WHO IS THE CLOWN, TO SAY THAT 290 ppm of CO2 is the best for crops and trees?! CO2 is food for the trees &crops – isn’t it most appropriate to ask the trees&crops for advice: how many parts per million of CO2 is the best?!?! Trees and crops cannot be ”brainwashed” by the aggressive propaganda, they don’t tell lies! Trees are not susceptible to brainwashing, as most of the people are
I have proven ‘’beyond any reasonable doubt: ‘’that is no such a thing as ‘’global’’ warming; warmings / coolings are never global. B] heat from the ground and troposphere is not ‘’radiated’’ out in space – all the heat is neutralized in the troposphere, by the ‘’cold vacuum’’ penetrating into the atmosphere; as the planet orbits as a Frisbee around the sun. No heat can be detected escaping / ”radiating” out of the stratosphere. ‘’Self Adjusting Temperature Mechanism’’ (SATM) is brilliant, infallible. Therefore: if there wasn’t one molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere – heat wouldn’t have being ”radiating” out into the void! Cold vacuum constantly penetrating into the troposphere is neutralizing all the heat in the first 1-9km altitude. Same as: when you put a block of ice into a pot of hot water; the coldness from the ice is neutralizing the heat -therefore: CO2 is unjustifiably blamed! 2] H2O regulates the climate, not CO2! Confusing climatic changes with the phony ‘’global’’ warmings, is the mother of all lies and a gross crime! Here is some of the truth:
THE TRUTH: heat created on the ground AND in the water is neutralized by the ”new cold vacuum” that penetrates into the troposphere every 9 minute. From 2-10km altitude all the heat is neutralized. The thinner the air up -> the more of that ”cold vacuum” penetrates in and out and neutralizes any extra heat. If no extra heat, that ”cold vacuum” just zooms away underutilized, or not utilized at all. Only occasionally super-heated gases from volcanoes and nuclear bombs explosions go above 10km up to 12km-18km, spread like mushroom, to be exposed to more cold vacuum; and gases of million degrees heat is neutralized, BUT: for the rest of the year, all that cold vacuum that zooms trough every 9 minutes, is unused. Because the planet orbits around the sun into that ”cold vacuum” at 108 000kmh -it means that: that ”cold vacuum” cannot get overheated one bit!!! Bottom line is: even if there was not one molecule of CO2 in the atmosphere – heat wouldn’t have ”radiated” out in void; all the cooling is done in the troposphere!!! Heat from the ground ”radiates” only few inches AND: horizontal winds collect that heat / then ”vertical winds” disperse it few km up into the thinner troposphere, where is ”neutralized” by the constantly coming in new ”cold vacuum” Heat from CO2 doesn’t radiate for more than a micron, and is directly cooled by the ”cold vacuum” No ”BACK-RADIATION” at all!!! CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas!
BUT, the truth will take long time to reach the public, because of entrenched pagan beliefs in the active Warmist & Skeptic activist… Galileo had similar problems, even Darwin…
Reality / facts: before Darwin published his book; the climate / weather was controlled by witches, dragons, and by St Peter. The bishop was threatening: if is too many teenage pregnancies, or people are not paying the 10% tax correctly to the bishop, that they deserve – St. Peter will sent hailstorms, droughts and floods. When floods finally arrived -> people were blaming the bishop and St. Peter. The bishop to get himself out of trouble – he was blaming the witches, and was burning them, to silence them. After the floods, hailstorms, and burning the witches – always good weather was coming = best proof that the bishop was always correct – and all people were very grateful to the bishop, for the good weather. 2]Many times, the strongest man in town was collecting ‘’contributions’’ so he can go far in the forest; where nobody can see him fighting the dragon (similar as now Warmist White Collar Criminals (WWCC) are going to the polar caps, AND to the bottom of the sea, to fight the elusive phony ‘’global’’ warming; because AGW lost it’s compass) – If they didn’t contribute, then – the bully was taking by force, the best chunks of meat, to be strong, to defeat the dragon, same result. At least, then everything was clear cut, and everybody knew the truth and ALL the facts..,
Then Darwin published his book… some unemployed geologist and paleontologist went into overdrive. When they find extra alluvial silt on few m2 somewhere -> that was ‘’proof’’ of warmer the WHOLE planet. Then; some places imprint of dryer= was warmer the ‘’whole’’ planet. Other times wetter was ‘’proof’’ of much warmer the ‘’whole’’ planet… they knew even ”by how many degrees”…?! Or a 10m3 of peat bog somewhere was ‘’proving’’ that ‘’the WHOLE planet’’ was much colder than normal. Extinction of many species was always attributed on warmer OR colder planet. They were going from ‘’Snowball earth’’ to ‘’Ice Free Polar Caps’’ and everything in between. WOW! Honesty was not needed… When they accumulated far too many phony ‘’global’’ warmings and ‘’global’’ coolings – instead of getting embarrassed – they invented truckloads of ‘’global’’ cycles… The earth’s temp was going up and down as if she had a hi-fewer…?! Their ‘’global’’ temp charts started to resemble a seismograph, everything with precision; 1234AD temp goes up by 0,024C –next year another 0,05C, next year goes down by 0,018C, ‘’precision’’ to a hundredth of a degree. 2]Because some report said: how much peasants in Buckingham Shire at that time were paying to the bishop’s 10% = how much per acre grain was produced, was more than during Renaissance = which they declared it ‘’LIA’’. As second ‘’proof’’ they have picture of people scatting on Thames = Buckingham Shire, a small dot on the map is their ‘’globe’’. Most lies were coming from England, for the last 150 years.
All the confusion about the phony global warming, was created long, long time ago. Failed geologist, that were not able to get themselves job in the mining industry did it, it wasn’t the butler who did it…!
Example #1: all extinctions were pinned on global warmings / coolings and comets hitting the earth. The truth: most viruses are smart and leave 10-60% of the host alive, so that the virus can survive, BUT: some viruses were stupid – easy to spread, were killing every host – wasn’t any immunisation invented => host left only fossilized bones to be found, virus extinct; or other animals invented immunity for it and the virus survived – probably now that virus is harmless nuisance as flue virus or similar. But for shionks that; every summer is global warming / every winter global cooling; is handy to blame the ”global” temperature for every extinction…?!
Example #2: alluvial deposits in Colorado canyon are as pages in a book; can tell the past very accurately: bigger gravel deposit = it was more rain – only fine dirt deposits are proof of not much rain, BUT: that doesn’t say even for Colorado state – it only tells about the rainfall of upstream the river catchment, full stop – definitely not about the whole planet!!! b] maybe was a wet year, OR: on 29 of February was lots of rain, rain melted the snow and the water from both created very big flood, then for the rest of the year was dry / no rain… for the shonks that’s irrelevant…?! c] then another shonky geologist finds same imprint in Mongolia, just a coincident – if it wasn’t exactly – he forced it to fit (same as you forcing your sock on a horse’s foot, for money and publicity, you can do it) That double proof cements the knowledge, goes in education books, it’s final proof… The question is: –”if there isn’t SAME imprints on all the other lands between Colorado and Mongolia, were all those lands on another planet at that time?”! That question was never asked, why not? a] more rain doesn’t mean ”warmer year” b] simultaneously floods and droughts happens on many places, all the time, the planet is a big place! When north pole was in Canada – Colorado was covered in ICE, but: at that same time in Germany and Poland was subtropics, equator was going over Siberia; yes it was different CLIMATES on most of the places on the planet; but was SAME overall global temp as today!. b] when north pole was in Vladivostok, equator was close to Colorado; yes different climates everywhere, but ”OVERALL” global temp was same as today! That confused the crap out of the opportunist ”researchers for funds and grants”
Example #3: most important: the official North Poll was on different places in the past – when North Poll was for example on Iceland, or west Canada-> some temperate lands now, was tropics / some today’s tropics were in cold climate. Milutin Milankovich was the only correct in his theory, nobody else! But: for the last 150y they found tropical imprint in cold climate; they declared it as ”the planet was much warmer” OR: when they found imprint of cold climate somewhere in the tropics; was declared as ” snowball earth” top stupidity! Now the western democracies are paying for that stupidity, and even democracy will be lost… because of ”established Pagan beliefs”…
Example #4: in a cave the shonk vandalizes the best stalagmite; cuts it and analyses the rings of calcium: thicker ring for him represents wetter year, WOW! It’s thicker ring because a herbivore animal drops something above, in the poo from the grass is ”extra calcium’‘ – another time a snail died above – from snail’s shell the calcium leached down and made bigger ring on that stalagmite; but that was declared instead as:7200 years ago was warmer by 2C, the WHOLE planet! One dead snail increased the temp on the whole planet, from Africa to Antarctic… reason: because somebody didn’t get into that cave and braked the shonk’s arm, for vandalizing the beautiful stalagmite, BECAUSE: if that stalagmite was able to tell the temp above on the surface -wouldn’t be 30 ALL different shapes and sizes stalagmites in 10m radius in the cave! Was it 30 different climates simultaneously in the 10m radius above the cave, so every stalagmite is different; YOU tell me!
#5: TREE RINGS ‘’PROXY DATA’’ CON
Any lumberjack, or orchard farmer can tell you that: ‘’prosperity of a tree depends on many, many different factors’’ BUT: somebody had to intercept emails, and write a book about ‘’Climategate’’ – so: the ‘’experts’’ on the net can beat themselves in the chest, and ridicule the conspirators… it’s like; somebody just discovered the wheel for them, few years ago… (they are the best proof; why the Warmist are marching from victory to victory)
Many years before the ‘’Climategate’’ – when the first time I heard on the TV box that: -‘’experts by tree rings are discovering the variations in past global temperatures’’ I couldn’t have believed my ears…and instantly said to myself: -‘’the trees are not lying, but: dishonest people are using trees, to tell lies’’!!!
Here are only couple of examples why, (you can ad up plenty more examples):
Lets use two trees, 20 feet apart – three #1 and tree #2. O.K:
#1: farmers know that: some soils are better for ‘’wetter years’’ other soils prefer dryer years (sandy/ clay soils) -> tree #1 has more clay, than tree #2 a bit more sandy soil => tree#1 would have thicker rings in dryer year / #2 in wetter years. which means: those trees will show different thickness rings, for same years. b] tree#1 was next to indented surface, which was gradually losing in floods the topsoil, but not the #2 = different thickness rings, for same years! BUT: a branch has fallen after in that indent, and started in floods to stop mulch coming from upstream-> improved thickness of his rings for next few years, but not the other one. After 10years branch rotted, and the floodwater started digging big drainage on the spot-> tree#1 was depraved from nutrients-> next rings were almost invisible.
Then couple of birds made a nest on #1 tree. Birds collected insects and seeds on a large radius area, and shitted all over the lucky tree – shower washes the bird poo onto the roots, as the most beautiful organic fertilizer -> that tree improved, and developed bushy leafs – because of that, other birds made nests on it also-> started to develop the best thick rings for next 5 years, BUT, not the other tree, 20 yards away. Then on tree #2 the eagle made nest-> that made the other birds to disappear -> #1 tree decreased rings thickness, but #2 increased the rings thickness, because the carnivore eagle poops ‘’blood and bone fertilizer’’ the best. AND: I didn’t say anything about the tree#3, 24feet away. Because under that tree was flatter land and no fallen branches, two cows were coming under it, every day for siesta; were crapping under it, all that fertilizer was enjoyed by the lucky tree #3 –Yes in climatology everything is bullshit, except the cowshit – cowshit is definitely not bullshit, but the best organic fertilizer! Therefore: for that tree, few bucketfuls of crap increased the temperature on the whole planet by 1,4C. Until one day the cow running away, slipped and braked her leg under the tree #1. After the cow died, tree #1 had the best blood and bone from it, for next 30 years. If that tree was cut for studying, would have shown as: ‘’the best rainfall, the hottest 30 years of global warming on the WHOLE , by 2,3C, just because one cow run out of luck.
We forgot about the tree #4, 25 yards away – it had a big tree next to it, which was blocking the sunlight for big part of the day b] was taking most of the nutrients and moisture from the ground, because had bigger roots, so for the tree #4 was big ”global cooling” because was making very small rings for many years… then the big tree fell down, from old age -> stopped collecting nutrients, stopped blocking the sunlight – for the tree #4 suddenly became ”global warming” started making thick rings, AND; the old tree was rotting for many years and was supplying great nutrients -> it had the best ”global warming” but not for the other trees in the neighbourhood. Which one of those four trees would you believe?
So: the trees are not lying, but: people using trees as ‘’proxy’’ are the real grand criminals, because: IF Michael Mann wants you to think that: -‘’a tree that cannot tell about the temperature on the hill in California, where was growing; how the hell can tell about Africa, Siberia, China, Australia, south America, Antarctic AND all the waters in-between?!?! That conman is still benefiting ‘’under false pretence’’ – billions squandered for ‘’preventing the non-existent global warming’’ – because of criminals like him… BUT: when you observe Warmist V Skeptics debate about ‘’Dr. Mann’’ –as if the hardcore criminal is a prophet…!!! When the conman Mann deserve longer jail sentence than Bernard Madoff – because Mann is responsible for squandering more other people’s billions, than Madoff! If Mann was a medical doctor… well, for him and similar protagonist; must be established some kind of Nurnberg model international court of justice! For everyone who deserves more than 8 lifetimes jail sentences. TREES NOT GUILTY!!! One attempting to get ”GLOBAL temperature data” from tree rings => is admission that: the character is a shameless con! Palm reading or tarot cards, or stalagmire, or tree ring reading is not science!Verdict: the conman Michael Man should shove the ”tree rings temperature data” up his own ring! Anybody ”believing” in any ”proxy data” is either a con, or a collateral damage to the aggressive / skilful propaganda… a zombie..
YOU know that: simultaneously is floods somewhere, drought other places, but conveniently they didn’t want to know. Can ”global warming” and ”global” cooling be at the same time?! What YOU don’t know is: SIMULTANEOUSLY is warmer than normal somewhere / colder than normal other places, always. Because: they emphasize where is warmer, and avoid to mention that is ”colder” than normal other places! you should know why, unless the propaganda has done a good job on you…
Their peers were not scrutinizing them – because they were creating a new profession AND those lies were bringing prestige and some cash. Those LIES were going in university and education books – when is in the books, it’s official… nobody can argue with books. (in reality, books are made from paper – paper can take everything, from genius work to crap, without objecting – reason they use paper even in the toilets…) B] in the 90’s an American historian, Pulitzer Price Winner (forgot his name) as one of the biggest original Warmist orator, was going around the planet and was saying anything, to prove to the public that: ‘’global’’ temp goes up and down as a yo-yo. Great orator, sometimes was assisted by Dr. Suzuki – he was telling about ‘’vineyards in England, Vikings on Greenland, people scatting on Thames.’’ THEN, prof. Ian Plimer adopted ALL that same crap, plus the crap accumulated for previous 150y, and published his book. His book became the Skeptic’s Bible = that was the biggest Christmas present to the Warmist. Somebody said to me: -‘’if the Skeptics didn’t exist, Warmist would have invented them’’ I’m proving that: ‘’the Warmist did invent the Skeptics’’ to ‘’pretend in public that they have an opponent = if is something wrong, opponents would correct?! As a ‘’Thug of war’’ – but, instead of the ‘’Skeptics’’ pulling the rope, they are pushing it, and are ahead of the Warmist by truckloads of phony ‘’global’’ warmings. (Warmist say: ”90% possibility of global warming in 100y” -most Skeptics expect another seven global warmings from now to 2100 – nothing skeptical about them). Phony global warmings are pouring out of the ‘’Skeptic’s’’ ears and out of their asses. They are stewing in Plimer’s dysentery… The only harm they can do to the Warmist is, Warmist can get hernia, from too much laughter, they can also get hernia from carrying all those billions of $$ looted from the Urban Sheep. All ”proxy data” collected from the past and used as ”global” temp record; IS THE GRANDMOTHER OF ALL LIES!!!
In the 70’s, they started threatening that: because of too much CO2 emission -> CO2 will create ‘’Dimming Effect’’ and less sunlight will come to the ground -> will create ‘’Ice Age by year 2000’’ they gave it a name ‘’Nuclear Winter Effect’’ apparently because; similar as if the dust and smog from nuclear war would do. They were emphasizing colder days or places, and avoided to talk about warmer than normal days simultaneously happening other places. Same as today they scream about ‘’warmer’’ days in the media; no matter where on the planet happened, but, where is colder than normal OR on the 90% on the planet where is normal temp, they avoid to mention – only was in reverse, in the 70’s. The biggest conman was an English prof. Hubert Lamb- he knew: if he ‘’predicts’’ Ice Age in 100y, not many people will get scared; so Hubert as the original Carbon Molester ‘’predicted’’ ”ice age in 25 years, by year 2000 – he wrote a book and was translated on other languages – Ice Age for year 2000 can only be avoided, only if we stop burning fossil fuel, especially coal (that helped Thatcher to close the English coalmines, easy). Hubert Lamb managed to con the politicians to give him lots of tax cash – those money attracted similar White Collar Criminals as Hubert. (The western Marxist replaced the bishop, AND the essential CO2 became the Wicked Witch).
In the early 80’s, they realized that: year 2000 is getting closer – no sign of the nuclear winter – his peers decided to go for: ‘’Global Warming instead; by 5-6C, by 2060”. Hubert’s book was sanitized beyond recognition and ‘’reprinted’’ Hubert only jumped from ice age to global warming, because year 2000 was getting closer. If he ‘’predicted it’’ in 100y instead – we would have being today still listening from the same Warmist Organized Crime, how is getting COLDER on the polar caps and on the bottom of the sea, and everywhere where are no honest people going. But they had to go in opposite direction, with bigger noise, people to forget the original Hubert’s ‘’prediction” (Hubert Lamb was the original CO2 for cash, Prophet / carbon molester) Hubert concocted the ‘’Snowball planet’’ and ‘’both polar caps ice free’’. Then, in the 80’s became: ‘’Greenhouse Global Warming and Sea rising’’ Then was no use of the con term ‘’Climate Change’’! At that time, still many people knew that water changes climate. Now, where the biggest Warmist White Collar Criminals are in East Anglia university building, is called ‘’Hubert Lamb Building’’ – because the ‘’Skeptics’’ are prepared to die in the trenches, defending the original / biggest CO2 Molester, the hardcore conman Hubert Lamb, because, he was for lots and lots of PHONY ‘’global’’ warmings, ”global” cycles and truckloads of global coolings about the past. Public was not taking much attention, but they were brainwashing the students => the new Pagan religion was established…
Momentum started in 1990, because of the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Before that, there were few millions of communist in the democratic west (now there are none) They were well organized, well connected -they all put green topcoat on and became the noisiest members in the Warmist Organized Crime (WOC) Nothing green about them, only the camouflage; reason I gave them the name: ”The Chameleons”. You go to any Warmist blog – you will see same doctrine: destroy the industry, destroy the economy, destroy freedom of speech, confuse the public. Their blind followers cannot comprehend that: if the economy goes belly up -> they will be the first to fall off the truck (because even in bad economy producers are needed – the parasites like the Warmist followers would instantly turn into organic mulch) Not many Warmist in Ethiopia, Somalia
Many of them were vegetarians, so they started demonizing the methane also, not only CO2; because cow and sheep being feeding the people for 10000y – if people get hungry – easier to start anarchy. Lenin, Trotsky by strikes bankrupted Russian economy AND thanks to the anarchy from WW1 -they created Soviet Union. Using WW2 anarchy, Stalin doubled the size of the empire. They destroy any opposition – if Pol Pot had opposition, he wouldn’t have being able to implement complete Marxist doctrine . They don’t demonize methane from bison, wildebeest and elephants, only the one from cattle and sheep. Scare tactics were increasing, and by 97 Kyoto Conference; they were sure that they will succeed to con the public: to stop using fuel and kill the cattle and sheep – then when the phony ‘’global’’ warming doesn’t show up – they will get the credit for preventing it; and will demand the taxpayer to feed the Marxist jet-setters forever. 98 was ”predicted” and declared as ‘’the hottest year ever’’ On the Kyoto conference they were confident, they will con the democratic west in no time. (please, go to apparatchiks blogs and see the attack on businesses, atack on anything that keeps the western economy prosperous
After the Kyoto Conference, they were for a big shock – instead of decreasing CO2 emission, most countries were increasing it. Especially happened what they didn’t predict – China, India, Brazil doubled their CO2 emission. Because of that, they ‘’LOWERED’’ their ”prediction”from 5-6C warming, down to 2C warming, and shifted it from 2060 to year 2100 instead. (no skeptic notices that: from 5-6C down to 2C is more, than from 2C down to zero) Anyway, prof Plimer and Monckton were ‘’crapping’’ that: ‘’it will get only warmer by 0,5C – 1,5C, so the Warmist were happy with that and they lowered it down to 2C, Warmist are not fussy. It suits the Warmist to wait 100y and see which lie is correct, Monkton’s OR Warmist ’So they declared that: Science is Settled’’ Warmist are not fussy – Plimer’s & Monkton’s 0,5C – 1,5C or the Warmist 2C, they are SAME LIES harvested from the same thin air, SO: the Warmist won. Skeptics are using the phony ‘’global’’ warmings / coolings crap concocted by the Warmist, OR by shonky ‘’researchers’’ that would have being in the Warmist cult, if they were alive – Warmist are happy to rob and oppress people until 2099; or until people on the street realize that is NO global warming – (then probably they will start ‘’global’’ cooling again). They are introducing Marxism by default; thanks to the phony ‘’Skeptics’’ Vegetarians say that: methane is 10 times bigger warming gas, Vegans say it’s 20 times, one said that: methane is 30 times bigger greenhouse gas… The truth needs resuscitating! (destroy the noble cow&sheep; because: if is not renewable wool and leather -> will be used synthetic, from non-renewable crude oil AND you will eat direct the grass, instead of knowing that: cow needs the grass, as much as grass needs the cow)
UNLESS WE PRESENT THE TRUTH TO THE PUBLIC that: the whole phony ‘’global’’ warmings crap is just that, 100%, 24 carat crap!!! Please don’t rely on the phony Skeptics! Even when people that are collecting temp data said that is no global warming; the Skeptics say: ‘’no, no, it’s only a ‘’PAUSE’’ the bigots are praying for ‘’global’’ warming, otherwise they would have to admit to themselves that: they have being duped by Plimer and by Anthony Watts. Warmist are thieves, but they are cunning, clever thieves, they are making billions, by using a simple lie – they will not admit the truth; without solid evidences, that: ‘’can be proven now, no need to wait 100y’’ I have all those evidences necessary!!! If you are a Secular Skeptic, please join me; I need all the help possible. If you do believe in the phony global warming; but you are not benefiting from the loot, please join me. The leading Warmist are the most dishonest people – skeptics are pretty honest people, their hearts are on correct place, unfortunately: their brains are 3feet lower than where it should be – they are the ‘’Plimer’s Closed Parachutes brains’’. They are into the Pagan Religion; lost capacity even to recognize when the truth drops on their lap…The truth always wins on the end! The truth: the ‘’Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism’’ (TSAM) is controlled by the honest laws of physics – those laws were same in the past as they are today, and will be same in 100y from now = no ‘’global’’ warming possible! Warmings / coolings were /are always localized. Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment; heating CO2 in a tube is not same as warmed CO2 in the atmosphere- which goes instantly up, when warmed, to cool down! Even the cavemen knew that, reason they invented the chimney!!!
Warmist intentionally confuse regular Climatic Changes, with the phony ”global” warming; to confuse the public. Most Skeptics confuse the same, because is trendy – because in the Pagan Religion thinking and different opinions are not appreciated… No Glasnost allowed in both camps…
I think was about year 2000, when the leading Warmist realized that is definitely no ”global” warming – so, they swapped the term ”Global Warming” for Climate Change” because the climate is in constant change – but they never admitted that: H2O CHANGES CLIMATE, NOT CO2; if CO2 was regulating the climate, would have being same climate in the desert and in rainforest (for most of the big city slickers IS same climate in desert and jungle) it’s same as: first saying that: the sun is orbiting around the earth – then swapping it for ” the moon is orbiting around the earth” = so: for the fundamentalist who call the phony ”global warming ”Climate Change” for them is as: the moon and the sun are orbiting the earth…?!?! Skeptics did not notice the trick the Warmist used on them – so… the gullible ”Skeptics” go around like Harry Krishna repeating: Climate Change, climate, climate, climate change! That made the Warmist to flourish, beyond their expectations… Warmist say: ”90% possibility of global warming” (in other words: the other 10% are their ”backdoor exit” ”Skeptics on the other hand, believe 101% in any phony global warming anybody can think off… Now some ”Skeptics” are even hallucinating that: it will be global cooling for next 30 years – Warmist cannot believe their luck, how ignorant their opponents are… believing all the misleading data…
Most probably the Warmist have their own people in-bedded in the Skeptic’s camp, to fabricate as much as possible bullshit, to get them deeper and deeper in it… AND: because the Warmist are more intelligent – they know by now that is NO global warming – because they robed billions of dollars already – they know that in few years the people on the street will start asking them to justify why is no global warming, or to give the money back. Now they have justification: their global warming was cancelled by the Skeptic’s global cooling, so, the ”overall” temp is same as always (Warmist already started defending the ”Skeptics” – both camps to go against the ”deniers” and silence them (it’s good for the public to see that) Warmist defending their geldings
Fact: WHAT DOESN’T EXIST, CANNOT HAVE A ”PAUSE” simple logic
Santa has a same ”PAUSE” between january and december… as the phony global warming!
Warmist invented the ”pause” because there are still lots of people on the street that can think for themselves, and are noticing that IS SAME TEMP AS ALWAYS WAS… AND: to prove to the politicians and the media that: –” skeptics are capable of thinking and reasoning as three old kids, OR as a 25y old fencepost”…
Dear visitor, if you tell a Skeptic the truth, with undeniable profs that is no global warming – he will not believe you, BUT: just for an experiment; why don’t you concoct that, say, for example: ” from 600AD to 730AD, for 130y and 4 months was another LIA. Ad some other crap, to make it more convincing and colorful; as: because of that – Mohamed invented the Muslim religion. b] in Europe was getting very cold and because of the cold; Byzantine empire started collapsing c]has being ”discovered” evidences in a peat-bog close to Mecca; in which states: ”the WHOLE planet was in ice age – exactly as the same as the one in Renaissance (you wouldn’t be telling a lie, because there was no such a thing as LIA during Renaissance) . In few days will be in most of the ”Skeptic’s blogs.
Warmist say: ”this year is warmer” – ” instead of Skeptics saying: no, it’s a lie! Instead, the ”Skeptics” go in overdrive, searching what is making that extra ”phony” heat – is it sunspots, is it galactic dust, is it natural variation?!?! ”SKEPTICS” ARE CONSTANTLY LEGITIMIZING THE WARMIST’ LIES!!! = Mother of all stupidity… Dear Skeptics: –”what doesn’t exist – cannot have a ”pause” – non-existent global warming doesn’t have a ”pause” that ”pause” will last for a billion years ahead!!!!
Satellite monitoring is for bullshine adicts, nothing more. They are not even monitoring – the ”pretend monitoring” is for justifying expenses and abuse of NASA’s name. There are variations in temp on every 10m altitude, but not on NASA’s infrared picture. If you are a big city slicker – go to hi rise building and check trough the window – as you go higher, temp drops. On NASA’s picture is same temp on the top of 5km mountain as on foot of that same mountain on sea level = proof that they are lying. #2: IF satellites did monitor, their infrared photos would have being showing the difference in temp between sea, lake and dry land, Because, water is colder on the surface, BUT warmer 3-7km altitude in the troposphere = on dry land is hot on the ground, but higher troposphere always colder! No contrast on NASA IR pictures, are they saying that: they cannot pick up difference in temp of UP TO 50C? Using the word *AVERAGING THE DATA* –is the biggest con that doesn’t hold water. When honest person averages the temp for the top of the mountain and foot of the 3-5-6km high mountains, and is SAME temperature top and bottom = NASA’s commissars became very destructive for humanity and NASA’s integrity accumulated in 60’s ans 70’s. I wish I can put those commissars on a witness stand, under oath..!!!
THE OFFICIAL AND CORRECT ‘’GLOBAL’’ TEMPERATURE CHART
50BC 1234AD LIA 1975 1997 2014 2100
See, straight line, not like a seismograph! People on the street; global temperature ‘’overall’’ is always the same – stop believing the Warmist thieves and the Skeptics fools; the phony ‘’pause’’ will last for a billion years! MONEY BACK GUARANTIED!
When on the subject on ”natural variation in temperature”: the truth: localized variations in temp are constant / otherwise the horizontal winds would have stopped, BUT: there is no such a thing as ” overall global temp variation!!!” Skeptic people are so addicted in ”global” warmings / coolings crap, the more of that crap = they feel better, happier – they don’t read the label on the crap, analyse / instant consumption – as long as is proof of global warmings and global coolings, the more = the happier, for both camps… They will believe in anything, except the truth!… Lucky Warmist Thieves!
WITHOUT THE PHONY SKEPTICS’s BLIND SUPPORT – WARMIST DON’T HAVE ANYTHING! WARMIST CASTLE IS BUILT ON THE LIES, THE SKEPTICS WARSHIP! IF you use Warmist words-> you end up thinking and supporting their thoughts!
DENIERS UNITE, to see the end of the Warmist cult – do not rely on the phony ”Skeptics” Skeptics are much bigger Warmist and more prolific liars, than the Warmist themselves! The truth: climate keeps changing – ”global” warming is impossible; it’s a concocted myth. Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism (TSAM) is brilliant / infallible. Global warming ”overall” is always ZERO! The only reason the Warmist exist and prosper, is because of the ”Skeptic’s” ignorance and belief in the Pagan Mythology!…
The situation is like this: Warmist are marching from victory to victory, riding on the Skeptic’s back (turned the Skeptics into their own geldings). Skeptics cannot ask themselves: Q:how the hell they can prove to the public that is not going to be any global warming in 100y, by their 100’s of past phony global warming, and global cycles and phony global goolings? Majority of the people on the street don’t give a rat’s ass, which camp is telling more lies, or in more details -all they know is: if it CAN happen, better be safe than sorry… Politicians count the numbers.
Fundamentalism / religious beliefs is not about proving… It would be as: ”if Rabbi and priest trying to prove to a Muslim cleric; that there is no god” Theoretically impossible. Because Mohamed was smart, he built his religion, using Judeo-Christianity as foundation. Only Darwinist can say to a Mullah: ”the God you people believe in, has being invented by people, to control and profit from people – the reality is completely different. People are genetically hardwired, to believe in good stories (Poe). Which means: both camps are like two cheeks on a same ass, must be some difference, but impossible to notice the difference. Yes, between the rider and the gelding there isn’t any thug of war/ any difference – So, the Warmist Organized Cult (WOC) declared: ”the science is settled”… They will even agree to 1,5C warming, to match the ”Skeptics” crap. As long as they can keep collecting the loot money, and oppress the society… thanks to whom?!…
Do you understand what I’m trying to say? Skeptic cannot say to the Warmist: -‘‘ hay, you cannot tell the temp for the whole planet, by 6000 thermometers. Because they themselves believe that temperature can be obtained from a peat bog, for hundredths of years, for the whole planet… Earthworms come to the surface and take new derbies in, every night, they shovel the whole mess constantly; it’s not like pages in a book – unfortunately, Skeptics would believe any crap, if promotes phony global warmings – reason they are born losers… b] for example: when Mann was analyzing the temp on the whole planet, from tree-rings… any lumberjack or orchid farmer would have told them that: 30 different things effect the thickens of a tree-rings – tree rings cannot tell the temp for that hill, where was growing – definitely not for the whole planet, BUT: for the skeptics, somebody needed to intercept emails and write a book, so they can beat themselves in the chest and keep repeating: Climategate, Climategate. Their Pagan beliefs are restricting them from using ”reason and logic” The Warmist Organized Crime are exploiting that, for oppressing and ripping-off the western democracies… They don’t have one legitimate proof of ”global” warming and will never have one; simply: cannot have any genuine proof, for something that doesn’t exist! But the Marxist manipulators are clever thieves…
Hold your horses Warmist, the truth exist: ”that is going to be, ZERO global warming!!! Global temp ”overall” is always the same! Temperature Self Adjusting Mechanism (TSAM) is brilliant; START LEARNING ABOUT IT!!!
The precursor of the evil was established in the 1800’s, by Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment: heating CO2 in a tube… The Warmist only weapon: Stefan Boltzmann’s crappy experiment; heating CO2 in a tube is not same as warmed CO2 in the atmosphere- which goes instantly up, when warmed, to cool down! Even the cavemen knew that, reason they invented the chimney!!! In the tube/ sealed chamber, warmed CO2 cannot expend, but keeps warming up when heated, UNDER ITS OWN CREATED PRESSURE – on the other hand: in the air, as soon as CO2 warms up-> INSTANTLY goes UP, where is thinner air and much colder, to release the heat!!! Comparing CO2 warming in the sealed tube AND: free CO2 in the air, is same as comparing a bird on the top of the tree, with a bird in the oven. That’s what the 30000 criminally oriented ‘’questionable scientist in what fields’’ are trying to con the public, for fleecing the Urban Sheep! And for Marxist /Bolsheviks model oppression!
Instead of the shonks realizing that: warmed CO2 in the tube doesn’t move – in the air; as soon as CO2 warms up a bit-> instantly goes UP, where is colder, to release the heat. Therefore: everybody on the street knows that: smog from cigarette, from chimney, from forest fire, instantly goes up, BUT: the brainwashed graduates know less than children… So: they swapped the ”CO2 in a tube” for a ”greenhouse gas” … how convenient… BUT: they conveniently overlooked that: normal greenhouse has ”solid” glass, or transparent plastic roof / covers 100% of the roof -on the other hand, CO2 is only between 300-400ppm, and oxygen & nitrogen are 998,999ppm; which means: CO2 would represent as a postage stamp as only ”part” of the roof, OR: as fishnet for roof!! which means: warmed gases can get out and UP, via the 99% of the roof! IF any of the Warmist shonks built a greenhouse, with fishnet as a roof – the neighbouring farmers would have put a Straight Jacket on him. Those same Warmist Commissars are preparing to take full control of the democratic world.
ONLY THE TRUTH IS WARMIST’s ACHILLES’S HILL (Skeptics hate me when I point to them that: ‘LIA, MGW, airport heat are not proofs – with those lies, cannot defeat the professional Liars!!! ” Question is: if it wasn’t airport heat; can 6000 thermometers tell the correct temp for the WHOLE planet?! Unfortunately, by complaining about ”airport heat” they are legitimizing / endorsing the EPA, IPCC and Met Office misleading ”PRETEND” global temperature collecting
Skeptics, if you want to get on the front foot #1: stop using the words ”climate change” – because climate is in constant change – now is getting summer climate in the N/H – winter climate in the S/H b] there is ”wet climate” and ”dry climate’‘ sometime wet climate gets dry – dry climate gets wet. So: when you refer to the Phony Global Warming (PGW) as ”climate change” -> you are officially admitting that you are just a Warmist roll of toilet paper, doing the Warmist dirty job, that’s all they need from you… instead, start calling it ”Phony Global Warming (PGW)” If CO2 was regulating the climate – would have being same climate in the deserts and forests; because in both places is same amount of CO2! #2: when they point to a bad weather somewhere, as proof that CO2 is doing it – don’t search for record of last century bad weather; any moron knows that was cyclones in the past. Instead: inform that is beautiful weather on 97% of the planet, even though is same amount of CO2 everywhere. For them is very depressing, to see good weather everywhere and people are enjoying themselves. #3: instead of complaining about ”airport heat” find some news reports from the 90’s – when the Warmist Cult where ”predicting” 5C-6C global warming by 2060 – demand apology, before anything else they can ”predict”. Records from newspapers from the 90’s, will expose all Warmist ”predictions” are expensive lies.
#2: stop hoping that the phony ”pause” will finish -instead: point to the public that is NO global warming – the public to start dealing with the Warmist Organised Cult (WOC) – that will put the Warmist in the corner -> and their funds will dry, media will get against them. Otherwise, what you are doing… even Marcel Marceau can win against you; Warmist Cult doesn’t need to say a single word, they will win; because you keep spooking the public about phony global warmings / coolings; and constantly shooting yourself in the foot, with a machine-gun…
TO PUT THE LEADING WARMIST IN JAIL, here is the TRUTH AND ALL THE PROOFS NECESSARY: the infallible Self Adjusting Temperature Mechanism (SATM) the earth has; the real proofs that can give Involuntary Euthanasia to the Warmist Cult::: https://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/cooling-earth/
From the ORIGINAL CO2 MOLESTER, Prof. Hubert Lamb; who was promoting ”Big Ice Age for year 2000, because of CO2 DIMMING EFFECT”
MOST of the ”ICE AGE for year 200 Predictors” are now in the Warmist Cult:
Here’s a list of articles from the 70’s predicting the next ice age along with a link to the website that listed them.
1970 – Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age – Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970)
1970 – Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself? (L.A. Times, January 15, 1970)
1970 – New Ice Age May Descend On Man (Sumter Daily Item, January 26, 1970)
1970 – Pollution Prospect A Chilling One (The Argus-Press, January 26, 1970)
1970 – Pollution’s 2-way ‘Freeze’ On Society (Middlesboro Daily News, January 28, 1970)
1970 – Cold Facts About Pollution (The Southeast Missourian, January 29, 1970)
1970 – Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports (St. Petersburg Times, March 4, 1970)
1970 – Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (The Boston Globe, April 16, 1970)
1970 – Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970)
1970 – U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic (The New York Times, July 18, 1970)
1970 – Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age (The Sydney Morning Herald, October 19, 1970)
1971 – Ice Age Refugee Dies Underground (Montreal Gazette, Febuary 17, 1971)
1971 – Pollution Might Lead To Another Ice Age (The Schenectady Gazette, March 22, 1971)
1971 – Pollution May Bring Ice Age – Scientist Rites Risk (The Windsor Star, March 23, 1971)
1971 – U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming (The Washington Post, July 9, 1971)
1971 – Ice Age Around the Corner (Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1971)
1971 – New Ice Age Coming – It’s Already Getting Colder (L.A. Times, October 24, 1971)
1971 – Another Ice Age? Pollution Blocking Sunlight (The Day, November 1, 1971)
1971 – Air Pollution Could Bring An Ice Age (Harlan Daily Enterprise, November 4, 1971)
1972 – Air pollution may cause ice age (Free-Lance Star, February 3, 1972)
1972 – Scientist Says New ice Age Coming (The Ledger, February 13, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Cometh For Dicey Times (The Sun, May 29, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Coming (Deseret News, September 8, 1972)
1972 – There’s a new Ice Age coming! (The Windsor Star, September 9, 1972)
1972 – Scientist predicts new ice age (Free-Lance Star, September 11, 1972)
1972 – British Expert on Climate Change Says New Ice Age Creeping Over Northern Hemisphere (Lewiston Evening Journal, September 11, 1972)
1972 – Climate Seen Cooling For Return Of Ice Age (The Portsmouth Times, September 11, 1972)
1972 – New Ice Age Slipping Over North (The Press-Courier, September 11, 1972)
1972 – Beginning of new ice age (The Canberra Times, September 12, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Begins A New Assault In North (The Age, September 12, 1972)
1972 – Weather To Get Colder (Montreal Gazette, September 12, 1972)
1972 – British climate expert predicts new Ice Age (The Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1972)
1972 – Scientist Sees Chilling Signs of New Ice Age (L.A. Times, September 24, 1972)
1972 – Science: Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, November 13, 1972)
1972 – Geologist at Case Traces Long Winters – Sees Ice Age in 20 Years (Youngstown Vindicator, December 13, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age On Its Way, Scientist Says (Toledo Blade, December 13, 1972)
1972 – Ice Age Predicted In About 200 Years (The Portsmouth Times, December 14, 1972)
1973 – New Ice Age coming? (Popular Science, January 1973)
1973 – The Ice Age Cometh (The Saturday Review, March 24, 1973)
1973 – Believe new ice age is coming (The Bryan Times, March 31, 1973)
1973 – ‘Man-made Ice Age’ Worries Scientists (The Free Lance-Star, June 22, 1973)
1973 – Fear Of Man-made Ice Age (The Spartanburg Herald, June 28, 1973)
1973 – Possibility Of Ice Age Worries The Scientists (The Argus-Press, November 12, 1973)
1973 – Weather-watchers think another ice age may be on the way (The Christian Science Monitor, December 11, 1973)
1974 – Ominous Changes in the World’s Weather (PDF) (Fortune Magazine, February 1974)
1974 – Atmospheric Dirt: Ice Age Coming? (Pittsburgh Press, February 28, 1974)
1974 – Support for theory of a cooling world (The Canberra Times, May 16, 1974)
1974 – New evidence indicates ice age here (Eugene Register-Guard, May 29, 1974)
1974 – Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, June 24, 1974)
1974 – 2 Scientists Think ‘Little’ Ice Age Near (Hartford Courant, August 11, 1974)
1974 – Ice Age, worse food crisis seen (Chicago Tribune, October 30, 1974)
1974 – Imminent Arrival of the Ice (Radio Times, November 14, 1974)
1974 – Making a BBC Science Special [The Weather Machine] (New Scientist, November 14, 1974)
1974 – The Weather Machine (BBC, November 20, 1974)
1974 – New ice age ‘could be in our lifetime’ (The Canberra Times, November 22, 1974)
1974 – Believes Pollution Could Bring On Ice Age (Ludington Daily News, December 4, 1974)
1974 – Pollution Could Spur Ice Age, Nasa Says (Beaver Country Times, December 4, 1974)
1974 – Air Pollution May Trigger Ice Age, Scientists Feel (The Telegraph, December 5, 1974)
1974 – More Air Pollution Could Trigger Ice Age Disaster (Daily Sentinel, December 5, 1974)
1974 – Scientists Fear Smog Could Cause Ice Age (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 5, 1974)
1975 – Climate Changes Called Ominous (The New York Times, January 19, 1975)
1975 – Climate Change: Chilling Possibilities (Science News, March 1, 1975)
1975 – B-r-r-r-r: New Ice Age on way soon? (Chicago Tribune, March 2, 1975)
1975 – Cooling Trends Arouse Fear That New Ice Age Coming (Eugene Register-Guard, March 2, 1975)
1975 – Is Another Ice Age Due? Arctic Ice Expands In Last Decade (Youngstown Vindicator, March 2, 1975)
1975 – Is Earth Headed For Another Ice Age? (Reading Eagle, March 2, 1975)
1975 – New Ice Age Dawning? Significant Shift In Climate Seen (Times Daily, March 2, 1975)
1975 – There’s Troublesome Weather Ahead (Tri City Herald, March 2, 1975)
1975 – Is Earth Doomed To Live Through Another Ice Age? (The Robesonian, March 3, 1975)
1975 – The Ice Age cometh: the system that controls our climate (Chicago Tribune, April 13, 1975)
1975 – The Cooling World (Newsweek, April 28, 1975)
1975 – Cooling trend may signal coming of another Ice Age (The Sun, May 16, 1975)
1975 – Scientists Ask Why World Climate Is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead (PDF) (The New York Times, May 21, 1975)
1975 – Summer of A New Ice Age (The Age, June 5, 1975)
1975 – In the Grip of a New Ice Age? (International Wildlife, July-August, 1975)
1975 – Experts ponder another ice age (The Spokesman-Review, September 8, 1975)
1975 – Oil Spill Could Cause New Ice Age (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 11, 1975)
1976 – Deadly Harvest [Film] (Starring: Kim Cattrall, Clint Walker, 1976)
1976 – The Cooling: Has the Next Ice Age Already Begun? [Book] (Lowell Ponte, 1976)
1976 – Ice Age Predicted (Reading Eagle, January 22, 1976)
1976 – Ice Age Predicted In Century (Bangor Daily News, January 22, 1976)
1976 – It’s Going To Get Chilly About 125 Years From Now (Sarasota Herald-Tribune, January 23, 1976)
1976 – Worrisome CIA Report; Even U.S. Farms May be Hit by Cooling Trend (U.S. News & World Report, May 31, 1976)
1977 – Blizzard – What Happens if it Doesn’t Stop? [Book] (George Stone, 1977)
1977 – The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age [Book] (The Impact Team, 1977)
1977 – The Ice Age Cometh… (New York Magazine, January 31, 1977)
1977 – The Big Freeze (Time Magazine, January 31, 1977)
1977 – Has The Ice Age Cometh Again? (Calgary Herald, February 1, 1977)
1977 – Space Mirrors Proposed To Prevent Crop Freezes (Bangor Daily News, February 7, 1977)
1977 – We Will Freeze in the Dark (Capital Cities Communications Documentary, Host: Nancy Dickerson, April 12, 1977)
1978 – Ice! [Book] (Arnold Federbush, 1978)
1978 – The New Ice Age [Book] (Henry Gilfond, 1978)
1978 – Winter May Be Colder Than In Last Ice Age (Deseret News, January 2, 1978)
1978 – Current Winters Seen Colder Than In Ice Age (The Telegraph, January 3, 1978)
1978 – Winter Temperatures Colder Than Last Ice Age (Eugene Register-Guard, Eugene Register-Guard, January 3, 1978)
1978 – International Team of Specialists Finds No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend in Northern Hemisphere (The New York Times, January 5, 1978)
1978 – Little Ice Age: Severe winters and cool summers ahead (Calgary Herald, January 10, 1978)
1978 – Winters Will Get Colder, ‘we’re Entering Little Ice Age’ (Daily Record, January 10, 1978)
1978 – Geologist Says Winters Getting Colder (Middlesboro Daily News, January 16, 1978)
1978 – It’s Going To Get Colder (Boca Raton News, January 17, 1978)
1978 – Another Ice Age? (Kentucky New Era, February 12, 1978)
1978 – Another Ice Age? (Reading Eagle, February 13, 1978)
1978 – The Coming Ice Age (In Search Of TV Show, Season 2, Episode 23, Host: Leonard Nimoy, May 1978)
1978 – An Ice Age Is Coming Weather Expert Fears (Milwaukee Sentinel, November 17, 1978)
1979 – A Choice of Catastrophes – The Disasters That Threaten Our World [Book] (Isaac Asimov, 1979)
1979 – The Sixth Winter [Book] (John R. Gribbin, 1979)
1979 – The New Ice Age Cometh (The Age, January 16, 1979)
1979 – Ice Age Building Up (Daily Record, June 5, 1979)
1979 – Large Glacial Buildup Could Mean Ice Age (Daily Chronicle, June 5, 1979)
1979 – Ice Age On Its Way (Lewiston Morning Tribune, June 7, 1979)
1979 – Get Ready to Freeze (Daily Chronicle, October 12, 1979)
1979 – New ice age almost upon us? (The Christian Science Monitor, November 14, 1979)
P.s. friends; go to your newspaper office and ask them to see their prints from the 70’s – they all have it on microfilm – you can find there lots of scaring the people about: ”will be Ice Age by year 2000, because CO2 creates Dimming Effect” At that time they were exaggerating colder days on many places and were ignoring the warmer places at that same time. Same as, now they exaggerate some warmer days than normal, and conveniently ignore where is simultaneously colder than normal places. That will pull the green carpet from under their Red feet!
Also: check in the 80’s -90’s papers, all the ”predictions” that: by 2060 the global temperature will be warmer by 5-6C. Before anybody knew that China, India will quadruple CO2 emission!