiences /knowledge  how to produce more and different varieties crops, and was less fighting between different tribes.

Apart from me, nobody uses in consideration that: ‘’invention of artificial fires has changed the climate on big part on the planet’’ No, not because of the increasing CO2 stupid theory; but because: trees / grass use the nutrients from the soil -> than rotten and replenish the soil again. By uncontrollable bush-fires, gradually rain and wind take away the ash into the sea = one way street. After 20-30 seasons of regular bush-fires, vegetation slowly gives up – deserts takes over. (is happening today also; desert’s created dry heat is vacuuming the moisture in distant lands and is preparing them for big bush-fires – but the extremist from both camps blame sunspots and galactic dust, supernova explosion…). Less vegetation / more deserts = hotter days / colder nights. Is interpreted as GLOBAL warming; because the shonky science uses only the hottest minute in 24h and ignores all the other 1439 minutes in 24h.

For the past, ‘’proxy crap’’ interpretation was the opposite: 7200 years ago, Sahara had lots of vegetation, lakes, rivers, topsoil moisture and ‘water vapor’’ and rhinos. There wasn’t helicopters, to put the fires off – fires were continuing to burn until some river as barrier – burning around the river catchments – gradually was making the rivers dry = no barriers = desert started expanding, and expanding, and expanding -> people were retreating and retreating and established Egypt in the river delta. So, 6000y ago; by Arabian peninsula and Sahara lots of vegetation = was more humidity around Mediterranean – the D/H scientists interpreted it as: ‘’the WHOLE PLANET was warmer by 2C, because of the sunspots’’ WOW!!! Instead of realizing that: human by rubbing two sticks for last 30000-50000y, turned Sahara into desert, Gobi into desert, Arabian peninsula into desert, most of Australia into desert. Now human has more destructive weapons than rubbing two sticks + the most destructive fanatic cults, the Warmist and the Fake Skeptics. In the past, people didn’t know that big fires was destructive – now the Warmist & Fake’s followers don’t know that H2O controls the climate, not CO2…

Warmist & Fake’s stupidity #9:THE SEA RISING WISHFUL THINKING 

When is declared that: ‘’the sea is raising by 1mm a year; the gullible Skeptic D/H thinks that:  that is because of ice melting, is not much…’’ Wrong! The seawater is rising, because of sediments washed from the land into the sea; nothing to do with melting ice. Same as if you put a handful of dirt in half-full bucket of water->water goes up. The propaganda machine will not clarify that, because it doesn’t suit them. Lake Chad, Aral sea, lake Ayers are almost dry – that water is into the sea. Less water on land = more in the sea. The deserts now are as ‘’dry sponges’’

In the same time, squashing tectonic plates are raising most mountains, to compensate for the erosion. If that wasn’t happening, for the past million years; by now, the highest point of land, would have being 1,9km covered by water – wouldn’t have being now one dry grain of sand! All dry land would have eroded – there is enough water on the earth; to cover the WHOLE planet by 2km of water. Would you prefer the whole planet under water, or what the Creator invented; by squashing of the tectonic plates – few small islands on the fault line to sink; but keep 1/3 of the planet on dry?!

The good Lord made the movement / squashing of the plates – to have 1/3 of the planet’s surface area dry. So, when the Swindlers are pointing about Maldives, Tuvalu; islands sinking – not on one occasion they have ever pointed that: those lowland islands are in monsoonal / tropical areas = sediments get washed into the ocean + they are on geographic positions; where the tectonic plates are sinking by 0,5mm a year. Truth will be against their lies. Inhabitants think: if is sinking now by 0,5mm – next year, or next Monday night might sink by 4-5m. In other words: the Organized Crime is making a hell in paradise, for those inhabitants. Imagine children at night, listening to the waves roaring – then going to the window 10 times a night, to see if the island is getting flooded. They don’t know that they have being used by the western  Warmist / Fakes psychos…

Since Darwin’s book was published – small number of Shonks went into overdrive; to prove that: nature can create catastrophes, without obeying the  Lord’s laws of physics and logic. One of those is: they find on some shore, that the sea was higher by 1-2-3-4-15-50m, instantly declare that: at that time, the sea was up by 15m! instead of pointing that: on that spot the tectonic plate has buckled up by 15m, but on some other place since that ‘’SAME time’’ has sunk by that much.

B] now they are lying that the ice on Antarctic will melt and flood lots of land (needs to get warmer planet by 30C, before ice on Antarctic ‘’starts’’ melting from heat) There is permanent ice in Patagonia and New Zealand, 1000 miles closer to the equator. Using on that same shonky theory that; creation of permanent ice in north America / north Europe during the big ice age – the sea-level being much lower than today. Not because it was extra ice, but because of their brains for logic and honesty is clinically dead! 1] Antarctic’s ice will never melt, as long as she is on the southern polar cap. 2] during the Big Ice Age; because Gibraltar opening didn’t exist; Mediterranean, Ionian, Aegean, Black sea, Adriatic, Caspian sea were only puddles of water. They contain now 3 times more water than the water trapped in the ice on Greenland. 3] at that time, north Atlantic and part of north pacific’s water was much ‘’colder’’ than now – water in the sea when gets ‘’colder’’ EXPANDS!

C] Because 80% of the seawater is below 4C; water below 4C, when warms -> shrinks / when gets colder -> EXPANDS. Put a bottle of seawater at 4C in your freezer – by the time it cools by couple of degrees – the bottle will explode. Then put seawater at zero degrees, or below and warm it up by few degrees – the water will SHRINK!!! They are not just wrong on everything, but are back to front also. Because ‘’they abolished the good Lord’s / nature’s laws of physics’’ without democratic legislation in parliament and in UN. (Shonky science on the run, by the Reds under green  camouflage). We’ll see if the Green Karl Marx controls the laws of physics; or nature and the creator of that nature.

Verdict: 1: because during the Ice Age in N/H; the ‘’colder water’’ in the sea expanded; plus because all those seas in the Mediterranean system didn’t have water = all that water was in the oceans = 15000y ago the sea-level was much ‘’higher’’ – that made water from Atlantic to overflow into the Mediterranean and ‘’that’’ created / cut Gibraltar Straits. 2: because of constant erosion of soil into the sea. B] because of constant buckling of tectonic plates – some places the seawater appears to go up / some places shrinks.

Fake’s mythology #10:

Palms were growing on Antarctic; ”PROOF” it was a BIG global warming

If it was coming from honest people; I would have said: ‘’combination of movement of the tectonic plates + wobbling of the planet (Milankovich ‘s Theory) = Antarctic, Alaska  were somewhere far away from the polar caps. Yes, same goes with the; no hair or feathers / coldblooded dinosaurs on Alaska. Because: if Antarctic was on the south poll as today; and was warm enough, palms to grow there = on the equatorial regions temp would have being 105C, that’s 5C above water boiling point – would have boiled the trees, animals and the oceans.

But, because it comes from pathetic / chronic / compulsive  liars – bigger possibility is:  those ‘’palm imprints’’ on Antarctic, came from some driftwood, brought by the currents… Or on the way to Antarctic; the shonky ”researchers” brought some rotten palms from some tropical island. Standby, for when they find some discarded plastic bottles and fishing nets drifted to the shores of Antarctic – for the Fakes, to declare that: the Vikings had a plastic factory on Antarctic…?  Bullish is the best organic fertilizer, for their sick imagination / attitude.

Just imagine that: a million years ago; north poll was 250km east of Vladivostok. On most of the places on the planet the temp was different – some places were warmer than today / some colder. Equator was on different place. So, they discover tropical climate was at that time in Canada – declare the whole planet much warmer. Other place was ice, where is now subtropics = for them was big ice age on the WHOLE planet. IDIOTS!!

                                                   Fake’s Smoking Canon # 11:    


 When the Warmist declared: ‘’the missing heat’’  it was time for the Skeptics to get on the front foot; to demand apology from the Warmist, and to admit that they were lying the whole time. There isn’t any missing heat, because extra heat in the troposphere is not accumulative!!! Instead, the Fake Skeptics went into horoscope overdrive, ”searching for what is producing the phony global warming – to cover up for the Warmist lies. Fakes started searching for ‘’sunspots / galactic dust’’ same as ‘’searching’’ for Santa and Rudolf… Because the Fakes have to play as Warmist ‘’Fig Leafs’’ to keep covering up the Warmist shame; instead of admitting that: global warmings don’t exist – localized warmings, they misinterpreted as global = sorry. Warmist don’t have a case; they can’t have any legitimate / real proof; because there isn’t such a thing as GLOBAL warming – Warmist only flourish on Fake Skeptic’s Pagan lies!!!

Fact: the heat on the earth is created by the ”shortwave IR &UV cumming from the sun, not by any stupid sunspots. UV& IR is created deep down into the plasma, sunspots not guilty. 

B] sunspots. If ‘’sunspots’’ were controlling the climate; ‘’same sunspots’’ affect Brazil and Sahara. The dumbest people in existence, are creating back-door exit for the Warmist. Warmist know that: when they fail to produce any global warming – they will blame the sunspots (already many Warmist realizing that is NO global warming; are talking about: not much activity on the sun, for the next 30 years, WOW!)  A] nobody can predict the amount of sun activity. B] sun activity has NOTHING to do with climate. C] it’s their admission that: they are looking for a backdoor exit. The dumbest morons are keeping the backdoor open for the Warmist = so, they can wait to the last minute / to the last taxpayer’s $$$ thy can chisel out. Instead off; less guilty Warmist starting to spit the dummy; instead of putting them in checkmate position – making them to return the loot money, and the Reds not to recuperate for the next 30years. Instead, the Fake Skeptics and their zombies are playing as the Warmist’ ‘’Fig Leafs’’ (when the truth is known, lots of satirical books will be written; about the dumbest humanoids, that walk on two legs)

Q: most of the Australian desert, 70% of the country is on same latitude (same distance from the equator and polar cap) as Burma / Vietnam, Brazil jungle.  Is it different sun with different sunspots, so those places have completely different climates?! Q: for what percentage of the Fakes; deserts and jungles have ”SAME” climate, because of SAME sunspots and galactic dust effect?! (what about the 20000 satellites orbiting the planet and other space junk, with their solar panels intercepting lots of sunlight, not to come to the ground? that’s accumulative, less heat every day?!) shouldn’t give them inspiration…

Most of the Fakes are big city slickers, don’t even understand what ‘’climate’’ is. B] Galactic dust / supernova explosions warms our planet?… Idiots!!! Outside the ‘’solar system’’ temperature is close to ultimate zero. To the closest star is 2 light years away of space with that temp. But, the closest star didn’t explode; therefore, from the supernova explosion, to the earth; that ‘’heat’’ must travel in space of many more light years away, with close to ultimate zero temp, and keep the heat, until arrives to England, WOW! Wouldn’t make sense to an earthworm; but it does, to the Fakes. All the supernova explosions, sunspots and all the ‘’galactic dust’’ warms LESS the earth, than one single Al Gore’s fart. Because the earth’s temperature self adjusting mechanism (ETSAM) is perfect.

In reality, the fake Skeptics are more scared from the truth, than the official Warmist. Because the ‘’Fakes’’ are trusted by the honest people in the community. When the honest people discover that; they have being duped by the ‘’pretend Skeptics’’ they will not blame the Warmist. The ‘’Original Sinners’’ and their lots of past ‘’phony’’ GLOBAL warmings, will turn into the biggest rotten eggs. Especially when the majority of people on the street discover that: after I presented the real proofs that; warmings / coolings are localized; the laws of physics don’t permit to be GLOBAL warming; the leading Fakes were obsessed in covering up the truth – to protect the Warmist and their own ‘’phony proxy GLOBAL warmings’’ Then it will be ‘’proxy GLOBAL warmings up the arse shoving’’. Fakes: instead of horoscope / solar / galactic influences – I suggest: ‘’reading tea cups accuracy has improved by 30%, you should go back to reading tea leafs, when supported by tarot cards, even better, than relying on the ‘’lucky sunspots, stars / heavenly bodies and their dust’’.

Sunspots are blotches of carbon / graphite that surfaces from deep down in the sun. They come and go – temp on the earth stays the same.  Sunspots are the new superstition. So: if you are a superstitions person -to be safe, eat lots of garlic – but if you want total protection – carry your rabbit’s foot  anyway you go – otherwise those sunspots will get you some day… If you don’t have a rabbit’s foot, order one immediately – until it arrives, stay indoors; the safest place is under the bed, stay there! OR: same as Inca people worshiping the sun; you must sacrifice three virgins every year… if you are lucky to find one in the western countries…  to please the sunspots…?!

If fluctuation in sunspots was dictating the climate = would have being same climate in Brazil and northern Australian deserts. Same sunspots, same latitude, same CO2; BUT COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CLIMATES. GLOBAL warmings / coolings in the past were not GLOBAL!!! Laws of physics don’t permit that. First they must abolish those laws of physics, by legislation and in UN.

Fake’s gullible daydream # 12:


Was it really? 98 turned out as ‘’the hottest year’’ for two reasons. For a start; 98 was as warm as 97 and 2010, as in 1849, and any other year. But the reason the Fake’s masters (IPCC) declared it as the hottest year; 1] because: was the year after the Kyoto conference = to scare the crap out of you. Second reason 98 was the hottest, was because: when their colleagues in East Anglia and IPCC realized that they overdid it – year 99 had to be colder. Otherwise, if they were adding every year as they did from 97 to 98, by the time they con every country = would have being getting warmer by 10 degrees, without thermometers noticing any warming. It will be known in history, as the most pathetic: Now ‘’the Fakes are proving the Warmist wrong; by using the Warmist invented lie… ‘’98 as the warmest’’ – turned out to be Warmist water pistols given to the ‘’phony Skeptics’’ and their blind followers as a present; to arm themselves.  That’s why Warmist declared: ‘’the science is settled’’ because of the calibre of their ‘’opponent’s’’ stupidity. Warmist are worried that: it might be discovered that 98 wasn’t warmer or colder than any other year. Fakes are beating themselves in the chest, by having proof that 98 was the ‘’warmest’’… the traitors of everything honest are legitimizing the Warmist’ opportunistic lie.

Over the sea, 2/3 of the planet’s surface area; not a single monitoring – on land; monitoring on major airports – between airports… 99,999999% of the land surface area not taken into account… that’s not part of their planet also… how the hell Fakes know that 98 was warmer than any other years – for what other years they know the temperature, and how did they discover?! You cannot compare one unknown with another unknown; but both camps ”pretend” that they can… What do you think? Example: in a distant galaxy; there are two planets – lets name them planet Gore and planet Plimer; which one of those planets is bigger?

The Fakes lie that 1000y ago, the WHOLE planet was warmer – Warmist use that and state that: 1000y ago, the WHOLE planet was cooler by 1C⁰. WOW!!! 1000y ago, people were scared to sail more than 50miles west of Lisbon – not to fall off the planet – the planet was flat and 70% of it didn’t exist, who was monitoring for them the other 70% of the planet?

 Atmosphere is not same as human body. I.e. when gets warmer under the armpits by half a degree= the whole body is warmer by that much. Atmosphere is completely opposite; when one part gets warmer = another part must get equally colder. That’s what the laws of physics do, by expanding oxygen & nitrogen in change of temperature. Determining warmth in the atmosphere, by monitoring on 6000 places, is only proof that the Swindlers ‘’AVOID’’  to know my formulas / the process of ’’temperature self adjusting’’. Not knowing the most basic, or not wanting to know the laws of physics, but squandering billions, is a double crime. Example: if a thermometer represents 50 000m2 – you put in that area another 5 thermometers on different places – if they show different temp than the one informing IPCC = scam proven!

 Leading Fakes are much more scared from the truth than the Warmist. Leading Warmist know that: by all the monitoring; they don’t know what was the planet’s temp last year, to save their lives – not a single thermometer over the sea / 2/3 of the planet’s surface area… But the Fakes are ‘’pretending’’ to prove the Warmist wrong, by ‘’proxy phony GLOBAL warmings’’ from before the thermometer existed?! Mother of all crimes!! Some of the Fakes are soliciting for cash, on false pretence. Pretend that they are against carbon tax – but when I present the real proofs – they throw tantrum, or run away and are actively silencing the truth. If you ask any Skeptic: -”how can you prove that is not going to be any global warming in 100y; with all those past phony global warmings and global coolings? Not one has an explanation. For the Warmist is most important, the Skeptics to con the people on the street that: earth’s temp can go up or down at the drop of a hat – better for them, those lies to come from their ”opponents”

10]Bottom line: over 90% of the original Swindlers that have being concocting that ‘’localized warmings / coolings; as GLOBAL, are now in the Warmist’ camp. If the rest were still alive – they would have being in the Warmist cult. 2] Warmist can decimate Skeptic’s lies in 5 days, but they don’t, because it suits them. They know that; all the Skeptic’s fairy-tales are wrong – they have being part of those  fairy-tales; most have being even concocted by them. Hubert Lamb was promoting: Nuclear Winter for year 2000, because of CO2 dimming effect’’ (the building where the Warmist Swindlers in East Anglia university are, is called ‘’Hubert Lamb, Building’’  ”The English Building of Shame”

Honest Skeptics, you have being constantly duped by your own leaders. They are defending the ‘’original scam’’ which is the foundation for the Warmist fortress. Wake up Skeptics, you have being blindfolded by prof. Plimer, Monckton; now their apostils and few other bloggers are doing everything possible, for you not to discover the truth and the real proofs. Don’t be prof. Plimer’s  (galah, is an Australian very noisy bird, that can talk; but doesn’t  understand what he is saying) Demand; for them to abolish LEGALLY the laws of physics and the winds, before you start to believe their destructive shonky science.

B] Can anybody imagine: ‘’if  Hansen, Lindzen, Mann, and few other top Warmist criminal Swindlers; admit that they were wrong – what would happen to them; from ‘’their own supporters’’? I’m not talking about their supporters of the lower genera and IQ, but from: politicians, academics, media personalities; that stuck their reputation / credibility on those criminal’s lies’’…  please think about that, then try to answer this question Q: if you are one of them top Warmist criminals; would you admit guilt, because of the Fake Skeptic’s Pagan proofs?! Take your time, before you answer. You can see why the Warmist declared; ‘’the science is settled’’ Would you admit guilt, to end up in jail; when 1000 Fake Skeptics conmen are fighting to defend you, with their bigger, cheap shameless lies. Now you see why the Fakes are silencing my proofs, facts, the truth = two criminal gangs, defend each other; ‘’Thief’s code of silence’’  If somebody was genuinely interested for the truth to win, would have welcomed any new, reliable evidences from me.

C] Apart from the Fake ”Skeptics” that are genuine Warmist, embedded in the Skeptic’s camp; to present themselves as ”opposition” I have a question to the rest. Q: did you ever ask yourself; how do you look in the Warmist eyes?! Here it is, people on the street are realizing that; temperature is not changing / it was all concocted lie -but active Fake Skeptics in the blogosphere are still hallucinating and searching for the existence of the phony GLOBAL warming -that they look in the Warmist eyes as a mentally damaged people…?  If the enemy loves you / needs you – there is a reason for it! When you don’t have a self-respect / ethos= you are the opponent’s fool.

Warmist intentionally confuse the phony global warming, with normal climatic changes – Skeptics keep repeating: ”Climate Change, climate, climate, climate change” same as Harry Krishna people… Skeptics, WATER REGULATES THE CLIMATE, NOT CO2!!!

D] Bottom line: now you know why the Warmist declared; ‘’the science regarding GLOBAL warming is settled’’  Because, their ‘’pretend opponents’’ are shooting themselves in the foot by a machine-gun, instead of pistol… Warmist are winning by telling lies  -/ the Fake Skeptics are losing by telling lies. Only my real proofs can see the end of the scammer’s scum. Hansen, Mann, Plimer, Gore; should be attached to a lie detector; to answer the simple question: do they believe in GLOBAL warming? No, not in climatic changes, climate never stops changing, some places for better, other for worse; but ‘’do they believe in their own ‘’GLOBAL warmings crap’’?!


If anybody believes that: by the ‘’phony GLOBAL warmings” above; the Fakes will proof that is no global warming in 100y… my tears will not help you much, you need a shrink! The truth always wins on the end. 


Santa has a same ”PAUSE” between January and December… as the phony global warming, which only arrives before important conference!

Warmist invented the ”pause” because there are still lots of people on the street that can think for themselves, and are noticing that IS SAME TEMP AS ALWAYS WAS… AND: to prove to the politicians and the media that: –” skeptics are capable of thinking and reasoning as five year old kids, OR as a 25y old fencepost”…

Warmist lies have limited shelf-lifeFAKE Skeptic’s stupidity is unlimited.

There is no such a thing as warmer the WHOLE planet – therefore, the Warmist don’t have a case / it’s all lies; but the Fakes are covering up the Warmist lies / shame – by inventing phony GLOBAL warmings = the ”Skeptics” became Warmist’ Fig Leafs

They made it official that: ‘’during the northern summer; the planet is WARMER BY up to 3,8C than during the southern summer.’’ WOW, what a science!…

I believe that: their data shows even bigger difference; but they are not heroic enough, to admit -> ‘’smoothing the data” follows..

The truth: not enough EXTRA WARMTH is in the atmosphere during the northern summer than during southern, to boil one chicken egg with it!!! BUT, it shows that ‘’their modelling’’ is complete crap! It shows warmer, for two unscientific reasons::

#1:  because 75% of the monitoring places are on the N/H, 25% only on the southern. Example: if 75 workers get pay increase by 10% for 6 months and 25 workers get pay decrease by 10% = overall together they will be getting more money; than for the next 6 months – when 75 workers get salary decreased by 10% and the other 25 workers get increased their salary by that much. What a con science is used; by not having monitoring places spaced equally!!!… Reason everybody is scared from the truth, and are trying to silence my proofs / science!!! (to be even more pathetic: because of elliptical orbit around the sun, earth is closer to the sun at Christmas, than in July)

Reason #2: on the S/H is much more water, than on the northern hemisphere. Where is ‘’more water’’ DAYS ARE COOLER / NIGHTS WARMER!!! It proves that: monitoring only for the ‘’HOTTEST MINUTE’’ in 24h, and ignoring all the other 1439 minutes – is the mother of all con and misleading science!!! BY BOTH CAMPS!!! Warmth in every minute in 24h has SAME value; but doesn’t go up / down equally as the hottest minute!!!

That’s admission that they are wrong by 3,8C in 6 months – then look at their ”GLOBAL” temperature charts for the last 150y, 1000y, 6000 years – they ”pretend” to be correct in one hundredth of a degree and occasionally in one thousandth of a degree, for every year. That’s what kind of people FROM BOTH CAMPS are talking about their  ”scientific proofs”… where is their credibility,  what kind of ”computer models” can be wrong by 3,8C for 6 months non-existent difference in temp – but are talking ”with precision” about 1920’s, 1850’s, 5BC, 7200BC…?

150y ago, there were only few unreliable thermometers; data collected by unreliable people. But that data is used as correct – sometime, by some, is stated as: unreliable; but was / IS used as reliable anyway, by those same people. 400-500-700 years ago.. well the correct GLOBAL temperature ”BY THEIR PROXY’‘   was discovered from: if there were 12 bushels of grain per acre in Devon-shire, England; then next year was only 11,5 bushels, because of damage by locust, or neighbour’s goats ->  that means that: in all of Oceania, south America, Australia and the other 90% of the planet – the temperature following year was ”COLDER BY 0,04C, on the WHOLE planet…. WOW! What a science – precision in one hundredth of a degree. Look at their GLOBAL temp charts = it looks as seismographs / the planet has a hi-fever…?

Their GLOBAL temp cycles are even more sick. They found in Colorado Canyon erosion that: certain deposits repeat themselves -> instantly they name them as ”factual cycles” in other country, or other continent, alluvial deposits don’t match the ones in Colorado – instead of admitting that: THOSE CYCLES were not GLOBAL – they just ad more and more different cycles. Blame the sunspots, solar dust; blame everything that cannot take them to court for defamation. Instead of starting to analyse: how the deterioration of vegetation / climate was gradually affected by human inventing the ARTIFICIALLY CREATION OF FIRE. In Eurasia + North Africa 50000-60000 years ago – north America 15000y ago – in Australia maybe 30000y ago. After 20-30 intensive bushfires, the vegetation gives up -> without vegetation -> rainfall decreases = become hotter days / colder nights / more extreme climate, not warmer.  Unfortunately, admitting the truth – so that the climate can be improved – which would bring money to the engineers and working people; but not to the Organized Crime

Before the invention of artificial fires by human – the only fires the earth knew, was from volcanoes and lightening storms. Volcanoes aren’t very often – electric storm is associated with rain = because of wet; fire doesn’t go far.  Artificial fires first started, when was mulch everywhere – after many generation; the mongrels were turning the best lowlands into deserts… now the Fakes are ”SKEPTICAL” if human can change the climate… self destructive idiots… born losers!

                                              DOUBLE CON IS BETTER

The leading ‘’Skeptics’’ realized that: it’s easier with a telescope to see distant objects in details -> concocted that: Galileo, and after him, people were observing the sunspots (if Galileo looked at the sun with his telescope -> would have burned a hole from his eye socket to the back of his head, in minutes). Then they added that: ”since 6000years ago, Chinese were absorbing and documenting sunspots” – (must have being lots of blinded Chinese…) So, they falsified for every year in the last few thousand years – sunspots to fit their original lies and misleading GLOBAL temp charts… perfect fit! Marvellous crap!

In reality, for the first time a filter was made, to see that the surface of the sun is not just red; but has sunspots; in 2004. Before that, for 100y they were blocking the sun with a cardboard and observing the sun-flares; NOT sunspots!!! Because the sun-flares from the corona were going in 8 minutes, where the earth will be in 6 months; the flares that affected the earth directly were blocked… wasn’t any benefit. B] looking directly at the sun, in 7-8 minutes; you will not see any sunspots, BUT, will see sunspots after for a day, even in a completely dark room; and you will never see anything else, in your life.

C] if you look at the sun with a telescope, will burn your eyes COMPLETELY  in half the time, than looking direct at the sun. Depends the power of the telescope; in 2-3 seconds complete blindness – in 10 seconds, your head will be steaming – in 2-3 minutes: the light through your eye socket would be going out from the back of your head. Galileo wasn’t so stupid, to look at the sun; he was looking at Jupiter. But the ‘’Fake Skeptics’’ to make the skeptical people to appear as bigger liars than the Warmist -> made for every year their ‘’forgery sunspots’’ to clip exactly to match their misleading global temp charts… what a criminal scam… to degrade the genuine, honest skeptical people!..

D]Their phony GLOBAL temp charts for the past, were created from their phony ‘’proxy’’::: if records say: 12 bushels of grain per acre, in Yorkshire / England = was warm year, on the whole planet. Next year only 11,2 bushels; they made official: colder year on the WHOLE planet by 0,4C. other years locust, or neighbour’s  goats damaged the grain; only 9,3 bushels -> mini ice age declared officially on their ‘’GLOBAL’’ temp charts. Therefore: if the neighbour got drunk in the tavern, instead of looking after his goats; the extra bottle of vino; changed the number of the sunspots…?! miracle, or a grotesque CON, by the ‘’leading’’ Fake Skeptics… In medieval ages people were more religious and were paying correct 10% tax to the bishop – after, in Renaissance (phony LIA) the mongrels were laying how much they produced – to pay less tax to the bishop. 3] using same crops on same land from Medieval times to Renaissance, no synthetic fertilizer – was less crops, not because of phony LIA!

They found 3 beetles in a pit moss in England, those beetles now are only further south – they declared ”was warmer the whole planet in medieval times” I pointed to them that: ”because of pesticide, those beetles are gone now, not because of different global temp; b] one peatbog cannot tell the temp from England, for the whole planet” To prove me wrong, they found another peatbog in Chile…   Well, any ”researcher using peatbog, as proxy data for the past – only shows that: the White Collar Criminal is a con, AND he is giving the ”Skeptics” longer rope, to make bigger fools of themselves!!! Why are meteorologist using thermometers and lots of man-hours, to collect temp every day of different places – when two peatbogs can give them correct temp for every city and country and ocean on the planet, for hundreds of years?! meteorologist should learn from the skeptics, and chuck their thermometers away!… Bucketful of shells in some corner of China can give them the correct temp for the WHOLE globe that was colder, OR lump of wood on the Alps will prove of ”global” warming, OR peatbog in Chile will tell about ”global” cooling, OR pit bog in Siberia will tell about a ”global” warming…?!?!

It started by vandalizing stalagmites in the cave – the ”build up / texture” of the stalagmite in the cave will give them the ”accurate” temp for the ”whole” planet…?! The compulsive, chronic, pathetic liars cannot see that: -” if the ”global temperature” was affecting the building structure and size of the stalagmites: every stalagmite in that cave would have being same, as built in the factory; BUT they are all different shapes and sizes – because many other different factors affect the structure! All the ”proxy data” are the same con, all concocted by White Collar Criminals (WCC) = all those ”proxy data” were collected and put in prof. Ian Plimer’s book – that book became ”Skeptic’s Bible”… precursor of all evil…

E] if Colorado canyon alluvial deposits say that: for certain period in the past was more rain, or less – for the Original Swindlers, that was telling the temp on the WHOLE planet…? Instead of admitting that: those deposits cannot even tell about the rainfall for the whole state of Colorado. Because of that; they have being declaring: Palaeocene,  Eocene, Crapocene – phony GLOBAL temp cycles = what a scam, declared as official records, by the original scum. Therefore, to cover up the mountains of the original Pagan lies – GLOBAL temp charts, which look as seismographs, with precision to one hundredth of a degree – they made the ‘’Sunspots Forgery’’ to support the biggest continuous con, since Darwin published his book. Before that; the climate entirely depended on St. Peter’s mood.

Would falsifying sun’s activity chart, make the politicians, media; and especially Mann, Hansen: to admit that they are lying about the phony GLOBAL warming? NOP, they, and the bias media know the date in 2004, when the first time powerful filter was used, to see details on the surface of the sun; and the company that made that filter. They keep under their sleeve that proof, to be used, when is most important time; to rub ”Skeptic’s” nose.

Proxy data ”extrapolated” from stalagmites: yes, they like the word ”extrapolated” -which means: concocted more crap… So: they cut the biggest and most  beautiful   stalagmite in the cave, in the name of ”science” – magnify it, and like tree-rings; for when it shows thicker rings => was more rain on the surface => it was warmer planet / thinner rings => less rain => it was cooler planet, cool. It goes in the university books, and is official; can’t argue against university knowledge!!!  Lets double-check:

Exactly above that stalagmite on the surface, a cow dropping brought some extra calcium in the digested grass long time ago – for couple years was sipping more calcium deep down to ”that lucky stalagmite” , but not to the others in that same cave – nevertheless; it was declared officially as ”warmer years on the WHOLE planet” because: everything that comes from those shonks is bullshit BUT not cows-shit, cows-shit is definitely not bullshit, but the best organic fertilizer; unfortunately most geologist are big city slickers and don’t know that. After many, many years again, just above that stalagmite dropped a dead bird, or a rodent AND from the bones lots of calcium was sinking down to the lucky stalagmite for many years, the rings said: it was very wet / hot 55 years on the ”whole” planet – that calcium got exhausted after 55 years -> because of  that followed by much colder planet. Then suddenly a snail decayed above, and from his shell released good amount of calcium; that stalagmite got fatter few-rings again, AND the ”climate expert” declared: 7200BC was hotter planet by 2C! ”One dead snail” made much hotter planet for many, many years; what a climatology science, what a science…  That snail must have being a big sucker. to increase the temperature by 2C, on the whole planet 7200BC?  What about IF there was 5 dead snails on the surface, above that stalagmite, as they use to congregate together; would have boiled the whole planet completely – from Australia, Antarctic, America, Africa and ALL the water in-between… (now the skeptics hope; that science, because is written in university books, will get them over the line) Only if the leading Warmist were so dumb…

Professional manipulators as the Warmist / Marxist know that: ”when that climate scientist / geologist first walked into that cave; he saw 75 stalagmites in 20m radius; all different sizes and shapes stalagmites – wouldn’t be even theoretically possible 75 different rainfalls and different climates above the  cave in 20m radius; so he didn’t have a heart to vandalize the stalagmite, and he put that in his logbook: he wouldn’t got on the front pages in newspapers, not in the school books, and he wouldn’t got funds and grants” -so: the Warmist / Marxist know the truth about every ”proxy data”! But they will never ask the ‘‘different global warmings geologist: -‘‘on some years is only showers, for surface moisture that doesn’t penetrate deep, to bring calcium to the stalagmites; years like that are not recorded on the stalagmite and, which confuses, like non existent tree rings on a tree – other times: there are 3-4 different big storms on different times in a SAME year, BUT are registered as three different years…?! Prof Plimer as the Skeptic’s Prophet, he gave lots of boomerangs to the Skeptics, to fight the Marxist thieves; unfortunately – with those boomerangs, the Skeptics only clabber themselves / always backfires… Warmist are marching from victory to victory, on Skeptic’s backs – using the Skeptics as their  own geldings…

If the Warmist admitted that they are wrong -> will lose billions of $$$ benefits every year  b] will lose grip and control over the nations c] some of them will end up in jail, for ”profiteering under false pretence”  Does anybody believes that: because of a dead snail, because of a picture people scatting on Thames and some stupid sunspots, they will give up all the power and privileges and declare themselves as criminals?!?!?! Think, think for few days, and then give us your answer.

Somebody said: ‘’Some geological fakes and frauds are carried out solely for financial gain whereas others maybe have increasing aesthetic appeal (faked fossils) or academic advancement (fabricated data) as their motive. All types of geological fake or fraud can be ingenious and sophisticated. Fake gems, faked fossils and mining fraud are common examples where monetary profit is to blame: nonetheless these may impact both scientific theory and the reputation of geologists and Earth scientists. The substitution or fabrication of both physical and intellectual data also occurs for no direct financial gain, such as career advancement or establishment of belief. Knowledge of such fakes and frauds may assist in spotting undetected geological crimes: application of geoforensic techniques should help the honest scientific community to detect such activity, which ultimately will undermine scientific integrity.”  ”honest scientific community” cannot be found between paid so called ”climatologists” needs intervention from outside ‘’

Q: do the Skeptics believe that: -”the leading Warmist will admit that they are lying, and give up all those billions of $$ and end up in jail; because the Skeptics keep repeating: LIA, Medieval ”global” warming, Roman ”global” warming, Palaeocene, Eocene, Crapocene?!?! A: in Pagan Beliefs thinking and honest debate not allowed… When for the ”Skeptics” Sahara and Brazil have same climate; the Warmist won, thanks to prof Plimer’s foot solders, his ”closed parashoth brains”! Because Sahara and Brazil have same amount of CO2; if CO2 was regulating the climate – must be same climate on both places…? Wouldn’t make sense to an earthworm, because earthworms don’t read Plimer’s Pagan Bible…

Why is difficult of learning the most important factors: ”ABSORPTION OF HEAT IS ALWAYS ”EQUAL” the RELEASE {A=R} because O&N are responsible for regulating same amount of heat to be always in the troposphere. By expanding / shrinking and vertical winds increasing / decreasing, and getting higher, when extra warmth!!!

Phony ”Global” temperature cycles: the only cycles on the planet are: day / night cycles – summer / winter cycles and Paris Hilton’s menstrual cycles, BUT: even they are not ”global” – when is winter in N/H, is summer in the S/H – then reverses. Also; when is day Australia, it’s night in Canada. Same: when gets warmer, for ANY reason on same place – simultaneously gets ”colder” on other place / places. Never is warmer the ”whole planet” or colder the whole planet – the honest laws of physics don’t permit that! Same as children’s see-saw plank – the higher one side goes, simultaneously the lower the other side goes – never both sides go up, or down simultaneously! Because of the Earth’s Temperature Self Adjusting  Mechanism (ETSAM)! (see the post COOLING EARTH for those proofs)

Yes, Colorado canyon is like pages in a book; the alluvial soil on the banks of the canyon can tell a lot about the past. When was more rainy years => bigger and more sediments are brought and deposited. So, you can see that similar sediments repeat themselves in different layers on the bank => that was declared as ”global TEMPERATURE cycles”. Conveniently they overlooked that: could be really big storms for few weeks, and dry for the rest of the year b] when in the distance some submarine volcanoes became active for few years -> evaporation increased in that area ->brought lots of rain in the headwaters of Colorado river. It’s hard to warm up extra the sea from sunlight; because: a: sunlight warms up the surface of the water only, warmer water doesn’t sink down, because the cold-water deep down, as heavier, is not letting the warmed water to go down b] when the surface water warms up ”extra” evaporation increases, evaporation is ”cooling process”–  when more evaporation, more clouds, clouds are as sun umbrellas, instantly intercept lots of sunlight high up, where cooling is much more efficient and less sunlight gets on the ground. Therefore: it’s total mistake to blame the sun, or sunspots for warming all the oceans, because of Colorado sediments; it’s localized event, submarine volcano’s heat is 100% absorbed in the water and spread by the currents a lot, but not around the planet. the rest of the planet was not on your ‘’globe’’… Well that heat increases localized evaporation , BUT: Anthropocene, HoloceneEocene, Crapocene because was warmer / colder  the whole planet… because was lots of rain in headwaters of Colorado river...Dear brothers, Skeptics: don’t put all your eggs in the ”sunspots basket”! All ”global cycles” were ALWAYS localized!!! Those stupid ”sunspots” cannot be blamed for affecting differently on different meridians!

Same as now, the shonks  blaming the ”sunspots” for El Nino and La Nina, example: when is El Nino, off Chilean coast is warmer and ”more rain” BUT: simultaneously is drought in Australia and India – in La Nina Australia gets much more rain, but not Chile! Because those natural events are occasionally produced: when is a movement in tectonic plates -> activate volcanoes on different places (99% of the volcanoes on the planet are submarine; because the tectonic plates are thinner there AND the “”Rim of Fire”” the plates move same as you; left leg, then the right leg – and affects differently on different places on the planet!

They have different ”extinctions of animals; to support their ”global temperature cycles”!Big mistake to blame phony global warmings / coollings for extinctions! The good Lord made different altitudes and latitudes for the critters to move away, when localized temperatures change, to survive; also he made it for adaptation and diversification. B] see, bacteria can survive in the soil, but not viruses – they are completely helpless – they need a host body, to survive in the blood. So, viruses are smart, they kill only 50%-90% of the host, and leave 10%-50% to produce immunity and carry the virus. Therefore: all critters, including human are survivors from those 10% – 50% that invented immunity for many different viruses, and those viruses don’t bother us, or gets us a bit sick, like from different flue viruses, but seldom kills us – BUT:

on many occasions in the past, many viruses were stupid; they evolved, were easy to spread by the wind and birds -> killed every host dinosaurs, or bird or animal, simultaneously killed themselves also – because without a host, they were not able to survive. Now we find fossilized bones from the host, but the killer virus thanks Lord is gone forever and we’ll never know about it. So: if the Butler did it and is gone, shouldn’t be blamed any ”global” ice age, or  phony ”global warming, or CO2” !!!


Dear Skeptics: when you are discussing about the phony ‘’global’’ warming, BUT: you are analysing some localized temperature =you are a collateral damage from the intensive misleading propaganda. Even IF that local temp is correct; does it means that; their ‘’global’’ temperature is correct?!

#2: when a Warmist refers as ‘’climate change’’  for the ‘’phony global warming’’ he is doing it, to confuse the ignorant / if a sceptic refers as ‘’climate change’’ for the ‘’non-existent global warming’’ is his admission that he is a ‘’Warmist’ gelding’’

#3: some of you are old, others young – wish you all to live to be 100. BUT: on your death bed – you will see that: will be SAME overall global temperature  as it was in 1970’s and 97, and 2011, and 2015 and any other year – so: then you will realize that: stefanthedenier was always 100% correct.


I made this post; brother Skeptics to open their eyes. Surprise, surprise; the Warmist hate this post MUCH MORE, than the Skeptics – obviously because the Warmist don’t want the Skeptics to open their eyes. That’s what’s  really happening on the net. SINCERE SKEPTICS, YOU ARE SHOOTING BLANKS AT THE WARMIST; BUT ARE CAMOUFLAGING YOURSELF WITH THEIR CRAP… wake up!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Both Emperors are Naked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ps. I just found the evidence about those planes that landed on Greenland during the WW2, on the link it says that: they found the planes 46 years after they landed – and intended to recover them. BUT, obviously they haven’t recovered them, because I was reading few years back in National Geographic, and they are still there, under 170m of ice now, here it is:   http://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/04/us/world-war-ii-planes-found-in-greenland-in-ice-260-feet-deep.html


Posted in Archives | Tagged , , , , , , , | 13 Comments